Alternatives to Prison: Exploring non-custodial sentencing of domestic violence offenders in NSW’s lower courts Christine Bond & Samantha Jeffries School.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New(?) Directions in Adult & Juvenile Sentencing in Australia Christine Bond Samantha Jeffries Griffith University.
Advertisements

The effectiveness of suspended sentences in reducing reoffending
Aboriginal women’s access to diversionary programs in NSW Ruth McCausland School of Social Sciences University of New South Wales.
Topic 10 Sentencing Topic 10 Sentencing. Topic 10 Sentencing Introduction to sentencing aims of sentencing types of sentences youth sentencing.
Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment II: Race and Crime.
The Impact of YCJA BC Criminal Justice Association Victoria, March 2010.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
Juvenile Offenders. Purpose What is the purpose of the JO system?
In whose interests? Restricting the freedom of movement of potential offenders with intellectual disabilites Jim Simpson
Justice Griffith 1 Juvenile Offending Trajectories A Queensland Study.
Group Risk Assessment Model Monitoring trends in re-offending among convicted offenders in adult and children’s court Fourth National Justice Modelling.
Marisela Velazquez, PhD Candidate James Cook University
Older Offenders & Criminal Justice
The transition from juvenile to adult criminal careers Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
Misspent Youth - Opportunities for Juvenile Justice Address by The Hon Wayne Martin Chief Justice of Western Australia JOHN CURTIN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC.
September 20, 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment OCTOBER 1, 2011.
Sexual Offender Treatment in Estonia: the Current Situation and Future Perspective Kaire Tamm Ministry of Justice of Estonia Criminal Policy Department.
Evaluation of the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s Three Court-Mandated Family Violence Programs: FVEP, EXPLORE, and EVOLVE Stephen M. Cox, Ph.D, Professor.
Youth Justice vs. Adult Justice
Youth detention population in Australia. 2 Introduction In Australia: – young people who are charged with or proven guilty of criminal offences may be.
To what extent is the justice system fair and equitable for youth?
Edward Finlayson SLC1 Criminal Procedures 2003 Act Principles The principles of the 2003 Act apply to all actions.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Revisiting ‘A unique punishment’ Professor Jacqueline Tombs Glasgow Caledonian University.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Define community corrections and discuss its role in the criminal justice system  LO2 Describe.
NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission RECIDIVISM OF 16 AND 17 YEAR OLD AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS: FINDINGS FROM TWO STUDIES Presented to Youth Accountability.
1 CRJS 4476 Lecture #2. 2 Sentencing key here is in understanding the difference key here is in understanding the difference between the conviction and.
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
Emma Grimley OVERVIEW: JUVENILE JUSTICE.  Combination of rules, institutions, and people involved in the control, punishment and rehabilitation of young.
An Overview of the Prison System in Lithuania Sandra Stanytė Social worker Vilnius archdiocese CARITAS In Service Training Course "Training Teachers and.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Probation Statistics Part 1 Crime, Justice & Security Statistics Produced in Collaboration between.
AS Level Law Machinery of Justice Sentencing. AS Level Law What you need to know and discuss: the need for a criminal justice system the main aims of.
PRETRIAL SERVICES IT’S COMING... FY 2001: project development/planning grant (9 months) FY 2002: project implementation grant for full operation.
(POST – TRIAL). The Act states that the sentencing judge is obliged to consider the following when sentencing:  Maximum penalty  Current sentencing.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
THE SCALE OF THE PROBLEM Quaker penal reform seminar 2013.
Meta regression analysis framework: the effectiveness of correctional education in reducing recidivism Margaret Giles, PhD Paper presented to MAER-Net.
Chapter 5 Young offenders. In this chapter, you will look at how the law deals with young offenders. You will study the age of criminal responsibility.
CRIME AND DEVIANCE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION IS TAKEN FROM HOLMES HUGHES & JULIAN AUSTRALIAN SOCIOLOGY – A CHANGING SOCIETY.
4.3 – Sanctions and their effectiveness - Imprisonment 
Juvenile justice trends in Australia
Prison population problems Submitted by Ieva Butrimavičiūtė PNVbd6-01.
Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections. JUSTIFICATION Reintegration Preparing offenders to return to the community unmarred by further criminal.
Presentation on the Phase 1 Report on the Home Confinement Program Orange County, Florida August 6, 2013.
Children in court & Diversionary Schemes By Maddie.
The impact of community-based drug and alcohol treatment on reoffending in Indigenous communities Anthony Morgan, Tracy Cussen, Alex Gannoni & Jason Payne.
POLI 103A CALIFORNIA POLITICS CRIME AND PUNISHMENT II: RACE AND CRIME.
Are fines criminogenic? The impact of fines on re-offending in NSW local courts David Tait Justice Research Group University of Western Sydney With Alice.
Understanding the Impact of Hidden Disabilities on Reentry Population Success: Just Because You Don’t See It Doesn’t Mean It Isn’t There CHERIE TAKEMOTO,
Youth Criminal Justice Act. to prevent youth crime to have meaningful consequences and ensure accountability for youth crime to improve rehabilitation.
Gender, Crime and Justice. Key differences and similarities in relation to statistics: More men in actual numbers But the rate change is higher in female.
Criminal Law Sentencing Youth Justice May Sentencing The Goal of sentencing is Deterrence Rehabilitation Retribution Segregation Taking into account.
A statistical model for predicting risk of re-imprisonment
Transforming prisons into correctional centres - places of new beginnings Monitoring of offenders placed under Section 62(f) – Criminal Procedure Act (No.
Bailing Out: Bail and the Use of Remand in Canada Dr. Nicole Marie Myers University of Ontario Institute of Technology 4 October
The Young Offenders Act April 1984 National system for dealing with youth.
Kaplan University Online CJ101 Unit 8 Introduction to the Criminal Justice System.
Courts and Corrections. The Youth Court Process After the police lay charges.... –Decision made about pre-trial detention –Decision made about trial setting.
Trial Procedures.  Trials may be held in either a family court or a youth justice court  Trial follow the same rules of evidence and are equally formal.
The Impact of Mandatory Supervised Release (MSR) Violators & Time Served on IDOC’s Population David E. Olson, Ph.D. & Donald Stemen, Ph.D. Department of.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
The Role Of Mental Health Professionals Under the YCJA Ryan C. Day, Ph.D, Psychologist April Jordan, B.S. Outreach Therapist.
Criminal Justice 4.4 Sanctions and their effectiveness Detention Orders and Supervision Orders.
Purpose of Youth Criminal Justice Act Purpose of Youth Criminal Justice Act Mechanics of the YCJA Mechanics of the YCJA Consequences under YCJA Consequences.
Imposing the ‘Sentence’
William Walsh CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
Introduction This presentation will:
It’s not a solution. 30% of adult prisoners were juvenile prisoners.
Presentation transcript:

Alternatives to Prison: Exploring non-custodial sentencing of domestic violence offenders in NSW’s lower courts Christine Bond & Samantha Jeffries School of Criminology and Criminal Justice Griffith University February 2015

School of Criminology & Criminal Justice Background  Shifts in criminal justice responses to domestic violence  Scarcity of research on sentencing domestically violent offenders

School of Criminology & Criminal Justice Key research question Are domestic violence offences sentenced differently from other violent offences?

School of Criminology & Criminal Justice Unique opportunity  NSW provides a unique opportunity in Australia  Domestic violence “flag”

School of Criminology & Criminal Justice Prior research  Limited comparative studies of sentencing domestic vs other violence »Absence of multivariate studies (in/out) »Restrictive samples (length of term)  Limited studies of non-custodial sentencing more generally

Current data  64,201 convictions  17.6% Indigenous 18.7% female 27.1% domestic violent-related School of Criminology & Criminal Justice New South Wales adult lower court administrative data January 2009 – June 2012 Most serious charged personal offence

Measuring sentencing outcomes School of Criminology & Criminal Justice Domestic violence cases (%) Non-domestic violence cases (%) Total Cases (%) Imprisonment Intensive/other detention Supervised community-based Unsupervised community-based Community service Monetary Minor/nominal Total100.0 All between-group differences significant at p<0.05 (N=64,201)

WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT SENTENCING TO PRISON? School of Criminology & Criminal Justice

Are domestic violence cases sentenced differently? Imprisonment outcome * All significant at p<0.05 (N=64,201) (Odds ratios shown. Model estimated with constant & missing dummy [not shown]. Line represents equal odds.) School of Criminology & Criminal Justice

Are domestic violence cases sentenced differently? Length of term * p<0.05 (N=6,598) (Estimated OLS coefficients shown. Model estimated with constant & missing dummy [not shown].) School of Criminology & Criminal Justice

WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT SENTENCING TO NONCUSTODIAL ORDERS? School of Criminology & Criminal Justice

Are domestic violence cases sentenced differently? Compared to Imprisonment School of Criminology & Criminal Justice Domestic violence vs other violence Intensive/other detention (vs imprisonment) 0.746* Supervised community-based (vs imprisonment) 1.455* Unsupervised community-based (vs imprisonment) 1.446* Community service (vs imprisonment) Monetary (vs imprisonment) 0.839* Minor/nominal (vs imprisonment) 1.810* * p<0.05 (N=64,201) (Relative risk ratio shown. Adjusted for Indigenous status, sex, age, prior appearances, offence seriousness, serious violence, multiple counts, release pre-trial, and went to trial. Model estimated with constant).

Are domestic violence cases sentenced differently? Non-imprisonment sentencing outcomes * All between-group significant at p<0.05 (N=64,201) (Average predicted probabilities shown. Adjusted for Indigenous status, sex, age, prior appearances, offence seriousness, serious violence, multiple counts, release pre-trial, and went to trial. Model estimated with constant & missing dummy). School of Criminology & Criminal Justice Intensive Monetary Minor

Are domestic violence cases sentenced differently? Long suspended/ bond orders * p<0.05 (N=28,946) (Odds ratios shown. Model estimated with constant & missing dummy [not shown]. Line represents equal odds.) School of Criminology & Criminal Justice

Summary (compared to similarly-situated other violent offences) Imprisonment On average, less likely to be sentenced to prison Length of term On average, less likely to receive “long” suspended/bond terms School of Criminology & Criminal Justice Noncustodial Length of noncustodial On average, shorter prison terms On average, more likely to receive suspended/bond (vs imprisonment) sentences

School of Criminology & Criminal Justice So what?  Does this mean can conclude leniency? »Complex process  social/contextual factors? »Expectations around rehabilitation? »Misunderstandings of the nature of domestic violence offending?  Adequacy of explanations of sentencing patterns?