Copyright © MCEC and SEL 2014 Mitigation of Undesired Operation of Recloser Controls Due to Distribution Line Inrush Lee Ayers Mid-Carolina Electric Cooperative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POWER QUALITY BACKGROUND & ELEC-SAVER TVSS
Advertisements

Speaker Scott Whaley - EIT Protecting & Ice Melting Westmans Distribution Lines.
DISPUTES & INVESTIGATIONS ECONOMICS FINANCIAL ADVISORY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING Early Lessons Learned from DOE-EPRI Framework Experience Melissa Chan MA DPU.
New Energy Horizons Opportunities and Challenges Fault Current Contributions from Wind Plants Dean Miller PacifiCorp July 25,
Transmission Operator Protection System Misoperations 2014 ERCOT Transmission Protections System Misoperations Data – 138kV and 345kV Combined (Not including.
© Southwest Electrical Distribution Exchange (SWEDE) May 2, 2008 Materials and Equipment John Macek Application Director, S&C Electric.
© ABB Ltd - ATLV /26/2015 Insert image here Fuses vs Fuseless Technology.
1 Distributed Generation and Power Quality. 2 Relaying considerations DG infeed may reduce the reach of overcurrent relays –DG feeds fault, so utility.
RT3b – André Smit, Siemens USA
Mississippi State University Intro to Electrical & Computer Engineering P ower S ystem Application Laboratory (PSAL) September 25, 2003 Schweitzer Engineering.
Copyright © SEL 2004 Protection for Abnormal System Conditions Presented at: Clemson Power Systems Conference 2005 March 10, 2005 E. O. Schweitzer Schweitzer.
CIGRE 7-10 September 2009, Moscow
Static Relays Static relays are those in which the designed response is developed by electronic or magnetic means without mechanical motion. The designation.
Distribution Automation Plans in AEP Texas. Overview AEP Texas is deploying smart meters to roughly 1,000,000 customers The meters utilize Landis + Gyr.
Electrical Apparatus Dan Melkey Power Line Supply “This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and.
Universal Relay Family
DUCK RIVER EMC Lockout/Tagout Procedures For Overhead and Underground Line Work (De-energizing Lines and Equipment for Employee Protection)
LOCKOUT/TAGOUT.
Fault Hunting Using Three-Phase Reclosers Michael S. CostaJerome V. JoskenDennis A. Walder Eversource EnergyUC SynergeticEaton IEEE Rural Electric Power.
© ABB Group June 10, 2015 | Slide 1 1MRS A self healing power system for the accurate fault location and zone concept T&D Smart Grids Europe 2012.
Transformer Testing Station Determining Sensitivity of a Relay to Inter-turn Faults on an Energized Power Transformer Sponsored by: Schweitzer Engineering.
Flanders Electric – Engineering Division Welcomes Youto an Overview of Reconditioned Switchgear.
1 PCA2 On-load Protection Condition Analyser. 2 PCA2 online testing concept Concept introduction: PCA2 is a new system test approach intended to save.
SHUNT CAPACITOR FUNDAMENTALS AND PROTECTION
1 The Utility Breaker Tim Heard DDC Engineer AEP Texas SWEDE 2006.
Chapter 7 SYSTEM PROTECTION
High-Impedance Fault Detection with the F60 Universal Relay
Interconnect Protection of Dispersed Generators
Power Distribution Harmonics Case Study of 285-3F Chiller Plant Michael W. Harmon Principle Engineer Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC Savannah River.
Numerical algorithms for power system protection Prof. dr. sc. Ante Marušić, doc. dr. sc. Juraj Havelka University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering.
1 Power Quality Mary Santori, P.E. Senior Engineer September 12, 2013.
APPA Engineering and Operations Technical Conference Atlanta, Georgia April 13-18, 2007 “Nailing the Basics” Earns Princeton, IL RP3 Diamond Award.
SDG&E Electric Reliability Reporting CPUC Workshops May 26-27, 2015.
SWEDE Tulsa May 8 th, 2009 Dennis Keilbarth Overhead Distribution Arc Flash at PSO.
Adaptive Protection of Distribution Feeders Alexander Apostolov, Benton Vandiver.
Transformer Taking the ratio of the two equations
Prepared By :.  Introduction  Techniques Used  Case Study  Advantages  Application  Conclusion OUTLINE.
Medium Voltage products Energy reliability & revenue improvement Speaker: Jean-Yves Pocthier - Schneider Electric France Technical solution for improvement.
Copyright © SEL 2008 Updated Transmission Line Protection Communications Roy Moxley, Ken Fodero, and Héctor J. Altuve Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories,
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Smart Grid Protection in China Wu Guopei Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau Guangdong Power Grid, China.
© ABB PTMV - 1, ABB Overhead Distribution Systems.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  PV in Spain: Basically Large plants connected to MV or HV Mainly in rural areas (generation exceeds consumption) 3,000.
05/18/001 N.Treadway Distributed Resources and Competitive Energy Markets in Illinois Workshop Session III, “Interconnection Issues” Thursday, May 18,
Slide 1 Line Current Differential Application on Short Lines Presentation to SSCET October 26 th, 2012.
PowerIT Air Insulated Cubicle Uniswitch
Utility Engineers, PC.  Generation  Transmission  Distribution.
Lecture 22 Unbalanced Faults and Power System Protection Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
Announcements Read Chapters 10 and 11
1 Distributed Generation and Power Quality-Continued.
DIGITAL DIFFERENTIAL RELAYS FOR TRANSFORMER PROTECTION USING WALSH SERIES AND LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATORS Ali Reza FEREIDUNIAN*, Ali Reza FEREIDUNIAN*, Mansooreh.
SERVICE ENTRANCE EQUIPMENT
ABOC/ATC days Electrical Network: Selectivity and Protection Plan José Carlos GASCON TS–EL Group 22 January 2007.
Sub-Synchronous Frequency Detection Using SEL OGIC ® Control Equations SSF Relay ERCOT Workshop NPRR562 Subsynchronous Resonance Larry Gross.
ECE 498HZ: Power Distribution System Analysis
Survey of Smart Grid concepts and demonstrations Smart substation Ari Nikander.
Interconnected Generation Preliminary Engineering Work Related to Fees.
Loop-Sectionalizing Automation Scheme Colin Hawthorne 4/26/2016.
Protection of Power Systems
April 7, 2015 Washington, D.C. Area Low-Voltage Event Operations Training Seminar 2016 Erik Johnson System Operations Training (ERCOT)
AUTOMATIC CIRCUIT RECLOSER
Power System Protective Relaying-Part One
Protection of Power Systems
Interconnect Protection of Dispersed Generators
Advanced Fuse-Saving Techniques
What is an Operation and Misoperation
Chapter 7 System Protection
A Tutorial on the Application and Setting of Collector Feeder Overcurrent Relays at Wind Electric Power Plants By: Stephanie Mercer.
Distance Protection: Why Have We Started With a Circle, Does It Matter, and What Else Is Out There? Edmund O. Schweitzer, III and Bogdan Kasztenny Schweitzer.
EUS 260 Capstone Project.
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © MCEC and SEL 2014 Mitigation of Undesired Operation of Recloser Controls Due to Distribution Line Inrush Lee Ayers Mid-Carolina Electric Cooperative Larry Wright Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.

53,000 active meters South Carolina counties ♦ Lexington ♦ Richland ♦ Newberry ♦ Saluda ♦ Aiken Mid-Carolina Electric Cooperative

MCEC Discussion Reasoning for changing recloser style Experience with tripping due to inrush Factors affecting inrush Solutions to tripping during inrush Future plans to address feeder circuit coordination

Example MCEC Distribution Circuit

Hydraulic Recloser Clearing Curves Two Fast A and Two Slow B Curves

Fast Curve Clears Temporary Faults Saves fuses Reduces outages

Historical Data 90% of faults clear on fast curve 5% of faults clear on slow curve 5% of faults proceed to lockout

Aging Recloser Fleet Reclosers were at least 20 years old One manufacturer was out of business Insufficient stock was available

Solid Dielectric Recloser With Microprocessor-Based Control

Reasons for Selecting New Reclosers Maintenance costs Coordination Safety Environmental concerns Testing Additional advantages

Hydraulic Maintenance Costs Maintenance required every 3 years Costs associated with maintenance – about $350 per recloser ♦ Parts and oil ♦ MCEC hours to change out recloser

Solid Dielectric Maintenance Costs No Regular Maintenance Required

Hydraulic Recloser Coordination Less reliable than expected Not repeatable Insufficient margin Prolonged outages due to poor selectivity

Solid Dielectric Recloser Coordination Microprocessor-based control Accurate and repeatable More curves available

Hydraulic Recloser Safety Hot stick is used for manual close and nonreclose Operator stands directly under recloser

Solid Dielectric Recloser Safety Operated remotely or on time delay No hot stick required (except yellow handle) Improved safety with hot-line tagging ♦ No closing ♦ More sensitive tripping

Hydraulic Environmental Concerns Mineral Oil Release Requires Cleanup Contaminated soil removal Decontamination Restoration

Solid Dielectric Environmental Concerns None

Hydraulic Testing Requires low-voltage, high-current test set Can only be done in shop

Solid Dielectric Testing Relay test set Recloser test set Soldering gun?

Additional Advantages of µP Control Forensic data Communications Self-monitoring and alarm Simpler-to-change settings

Initial Experience With µP Control More than 150 reclosers (35 A and 50 A) changed out Many event reports received Noticed unintended operations on fast curve when power restored

First Recloser Trip – Raw Event

Second Recloser Trip – Raw Event

µP Control Operate Curve

First Recloser Trip – Filtered Event

Second Recloser Trip – Filtered Event

Is This Normal? “There is an argument that a recloser rarely closes in and holds on second fast operations due to inrush current.” – McGraw Edison Power Systems Division, “Overcurrent Protection for Distribution Systems – Seminar Notes,” May 1984

Is This Acceptable? No. Why Unnecessarily Blink Customer Power?

Transformer Inrush

Inrush Current

Second Harmonic

One Method to Secure Relays Change Settings Change curve shape Raise pickup Raise time dial

Testing Other Fast Curves

Test Results CurveTrip 4No R N 17No 1Yes A (TD = 2)Yes

Disadvantages of Changing Settings Slows protection Is difficult to quantify distribution line inrush ♦ EMTP ♦ Real-time digital simulation

A Better, Easier Solution: Second-Harmonic Blocking

First Recloser Trip – Raw Event

First Recloser Trip Harmonics

Second Recloser Trip – Raw Event

Second Recloser Trip Harmonics

Second-Harmonic Blocking Logic

First Event With Second-Harmonic Blocking

Second Event With Second-Harmonic Blocking

Substation Recloser Inrush Event

Incorrect Second-Harmonic Blocking Step change in fundamental frequency ♦ Fourier transform ♦ Short-lived blocking (0.25 cycles) CT saturation ♦ Has low fault current and low X / R ratio ♦ Is backed up by slow curve

CT Excitation Curve

Path Forward Install three-phase 70 A reclosers with single-pole tripping Implement second-harmonic blocking on reclosers and feeder relays Perform coordination studies again

Transformer Fuse Coordination

Questions?