NEW YORK PLANNING FEDERATION PRESENTATION April 13, 2015 SEQR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
What, When, and a Start on How
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
TOWNSHIP OF BECKWITH OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW OFFICIAL PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE: AUGUST 24, 2010 OPEN HOUSE NO. 3 AGENDA  What is an Official Plan?  The Official.
Scoping in the EIA process Proposal Identification Screening
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -NPDES Permit Process-
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
1 SEQR & Environmental Health: Types of Actions Justin Pfeiffer, Esq. Senior Attorney, NYSDOH March 23, 2011.
1 Planning and Environment Linkages: Case Studies Michael Culp and John Humeston FHWA November 2, 2006.
Zoning Ordinance Update Planning Commission February 25, 2015.
Area Commissions Purpose Area commissions are established to afford additional voluntary citizen participation in decision-making in an advisory.
Planning & Community Development Department Municipal Code Amendments: Adoption/Certification Authority of California Environmental Quality Act Reviews,
Planning Issues in Agriculture Laws and Regulations Lecture 6 Lecture 6.
Noel H. Kaplan, Senior Environmental Planner
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
1 SEQR Revised Environmental Assessment Forms and the EAF Mapper January 14, 2015.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
How 1041 Regulations are Impacting Geothermal Development A discussion of how counties are applying 1041 regulations to geothermal development and the.
Overview of Land Use Compatibility between Sensitive Land Uses and Nuisance Sources Peter Piersol A&WMA/OPPI Land Use Compatibility.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Slovak Environmental Inspectorate Procedure of issuing the permits in the Slovak Republic.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Environmental Impact Assessment in the Slovak republic.
A Division of New York Department of State New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA)
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation October 2004.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
Using Planning and Zoning to Promote Healthy Living.
12 July 2010 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits Critical Environmental Areas Under SEQR What Do They Mean?
1 Public Planning Meeting Date: June 24, 2015 Application: Draft Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applicant: Highland Gate.
1 Completing the CEQA Checklist Terry Rivasplata.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
Housing Element Update Workshop #2 January 28, 2009.
Horse Creek Wind Farm Community Review Workshop #1: Introductory Meeting April 21, 2011—6:30pm at the Paynter Center.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Flow Standard Amendment to New York’s Water Quality Standards Regulations Scott J. Stoner Chief, Standards.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
The Rezoning Process CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PLANNING.
Durham Villas Planned Unit Development TSM & REZ Morris Bud Keeney Butte County Board of Supervisors December 11, 2012.
Community Development Department May 2, 2016 NEW CPAC MEMBERS TRAINING WELCOME.
Overview of the Updated SEQR Forms, Workbook & Mapping Application February 27, 2014.
ANNEXATION Statutory Overview July 19, 2011 David L. Yearout, AICP, CFM.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL. Recent Projects  University Village Local Area Plan (2015)  Active Transportation Plan (2014)  Trans Canada.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Development Services Official Community Plan Overview and Review Process.
A presentation by John C. Cappello, Esq
New Comprehensive Zoning By-law December 12, 2016.
2017 Zoning Update New Sewickley Township.
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Consideration of Action Re: Commercial Cannabis Businesses
ALAN J. KNAUF KNAUF SHAW LLP November 16, 2012
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Alaska Roadless Rulemaking
Hands-On: FSA Assessments For Foreign Schools
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

NEW YORK PLANNING FEDERATION PRESENTATION April 13, 2015 SEQR

Overview I. Know What SEQR is. II. Know The general processes and procedures. III. Assist your community with SEQR on a routine basis. IV. The impacts of the new required forms.

Who is the Audience? Phil Duchscherer  Planning Boards, Code Officials, and others  Levels of Expertise:  “Seeker”  Novice  Routine  Black Belt?

Resources Where is the best place to find information on SEQR?  6 NYCRR Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review  DEC website

Why must SEQR be completed on most actions? Question?

I. Because you have to. II. It will help to make a successful project. III. Because you could get sued if you don’t. IV. All of the above.

State Environmental Quality Review SEQR

 Required by the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) – 19 NYCRR Part 617, as promulgated by the NYSDEC.  SEQR equates to an environmental overlay on local land use review and approval.  SEQR is built on the recognition that we are all stewards of the environment and, as such, should include environmental consideration in our planning, review and decision making processes. Washington Office Amherst Office

What SEQR Is and Is Not?  SEQR is NOT a permit or approval.  SEQR is an additional review that enables state and local agencies to evaluate the environmental effects of their decisions.  SEQR is activated when a state or local agency must make a discretionary decision. Washington Office

What is Subject to SEQR?  Any action (project or physical activity) that is directly undertaken, or funded by, or requires a discretionary permit or approval from a municipal agency. Washington Office

Examples  Site plans  Subdivision of land  Special use permits  Rezoning of land  Use variances and some area variances  Adoption of plans or local legislation  Purchase of property  Funding of projects, etc.  Other?

The Process  When to start the SEQR review process (as early as possible in process).  Who Starts (Lead Agency, Involved Agencies, Interested Agencies) – Typically started by a local government board: PB, TB, and infrequently a ZBA. Washington Office

 Type I  Type II  Unlisted Classifying an Action

 Type I:  Have the potential for significant environmental impacts  Listed in the regulations  Lower thresholds if affects Agricultural Districts (25%), Historic Properties (any), Parkland/Open Space (25%)

Classifying an Action  Type II: Exempt Action  By law, do not have a significant environmental impact  Specific listing in regulations  Unlisted: All other actions  MOST actions are Unlisted

Requirements for Each Type of Action

 Type I:  Requires preparation of Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF).  Lead Agency must be established.  Conduct coordinated review with involved and interested agencies.  Type I actions tend to have impacts, but this does not mandate the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).  Required Notices and Filings.

Requirements for Each Type of Action  Unlisted Action:  Short Form EAF is used, but can use Full EAF.  Coordinated Review not required, but is recommend if other agency approvals are required or if their input is desired.

Requirements for Each Type of Action  Type II:  No action is required – Exempt from review.  In some instances it is recommended that a Short Form EAF be completed and placed in municipal file (noting Type II Action).

Requirements for Each Type of Action  Full EAF  Applicant completes Part 1 – Must be completed as best as possible, with signature.  Agency reviews and asks questions concerning information contained on the form in an effort to evaluate potential project impacts.  Agency completes Part 2 – Gain as much information as possible about the project (under the Part 1 effort get input from other agencies, the public and through research, etc.) before completing Part 2. A great tool for evaluating a Project!!  Agency directs completion of Part 3, as necessary; back-up information, documentation, reports, studies, etc., to provide further detail for evaluation of potential environmental impacts.

Determination of Significance

 Negative Declaration  A statement that formally ends the SEQR process.  A determination that the proposed action will not have a potential significant impact on the environment.  Must be prepared in writing, identifying and evaluating the relevant areas of concern, and kept on file – must be a “reasoned elaboration” of the decision.  For Type I actions, the Negative Declaration must be distributed to all Involved Agencies, and the applicant (and published in ENB).

Determination of Significance  Negative Declaration  For unlisted actions, non-coordinated review: each agency makes their own decision.  Supporting documentation must be included in the file.  Must be adopted by formal resolution.  Documentation, Documentation, Documentation.

Determination of Significance  Positive Declaration  Action may result in impact on the environment.  An EIS must be prepared.  Get assistance.

SEQR: A Tool for Success

Any Questions?

SEQR Amendments  Adopted changes went into effect on October 7, 2013  New EAFs Note: The following slides are from a NYSDEC presentation.

N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORMS

Goals of EAF Revision Process  Reduce need for additional studies.  Encourage more use of the short EAF.  Make use of the internet and electronic technologies and use of gatekeeper questions.  Eliminate need for a separate determination of significance.  Serve as the starting point for scoping. N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION

Environmental Assessment Forms NEW:  Forms were adopted by the Commissioner on January 25, Forms  Forms were originally effective on October 1, 2012; effective date was changed to April 1, 2013 and then to October 7, 2013 so that workbooks and GIS platform are available ahead of effective date. N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION

Environmental Assessment Forms  DEC has prepared companion workbooks and is preparing web-based forms and upgrading GIS platform.  Draft Short EAF workbook - comment period ended on 10/22/12.Short EAF workbook  Draft Full EAF workbook - comment period ended on 5/20/13. Draft Full EAF workbook 5/20/13.  Vendor has started work on the GIS platform (completed). N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION

The Updated EAF’s  How are they different?  Topics covered  Determination of significance is built into the form  Fill-out-able on line  Hyperlinks to workbook

EAF Workbooks  Workbook is intended to:  lead sponsors through preparing Part 1;  Guide lead agency in preparing Parts 2 & 3.  Workbooks provide links to spatial data (e.g., maps) and other sources of information for use in preparing forms.  Workbook makes generous use of examples.  Glossary of terms. - - N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION

Questions and Full EAF SEAF – Part 1, 2 and 3

SEAF - Part 1, Question 1  Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, or regulation?  If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If Yes  If no, continue to Question 2. If no N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION

SEAF - Part 1, Question 3 a. Total acreage of the site? b. Total acreage to be disturbed? c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? d. How to answer the questions. N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION

SEAF - Part 1, Question 4  Check all land uses that occur on adjoining, and near the proposed action?  Urban?  Rural (non-ag)?  Industrial?  Commercial?  Residential (Suburban)?  Workbook help in answering the questions! Workbook help in answering the questions!  Forest?  Agriculture?  Aquatic?  Parkland?  Other? N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION

Internet Tools

SEAF - Part I, Question 12.b. b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? This has created problems in certain communities!

 13 pages; with numerous new and more clarifying questions.  Air Emissions, public transportation, lighting, hazardous materials, contamination history, and wildlife species, etc. Full EAF - Part 1

SEAF - Part 2, Question 1  Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations?  Workbook help! Workbook help! N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION

SEAF - Part 2, Question 3  Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community?  Workbook help! Workbook help! N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION

SEAF - Part 2, Question 6  Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities?  Workbook help! Workbook help!  Has created some problems.

Full EAF - Part 2  10 pages; refers to Part 1 questions, includes more questions per “Impact area,” and still has “No/Small” category and “Moderate/Large” impact categories.  Some new questions will probably be litigated in the future.

Making the Determination of Significance - Part 3  The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3.  For every question in Part 2 that was answered “moderate to large impact may occur”… please complete Part 3.  Can also use to document why impact was categorized as small.  Workbook help! Workbook help! N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION

Information and Links  Check the Environmental Notice Bulletin at:  Revised EAFs, draft workbooks & proposed regulatory changes at:  To be placed on service list us at: N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION

You Made It Through SEQR Training! Thank You Andrew C. Reilly, PE, AICP Wendel Director of Planning & Environmental Services Questions & Answers