Last Study Topics How To Value Common Stock Valuing Common Stock Capitalization Rates Returns Measurements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fin351: lecture 5 Other Investment Criteria and Free Cash Flows in Finance Capital Budgeting Decisions.
Advertisements

Chapter 9 - Capital Budgeting Decision Criteria. Capital Budgeting: The process of planning for purchases of long- term assets.  For example: Suppose.
Why Net Present Value Leads to Better Investment Decisions than Other Criteria Principles of Corporate Finance Seventh Edition Richard A. Brealey Stewart.
9-0 Chapter 9: Outline Net Present Value The Payback Rule The Discounted Payback The Average Accounting Return The Internal Rate of Return The Profitability.
Why present value leads to better investment decisions than other criteria Yes, there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run there’s still time.
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Irwin/McGraw-Hill Chapter 6 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Third Edition Net Present Value and Other Investment.
Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 0 Chapter 8 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria.
Chapter 5 Principles of Corporate Finance Eighth Edition Why Net Present Value Leads to Better Investment Decisions Than Other Criteria Slides by Matthew.
Chapter 5 Why Net Present Value Leads to Better Investment Decisions than Other Criteria.
2-1 Copyright © 2006 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited prepared by: Sujata Madan McGill University Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Third Canadian Edition.
Thank you Presentation to Cox Business Students FINA 3320: Financial Management Lecture 12: The Basics of Capital Budgeting NPV, IRR, and Other Methods.
P.V. VISWANATH FOR A FIRST COURSE IN FINANCE 1. 2 Decision Criteria NPV The Payback Rule Accounting Rate of Return IRR Mutually Exclusive Projects The.
Chapter 10 - Capital Budgeting
Chapter 9 INVESTMENT CRITERIA Pr. Zoubida SAMLAL GF 200.
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter Nine.
Chapter 9. Investment In Long-Term Assets Chapter Objectives Difficulty in finding profitable projects Use capital budget techniques to evaluate new.
Other Investment Criteria and Free Cash Flows in Finance
Ch 6 Project Analysis Under Certainty
CHAPTER 10 The Basics of Capital Budgeting Omar Al Nasser, Ph.D. FIN
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria.
4. Project Investment Decision-Making
Last Study Topics FCF and PV NPV and its competitors The payback Period The book rate of return Internal rate of return.
FIN 40153: Advanced Corporate Finance EVALUATING AN INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY (BASED ON RWJ CHAPTER 5)
8- 1 McGraw Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Sixth Edition Richard.
P.V. VISWANATH FOR A FIRST COURSE IN FINANCE 1. 2 Decision Criteria NPV IRR The Payback Rule EVA Mutually Exclusive Projects The case of multiple IRRs.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Capital Budgeting Techniques.
Investment Decision Rules 04/30/07 Ch. 10 and Ch. 12.
Stocks & Stock Market Primary Market - Place where the sale of new stock first occurs. Initial Public Offering (IPO) - First offering of stock to the general.
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000
Lecture 7 The Value of Common Stocks Managerial Finance FINA 6335 Ronald F. Singer.
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter Nine.
Capital Budgeting Decision Rules What real investments should firms make?
The Value of Common Stocks Chapter 4. Topics Covered  How Common Stocks are Traded  How To Value Common Stock  Capitalization Rates  Stock Prices.
Fin351: lecture 4 Other Investment Criteria and discounted Cash Flow Analysis Capital Budgeting Decision.
Why Net Present Value Leads to Better Investment Decisions than Other Criteria Principles of Corporate Finance Sixth Edition Richard A. Brealey Stewart.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
FIN 819: lecture 2'1 Review of the Valuation of Common Stocks How to apply the PV concept.
Chapter 5 Why Net Present Value Leads to Better Investment Decisions than Other Criteria Managerial Finance FINA 6335 Ronald F. Singer.
8- 1 McGraw Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 8 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria.
Unit 4 – Capital Budgeting Decision Methods
Chapter 7 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Fifth Edition Slides by Matthew Will McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Class 3 Investment Decisions and Capital Budgeting.
Financial management: lecture 6 NPV and other Investment Criteria Capital Budgeting Decisions.
NET PRESENT VALUE AND OTHER INVESTMENT CRITERIA
8-1 Lecture 8: Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria This lecture presents multiple valuation techniques used during the capital budgeting process.
Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria By : Else Fernanda, SE.Ak., M.Sc. ICFI.
Basics of Capital Budgeting. An Overview of Capital Budgeting.
Chapter 5 Principles of Corporate Finance Eighth Edition Why Net Present Value Leads to Better Investment Decisions Than Other Criteria Slides by Matthew.
0 Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Seventh Edition 6 Chapter Six Some Alternative Investment Rules.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McGraw-Hill/Irwin Cost of Capital Cost of Capital - The return the firm’s.
Last Study Topics Internal Rate of Return Pitfalls of IRR.
Other Criteria for Capital Budgeting Text: Chapter 6.
Chapter 6 – Multiple Cash FlowsCopyright 2008 John Wiley & Sons 1 CHAPTER 10 The Fundamentals of Capital Budgeting.
Chapter 12 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Fifth Edition Slides by Matthew Will McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
DMH1. 2 The most widely accepted objective of the firm is to maximize the value of the firm. The financial management is largely concerned with investment,
Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
Principles of Corporate Finance Eighth Edition Chapter 5
MT480 Unit 4 Seminar Chapters 5 and 6.
Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
Chapter 6 Principles of Corporate Finance Concise Edition
Chapter 4 The Value of Common Stocks Principles of Corporate Finance
Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
Chapter 5 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000
Lecture 4 The Value of Common Stocks
Corporate Financial Theory
Presentation transcript:

Last Study Topics How To Value Common Stock Valuing Common Stock Capitalization Rates Returns Measurements

Today’s Topics FCF and PV NPV and its Competitors The Payback Period The Book Rate of Return Internal Rate of Return

FCF and PV Free Cash Flows (FCF) should be the theoretical basis for all PV calculations. FCF is a more accurate measurement of PV than either Div or EPS. The market price does not always reflect the PV of FCF. When valuing a business for purchase, always use FCF.

FCF and PV Valuing a Business The value of a business is usually computed as the discounted value of FCF out to a valuation horizon (H). The valuation horizon is sometimes called the terminal value and is calculated like PVGO.

FCF and PV Valuing a Business PV (free cash flows)PV (horizon value)

FCF and PV Example Given the cash flows for Concatenator Manufacturing Division, calculate the PV of near term cash flows, PV (horizon value), and the total value of the firm. r=10% and g= 6%

FCF and PV Example - continued Given the cash flows for Concatenator Manufacturing Division, calculate the PV of near term cash flows, PV (horizon value), and the total value of the firm. r=10% and g= 6%.

FCF and PV Example - continued Given the cash flows for Concatenator Manufacturing Division, calculate the PV of near term cash flows, PV (horizon value), and the total value of the firm. r=10% and g= 6%.

Why Net Present Value Leads to Better Investment Decisions than Other Criteria Wajid S Ahmed Chapter 5 McGraw Hill/Irwin

Introduction Vegetron’s chief financial officer (CFO) is wondering how to analyze a proposed $1 million investment in a new venture called project X; Your response should be as follows: “First, forecast the cash flows generated by project X over its economic life. Second, determine the appropriate opportun - ity cost of capital

Continue Third, use this opportunity cost of capital to discount the future cash flows of project X; Fourth, calculate net present value (NPV) by subtracting the $1 million investment from PV. Invest in project X if its NPV is greater than zero. – Why NPV is so important!

Continue What is best for Vegetron stockholders – Maximization of their wealth. Lets see the following table;

Continue Clearly project X is worthwhile if its present value, PV, is greater than $1 million, that is, if net present value is positive; By calculating the present value of project X, we are replicating the process by which the common stock of firm X would be valued in capital markets; And, ultimately show up in Vegetron’s market value;

Continue The opportunity cost of taking the project is the return shareholders could have earned had they invested the funds on their own; When we discount the project’s cash flows by the expected rate of return on comparable financial assets, we are measuring how much investors would be prepared to pay for your project;

NPV and Cash Transfers Every possible method for evaluating projects impacts the flow of cash about the company as follows. Cash Investment opportunity (real asset) FirmShareholder Investment opportunities (financial assets) InvestAlternative: pay dividend to shareholders Shareholders invest for themselves

NPV’s Competitors we will now look at three of the alternatives. – They are: – 1. The book rate of return. – 2. The payback period. – 3. The internal rate of return. But, Three Points to Remember about NPV!

NPV’s 3-Points First, the NPV rule recognizes that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow, because the dollar today can be invested to start earning interest immediately; Second, net present value depends solely on the forecasted cash flows from the project and the opportunity cost of capital;

Continue Third, because present values are all measured in today’s dollars, you can add them up; Therefore, if you have two projects A and B, the net present value of the combined investment is; – NPV(A +B) = NPV(A) + NPV(B)

NPV depends on CFs Net present value depends only on the project’s cash flows and the opportunity cost of capital; When companies report to shareholders, they report book—that is, accounting—income and book assets; book income gets most of the immediate attention;

Continue The book rate of return may not be a good measure of true profitability. It is also an average across all of the firm’s activities; – Book rate of return = book income book assets The average profitability of past investments is not usually the right hurdle for new investments;

Payback The payback period of a project is the number of years it takes before the cumulative forecasted cash flow equals the initial outlay. The payback rule says only accept projects that “payback” in the desired time frame. This method is very flawed, primarily because it ignores later year cash flows and the the present value of future cash flows.

Payback Example Examine the three projects and note the mistake we would make if we insisted on only taking projects with a payback period of 2 years or less.

Payback Example Examine the three projects and note the mistake we would make if we insisted on only taking projects with a payback period of 2 years or less.

The Payback Rule The payback rule with a cutoff period of three or more years would accept all three projects; Therefore, regardless of the choice of cutoff period, the payback rule gives answers different from the net present value rule; – The payback rule ignores all cash flows after the cutoff date; – The payback rule gives equal weight to all cash flows before the cutoff date;

continue In order to use the payback rule, a firm has to decide on an appropriate cutoff date; If it uses the same cutoff regardless of project life, it will tend to accept many poor short- lived projects and reject many good long-lived ones; What about the discounted-payback rule asks?

Internal Rate of Return Example You can purchase a turbo powered machine tool gadget for $4,000. The investment will generate $2,000 and $4,000 in cash flows for two years, respectively. What is the IRR on this investment?

Internal Rate of Return Example You can purchase a turbo powered machine tool gadget for $4,000. The investment will generate $2,000 and $4,000 in cash flows for two years, respectively. What is the IRR on this investment?

Internal Rate of Return Example You can purchase a turbo powered machine tool gadget for $4,000. The investment will generate $2,000 and $4,000 in cash flows for two years, respectively. What is the IRR on this investment?

Internal Rate of Return IRR=28%

Summary FCF and PV NPV and its Competitors The Payback Period The Book Rate of Return Internal Rate of Return

Continue Now, the internal rate of return rule is to accept an investment project if the opportunity cost of capital is less than the internal rate of return; – If the opportunity cost of capital is less than the 28 percent IRR, then the project has a positive NPV. – If it is equal to the IRR, the project has a zero NPV. – And if it is greater than the IRR, the project has a negative NPV

Internal Rate of Return Pitfall 1 - Lending or Borrowing? With some cash flows (as noted below) the NPV of the project increases s the discount rate increases. This is contrary to the normal relationship between NPV and discount rates.

Project C If the opportunity cost of capital is 10 percent, that means the project is a good one. Or does it? Should we accept or reject? – The only way to find the answer is to look at the net present value.

Internal Rate of Return Pitfall 1 - Lending or Borrowing? With some cash flows (as noted below) the NPV of the project increases s the discount rate increases. This is contrary to the normal relationship between NPV and discount rates. Discount Rate NPV

Internal Rate of Return Pitfall 2 - Multiple Rates of Return Certain cash flows can generate NPV=0 at two different discount rates. The following cash flow generates NPV=0 at both (-50%) and 15.2%.

Internal Rate of Return Pitfall 2 - Multiple Rates of Return Certain cash flows can generate NPV=0 at two different discount rates. The following cash flow generates NPV=0 at both (-50%) and 15.2% NPV Discount Rate IRR=15.2% IRR=-50%

Internal Rate of Return Pitfall 3 - Mutually Exclusive Projects IRR sometimes ignores the magnitude of the project. The following two projects illustrate that problem.

Explanation If you follow the IRR rule, you have the satisfaction of earning a 100 percent rate of return; If you follow the NPV rule, you are $11,818 richer; Is it worth making the additional $10,000 investment in F? – you look at the IRR on the incremental flows.

Internal Rate of Return Pitfall 3 - Mutually Exclusive Projects

Opportunity Cost matters if the opportunity cost of capital were 20 percent, investors would place a higher value on the shorter-lived project G. But in our example the opportunity cost of capital is not 20 percent but 10 percent. Investors are prepared to pay relatively high prices for longer-lived securities, and so they will pay a relatively high price for the longer- lived project.

Continue At a 10 percent cost of capital, an investment in H has an NPV of $9,000 and an investment in G has an NPV of only $3,592; Assume, it is a shortage of capital which forces the choice between G and H.; When this implicit assumption is brought out, H is better if there is no capital shortage.

Incremental Flows First, you check that project G has a satisfactory IRR. Then you look at the return on the additional investment in H. The IRR on the incremental investment in H is 15.6 percent. Since this is greater than the opportunity cost of capital, you should undertake H rather than G.

Internal Rate of Return Pitfall 4 - Term Structure Assumption We assume that discount rates are stable during the term of the project. This assumption implies that all funds are reinvested at the IRR. This is a false assumption. In a situation where it is important, we have to compare the project IRR with the expected IRR (yield to maturity) offered by a traded security

Internal Rate of Return that; – (1) is equivalent in risk to the project and. – (2) offers the same time pattern of cash flows as the project. Calculating the IRR can be a laborious task. Fortunately, financial calculators can perform this function easily.

Profitability Index When resources are limited, the profitability index (PI) provides a tool for selecting among various project combinations and alternatives A set of limited resources and projects can yield various combinations. The highest weighted average PI can indicate which projects to select.

Profitability Index Example We only have $300,000 to invest. Which do we select? ProjNPV InvestmentPI A230,000200, B141,250125, C194,250175, D162,000150,

Profitability Index Example - continued ProjNPV InvestmentPI A230,000200, B141,250125, C194,250175, D162,000150, Select projects with highest Weighted Avg PI WAPI (BD) = 1.13(125) (150) (25) (300) (300) (300) = 1.01

Profitability Index Example - continued ProjNPV InvestmentPI A230,000200, B141,250125, C194,250175, D162,000150, Select projects with highest Weighted Avg PI WAPI (BD) = 1.01 WAPI (A) = 0.77 WAPI (BC) = 1.12

Linear Programming Maximize Cash flows or NPV Minimize costs Example Max NPV = 21Xn + 16 Xb + 12 Xc + 13 Xd subject to 10Xa + 5Xb + 5Xc + 0Xd <= Xa - 5Xb - 5Xc + 40Xd <= 12

Vegetron Case Table 5.1

Vegetron Case Table 5.2