BIG Process Flow Annexure A1. Call for Proposals Opens Call for Proposals Closes BIG Partners assigned proposals to review Preliminary screening by BIG.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2007 CAH HF Program Group 2 Roadmap Next Steps for Phase II January – March 2007 JANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC Engage Internal Stakeholders Plan/Educate.
Advertisements

ICCA Board Webinar Meeting July 14, Agenda 1.Update on India and Argentina 2.Update on ICCA and CPAg discussions 3.ANSI ISO accreditation 4.ICCA.
THE NSF BUDGET Overview of Agency Funding Processes Presented by Beth Blue National Science Foundation Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management.
Managing a Scientific Laboratory Financial Management and Budgeting.
Facilitate by: Mr. Ok Libounna Director for Financial Affair, Church World Service (CWS)
1 April 2010 TX SET Timeline Project Conceptualization 11 weeks Market Requirements 12 weeks ERCOT Requirements 12 weeks Conceptual Design 6 weeks Detail.
State Milestones Subsidized Insurance Workgroup High Level Timeline 2011 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 Mar 2011 Apr 2011 May 2011 Jun 2011 Jul 2011 Aug 2011 Sept 2011.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Implementing a Calibration Management System Cory Otto Principal Metrology Engineer, Boston Scientific 10 October 2012.
California Energy Action Plan Tim Tutt California Energy Commission Dan Adler California Public Utilities Commission June 24, 2004 Goal II – Accelerate.
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
PRODUCT TRANSFER.
Summary: Idea to Proof of Concept
In-Kind Contribution Management Update Allen Weeks March 20, Lund.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration USDOT – PHMSA HMEP Grants Major Audit Findings NASTTPO April 25,
Part-financed by the European Union Project implementation and monitoring: What is good to know when applying? Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant.
November New Programme Projects of National Importance Lm25,000 Specific Programme still under development.
A need exist to define & establish Consumer replacement services and Technology to replace absolute technology to enable automation of all existing manual.
WLE Operations Team Planning Meeting 2 nd February 2015, Water’s Edge.
Chapter 15 Introduction to Systems Development. Learning Objectives Learn how information systems are developed Understand importance of managing SD process.
This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.
AMC Governance and Institutional Support. Objectives Build on existing capacity Ensure appropriate independence and credibility through transparency,
Business Consulting Services Engagement Proposal & Letter of Agreement Project Management Timelines/GANNT Chart.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
The SaTH Foundation Trust Programme Deborah Shaw March 29th 2007.
1 expect the best Lemuel C. Stewart, Jr. Chief Information Officer of the Commonwealth Information Technology Investment Board September.
CEQA and the Delta Plan Presentation to Delta Stewardship Council February 24, 2011.
This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.
12.1 Plan Procurement: Introduction
IEEE /r5 Submission November 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Grantmaking – Up Front Just for now Will redo multiple times as we grow Keep it informal, or go formal? No matter what: mitigate the risks Failed projects.
Step 1 in the evaluation process No Returnable Document/ Schedule File AFile BFile C Basic Compliance Tenderer’s tick box √ All mandatory requirements.
Page 1 Enterprise Data Warehouse Project Executive: Barbara Chmielewski Project Manager: Anita Sharma.
Rob Connatser NSS Instrument Work Packages and XLPM.
PCE Program Debrief Jim Eggemeyer, Director, Office of Sustainability Shawn Marshall, LEAN Energy US March 24, 2016.
SRG Gantt Chart Template
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Timeline Roadmap Template
Recommendation of Texas Test Plan Team to RMS
Second Independent Evaluation of UNAIDS
Banner Project Update for Division Deans
Proposed Bay TMDL Schedule
Company Name’s Marketing Strategy
Project Ideation Agile Down-to-Earth © 2016.
Quantification of BMP Impacts on CBP Management Strategies
Second Independent Evaluation of UNAIDS
ESB Networks Market Release Meeting of the IGG, March 5th 2009
West Essex Business Planning Process
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
Key Value Indicators (KVIs) Version 1.1 (amendments from V1.0 in red)
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Center for Vision (CVN) on Block 33 Move Planning & Logistics Timeline
Back-End Payor Sub-Group
XRN Nov 19 Release - Status Update
MULTISPORTS CENTRE PRESENTATION
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
Transfer to Operations
Second Independent Evaluation of UNAIDS
1.
XRN Nov 19 Release - Status Update
Multi-Family Fourplex Apartment
Executive Project Kickoff
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
XRN 4954 – MiR Drop 5 - Status Update
XRN 4927 – MiR Drop 4 - Status Update
Student Assignment Review Advisory Committee
XRN Nov 19 Release - Status Update
Stage Gate Process Template
Presentation transcript:

BIG Process Flow Annexure A1

Call for Proposals Opens Call for Proposals Closes BIG Partners assigned proposals to review Preliminary screening by BIG Partner BIG Partner requests reviewers to evaluate Proposal not eligible 1 Jan 1 July ~ 14 Feb ~14 August Application process Slide 1 of 4 Application process Slide 1 of 4 Basic eligibility Topics relevant to biotech/biomed POC project for tech vs. basic research Basic eligibility Topics relevant to biotech/biomed POC project for tech vs. basic research

Receipt of reviewers comments BIRAC screening BIRAC shortlists applicants for presentation to TEP in Delhi Proposal not eligible Proposal recommended to BIRAC 2 pos/ 2; 2 pos/3 Proposal recommended to BIRAC 2 pos/ 2; 2 pos/3 Proposal not eligible 2 neg/ 2 2 neg/ 3 Proposal not eligible 2 neg/ 2 2 neg/ 3 Application process Slide 2 of 4 Application process Slide 2 of 4 Novelty or unmet need Technical feasibility of idea; do- ability; any prelim indication that it might work Can the team deliver? Technical capability. Project mgmt experience Potential to create IP or existing IP; Estimate of FTO based on reviewer’s experience. Can the project achieve impt goals in 18 months and Rs 50 lakhs? Are budget and timelines realistic? Novelty or unmet need Technical feasibility of idea; do- ability; any prelim indication that it might work Can the team deliver? Technical capability. Project mgmt experience Potential to create IP or existing IP; Estimate of FTO based on reviewer’s experience. Can the project achieve impt goals in 18 months and Rs 50 lakhs? Are budget and timelines realistic? Does the topic fit within scope of BIG? Does BIRAC concur with reviewer’s comments? Some prior art search is reqd? Does the topic fit within scope of BIG? Does BIRAC concur with reviewer’s comments? Some prior art search is reqd? 1 April 1 Sept

Presentation in Delhi to TEP. Decision by ESC Due diligence by BIG Partner; site visit; detailed discussion BIG Partner provides due diligence report to BIRAC Proposal not eligible In principle approval decision by ESC Proposal not selected ~ 15 May ~ 15 Oct ~ 1 June ~1 Nov ~ 1 July ~1 Dec Delays possible here if applicant needs time to produce documents Application process Slide 3 of 4 Application process Slide 3 of 4 Novelty or unmet need Technical feasibility of idea Technical credibility of PI Proposal budget/timelines realistic Novelty or unmet need Technical feasibility of idea Technical credibility of PI Proposal budget/timelines realistic Company legal and financial documents Project milestones/budgets; quotes Commitment of incubator Adequacy of facility available Tech transfer agreement; scientific support contracts Company legal and financial documents Project milestones/budgets; quotes Commitment of incubator Adequacy of facility available Tech transfer agreement; scientific support contracts

BIRAC does final review Agreement signed between Grantee and BIG Partner First installment released by BIG Partner. BIG Project can begin. First installment released by BIG Partner. BIG Project can begin. BIRAC okays final terms and signing of agreement by BIG Partner Proposal not selected ~ 1 Aug ~ 1 Jan ~ 1 Sept ~1 Mar Application process Slide 4 of 4 Application process Slide 4 of 4 All scheme requirements met

Project Review and Monitoring

First installment Next installment released Monitoring Phase Slide 1 of 1 Monitoring Phase Slide 1 of 1 Milestone “N” (Targets met!) + Utilization certificate Milestone “N” (Targets met!) + Utilization certificate Final Milestone (Targets met!) + Utilization certificate Final Milestone (Targets met!) + Utilization certificate Last installment (~5%) (after end of project) Last installment (~5%) (after end of project) BIG Partner All capex projected was purchased; set-up and working; logs maintained; insurance taken; AMC Sufficient staff engaged formally in project; all hiring against formal contracts Proper accounts maintained Project mgmt and business mentoring if asked/required BIG Partner All capex projected was purchased; set-up and working; logs maintained; insurance taken; AMC Sufficient staff engaged formally in project; all hiring against formal contracts Proper accounts maintained Project mgmt and business mentoring if asked/required Project Reviewing Committee Whether milestones met? Consider requests for moving timelines or milestone targets? Provide inputs to BIRAC on changes requiring BIRAC decisions. Ex – any budget changes. Technical mentoring Project Reviewing Committee Whether milestones met? Consider requests for moving timelines or milestone targets? Provide inputs to BIRAC on changes requiring BIRAC decisions. Ex – any budget changes. Technical mentoring