Developing a multi-criteria approach for drug reimbursement decision making: an initial step forward Francois Dionne- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6th European Patients’ Rights Day The EMA Geriatric Medicines Strategy and the empowered aging patient Francesca Cerreta EMA (European Medicines Agency)
Advertisements

Non-randomized studies: Studies with historical controls and the use of Objective Performance Criteria (OPCs) Jeff Cerkvenik Statistics Manager Medtronic,
Technology Appraisal of Medical Devices at NICE – Methods and Practice Mark Sculpher Professor of Health Economics Centre for Health Economics University.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
E5 Experiences in Japan Examples with unfavorable outcome How can we improve? Masuhiro Kato, PhD Chair, EFPIA Japan Technical Subcommittee (AstraZeneca.
How do we achieve cost effective cancer treatments in the UK? Professor Peter Littlejohns Department of Public Health and Primary Care.
Establishing Research Priorities for Public Health Emergency Preparedness in Canada: Results of a Scoping Review and Priority- Setting Meeting Yasmin Khan,
Patient Safety Conference National Clinical Effectiveness Committee
MEDICINES SELECTION & FORMULARY MANAGEMENT
December 14, FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Efficient advancement to clinical trials Jack A.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
End-of-life premiums in reimbursement decision making Christopher McCabe PhD Capital Health Endowed Research Chair University of Alberta.
Social and Economic Aspects of Chainsaw Logging Meeting in Georgetown Guyana 16 and 17 May.
Current Approaches in European Health Care Policy What models can balance the needs of payors and industry?
Washington State Health Care Authority/PEBB1 Public Employees Benefits Board Meeting June 27, 2000.
Priority setting in Ontario's LHINs: Ethics & economics in action Jennifer Gibson, PhD University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics Craig Mitton, PhD.
Pharmacovigilance Programme of India
CHALLENGES FOR PRAGMATIC TRIALS IN EUROPE Donna A. Messner, PhD.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
1 Reconciliation of Economic Arguments and Clinical Practice Monday November 4, 2002 ISPOR, Rotterdam Jan Busschbach PhD, –Department of Medical Psychology.
To fund or not to fund: A generalized decision-making model for health care resource allocation PRIORITIES 2010 The 8th Biennial Conference of the International.
Introduction to MAST Kristian Kidholm Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Ethics in Quality Improvement Quality Academy Cohort 6 Melanie Rathgeber MERGE Consulting.
Workshop The science and methodologies behind HTA, diversity and commonality across the EU Achieving more patient centred HTA in different countries.
The Practical Art of Endpoint Selection: Industry Perspectives A View from the Pharma Industry of the FDA Guidance on PROs Glenn A. Phillips, Ph.D. Director.
1 QALY, Burden of Disease and Budget Impact  Jan J.V. Busschbach, Ph.D.  Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands  
September 13, 2007SGH&M2B International&Training Workshop What does the European Technology Platform “Innovative Medicines initiative” offer? Vitalijs.
HTA cooperation in the EU EPF workshop Jérôme Boehm 18 May 2010.
Michael Webster (Cameco Corporation) Tamara Yankovich (IAEA, Formerly Saskatchewan Research Council) Martin Klukas (Atomic Energy of Canada Limited) IAEA.
Access to Medicine Index Problem Statement Long-standing debate about: What is the role of the pharmaceutical industry in access to medicines? Where are.
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
1 Sustainable Development Assessment: A formalized approach initiated in Tunisia Rafik MISSAOUI (APEX-ALCOR)
Adaptive Licensing UK. Content What is adaptive licensing? Draft criteria for pilot candidate selection EMA Road Map 2015 and work programme 2012 UK perspective.
THE EVIDENCE SANDWICH MODEL Dr. Soumyadeep Bhaumik BioMedical Genomics Centre, Kolkata Research priority setting exercises:
WHO GUIDANCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EVIDENCE-BASED VACCINE RELATED RECOMMENDATIONS August 2011.
Preliminary classification of proposals by the CEWG Proposals for innovative financing: Discussing the work to-date of WHO’S Consultative Expert Working.
“Doing Double Duty” Collecting Data for FDA and CMS in the Same Study Medical Device Regulatory & Compliance Congress March 30, 2006 Donald P. Conway,
Portfolio Committee for Health Medicines and Related Substances Amendment Bill (06/08/08) IMSA represents Research Based Pharmaceutical Companies.
Introduction to the Meeting Introduction to the Meeting Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee November 17-18,
How to weight cost effectiveness in appraisal NVTAG / CVZ course: The appraisal process, work in progress 22th of April 2009 Jan van Busschbach.
Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) Risk Management Public Workshop Day 1 - April 9, 2003 Risk Assessment in Drug and Biological Development Joanna.
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK.
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Site Visit Introduction Kathryn M. Carbone, M.D. Associate Director for Research.
1 PRIORITY MEDICINES FOR EUROPE AND THE WORLD Barriers to Pharmaceutical Innovation Richard Laing EDM/PAR WHO.
Health Technology Assessment for Pharmaceuticals and New Medical Technologies - Where are we now? The industry perspective Jenny Hughes, Director, Vaccines.
Integrating Qualitative Research Into Health Technology Assessment in Canada The CADTH Experience Laura Weeks, PhD Scientific Advisor Kristen.
The HTA-Adoption (missing) Link for Medical Devices: Observations to Date Daria O’Reilly PhD Associate Professor, Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics,
Joint Non-Prescription Drugs and Pediatric Advisory Committee Meeting October 18-19, 2007 Considerations for Extrapolation of Efficacy from Adults to Children.
Gwendolyn Ryals, Look at Me Artwork from The Creative Center Janey Shin, Director, Real World Evidence Government Affairs and Market Access CADTH Symposium.
Connected Health View from Scotland Prof George Crooks OBE Dublin November 2014.
Coaching model for Person Centred Care “Person to Partner model”
Patient Engagement in Drug Development: Experiences, Good Practices and Lessons Learned Lana Skirboll VP Science Policy Sanofi October 28, 2016, National.
Health Technology Assessment
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
STEP INto Healthcare Programme
Data Managers’ Forum What’s in it for us?
Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation
Marketing Linkage starts on Day 1.
Positive Impacts of Developing Novel Endpoints Generated by Mobile Technology for Use in Clinical Trials* SPECIFIC BENEFITS   SHORT-TERM MEDIUM-TERM LONG-TERM.
Goals and documentation of quality decision-making practices
Figure 4 Precision prescribing
Issues in Hypothesis Testing in the Context of Extrapolation
HTA in the Region Reflections on the way forward
The slide shows the seven key steps that make up a systematic approach to benefit-risk assessment for medicines. Source: The CIRS Benefit-Risk Research.
Joint BES/BBS Seminar Patient Preference Studies – Introduction
A PILOT STUDY EXAMINING CRITERIA USED TO SELECT DRUGS FOR HOSPITAL, PROVINCIAL AND NATIONAL FORMULARIES Robertson J, Newby DA, Pillay T, Walkom EJ The.
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
LHIN Service Change Planning
An Agency Perspective on Plain Language Summaries of Publications
Presentation transcript:

Developing a multi-criteria approach for drug reimbursement decision making: an initial step forward Francois Dionne- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation Farzad Ali- Pfizer

Plan 1. Why this initial step 2. How was the work done 3. Where do we stand now 4. What’s next

Why this initial step Industry is evolving PAST Regulatory Need PRESENT Regulatory Need Payer Need

What could HTA/Payers consider? Cost-Effectiveness Safety Efficacy (Comparator, endpoint) Patient Preference Ethical and equity consideration Budget Impact & Affordability Unmet need $ Burden of Disease Reward future innovation (dynamic efficiency) Severity Price

How was the work done Two workshops- November 2013, April 2014 Key stakeholders involved Report is a summary of the discussions

Where do we stand now Overarching context Seven guiding principles Ten criteria Dionne F, Mitton C, Dempster B, Lynd LD. Developing a multi-criteria approach for drug reimbursement decision making: an initial step forward. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2015;22(1):e Epub 2015 Feb 12.

What’s next The next steps involve: Finalization of the criteria selection Refinement of the criteria definitions to ensure clarity and minimize potential overlap between criteria Criteria weights have to be set, and each criterion needs a rating scale Finally, the completed framework should be tested for validity with some past submissions to examine the robustness of the entire rating tool