Plans for Reporting Results and Performance Level Setting The Second Annual New Jersey Leadership Summit January 21, 2015 Jeffrey Nellhaus Chief of Assessment,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Field Testing Testing the Test March PARCC Consortium 2 Governed by the education chiefs in the states.
Advertisements

Establishing Performance Standards for PARCC Assessments Initial Discussion PARCC Governing Board Meeting April 3,
What’s New in PARCC: What ELC Members Need to Know … and Share with You.
PARCC Top 20 If you want to follow along, go to.. About PARCC PARCC Top 20
Field Tests … Tests of the test questions Jeff Nellhaus, PARCC, Inc. Louisiana Common Core Implementation Conference February 19,
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers June 2011.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Governing Board & Advisory Committee on College Readiness Special Joint Session College- and Career-Ready Determination Policy and Policy-Level Performance.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers Outline of PARCC Information *Parent/Student Resources, are noted at the end of this.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core Summer Institutes 1.
PARCC’s Online Score Report Designs Jeff Nellhaus, Chief of Assessment PARCC, Inc. December 8, 2014.
PARCC Assessment Math Shifts Becky Justus Math Teacher Greene County Tech Junior High PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member.
Background 2Achieve | 2013 Closing the Expectations Gap  This is the eighth year that Achieve has surveyed all 50 states and reported on state progress.
PARCC Information Meeting FEB. 27, I Choose C – Why We Need Common Core and PARCC.
PARCC Overview Lee County School District January 2013.
College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) December
New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC Mathematics Summative Assessment March 2013.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Higher Education Update State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) Annual.
PARCC Consortium 1 AR CO IL LA MA MS NM NY OH TN MD NJ RI Governing Board States DC 2010 Governing members: Governing members: Administering.
Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape Melissa Fincher, Ph.D. Associate Superintendent for Assessment and Accountability Georgia Department for Education.
0 PARCC Performance Level Setting Place your logo here.
Fall Preview for Higher Education Leaders Sue Lane, Senior Advisor to the Commissioner for P-16 Access and Alignment, Massachusetts Department of Higher.
PARCC Performance Level Setting
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION DECEMBER 8, 2015.
Fall Preview for District Leaders Angela Chamness, Division Administrator, Illinois State Board of Education Jeff Nellhaus, Parcc Inc.’s Chief of Assessment.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE River Edge School District December 16, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.
Are You PARCC Ready? An Update from the Consortium Lesley Muldoon, Chief of Staff, PARCC March 21, 2014.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE TINTON FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 14, 2015.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Race to the Top Assessment August 2, 2011 Patrick Rooney.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ROXBURY SCHOOL DISTRICT JANUARY 4, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ESSEX FELLS SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 16, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE POMPTON LAKES PUBLIC SCHOOLS JANUARY 5, 2016.
R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC S CHOOLS PARCC S CORE R EPORTS FOR P ARENTS J ANUARY 12, 2016 Janet Seabold.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HACKETTSTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS JANUARY 20, 2016.
Superintendent Report September 22, Ground rules  Every challenge is real & unique  The experts are in the room  We absolutely can find solutions.
Measuring College and Career Readiness 2015 PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE EDGEWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEANOR VAN GELDER SCHOOL.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
Policy Definitions, Achievement Level Descriptors, and Math Achievement Standards.
PARENT UNIVERSITY: Preparing Your Child for Success Presented by: Dr. Alicia Scelso, Principal, Pequannock Township High School Richard M. Hayzler, Principal,
PARCC 2.0 Parent Presentation Presented by: Dr. Cynthia Pritchett.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level AzMERIT Update Wendy Davy, Director.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Year One Belleville Public schools January 25, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS DECEMBER 16, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE NETCONG SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 15, 2015 Dr. Gina Cinotti, CSA.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee January 11, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Parent Information for PARCC January 2016
Spring 2015 Verona PARCC Results: Year One Wednesday, March 16 7:00-8:00 p.m. VHS Learning Commons.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
School Test Coordinators Presented by: Dr. Cynthia Pritchett November 12, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016 ADMINISTRATIONS 1.
Score Reports and Resources for Educators. ✓ Determine whether students are college- and career-ready or “on track” ✓ Provide tools to assess student.
Project Update: Next-generation MCAS
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Advanced Placement & PARCC Results
Paulsboro School District
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Parent Academy for Student Success (PASS)
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
Paulsboro School District
Presentation transcript:

Plans for Reporting Results and Performance Level Setting The Second Annual New Jersey Leadership Summit January 21, 2015 Jeffrey Nellhaus Chief of Assessment, PARCC, Inc.

1.Priorities Provide a brief review of the priorities that drive PARCC 2.Reports of Results You will become knowledgeable about the kinds of metrics and reports that will be used to report the results of the PARCC assessments next fall 3.Performance Level Setting (aka standard setting) You will be knowledgeable about the process PARCC intends to conduct this summer to identify the threshold scores for each of its five performance levels Objectives for this morning … 2

PARCC Consortium in AR CO IL LA MA MS NM NY OH TN MD NJ RI Governing Board States DC Administering the test in 12 members 5 million students Nearly 15% of students in grades 3-11 nationally About 3 in 4 will take the tests on computer

Develop tests worth taking Texts worth reading Essays worth writing Problems worth solving Accessible to all students Goals … Report results worth using Valid Reliable Timely Actionable 4

Determine whether students are college- and career-ready or “on track” Provide tools to assess student learning and support instruction during the school year Report comparable results across schools, districts and member states Generate data, including growth metrics, for accountability uses Priority Purposes Use technology to increase student access and engagement, and create efficiencies 5

PARCC Assessment System 6

Draft Score Report Designs “Results Worth Using” 7

PARCC Score Report Design Study PARCC conducted a 5-month, multi-phase Score Report Design Study to establish priorities for the kinds of data the reports should include and how they should be presented. Stakeholders providing input included: Teachers and Administrators (Central Office and Building) Parents Higher Education Representatives PARCC state education leadership PARCC Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) 8

Data Management & Reporting System PARCC score reports will be available to local educators online through its interactive web-based Data Management and Reporting System, and to parents via a printed student reports PARCC’ web-based system will provide authorized users to customize reports using the following “filters” 9 Student School District State PARCC Year Subject Type of Test Grade Student Group Overall Scores Status Scores Growth Scores Sub-Scores Item Level Scores

Performance Levels Math ELA/L Scale Scores Mathematics ELA/L Reading Writing Sub-Scores Whether the student’s performance in the sub- category was At/Above, Near, or Below the performance of students who scored “just Level 4” overall in the content area Metrics for Reporting Results At the level, student the number of points earned At the school level, the average number of points earned by all the students in the school who took the item. Item Scores

Draft of Individual Student Report 11

Draft of Student Roster - Sub-Scores 12

Draft of Student Roster – Item Scores 13

Draft School by Grade Summary Report 14

Draft District by School Summary Report 15

Draft State by District Summary Report 16

Draft PARCC by State Summary Report 17

Performance Level Setting 18

PARCC will report results using five performance levels (names under discussion) Students performing at Levels 4 or 5 on Algebra II, Integrated Math 3, or ELA/L grade 11 assessments will earn a College- and Career-Ready Determination Public colleges and universities in PARCC states have agreed to allow students who have been accepted and have earned CCR Determinations to enter directly into credit-bearing courses without remediation PARCC Performance Levels 19

Performance Level Setting: What is it? 20 Use Performance Level Descriptors & Data from Research Identify Threshold Scores Five PARCC Performance Levels

Who will participate? High School Panels (6) Grade 3-4 Panel (2) Grade 5-6 Panel (2) Grade 7-8 Panel (2) Performance Level Setting 21 K-12 educatorsPostsecondary faculty Business peopleCommunity members Grade-Span Panels Each Panel will Include 20 Participants

Schedule of Performance Level Setting Events 22 PARCC Performance Level Setting Schedule Panel Start DateEnd Date Subject/Grade Mathematics Panels ELA/Literacy Panels Dry Run5/21/20155/28/2015Algebra II and Integrated 3Grade 11 High School7/27/20157/31/2015 Algebra I and Integrated 1 Geometry and Integrated 2 Algebra II and Integrated 3 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grades 7–88/17/20158/21/2015Grades 7 and 8 Grades 3–68/24/20158/28/2015 Grades 5 and 6 Grades 3 and 4 Grades 5 and 6 Grades 3 and 4

Performance Level Setting: What Process Will be Used? PARCC will Use an Evidence-Based Process The process combines expert judgment with data from research The process will generate threshold scores that – Reflect PARCC’s performance level descriptors (PLDs) – Are consistent with the results reported by other well-regarded state, national and international assessment programs Because comparability is a priority, every state will adopt the same threshold scores 23

Performance Level Setting: Training Panelists will: Practice with online tutorial Take the computer-based assessment Review the performance level descriptors (PLDs) Write “borderline” performance level descriptors (PLDs) Practice with the process 24

Proposed Performance Level Setting Method 25 Yes/No Method (proposed) Review test items Answer the question: Based on the PLDs, would a student performing at Level X be likely to answer the item correctly? Impact data Impact data includes: Empirical data from research Judgments of other panelists % of students performing at each level % who got item correct Multiple Rounds After an initial round of review, panelists discuss their judgments, are given certain impact data and conduct a second round of review, After the second round, panelists discuss their judgments again, are given additional data and conduct a third and final round.

Grade 3 Sample Item and PLDs Grade 3 Math : Sub-Claim A The student solves problems involving the Major Content for the grade/course with connections to the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Level 5: Distinguished Command Level 4: Strong Command Level 3: Moderate Command Level 2: Partial Command Time 3.MD MD.1-2 Tells, writes and measures time to the nearest minute. Creates two-step real world problems involving addition and subtraction of time intervals in minutes. Tells, writes and measures time to the nearest minute. Solves two–step word problems involving addition and subtraction of time intervals in minutes. Tells, writes and measures time to the nearest minute. Solves one-step word problems involving addition or subtraction of time intervals in minutes. Tells, writes and measures time to the nearest minute. Solves one-step word problems involving addition or subtraction of time intervals in minutes, with scaffolding, such as a number line diagram. 26 Patricia needs to read for 120 minutes each week. She read for 26 minutes on Monday. She read for 39 minutes on Tuesday. She read for 38 minutes on Thursday. How many more minutes does Patricia need to read this week? minutes Click on the answer box and type in a number. Backspace to erase.

Research to Inform the Performance Level Setting Process Research Questions – What percentage of students are likely to be college- and career-ready, according to PARCC’s definition? – What percentage of students are likely to be on track to college and career readiness at earlier grades? Two studies to inform performance level setting 27 Postsecondary Educators Judgment Study Benchmark Study SAT ACT NAEP TIMSS PISA

Performance Level Setting Timeline 28

Sign up for the PARCC Updates newsletter at Sign up for the PARCC Updates newsletter at me Follow me on Follow us on Visit our website Sign up for the PARCC Updates newsletter on our website Updates and more information 29