ALDOT HSIP FUNDING OPPORTUNTIES ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF SAFETY OPERATIONS SONYA BAKER TIMOTHY BARNETT MAY 13, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Description and Needs Lincoln Way Widening Addition of a center-turn lane and safety improvements to the grade and horizontal alignment. Needs.
Advertisements

Strategic Highway Safety Plan/Developing Local Road Safety Plans Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Safety.
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
HFST Council Meeting FHWA Update Frank Julian Federal Highway Administration Resource Center - Safety and Design Team August, ATSSA Mid Year.
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
Cost Estimation System Tool
A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
Incorporating Safety into the Transportation Planning Process 62 nd Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 23, 2013.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Implementation Plan.
Data Analysis and Use 3-1 NLTAPA Joint Safety Work Group Webinar November 18, 2013.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Highway Safety Provisions Elizabeth Alicandri FHWA.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Module Use research and appropriate methods for selecting effective countermeasures and targeting diverse cultural and geographic populations. Countermeasure.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E. Traffic Investigations Engineer, ODOT February 26, 2015.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE). Outline  Background  ICE Process  Impacts  Current Status.
From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
Mid-States Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference Guan Xu, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Design.
2009 ACEC/ODOT CONFERENCE ODOT’S 1R PROGRAM Liz Hunt, P.E. ODOT Pavement Services Engineer.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
1 Toward Zero Deaths: A National Strategy for Highway Safety Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration United States.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
Louisiana Local Road Safety Program
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
1 Update Update MnDOT’s County Roadway Safety Plans CTS Transportation Research Conference May 23, 2012 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
The Safety Problem Is Global The Safety Solution Is Local and Personal Business of Saving Lives.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
US 421 Centerline Rumble Strips in Chatham Co. Renee B. Roach, P.E. and Al Grandy May 2, 2007.
Jason J. Siwula, PE – Safety Engineer HSIP HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT SIGNING.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Advancing Safety through SAFETEA-LU Michael Halladay FHWA Office of.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Oregon’s All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Zahidul Siddique, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Oregon Department of Transportation October 26, st International.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
1 Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements (ELCSI) Pooled Fund Study Roya Amjadi, Highway Research Engineer FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Research Center 10/24/08.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) GRANTS Presented By: Patrick V. DeChellis Deputy Director Los Angeles County Department.
Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok,
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Road Safety Audits Road School, 2011 Rick Drumm, P.E. Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Presented to presented by Alabama Department of Transportation April 8, 2016 The Alabama Transportation Planner’s Guide to Safety Data Access and Documentation.
SCDOT Highway Safety Program
Highway Safety Improvement Program
Public Information Meeting NW 100th Street Reconstruction Project
ViDA Software Overview
Moving Maryland Toward Zero Deaths
SCOHTS Meeting June 15-17, 2011.
Traffic Study Presented by Keith Wenners, pe, ptoe
Highway Safety Improvement Program
SCOHTS Meeting June 15-17, 2011.
Clark County, WA Safety Management Program
Presentation transcript:

ALDOT HSIP FUNDING OPPORTUNTIES ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF SAFETY OPERATIONS SONYA BAKER TIMOTHY BARNETT MAY 13, 2015

ALDOT HSIP FUNDING OPPORTUNITES Objectives What is the HSIP? What type of projects are eligible/ineligible? What is the application process? – Application Details – Project Sponsors Responsibility – HSIP Application Flow Chart/Process Summary/Next Steps – Additional Training available

WHAT IS HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP)?

Objective of HSIP MAP-21 continued the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) as a core federal-aid program. The goal of the program is to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The program requires a “data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety on all public roads that focuses on performance”.

Federal HSIP Requirements Under 23 USC 148(c)(1), to obligate HSIP funds, a State must: -Develops, implements, and updates a strategic highway safety plan (SHSP) that identifies and analyzes highway safety problems and opportunities. -Produces a program of projects or strategies to reduce identified safety problems; and -Evaluates the SHSP on a regularly recurring basis.

Alabama Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) 2 nd Edition 2012 SHSP Emphasis Areas Driver Behavioral Crashes Infrastructure Countermeasures Legislative Initiative Traffic Safety Information Systems Safety Stakeholder Community

SHSP Infrastructure Countermeasures Category of HSIP Projects Systemic Safety Improvements – Installation of Rumble Stripes – Horizontal Curve Resigning – Shoulder Widening – Widening of Inside and Outside Shoulders on Horizontal Curves – Signage and Markings Non-Systemic Improvements – Safety Improvements that DO NOT fail into the broad safety improvements categories – Based on Benefit to Cost(B/C) Ratio

Examples of Types of HSIP Projects GEOMETRIC COUNTERMEASURES – Offset Left Turn and Right Turn Lanes – Delineation – Left Turn and Right Turn Traffic Control and Geometric Improvements – Passing Lanes – Roundabouts TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE COUNTERMEASURES – Intersection illumination – Signage – Upgraded pedestrian crossings

Examples of Types of HSIP Projects ROADSIDE AND ROADWAY DEPARTURE COUNTERMEASURES – Installation of Rumble Stripes – Horizontal Curve Resigning – Shoulder Widening – Installation of Guardrail

HSIP “Expanded” Eligible Projects Roundabouts Offset Left-turn and Right-Turn Lanes Construction and Operational Improvement on High Risk Rural Roads Bicycle & Pedestrian Countermeasures Safety Assessments – Road Safety Assessments (RSA) – Safety and Operational Studies for high crash corridors Non-infrastructure projects – Public Relations Activities – Enhanced Enforcements – Improvement in the collection and analysis of crash data Non-infrastructure projects – Public Relations Activities – Enhanced Enforcements – Improvement in the collection and analysis of crash data

INELIGIBLE HSIP PROJECT ACTIVITIES Work deemed to be a highway maintenance activity Grade separation projects Major horizontal or vertical realignments Major drainage improvements Major utility relocations Projects requiring extensive right-of-way acquisitions Work zone activities necessary for the management of the construction site during construction

HSIP APPLICATION DETAILS

Overview of HSIP Application Th e HSIP Project Application Form contains the following sections: Section I: Project Sponsor Information Section II: Project Location and Description Section III: Risk Narrative Section IV: Traffic and Crash Data Section V: Proposed Improvement Action(s) Section VI: Project Phase Costs Section VII: Benefit/Cost Ratio Calculation It is critically important that the application form contain accurate and relevant data, analysis, and other supporting information to “make the case” for the proposed project.

HSIP APPLICATION DETAILS Section I: Project Sponsor Information – Contact Information Section II: Project Location and Description – Proposed Project Limits – Functional Classification – OSO Identified High Risk study – Existing Traffic Control Devices Section III: Risk Narrative – Description of Safety Countermeasures – Sketches, Photos, Articles, Collision Diagrams, etc.

HSIP APPLICATION DETAILS – Section IV: Traffic and Crash Data Review and Analysis of Crash Data – Crash Types (Run Off Road, Side Swipe, Head On, etc.) – Crash Severity (Fatality, Injuries, PDO) AADT – Approach AADT (Intersections) Length and Width of Roadway (Segments) Functional Classification Any previous Safety Studies – (not all inclusive )

HSIP APPLICATION DETAILS Section V: Proposed Improvement Action(s) – Proposed Countermeasures – Crash Reduction Factors (CRFs) Estimate of the Percentage of Crashes Reduction (all crashes, targeted crashes) per Countermeasure – Most common CRFs are included in the application as a guide – Service Life per Countermeasures

Alabama CRF Guide

HSIP APPLICATION Section VI: Project Phase Costs – Preliminary Engineering – Utilities and ROW Cost (minimal cost) – Construction Section VII: Benefit/Cost Ratio Calculation (automatically calculated when the other sections are inputted)

Completing HSIP Applications Address ALL checklist items for completeness Submit application as directed in HSIP manual Application must be signed by PE Responsibility of Project Sponsor(for approved projects) – Comment supporting matching funds (90% Federal/10% Local) – Comply to Federal Regulations, including providing information for annual HSIP Report – Projects that are not progressing may be deleted from the program

HSIP Project Process OSO Manages the HSIP Program Regions Manage HSIP Projects ALDOT Region Submits Reviewed Project Application to OSO 5. OSO Completes Technical Review6. OSO Makes Funding Decision Project Sponsor Completes HSIP Application (Data Collection and Analysis) 3. Submit to ALDOT Region Office 4. Review by ALDOT Region Office Project Sponsor Becomes Familiar with the ALDOT HSIP Project Process 1. Review OSO Website/OSO Training 2. Review Alabama SHSP

Project Selection HSIP Project Priority Criteria Assigned Points Proposed Weight Range of Values Project Location 5 = project located at a high- risk location established through a safety study (intersection or segment) 0 = project not located at a high-risk location 5 0 to 25 Composite Benefit/Cost Ratio (B/C) for Proposed Project Value of the B/C ratio times the B/C value Ease of Project Delivery 5 = Relatively easy/straightforward 2 = Some potential risks 0 = Likely to have significant risks 5 0 to 25 Crash Severity Potential 5 = High potential as assessed by OSO 0 = Low potential as assessed by OSO 50 to 25 TOTAL POINTS: To be determined by OSO

SUMMARY The proposed project must address a stated goal(s) of the Alabama SHSP There must be a documented description of the safety issue(s) along with supporting data and quantitative and/or qualitative information on the proposed safety countermeasures. A project sponsor(s) must be identified who is willing to implement the project according to Federal and ALDOT guidance and requirements.

Next Step: Upcoming HSIP Training!! Attend the upcoming HSIP Training, Gresham Smith, along with Dr. Dan Turner – Thursday, May 21, 2015 from 8 to 12 PM Central Office in Montgomery, Conference Room 5 and 6 Teleconference at ALDOT Region Offices – Can’t make it? It will be video recorded and made available on OSO website!!! – Applications will be taken year round starting in July/August 2015 Attend the upcoming HSIP Training, Gresham Smith, along with Dr. Dan Turner – Thursday, May 21, 2015 from 8 to 12 PM Central Office in Montgomery, Conference Room 5 and 6 Teleconference at ALDOT Region Offices – Can’t make it? It will be video recorded and made available on OSO website!!! – Applications will be taken year round starting in July/August 2015

Questions? Sonya Baker Safety Engineering Manager (334) Timothy Barnett, P.E., P.T.O.E. Safety Operations Engineer (334)