Eleven-Year Trends in Division I Athletics Finances.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Books Program Performance Review Books Subcommittee Meeting 5 January 2010 Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, Florida.
Advertisements

Books Program Performance Review Karen Rosenblum Books Subcommittee Meeting 6 January 2009.
Self-employed Evidence base Purpose This slide-pack aims to provide a broad evidence-base on self- employment in the UK. Drawn predominantly from.
Key Performance Indicators for the Junior Resource Sector: Q Update Prepared by Mike Doggett August 27, 2014.
Auditor of Public Accounts Update Bill Cole, Deputy Auditor Auditor of Public Accounts May 8, 2006.
1 Medicaid Reporting and Trend Review Department of Social Services Division of Financial Services October 10, 2014.
Together, We Make a Difference Brewer Direct Inc Nationwide Rescue Mission Donor Performance Benchmark Study.
Arkansas Higher Education Financial Condition Report A Report to the Arkansas Higher Education Coordinating Board October 30, 2009.
The Republic of the Marshall Islands and other Island Areas A Comparative Analysis of Selected Demographic, Social & Economic Indicators May 2003.
FACTORS INFLUENCING COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT REVENUES By: Chad D. McEvoy, Alan L. Morse, and Stephen L. Shapiro Presented by: Dion Doucet.
“THE KITCHEN SHOPS” FINANCIAL ANALYSIS June 2011.
Gross Domestic Product
Messiah College Institutional Planning & Finance May 30, 2007 Understanding Higher Ed Finance.
Project Earnings and Cash Flows 2/02/06. Investment decision revisited Acceptable projects are those that yield a return greater than the minimum acceptable.
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 12 Reporting and Interpreting the Statement of Cash.
How Does Ability to Speak English Affect Earnings?
Time for a Turnaround: Facing Fiscal Reality in New York State Citizens Budget Commission.
1. Statistics 2. Frequency Table 3. Graphical Representations  Bar Chart, Pie Chart, and Histogram 4. Median and Quartiles 5. Box Plots 6. Interquartile.
Success in College Football and its Effects on Incoming Freshmen and Overall Academics Cameron Jean, Department of Marketing, College of Business, & Honors.
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 17 The Distribution of Income.
A Brief Introduction to GIC’s System of Retiree Health Insurance OPEB Commission April 5, 2012 Catharine Hornby, General Counsel, GIC.
Aim: Money Matters – Credit Cards Course: Math Literacy Aim: How does money matter? Installment buying – Credit cards! Do Now: A Blazer with a price of.
™ Transforming the Cost Base: 2009 Update 22 October 2009 Finance and Strategy Practice Economic Analysis and Decision Support Group.
School Funding Formula (Agenda item 7). Overview Provide an overview of the formula headlines Final schools funding formula 2015/16 Base Formula.
Macalester College Summary: Proposed Operating Budget April 2009.
Financial Framework. Financial Framework © 1993 Gemini Consulting. Reproduction with Express Permission Only. XXXX, Inc./Gemini Approach Worked.
May 06th, Chapter - 7 INFORMATION PRESENTATION 7.1 Statistical analysis 7.2 Presentation of data 7.3 Averages 7.4 Index numbers 7.5 Dispersion from.
Chapter 17 The Distribution of Income McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 13 Measuring and Evaluating Financial Performance PowerPoint.
1 Presentation Overview The national economic recession has had significant impacts on the Rio Rancho economy, which can be seen in employment levels,
dp 2007 Farm Financial Survey Highlights dp 2 Publication: E ISBN: Catalogue: A36-1/2-2007E-PDF Project: dp.
Workforce Profiling Statistics Gender Split Across College 2007/08 The above chart illustrates a fairly even gender split across the College,
TENNESSEE BOARD OF REGENTS FINANCIAL OVERVIEW JANUARY 19, 2010 Presentation to the Association of Government Accountants’ Winter Seminar.
Managerial Accounting Wild and Shaw Third Edition Wild and Shaw Third Edition McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All.
AGB/NACUBO Compliance Questionnaire Study Selected Results
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Slide 1 Preliminary Press Releases Releasing Financial Information Quarterly and Annual Reports Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
>  Slide 1 Coaching Insights Coaching statistics and analysis 2015/16.
STAFFING & COMPENSATION STUDY How Organizations Staff Their Content Marketing Endeavors 2011.
Additional analysis of poverty in Scotland 2013/14 Communities Analytical Services July 2015.
MANAGING NONINTEREST INCOME AND NONINTEREST EXPENSE Chapter 5 Bank Management 5th edition. Timothy W. Koch and S. Scott MacDonald Bank Management, 5th.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Slide Financial Statements Analysis and Interpretation.
Home sales in Sandy Springs are -21.4% lower year-to-date in 2008 than in 2007 Sales through 3Q 2008 were -42.1% lower than in Q 2008 sales were.
Indian and Northern Affaires indiennes Affairs Canada et du Nord Canada First Nation and Inuit Community Well-Being : Describing Historical Trends ( )
Chapter 4: Trends in Hospital Financing. Trends in Hospital Financing Chartbook 2000 Overall Financial Performance The aggregate hospital total margin.
Poverty in Scotland and the UK Communities Analysis Division– September 2015 While relative poverty in Scotland fell in 2013/14, it remained flat in the.
IPERS Update SAI Annual Conference August 3, 2011.
Population Trends Why do populations grow and shrink?
Brandon Magliocco & Dr. David Schaffer  Economics  Univ. of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Changing Wage Rates Among Men and Women in the U.S. by Age Cohort and.
PROJECT TITLE Authors: A, B, C. Advisor: X, Y. SUBTITLE (TRANSITION SLIDE)
2 The Athletic Department desires to improve its athletic programs to enhance the complete student experience. Athletics is committed to helping to provide.
Financial Analysis. Used by decision makers to interpret accounting or financial information We will focus on a few common methods of financial analysis:
TRENDS IN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND BROKERAGE A Presentation to NARPM April 11, 2016.
Public Hearing: Fiscal Year 2017 Recommended Operating Budget City Council Meeting, May 9, 2016 Item 7.
UMKC ATHLETICS Faculty Senate 3/21/2017.
WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS
Budget Development Discussion
Statistics and Probability-Part 7
WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS
APPA: THE ASSOCIATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION FACILITIES OFFICERS Executive Summary, FINAL March 31, 2015 Audit.
A joint survey effort between Duke University and CFO Magazine
Meeting of the Presidents of the Conferences September 2016
Aggregate Overview of Extension District Finances in Iowa
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
Example Exercise 3-10 Vertical Analysis Income Statement Balance Sheet
FISCAL YEAR 2015 – 2016 First Interim
Charting Trends in Independent School
Current Status of NCAA Financial Dashboard and Reporting Systems
APPA: THE ASSOCIATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION FACILITIES OFFICERS Executive Summary, Preliminary Draft March 31, 2013 Audit.
Statistics and Probability-Part 7
2016 Completions Preliminary Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Eleven-Year Trends in Division I Athletics Finances

Data The data used here were collected from the NCAA Financial Reporting System for fiscal years through Significant changes were made to the process beginning with the data collection in (e.g., definitional changes, agreed-upon procedures, etc.), so previous data are not comparable. When the data are divided into quartiles for this presentation, those quartiles are based on 2014 total expenses within each subdivision. 345 Division I institutions provided data to the NCAA Financial Information System.

Generated Revenue Sources Ticket sales NCAA and conference distribution Contributions from alumni and others Other: –Guarantees and options –Third party support –Concessions –Broadcast rights –Royalties / advertising / sponsorship –Sports camps –Endowment / investment income

Allocated Revenue Sources Allocated support: ‒ Student activity fees ‒ Direct government support ‒ Direct institutional support ‒ Indirect institutional support

Summary Data for Division I By Subdivision

Median (and Range) 2014 Revenues and Expenses for Division I Institutions By Subdivision FBSFCS Division I – No MFB Generated Revenues $44,455,000 ($5 million to $193.9 million) $4,137,000 ($659,000 to $20.9 million) $2,667,000 ($456,000 to $22.3 million) Total Revenues $62,275,000 ($11.2 million to $165.7 million) $15,315,000 ($3.2 million to $43.9 million) $14,413,000 ($2.3 million to $44.5 million) Total Expenses $63,956,000 ($11.4 million to $146.8 million) $15,154,000 ($3.9 million to $43.8 million) $14,322,000 ($3.9 million to $44.5 million) Net Generated Revenue ($14,734,000) (($49.0 million) to $23.6 million) ($11,041,000) ($2.1 million to 35.7 million) ($11,245,000) ($1.5 million to $37.4 million)

Median (and Range) 2014 Revenues and Expenses for Division I Institutions By Subdivision AG*Other FBS Generated Revenues $81,660,000 ($37.2 million to $193.9 million) $11,895,000 ($5 million to $50.2 million) Total Revenues $87,637,000 ($50.7 million to $196 million) $29,874,000 ($12.1 million to $71.5 million) Total Expenses $87,292,000 ($50.5 million to $154.1 million) $29,797,000 ($12.2 million to $71.4 million) Net Generated Revenue ($3,433,000) (($37.9 million) to $83.5 million) ($18,267,000) ($3.3 million to $40.9 million) The “AG” category includes institutions that are members of the five Autonomous Governance conferences.

Summary of 2014 FBS Data Large disparities seen in both revenues and expenses across FBS institutions. Median institution shows negative generated net revenue of approximately $14.7 million. The median generated revenues increased by 6.1 percent, and the median total expenses increased by 2.8 percent since Generated revenues exceeded expenses in 2014 at 24 institutions. The average net positive revenue for those institutions was $11.5 million (ranged from $96,000 to $83.5 million).

Summary of 2014 FCS Data Large disparities seen in both revenues and expenses across FCS institutions (expenses ranged from approximately $3.9 to $43.8 million and revenues ranged from $3.2 to $43.9 million). The median generated revenues increased by 9.1 percent, and the median total expenses also increased by 4.6 percent since Generated revenues did not exceed expenses for any institution in The median negative net generated revenue for FCS schools is approximately $11.0 million.

Summary of 2014 No MFB Data Large disparities seen in both revenues and expenses across No MFB institutions (expenses ranged from approximately $3.9 to $44.5 million and revenues ranged from $2.3 to $44.5 million). The median generated revenues increased by 9.8 percent, and the median total expenses also increased approximately 2.1 percent since Generated revenues did not exceed expenses for any institution in The median negative net generated revenue for Division I No MFB institutions is approximately $11.2 million.

Revenue and Expense Trends from 2004 to 2014 By Subdivision

Division I Median Total Revenues By Subdivision and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : FBS = 120.7% FCS = 93.9% No MFB = 96.2%

Division I Median Generated Revenues By Subdivision and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : FBS = 94.4% FCS = 99.1% No MFB = 78.5%

Division I Median Total Expenses By Subdivision and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : FBS = 120.6% FCS = 97.0% No MFB = 99.7%

Comparison of FBS Generated Revenue and Total Expense Trends (2004 – 2014)

Division I Net Operating Results Excluding Allocated Support By Subdivision and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : FBS = 149.6% FCS = 86.9% No MFB = 106.3%

Division I FBS Average Positive Generated Net Revenue (PNR) for Those Schools Reporting PNR By Year *Number displayed by each data point equals number of institutions showing positive generated net revenue in that year.

Summary of 2004 – 2014 FBS Trend Data Over the 11-year period, generated revenues grew by 94.4 percent. Total expenses grew by percent. Over the past two years, generated revenues have grown by 9.5 percent while total expenses have grown by 13.7 percent. The three subdivisions show wide disparities among them in terms of median revenues and expenses. However, the median negative net revenue is relatively similar across the three subdivisions and there is a fairly narrow distribution of allocated revenue totals across the division (the medians are between $11.0 million and $14.7 million). This may indicate some consensus on the monetary value to institutions of supporting a Division I athletics program.

Summary of 2004 – 2014 FCS and No MFB Trend Data Over the 11-year period, generated revenues for FCS grew by 99.1 percent. Total expenses grew by 97.0 percent. ‒ Over the past two years, generated revenues increased by 10.3 percent and total expenses increased by 7.4 percent. Among Division I schools with no MFB, generated revenues grew by 99.1 percent over the past 11-year period. During this same time, total expenses grew by 99.7 percent. ‒ Over the past two years, generated revenues increased by 20.9 percent and total expenses increased by 10.3 percent.

Selected Findings from Dashboard Indicators By Subdivision

Division I Median Revenue Self- Sufficiency (Gen. Rev. by Total Exp.) By Subdivision and Year (2004 – 2014)

Division I Median Proportion of Total Expenses Related to Coaches’ Compensation By Subdivision and Year (2004 – 2014)

Division I Median Proportion of Total Expenses Related to Total Compensation By Subdivision and Year (2004 – 2014)

Division I Median Ratio of Athletics Expenses to Institutional Expenses By Subdivision and Year (2004 – 2014)

Division I Median Ratio of Allocated Revenues to Institutional Expenses By Subdivision and Year (2004 – 2014)

Division I Median Increase Gap* Between Athletics Expenses and Institutional Expenses By Subdivision and Year (2004 – 2014) *Increase Gap is calculated by subtracting annual percentage increase in institutional expenses from annual percentage increase in athletics expenses.

Summary of 2004 – 2014 FBS Dashboard Indicator Trend Data The median FBS institution is approximately 71.3 percent self-sufficient. This is in contrast with 27.3 and 18.6 percent levels in the other two subdivisions. Coaches’ compensation as a proportion of total expenses has remained steady over time. Total compensation as a proportion of total expenses has also remained steady over time. The median ratio of athletics expenses to institutional expenses has risen from about 4.5 percent in 2004 to almost 6 percent in In the early years of this time period, athletics expenses were growing at rates that were up to 5.0 percent faster than institutional expenses. While the past few years the rate has slowed to rate almost zero, the trend is increasing after the recent recession. In 2012 and 2013 athletics expenses were growing 4 percent to 5 percent faster than institutional expenses; however, this year that has decreased to 2 percent. The median cost per student-athlete has grown from $63,000 to $110,000.

Summary of 2004 – 2014 FCS Dashboard Indicator Trend Data The median FCS institution is approximately 27.3 percent self-sufficient. Coaches’ compensation as a proportion of total expenses has dropped from almost 20 percent at the beginning of the period to 18.7 percent in the most recent year. The median ratio of athletics expenses to institutional expenses has grown from just over 5 percent to almost 7 percent over this period. FCS institutions have the highest such ratio of the three subdivisions. In the early years of this time period, athletics expenses were growing at rates that were up to 5.0 percent faster than institutional expenses. While the past few years the rate has slowed, the trend is increasing after the recent recession, and athletics expenses increased at a rate that was about 2 percent higher than institutional expenses in the most recent year. Cost per student-athlete has grown from $20,000 to $38,800.

Summary of 2004 – 2014 No MFB Dashboard Indicator Trend Data The median Division I no MFB institution is approximately 18.6 percent self- sufficient. Coaches’ compensation as a proportion of total expenses has been fairly steady over the period (17.0 to 19.0 percent of the total expenses). The median ratio of athletics expenses to institutional expenses has grown from about 4.5 percent to over 6 percent over this period. In the early years of this time period, athletics expenses were growing at rates that were up to 5.0 percent faster than institutional expenses. While the past few years the rate has slowed, the trend is increasing after the recent recession and athletics expenses have increased 1 to 2 more quickly than institutional expenses over the past two years. Cost per student-athlete has grown from $26,000 to $45,200.

Revenue and Expense Detail for FBS Institutions By Expense Quartile

Median 2014 Revenues and Expenses for FBS Institutions By Expense Quartile Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4Overall FBS Generated Revenues $105,275,000$63,442,000$24,274,000$8,917,000 $44,455,000 Total Revenues $110,240,000$75,417,000$40,990,000$27,050,000 $62,275,000 Total Expenses $107,423,000$73,293,000$43,087,000$27,237,000 $63,956,000 Net Generated Revenue $217,000($9,897,000)($19,326,000)($17,074,000) ($14,734,000)

Division I FBS Median Generated Revenues By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : Quartile 1 = 97.8% Quartile 2 = 94.6% Quartile 3 = 76.4% Quartile 4 = 78.6%

Division I FBS Median Allocated Revenues By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : Quartile 1 = 108.1% Quartile 2 = 63.0% Quartile 3 = 190.7% Quartile 4 = 113.0%

Division I FBS Median Total Expenses By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : Quartile 1 = 118.0% Quartile 2 = 99.4% Quartile 3 = 92.4% Quartile 4 = 89.5%

Division I FBS Net Generated Revenue By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage change from : Quartile 1 = % Quartile 2 = 47.1% Quartile 3 = 144.3% Quartile 4 = 94..0%

Division I FBS Median Revenue Self- Sufficiency (Gen. Rev by Total Exp.) By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014)

2014 Top Four Revenue Categories for FBS Institutions By Expense Quartile Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4Overall FBS Category 1 (% of Total) Alumni Contributions (28%) NCAA/Conf. Distributions (26%) Direct Inst. Support (19%) Student Fees (28%) Alumni Contributions (21%) Category 2 (% of Total) Ticket Sales (26%) Alumni Contributions (19%) NCAA/Conf. Distributions (16%) Direct Inst. Support (27%) Ticket Sales (20%) Category 3 (% of Total) NCAA/Conf. Distributions (20%) Ticket Sales (19%) Ticket Sales (15%) Alumni Contributions (9%) NCAA/Conf. Distributions (20%) Category 4 (% of Total) Royalties and Sponsorships (8%) Direct Inst. Support (10%) Alumni Contributions (15%) NCAA/Conf. Distributions (8%) Direct Inst. Support (9%)

2014 Top Four Expense Categories for FBS Institutions By Expense Quartile Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4Overall FBS Category 1 (% of Total) Salaries and Benefits (35%) Salaries and Benefits (36%) Salaries and Benefits (38%) Salaries and Benefits (31%) Salaries and Benefits (35%) Category 2 (% of Total) Facilities and Maintenance (18%) Grants-in-Aid (16%) Grants-in-Aid (16%) Grants-in-Aid (24%) Grants-in-Aid (15%) Category 3 (% of Total) Grants-in-Aid (11%) Facilities and Maintenance (13%) Facilities and Maintenance (9%) Team Travel (9%) Facilities and Maintenance (14%) Category 4 (% of Total) Other Expenses (11%) Other Expenses (8%) Team Travel (8%) Facilities and Maintenance (6%) Other Expenses (9%)

Summary of 2004 – 2014 FBS Revenue and Expense Detail There are large disparities within FBS in both revenues and expenses. For instance, the median expenses in the top quartile were approximately $107.4 million, versus a median of $27.2 million in the lowest quartile. The gap between high and low seems to be widening. The lowest quartiles shows the lowest rates of growth in generated revenues; conversely, the highest quartile is growing expenses at the fastest rate. No positive growth in net generated revenue is shown. Alumni contributions is the top revenue category in the top quartile, while student fees is the top revenue generator in the lowest quartile. Salaries are the main expense items in all quartiles at approximately 35.0 percent of total expenses. Facilities expenses are second for the top quartile, for all others it is grants-in-aid.

Revenue and Expense Detail for FCS Institutions By Expense Quartile

Median 2014 Revenues and Expenses for FCS Institutions By Expense Quartile Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4Overall FCS Generated Revenues $8,170,861$5,379,164$3,360,681$2,773,864$4,136,548 Total Revenues $28,559,829$19,020,977$13,481,937$10,680,462$15,314,760 Total Expenses $27,376,170$19,020,977$13,785,163$10,580,102$15,153,704 Net Generated Revenue ($20,444,859)($13,004,523)($10,302,648)($7,537,823)($11,041,239)

Division I FCS Median Generated Revenues By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : Quartile 1 = 127.8% Quartile 2 = 136.0% Quartile 3 = 80.6% Quartile 4 = 153.2%

Division I FCS Median Allocated Revenues By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : Quartile 1 = 72.5% Quartile 2 = 112.3% Quartile 3 = 94.5% Quartile 4 = 112.7%

Division I FCS Median Total Expenses By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : Quartile 1 = 90.0% Quartile 2 = 113.8% Quartile 3 = 91.1% Quartile 4 = 116.1%

Division I FCS Net Generated Revenue By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage change from : Quartile 1 = 75.9% Quartile 2 = 109.2% Quartile 3 = 90.8% Quartile 4 = 107.6%

2014 Top Four Revenue Categories for FCS Institutions By Expense Quartile Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4Overall FCS Category 1 (% of Total) Direct Inst. Support (41%) Direct Inst. Support (46%) Direct Inst. Support (52%) Direct Inst. Support (43%) Direct Inst. Support (45%) Category 2 (% of Total) Student Fees (17%) Student Fees (14%) Student Fees (14%) Student Fees (21%) Student Fees (16%) Category 3 (% of Total) Indirect Inst. Support (12%) Indirect Inst. Support (9%) Indirect Inst. Support (7%) Guarantees and Options (9%) Indirect Inst. Support (9%) Category 4 (% of Total) Alumni Contributions (9%) Alumni Contributions (8%) Alumni Contributions (6%) Alumni Contributions (8%)

2014 Top Four Expense Categories for FCS Institutions By Expense Quartile Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4Overall FCS Category 1 (% of Total) Salaries and Benefits (32%) Salaries and Benefits (32%) Salaries and Benefits (32%) Grants-in-Aid (33%) Salaries and Benefits (32%) Category 2 (% of Total) Grants-in-Aid (20%) Grants-in-Aid (28%) Grants-in-Aid (32%) Salaries and Benefits (33%) Grants-in-Aid (26%) Category 3 (% of Total) Indirect Inst. Support (12%) Indirect Inst. Support (9%) Team Travel (9%) Team Travel (9%) Indirect Inst. Support (9%) Category 4 (% of Total) Direct Inst. Support (9%) Team Travel (8%) Indirect Inst. Support (7%) Other (5%) Team Travel (8%)

Summary of 2004 – 2014 FCS Revenue and Expense Detail There are large disparities within FCS in both revenues and expenses. For instance the median expenses in the top quartile were approximately $27.4 million, versus a median of $10.6 million in the lowest quartile. The gap between high and low seems to be widening. No positive growth in net generated revenue is shown. Direct institutional support is the top revenue category in all quartiles. Salaries and grants-in-aid are the top two expense items in all quartiles at approximately 32 percent of total expenses. Grants-in-aid follow salaries at 26 percent for overall expenses.

Revenue and Expense Detail for No MFB Institutions By Expense Quartile

Median 2014 Revenues and Expenses for No MFB Institutions By Expense Quartile Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4 Overall No MFB Generated Revenues $5,550,482$2,960,931$1,875,600$1,622,076$2,666,733 Total Revenues $24,374,227$16,733,183$12,549,290$9,524,138$14,413,451 Total Expenses $23,155,743$16,282,355$12,482,364$9,002,717$14,321,711 Net Generated Revenue ($17,746,301)($12,899,102)($10,481,327)($6,975,099)($11,244,847)

Division I No MFB Median Generated Revenues By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : Quartile 1 = 130.8% Quartile 2 = 70.9% Quartile 3 = 29.9% Quartile 4 = 144.7%

Division I No MFB Median Allocated Revenues By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : Quartile 1 = 113.1% Quartile 2 = 107.3% Quartile 3 = 96.7% Quartile 4 = 106.4%

Division I No MFB Median Total Expenses By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage increase from : Quartile 1 = 123.3% Quartile 2 = 110.6% Quartile 3 = 77.0% Quartile 4 = 116.8%

Division I No MFB Net Generated Revenue By Expense Quartile and Year (2004 – 2014) Percentage change from : Quartile 1 = 118.6% Quartile 2 = 119.6% Quartile 3 = 107.5% Quartile 4 = 102.6%

2014 Top Four Revenue Categories for No MFB Institutions By Expense Quartile Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4 Overall No MFB Category 1 (% of Total) Direct Inst. Support (50%) Direct Inst. Support (53%) Direct Inst. Support (44%) Direct Inst. Support (50%) Category 2 (% of Total) Indirect Inst. Support (13%) Student Fees (19%) Student Fees (22%) Student Fees (29%) Student Fees (17%) Category 3 (% of Total) Alumni Contributions (9%) Indirect Inst. Support (10%) Indirect Inst. Support (6%) Indirect Inst. Support (6%) Indirect Inst. Support (10%) Category 4 (% of Total) Student Fees (9%) Alumni Contributions (7%) Alumni Contributions (5%) Alumni Contributions (6%) Alumni Contributions (7%)

2014 Top Four Expense Categories for No MFB Institutions By Expense Quartile Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4 Overall No MFB Category 1 (% of Total) Salaries and Benefits (30%) Salaries and Benefits (33%) Salaries and Benefits (36%) Salaries and Benefits (32%) Salaries and Benefits (32%) Category 2 (% of Total) Grants-in-Aid (28%) Grants-in-Aid (29%) Grants-in-Aid (30%) Grants-in-Aid (31%) Grants-in-Aid (29%) Category 3 (% of Total) Indirect Inst. Support (13%) Indirect Inst. Support (10%) Team Travel (8%) Team Travel (10%) Indirect Inst. Support (10%) Category 4 (% of Total) Team Travel (8%) Team Travel (8%) Indirect Inst. Support (6%) Indirect Inst. Support (6%) Team Travel (8%)

Summary of 2004 – 2014 No MFB Revenue and Expense Detail There are large disparities within Division I schools without MFB in both revenues and expenses. For instance, the median expenses in the top quartile were approximately $23.2 million, versus a median of $9.0 million in the lowest quartile. The gap between high and low seems to be widening. The third quartile shows the lowest rate of growth in generated revenues; conversely, the highest quartile is growing expenses at the fastest rate. No positive growth in net generated revenue is shown. Direct institutional support is the top revenue category in all quartiles, followed by indirect institutional support in the top quartile and student fees in the bottom three quartiles. Salaries are the main expense items in all quartiles at approximately 32 percent of total expenses. Grants-in-aid follows at 29 percent for overall expenses.