SYNTHESIS OF TRANSPORTATION EXCLUSIONS TO SECTION 106 REVIEW April 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
Advertisements

Pedestrian Considerations in Work Zones… St. Peter Main Street Reconstruct.
Ecological Survey Reports The level of ESR Report is determined by the type of project and its probable level of impacts.
NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November 2014.
CR 236 Resurfacing from US 441 to I-75 30% Plans Alachua County Board of County Commissioners September 28, 2010.
Alachua County Board of County Commissioners NW 16 th AVENUE / NW 23 rd AVENUE FROM NW 57 th Terrace to NW 13 th Street.
Created by: Victor Lund, PEKen Johnson, PE, PTOE St. Louis CountyMnDOT.
1 Resurfacing and Curb Ramps. 2 FHWA’s Americans with Disabilities Act Program / Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 The primary purpose of.
Cost Estimation System Tool
Sect. 12A-2 – Accessible SW Requirements ADA Clarifications: – When are curb ramps required? – What constitutes an alteration? – Does the scope of resurfacing.
Georgia DOT Local Maintenance Improvement Grant Program Todd Long, P.E., Deputy Commissioner.
State of Morrisville Mayor Mark Stohlman July 17, 2014.
Federal Fund Exchange Training. What is the Federal Fund Exchange? This is a voluntary program in which a Local Public Agency can trade its federal obligation.
Baudette, Minnesota/Rainy River, Ontario International Bridge
WELCOME! October 28, 2013 ODOT District 1 & District 2.
PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS: TRANSPORTATION Steve Hansen, PE Director of Public Works – Liberty, MO APWA PW Institute April 8, 2014.
“ Pavement markings can enhance safety since centerlines have been shown to cut crash frequency by 29% compared to roads without them ” Wisconsin Transportation.
Borough of Madison Samson Avenue Reconstruction Engineering CY2012 Existing Conditions Underground Infrastructure Federal Aid SRTS Application Reconstruction.
March 2014 Water Resource Permitting Purpose & Need.
Section 106 Clearance Application Missouri Local Programs How to Complete the Application for Section 106 Clearance.
S.R. 256 Road Reconstruction Project From City of Austin to S.R. 203 Thursday, February 6, 2014 Austin Elementary School 6:00 p.m.
Dowell Road Widening From South of HG Truman Road To South of Bean Road Calvert County, Maryland.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Miccosukee Road Resurfacing and Re-striping Public Input Requested On-Street Parking vs Bike Lanes.
Office of Project Development Department of Highways Retreat June 12, 2008.
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Ch. 7 1.
Cross Sections CE 453 Lecture 22 Iowa DOT Design Manual Chapter 3.
Highway Maintenance & Rehabilitation
VTA Light Rail System and Safety Enhancements MTC Railroad Crossing Seminar May, 21, 2008.
SECTION 3. Centerline and Edge Line Final Rule DECEMBER 1999.
US 1 COLLEGE PARK – SEGMENT 1 FROM COLLEGE AVE/REGENTS DRIVE TO MD 193 (UNIVERSITY BLVD) Presentation to College Park City Council August 5,
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
Monroe County Transportation Projects 4 Local Agencies: Unincorporated Monroe County City of Key West City of Marathon Village of Islamorada District Six.
LAKE COUNTY DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW AND PROGRAM PRIORITIES Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Trail Funding Sources & General Information
Borough of Madison Green Avenue Reconstruction Engineering CY2012 Existing Conditions Underground Infrastructure Municipal Aid Application Reconstruction.
AAPA 2011 Study Tour – Surface Treatments #1 Surface Treatments #1.
Project Development – High Priority Segments -- ATP 2 10/29/2012 Road Surface? Paved Gravel Segment received Stars for Lane Departure Crash Density & Critical.
SR 1 BLUFFTON Public Hearing September 25, INDOT Mission: INDOT will plan, build, maintain and operate a superior transportation system enhancing.
Streamlined Environmental Requirements for Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) and Small Cells.
Paving for Progress Aaron D. Granquist, Project Manager, HR Green, Inc. Doug Wilson, Capital Improvement Project Manager, Cedar Rapids Handouts and presentations.
CAT Realignment and Reconstruction of Rt. 28A Town of Olive Ulster County, New York January 2009.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
STA Safety Project PID #76439 December 12, 2006.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Highway Design Criteria Overview April 24, 2006 David R. Dougherty, P.E.
SR 256 Road Rehabilitation Town of Austin January 18, :00pm Austin Elementary School.
1 MD 5 (Point Lookout Road) Leonardtown (Phase 1) Intersection Reconstruction At Abell and Moakley Streets Informational Meeting January 19, 2016.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Public Works. Strategic Plan Presentation Department Organization Strategic Goals relating to Public Works Department Issues.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN (STIP) Public Hearing.
2013 Roads and Sidewalk Capital Programs Roads and Parks Maintenance Department Development & Infrastructure Division December 2, 2013.
STRONG NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVE Public Works Department January 30, 2007 Agenda item 8.01.
Agenda Updates to Driveway and Sidewalk specifications and permits
European Asphalt Pavement Warranties Scan
Pavement condition index calculation
NIRPC Complete Streets Guidelines
Construction Management & Inspection
Regulation Amendment AM April 3, 2018.
Design Criteria CTC 440.
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Note: Need to update based on revisions to Ch 7 of HDM (freeway and non-freeway now covered in.
State Infrastructure Bank
Walker Street Reconstruction Project 25% Design Public Hearing
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Presentation transcript:

SYNTHESIS OF TRANSPORTATION EXCLUSIONS TO SECTION 106 REVIEW April 2015

C OLLECT AND REVIEW STATE DOT PA S AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORITIES. C OLLECT AND REVIEW STATE DOT PA S AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORITIES. D EVELOP AN EASY - TO - USE FORMAT PRESENTING INFORMATION ON EXCLUDED ACTIONS FOUND IN THE PA S AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORITIES. D EVELOP AN EASY - TO - USE FORMAT PRESENTING INFORMATION ON EXCLUDED ACTIONS FOUND IN THE PA S AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORITIES. I NTERVIEWING STATE DOT S ON THEIR APPLIED EXPERIENCES IN STREAMLINING S ECTION 106 THROUGH THE USE OF THESE EXCLUSIONS FROM FURTHER REVIEW. I NTERVIEWING STATE DOT S ON THEIR APPLIED EXPERIENCES IN STREAMLINING S ECTION 106 THROUGH THE USE OF THESE EXCLUSIONS FROM FURTHER REVIEW.

General Maintenance and Repairs  Routine roadway and roadside maintenance and repair activities within existing interchanges, medians, and adjacent frontage roads in previously disturbed areas Pavement Resurfacing, Restoration, and Replacement  Restore, rehabilitate, and/or resurface existing pavement including sealcoats, chipseal, milling, grooving, patching, etc., within the existing roadway prism  Pavement reconstruction, resurfacing, placement of sealcoats and chipseals, and/or crack filling that extends beyond the existing roadway prism Lane Additions and Widening  Widening of existing roads where additions are limited to a specified lane width (e.g., less than one half lane) or distance from the existing right-of-way (e.g., less than 20 feet); includes minor changes in road alignment  Addition of lanes within the existing right-of-way where no cultural resources or NRHP eligible sites or districts are present Shoulders  Adding new shoulders, paving or widening existing shoulders Intersection/Interchange Improvements  Intersection improvements including construction of turn and auxiliary lanes, minor realignment of on/off ramps, channelization, signage, pavement markings, etc.

M ANY PA S REQUIRE SCREENING OF ACTIONS BY A QUALIFIED CRM SPECIALIST BEFORE THE ACTION CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM FURTHER REVIEW. S OME PA S ALLOWED FOR A NON -CRM PROFESSIONAL TO MAKE THE DECISION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT AN ACTION CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM FURTHER REVIEW.

S OME PA S EXCLUDED CLASSES OF ACTIONS WITHOUT BEING SCREENED BY EITHER A CRM SPECIALIST OR NON -CRM SPECIALIST : S OME PA S EXCLUDED CLASSES OF ACTIONS WITHOUT BEING SCREENED BY EITHER A CRM SPECIALIST OR NON -CRM SPECIALIST : POTHOLE FILLING PAVEMENT MILLING SURFACE TREATMENTS TO EXISTING ROADWAYS REPAIR IN KIND OF CURBS / SIDEWALKS / STREET FURNITURE BEAM END REPAIR OF BRIDGES THAT ARE LESS THAN 50 YEARS OLD

D OES YOUR USE OF EXCLUDED ACTIONS STREAMLINE S ECTION 106 COMPLIANCE AND THE PROJECT DELIVERY PROCESS ? D OES YOUR USE OF EXCLUDED ACTIONS STREAMLINE S ECTION 106 COMPLIANCE AND THE PROJECT DELIVERY PROCESS ? W HY DOES YOUR AGENCY REQUIRE THE SCREENING OF CERTAIN ACTIONS BEFORE THEY ARE EXCLUDED FROM FURTHER S ECTION 106 REVIEW ? W HY DOES YOUR AGENCY REQUIRE THE SCREENING OF CERTAIN ACTIONS BEFORE THEY ARE EXCLUDED FROM FURTHER S ECTION 106 REVIEW ? W HY DOES YOUR AGENCY NOT REQUIRE THE SCREENING OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ? W HY DOES YOUR AGENCY NOT REQUIRE THE SCREENING OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ? W HAT IS YOUR PROCESS FOR ADDING TO OR CHANGING YOUR LIST OF EXCLUDED ACTIONS ? W HAT IS YOUR PROCESS FOR ADDING TO OR CHANGING YOUR LIST OF EXCLUDED ACTIONS ?

“… IT ALLOWS US TO QUICKLY REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PROJECTS THAT ARE INNOCUOUS TO HISTORIC RESOURCES, AND FOCUS OUR LIMITED PERSONNEL AND TIME ON PROJECTS THAT WILL HAVE EFFECTS ON HISTORIC RESOURCES. W HAT ’ S MORE, WE CAN PERMIT PROJECTS THAT HAVE A SHORT FUSE, AND RELATIVELY SIMPLE ACTIONS ( I. E. PAVING, STRIPING ) WITHOUT HASSLING THE SHPO, EXTENSIVE AND EXPENSIVE TIME OF OUR STAFF, AND IN OUR MINDS, MAKES US FEEL LIKE THE SPIRIT OF S ECTION 106 IS BEING UPHELD.”

H AVING A PA THAT IDENTIFIES ACTIONS EXCLUDED FROM FURTHER S ECTION 106 REVIEW STREAMLINES BOTH S ECTION 106 COMPLIANCE AND PROJECT DELIVERY H AVING A PA THAT IDENTIFIES ACTIONS EXCLUDED FROM FURTHER S ECTION 106 REVIEW STREAMLINES BOTH S ECTION 106 COMPLIANCE AND PROJECT DELIVERY S INCE PA S ARE NEGOTIATED AGREEMENTS, EACH STATE PA IS SOMEWHAT UNIQUE IN TERMS OF WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM FURTHER REVIEW AND HOW DECISIONS ARE MADE ON WHAT IS EXCLUDED. S INCE PA S ARE NEGOTIATED AGREEMENTS, EACH STATE PA IS SOMEWHAT UNIQUE IN TERMS OF WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM FURTHER REVIEW AND HOW DECISIONS ARE MADE ON WHAT IS EXCLUDED.