VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER: Sentencing Impact of Charging Choices

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Defining and Measuring Crime Chapter 3. To teach the social expectations of society To protect citizens from criminal harm and punish wrong doers To express.
Advertisements

Criminal Law Section 1 What Is a Crime? Section 2 Particular Crimes.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICING IN AMERICA DUTIES OF THE POLICE  4 MAJOR DUTIES Keep the peace Apprehend violators Prevent crime Provide Social Services.
Ld.5, vol.2: Chapter 1 PC 832 Lecture
CHANGES IN DWI & DRUG COURT LEGISLATION
CHAPTER 2: CRIME Area of Study 2: Criminal Law. The need for criminal law Read The need for criminal law, Definition of a crime, Elements of a crime,
BREAKOUT SESSION 2 Basic Distribution Calculations 1.
DUI AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY ART LUSSE JUNE 30, 2010 LAW & JUSTICE INTERIM COMMITTEE.
Juvenile Justice system
The 3-Strikes Law California, U.S.A. March 7, 1994.
Introductory Overview Of Proposition 36
Aim: How does the NYS Penal Law define the crimes of Homicide and other related offenses?
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
AGENDA Overview of Juvenile System with stats and facts Read and annotate article #3 and #4 Compare/Contrast both articles Debate LEARNING FOCUS FOR TODAY.
CLASSIFICATION OF CRIMES & PENALTIES California Criminal Law Concepts Chapter 2 1 Mike Reid LAHC.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial
Sentencing and Punishment
ROBBERY AND EXTORTION M. Reid California Criminal Law Concepts Chapter 15 1.
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) Defendant pled guilty to offense punishable by imprisonment between 5 and 10 years Judge at sentencing hearing.
Blakely Update for District Court Judges October 2005 John Rubin © 2005.
Unit 5: Crimes Against the Person Moral Turpitude Aggravated Felonies Homicide, etc.
U.S. Government Chapter 15 Section 3
Sentencing in Canada Imposing a Sentence.
September 20, 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment OCTOBER 1, 2011.
Aim: What are the guidelines for imposing sentences upon a convicted person?
Chapter 4 The Law.
There are two levels of crime:  Misdemeanors – Minor Crimes such as theft of low valued items (Under the value of $250.00) and traffic violations  Felonies.
Chapter 28.2 “The Judicial Branch of Texas”. The Judicial Branch is made up of courts and judges throughout the state.
The Texas Judiciary. Criminal Cases Burden of Proof: legal obligation of one party in a lawsuit to prove its position to a court ---- In a criminal case,
BREAKOUT SESSION 2 Basic Distribution Calculations 1.
CRIMINAL LAW SUMMER 2011 TA SESSION NOTES Chapter 1 Punishment and Its Rationales.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
3Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART What Is a Crime? Section 3.1.
Chapter 16.2 Criminal Cases.
Criminal Justice Chapter 9 Presentation Assignment By: Ciara Hairston & Kiya Holland May 4, 2012.
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
Criminal Justice System. Police Have immediate control over who is arrested “Police discretion” Size of U.S. population and number of police officers.
Criminal Sentencing in N.C.. Structured Sentencing In 2011, N.C. passed the Structured Sentencing law to organize the punishment of criminals. – Sentencing.
Presentation of Sentence Credits for Persons Convicted of Certain B Felonies Materials to Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice (NRS )
Stalking Awareness And Prevention Francis A. Arenas, Esq.
Criminal & Civil Law Chapter 15. Where do our laws come from? The Constitution – Constitutional Law The Legislature – Statutory law The Decisions of Judges.
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
Introduction to Criminal Justice Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty Chapter Nine Bohm and Haley.
Judicial Branch Interprets the laws. Civil Law Disputes between two or more people or groups. Often involve property rights, family matters, and arguments.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Legal Consequences Illegal Drug Possession And Underage Drinking Presented by Mrs. Noël.
SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS CHAPTER 15 PAGES
Chapter 2 – Criminal Law. Spirit of the Law Crime – Act against the public good Punishable by fine, imprisonment or both Must be prohibited by the law.
Street Law Ch. 15: The Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing and Corrections.
Lesson Six Criminal Law. 一、 General introduction of criminal law  (一) Concept of criminal law  Criminal Law is a body of rules and statutes that defines.
Democracy and Constitutions The Texas System of Justice p
Challenges in Determining Whether Treatment Programs are Effective
Sentencing.
sealing of adult convictions
Imposing the ‘Sentence’
HOMICIDE.
Classification of Crimes
THEFT CRIMES LAW OFFICES OF SUE SAHAMI At the Law Offices of Sue Sahami, we’re dedicated to ensuring you and your loved ones.
Applicable Penalties - DUI Murder
Juvenile vs. Adult Differences in the Criminal Justice System
North Carolina Sentencing Guidelines
Classification of Crimes
Chapter 8 Notes – Criminal Law
HNA Lesson 23 Aim: How does the NYS Penal Law define the crimes of Homicide and other related offenses?
Nondisclosure Nuts & Bolts Our little secret…
Sentencing Guidelines/Mandatory Minimums and Charging
Washington State Three Strikes Law
AGENDA Felonies v. misdemeanors
Presentation transcript:

VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER: Sentencing Impact of Charging Choices Creg G. Datig Director – TSRP Program CDAA

VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER WITH INTOXICATION: Charges Penal Code Section 191.5 (a): Gross Vehicular Manslaughter while Intoxicated (b): Vehicular Manslaughter while Intoxicated (d): “Courtney’s Law” – 191.5(a) with Specified Prior(s) Alleged

GROSS V.M. WHILE INTOXICATED Penal Code Section 191.5(a) Punishment: 4 – 6 – 10 years SERIOUS FELONY (1192.8 PC; Peo. v. Gonzales (1994) 29 CA4th 1684) “STRIKE” – 667(c) PC, 1170.12 PC NOT a “violent felony” pursuant to 667.5(c) PC 50% CONDUCT CREDITS, 2933(a) PC Probation eligible (See, e.g., Peo. v. Weaver (2007) 149 CA4th 1301) NOTE: Irreduceable felony; NOT a violent felony per 667.5(c); In order to be violent, a 12022.7 GBI allegation must be pled and proven, see 667.5(c)(8).

191.5(a) PC: Lesser Offenses 191.5(b) PC Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated 192(c)(1) PC Gross Vehicular Manslaughter (without intox.) 192(c)(2) PC Vehicular Manslaughter (misdemeanor) 23153 VC DUI Causing Injury 23152 VC DUI

191.5(a) PC: Multiple Deaths / Injuries, Same Incident SEPARATE 191.5(a) COUNT for each victim: Consecutive punishment OK Peo. v. MacFarland (1989) 47 Cal.3d 798 GBI ALLEGATION(S) for deceased victims other than “primary vic” named in 191.5(a) count: OK Peo. v. Weaver (2007) 149 CA4th 1301 Multiple GBI Allegations may be alleged for multiple deceased victims Peo. v. Arndt (1999) 76 CA4th 387 GBI Allegation(s) turn the 191.5(a) into a 667.5(c) violent felony: only 15% conduct credit. (PC 2933.1)

191.5(a) PC: Multiple Deaths / Injuries, Same Incident INJURED VICTIMS OTHER THAN DECEASED IF GBI SUSTAINED: 12022.7 PC (a): Victim over 5 yrs. old (b): Coma or Paralysis (c): Victim 70 yrs. of age or older (d): Victim less than 5 yrs. old INJURY, NOT GBI: 23558 VC One year for each additional victim, up to 3 12022.7(a)= +3 (b)= 5 (c) = + 5 (d) = + 4,5,6

191.5(a) PC: Scenario – 2 Deceased Victims, 1 Injured (not GBI) CT 1: 191.5(a) PC Victim 1 CT 2: 191.5(a) PC Victim 2 CT 3: 23153 VC Victim 3 ______________________________________________________________________ CT 1 = 4 – 6 – 10 CT 2 = 1/3 (6) consec. CT 3 = 1/3 (2) consec. Total (assuming mid-term CT 1) 6 + 2 + 8 mos. = 8y 8mos @ 50% Conduct Credits CT 1: 191.5(a) PC Victim 1 Alleg: 12022.7(a)PC Victim 2 Alleg: 23558 VC Victim 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CT 1 = 4 – 6 – 10 + 12022.7(a) = 3 consec. + 23558 = 1 consec. Total (assuming mid-term) 6 + 3 + 1 = 10 yrs @ 15% Conduct Credits (only 1 “strike,” though) Note: In scenario 1, you get 2 STRIKES; In scenario 2, you only get one

VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER WHILE INTOXICATED Penal Code Section 191.5(b) Punishment: Wobbler / 16m – 2 – 4 SERIOUS FELONY “STRIKE” 50% CONDUCT CREDITS Probation Eligible Lesser Offenses Multiple Deaths / Injuries Considerations (same as 191.5(a) PC)

191.5(b) PC: The 23153 VC + GBI Conundrum (Single Deceased Victim) CT 1: 191.5(b) PC ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 16m – 2 – 4 yrs. @ 50 % Conduct Credits Maximum Possible Actual Time: 2 years CT 1: 23153 VC Alleg: 12022.7(a) PC ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 16m – 2 – 3 yrs. Plus 3 yrs. consec.; 15% Conduct Credits Maximum Possible Actual Time: 5 years, 1 mo. +

THE Binkerd CAVEAT CT 1: 191.5(b) PC, Guilty CT 2: 23153 VC, Guilty Alleg: 12022.7(a) PC, Admitted Court sentences defendant on Count 2 plus the GBI allegation, stays sentence on Count 1 per PC Section 654. Sounds Good, Right? WRONG!

THE Binkerd CAVEAT Peo. v. Binkerd (2007) 155 CA 4th 1143 “Under the statutory elements test, the violation of Vehicle Code section 23153 is necessarily a lesser included offense [of 191.5(b) PC, (formerly 192(c)(3) PC)], and appellant cannot be convicted of violating both statutes. Appellants conviction… for violating VC section 23153 cannot stand.”

“Courtney’s Law” Penal Code Section 191.5(d) Punishment: 15 yrs. to Life “Watson” MURDER FALLBACK (usually) If qualifying priors are available and alleged SERIOUS FELONY STRIKE LESSER OFFENSES (Compare) 187 PC: 192(b) PC (involuntary manslaughter) 191.5(d) PC: 191.5(a), 191.5(b), 192(c)(1), 192(c)(2), 23153 VC, 23152 VC Peo. v. Sanchez (2001) 24 Cal.4th 983

“Courtney’s Law”: 2 Penal Code Section 191.5(d) MINIMUM PAROLE ELIGIBILITY (Compare): 187 PC: 15 years (See In re Cervera (2001) 24 Cal.4th 1073) 191.5(d)PC: 7 ½ years “Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 2930)… shall apply to reduce the term imposed pursuant to this subdivision.”

THE TSRP PROGRAM DOING JUSTICE PROTECTING LIVES Funding for this program provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through NHTSA