Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM1 Subjective Quality Testing - Voice & Audio.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IP Cablecom and MEDIACOM 2004 Prediction and Monitoring of Quality for VoIP services Quality for VoIP services Vincent Barriac – France Télécom R&D SG12.
Advertisements

Do Bystanders and Dialog Participants Differ in Preferences for Telecommunications Channels? -- The Effects of Noise and Delay -- Nigel Ward Anais G. Rivera.
Adam Diel.  In 1981 IBM PC 150 introduced the first PC Speaker.  Each game had to write support for it (sound cards were impractical during this time)
2nd Workshop on Wideband Speech Quality - June Perceptual Wideband Audio Quality Assessments Using PEAQ Christian Schmidmer Opticom GmbH, Erlangen.
Perceived Audiovisual Quality of Low-Bitrate Multimedia Content Stefan Winkler, Christof Faller IEEE Transactions on Multimedia vol. 8, no. 5, pp ,
Speech Compression. Introduction Use of multimedia in personal computers Requirement of more disk space Also telephone system requires compression Topics.
ITU Regional Standardization Forum For Africa Dakar, Senegal, March 2015 QoS/QoE Assessment Methodologies (Subjective and Objective Evaluation Methods)
IT-101 Section 001 Lecture #8 Introduction to Information Technology.
CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS 5. Speech Coding. Low Bit-rate Voice Coding  Voice is an analogue signal  Needed to be transformed in a digital form (bits)
2nd Workshop on Wideband Speech Quality - June nd Workshop on Wideband Speech Quality in Terminals and Networks: Assessment and Prediction 22nd.
1 TAC2000/ IP Telephony Lab Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ) Speaker: Wen-Jen Lin Date: Dec
1 ITU Workshop on “Quality of Service and Quality of Experience of Multimedia Services in Emerging Networks” (Istanbul, Turkey, 9-11 February 2015) Overview.
Adaptive Playout Scheduling Using Time-scale Modification Yi Liang, Nikolaus Färber Bernd Girod, Balaji Prabhakar.
1 E-Model & MOS Speaker: Cheng-lin Tsai Adviser: Quincy Wu Date:2009/07/02.
Oct. 18, 2000 Subjective Tests Results Yi Liang Degradation Category Rating of Scaled Speech Three short network traces with different jitter statistics.
Nov. 3, 2000 Adaptive Playout Scheduling in Packet Voice Communications.
Brian White CS529 SPEAK WITH FORWARD ERROR CORRECTION: IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION.
Video for Mobile Device Mark Green School of Creative Media.
Fundamentals of Perceptual Audio Encoding Craig Lewiston HST.723 Lab II 3/23/06.
8th and 9th June 2004 Mainz, Germany Workshop on Wideband Speech Quality in Terminals and Networks: Assessment and Prediction 1 Vincent Barriac, Jean-Yves.
Objective and Subjective Degradations of Transcoded Voice for Heterogeneous Radio Networks Interoperability Ľubica Blašková 1, Jan Holub 1, Michael Street.
Draft-ietf-codec-results-00 Jan Skoglund, Christian Hoene November 15th, 2011 draft-ietf-codec-results-001.
Sound Locatability Tests Comparative Locatability Tests of Warning Signals.
Speech coding. What’s the need for speech coding ? Necessary in order to represent human speech in a digital form Applications: mobile/telephone communication,
Digital Audio Watermarking: Properties, characteristics of audio signals, and measuring the performance of a watermarking system نيما خادمي کلانتري
Ensuring Quality in the Contact Center Joseph Dumont Product Manager Contact Center Services Empirix, Inc.
1 TTC‘s Standardization Work Network Management Committee “A Method for Speech Quality Assessment of IP Telephony”
Diffusion libre A state of the art of voice quality measurement techniques and of associated standards at ITU-T SG 12 Orange Labs Vincent BARRIAC, Recherche.
ETSI STQ, Taiwan Workshop, February 13th, Recent improvements in transmission quality assessment : Background noise transmission Results of STF.
Subjective Sound Quality Assessment of Mobile Phones for Production Support Thorsten Drascher, Martin Schultes Workshop on Wideband Speech Quality in Terminals.
Impact of Lab Effects and Environment on Audiovisual Quality Margaret H. Pinson.
VQEG MM Phase 2 Working document towards a project plan.
Tratamiento Digital de Voz Prof. Luis A. Hernández Gómez ftp.gaps.ssr.upm.es/pub/TDV/DOC/ Tema2c.ppt Dpto. Señales, Sistemas y Radiocomunicaciones.
Colombia, September 2013 The importance of models and procedures for planning, monitoring and control in the provision of communications services.
IP Networking & MEDIACOM 2004 Workshop April 2001 Geneva Characterising End to End Quality of Service in TIPHON Systems Characterising End to End.
Dither and Noise Shaping
NORTEL NETWORKS CONFIDENTIAL 2 Evaluaton of Objective Quality Estimators: Methods used with Voice Models & Implications for Video Testing Leigh Thorpe.
Department of Communication and Electronic Engineering University of Plymouth, U.K. Lingfen Sun Emmanuel Ifeachor New Methods for Voice Quality Evaluation.
AGH, NTIA, Intel, IRCCyN, Opticom, Technicolor.  Wide Range of Quality ◦ Original—Heavily Compressed  VGA  60 clips  10 SRC ◦ 50% English Language.
COPYRIGHT © All rights reserved by Sound acoustics Germany The averaged quality measures over all test cases indicate the real influence of a test object.
CS Spring 2009 CS 414 – Multimedia Systems Design Lecture 3 – Digital Audio Representation Klara Nahrstedt Spring 2009.
SwissQual AG – Your QoS Partner Workshop on Wideband Speech Quality in Terminals and Networks: Assessment and Prediction 1 8th and 9th June Mainz,
Scaling Studies of Perceived Source Width Juha Merimaa Institut für Kommunikationsakustik Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
1 Objective Video Quality Models for HEVC. 2 Introduction ITU-T SG9 and ITU-R WP6C have successfully developed a number of Recommendations All the Recommendations.
Comparisons of FEC and Codec Robustness on VoIP Quality and Bandwidth Efficiency Wenyu Jiang Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University ICN 2002, Atlanta,
VQEG MM Phase 2 Working document towards a project plan.
Minjie Xie, Dave Lindbergh, and Peter Chu
CS Spring 2014 CS 414 – Multimedia Systems Design Lecture 3 – Digital Audio Representation Klara Nahrstedt Spring 2014.
Alan Clark Telchemy Modeling the effects of Burst Packet Loss and Recency on Subjective Voice Quality Alan Clark Telchemy
On the improvement of virtual localization in vertical directions using HRTF synthesis and additional filtering Wersényi György SZÉCHENYI ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY,
1 Video and Voice over IP performance over a Satellite link Bob Dixon, Ohio State University/OARnet Prasad Calyam, OARnet Joint Techs Workshops, Columbus,
Evolutionary Fuzzy Volume Tuner for Cellular Phones.
ITU Workshop on QoS and QoE of Multimedia Applications and Services Haarlem, The Netherlands 9-11 May 2016 Standards for video QoE assessment Paul Coverdale.
Voice Telecommunications Accessibility for Individuals with Hearing Loss Linda Kozma-Spytek Technology Access Program Gallaudet University; Washington,
Using Speech Recognition to Predict VoIP Quality
Voice Quality in IP Telephony
VoIP over Wireless Networks
Introduction to Audio Watermarking Schemes N. Lazic and P
Precedence-based speech segregation in a virtual auditory environment
Objective and Subjective Audio Assessment of MP3 Players’ Quality
Wenyu Jiang Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University
Spread Spectrum Audio Steganography using Sub-band Phase Shifting
Lesson Objectives Explain how sound can be sampled and stored in digital form Explain how sampling intervals and other considerations affect the size of.
The New Tech Blocks Noise Disruption Faster than the Speed of Sound The New Tech Blocks Noise Disruption Faster than the Speed of Sound Noise Cancelling.
Voice conversion using Artificial Neural Networks
Wenyu Jiang , Henning Schulzrinne 이주경
Bandwidth Extrapolation of Audio Signals
Recap In previous lessons we have looked at how numbers can be stored as binary. We have also seen how images are stored as binary. This lesson we are.
COPYRIGHT © All rights reserved by Sound acoustics Germany
Presentation transcript:

Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM1 Subjective Quality Testing - Voice & Audio

Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM2 MOS acc. To P.800 Standardized Listening Test Procedure acc. to ITU-T P.800ff Absolute Category Rating Test (ACR), no comparison to a reference signal (original) „How good does it sound?“ 5-point grading scale ‚opinion scale‘ Averaging over test subjects: MOS ‚Mean Opinion Score‘ Excellent Good Fair Poor Bad ImpairmentGrade

Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM3 P.CONV Framework for conversational tests Two test persons having a real conversation Example scenarios (e.g. order pizza, book a flight…) … Still a bit vague, many open questions, current research.

Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM4 P.835 Subjective assessment of noise reduction systems Similar to P.800 Separate votes for: –Speech signal –Background activity (e.g. noise) –Overall quality (high correlation with P.800 results)

Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM5 Standardised assessment procedure for 'small impairments' in audio systems (ITU-R 1994) Comparison between reference and test signal Very sensitive to subtle distortions double-blind triple-stimulus with hidden reference Subjective Assessment in ITU-R BS.1116 OriginalAB original / coded coded / original

Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM6 Continuous grading scale with “anchors” Subjective Difference Grade (SDG) Question: „How different do the samples sound?“ Subjective Assessment in ITU-R BS.1116

Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM7 Subjective Testing of Intermediate Audio Quality MUSHRA - Multi Stimulus Test with Hidden Reference and Anchors  developed by EBU working group B/AIM  targets at IAQ  ITU-R BS.1534

Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM8 MUSHRA Test Training of Subjects comparison with CD quality reference two low-pass 'anchors' (7kHz, 3.5kHz) incl. subjects can randomly access all types of codecs at similar bitrate

Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM9 MUSHRA Test Scoring Phase subjects can randomly assess all codecs under test of similar bitrate at the same time two low-pass 'anchors' (7kHz, 3.5kHz) inc.. comparison with CD-reference, hidden reference inc.. subjects adjust slider, no score involved slider mapped to

Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM10 Comparison of Subjective Test Methods

Christian Schmidmer, OPTICOM11 Minimum Requirements Headphones (not the cheap ones, no ear buds, no 10$ PC speakers, …) Reasonably quiet room Several listeners Good soundcard Knowledge These are the minimum requirements only, sufficient to do some prescreening. To conduct a reliable subjective test, much more efforts are required!