The Securitization of Migration in Austria Paul Ploberger Tihany,
Overview What happened? What is „security“? What is „securitization“? What is wrong with „securitization“? What does that mean for migration? What to take away from this talk
What happened? Recruitment of „guest workers“ throughout the 1960ies Seen as necessary for economic growth Migration as part of labor market politics
What happened?
Oil crisis in 1974 Organized crime as new topic 90ies: threat to Austrian identity Welfare system Economic development Shift in migration patterns (S-N -> E-W) Rise of Austrian Freedom Party
What happened? Jörg Haider († 2008) Rightwing populist party In government from 2000 to 2006
What happened? Shift in institutional setting Fremdenkriminalität („crime committed by foreigners“) Connection: migrants – security of Austrian population Expansion of „security“ limitation of migration and asylum
What is „security“? (Military) survival of nation-state Broadening of concept after Cold War „Enemies“ „threats“ and „risks“ Nation-state individuals „Widening and deepening“ of security
What is „security“? Security is Not clear-cut but ambiguous and contested Not a material good but a social construct There is no security issue per se An issue has to be made a security issue
What is „securitization“? Non- politicized politicized securitized
What is „securitization“? Discoursive concept Security located in language Securitization is a Speech Act with a certain modality and logic: Existential threat Substantial consequences Need to react right away
What’s wrong with “securitization”? Indicates threat and immediate reaction One solution as adequate Limits dialog and opportunities for other solutions Potentially undemocratic Might undermine rights and liberties Transparency and accountability?
What does this mean for migration? Migrants/migration as possible threat legitimizes drastic measures Limits to possibilities of migration worsening of situation of migrants „regular“ migration versus „irregular“ migration
What to take away from this talk Security is highly ambiguous and controversial A security issue has to be made Question security issues!
Thank you!