Turkish Stream: A Threat or a Challenge to the Southern Gas Corridor?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Southern Corridor John Baldwin.
Advertisements

Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project
Kristine Margvelashvili MA student at International Hellenic University Black Sea Cultural Studies (Politics and Economy Stream); Erasmus Mundus Program.
Zagreb, 28 September 2004 The South East Europe gas market: a preliminary analysis of facts and opportunities from the Regulators perspective GAS TASK.
Turkey and Mediterranean Gas: What does it Mean for Europe and the World? A Post-Ukraine Prognosis John Roberts, Energy Security Specialist, Methinks Ltd.
EBRD – Annual meeting and Business Forum Istanbul 2013 Nabucco Gas Pipeline International Reinhard Mitschek Chief Executive Officer 10 May 2013.
1 Natural Gas Transmission within Romanian Gas Market BLACK SEA ENERGY CONFERENCE 3-5 April 2006, Bucharest, Romania.
Developing the Southern Corridor Al Cook – Vice President, Shah Deniz Development.
Putin’s ‘Turkish Stream’: Who Knows What? John Roberts Energy Security Specialist, Methinks Ltd 2030 EU Energy Security The Role of the Eastern Mediterranean.
The University for business and the professions. The University for business and the professions The Russian Gas Deficit Geopolitical Implications for.
Energy Security and Current Developments in the Russia-EU Energy Relationship Jack Sharples University of Glasgow.
Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) BULGARIA MACEDONIA ALBANIA ITALY BULGARIA MACEDONIA ALBANIA ITALY GREECE.
Zlín February 11, Azerbaijan Macroeconomic Indicators 2013 GDP – 73 bln. GDP Growth – 5.8% (2013), 10 % average in Non-oil Growth – 10.
The Southern Gas Corridor
BOTAŞ PETROLEUM PIPELINE CORP. BOTAŞ Projects and the Energy World
Elena Telegina Director of the Institute of Geopolitics and Energy Security Corresponding Member of Russian Academy of Sciences Dean, International Energy.
1 The Bulgarian Natural Gas Market: The TSO’s point of view Angel Semerdjiev, Executive Officer, Bulgartransgaz EAD 30 January 2009, Sofia.
The Interconnector Greece-Italy (IGI) Project:
Contribution of new supply sources and transit routes for establishing a TR gas hub Dr. Cenk Pala, TAP Government Affairs Advisor Turkey.
Sources of Natural Gas Supply - European Union
3 November 2005 GIE Conference Gas Market Developments in SEE Balázs SÁNDOR Chairman GIE ECSEE Study Group Athens - 3 November 2005.
Recent Regulatory Developments in the gas market of the Energy Community Dr. Michael Thomadakis Vice President, RAE Chairman of the Gas Working Group,
OXFORD INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY STUDIES Natural Gas Research Programme Russian and its potential impact on the global LNG market James Henderson Natural Gas.
INITIATIVE FOR GAS HUB CREATION IN SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE SOFIA, г.
Overview of the latest developments of the Hungarian energy market Mr. György Hatvani Deputy State Secretary of energy and industry Ministry of Economy.
IES Key points of Russian energy strategy up to 2030 – between Europe and Asia Dr. Alexey Gromov Deputy General Director Institute for Energy Strategy.
28 September 2004Energy Community South Eastern Europe1 Gas in South Eastern Europe GTE presentation Philippe Mannoni GTE Executive Secretary Zagreb, 28.
The Southern Gas Corridor to Europe – Progress Bud Fackrell - President, BP Turkey.
Bulgartransgaz EAD: Perspectives for Investments and Developing of the Gas Infrastructure Southeast Europe Business Forum; 22 – 23 November 2012, Istanbul.
1 SECURITY OF SUPPLY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ENERGY COMMUNITY Energy Community Secretariat VISION OF EUROPEAN SERBIA International Conference organized by.
Increasing Role of SOCAR in Ensuring Energy Security of Eurasia Rovnag Abdullayev, President of SOCAR VI-th Eurasia Forum KAZENERGY, 4-5 October, 2011.
Prospects, issues, and implications of gas exploration in the Eastern Mediterranean Focus on energy developments and commercial dynamics in Cyprus Prepared.
EVN - Energy and Environment Services
Nord Stream: a Major European Infrastructure Project – Status and the Way Forward > Henning Kothe, Project Director Nord Stream AG Moscow, 27 th of June.
Russia as a key player on the world energy market Elena Telegina Director of the Institute of Geopolitics and Energy Security of Russia Member of the Board,
Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Initiative for South Eastern Europe DPPI SEE Seminar on Strengthening Cooperation with Candidate Countries and Western.
Energy Greece: hub for energy independence of Europe? Georgette Lalis Task Force for Greece – Head of the Athens office.
1 VI KAZENERGY Eurasian Forum 4-5 October 2011, Astana THE ROLE OF THE CASPIAN REGION FOR EUROPIAN ENERGY SECURITY Traycho Traykov Minister of Economy,
Gasunie gaat verder in gastransport Sharing lessons from unbundling Dutch unbundling, a long and winding road 4 November 2005, Athens.
OMV Gas Move & More. Investing in SEE – OMV´s Approach for the Region Athens, November 3rd, 2005.
Directorate-general for Energy and Transport European Commission June rd Expert Group Meeting Transport Euro-Asian Linkages Sanna Kuukka.
The European Energy Needs and Turkey, the gateway to new supply regions.
OMV Gas International Move & More. Interaction between Transit & Storage/ Investment into Gas Infrastructure in SEE Bratislava, September 29 th 2006 Martin.
Azerbaijan and energy security
Azerbaijan Strategic Performance Unit Sangachal Terminal Presentation BP Azerbaijan Strategic Performance Unit July, 2009.
1 The Energy Community of South East Europe 4th Poverty Reduction Strategies Forum June 26-27, 2007 Athens, Greece Henk Busz Europe and Central Asia Region.
Development of Russian-Turkish energy cooperation as the factor of Turkey's role in the world economic system (Turkish Stream factor) Dr. Doç. Alexander.
Proposed Pipelines & Infrastructure Proposed Pipelines & Infrastructure.
NS4054: Energy Security Routes to Energy Security: The Geopolitics of Gas Pipelines between the EU and Its Southeastern Neighbors Supplemental Text: Kalicki.
IV Athens Forum 3-4 June 2004 Towards a GAS market in the South East Europe Fabio Tambone – Sergio Ascari WG CEER SEEER.
The Turkish Experience: Diversification of Natural Gas Supply and Guaranteeing the Security of Supply By Ali TUNGA Chairman.
1 NATIONAL PROJECTS OF REGIONAL IMPORTANCE MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND ENERGY OF REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA SECOND CONFERENCE ORGANIZED BY NEWSPAPER “CAPITAL” 27.
South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme Beyond the South East Europe Programme.
Unlocking the market potential for gas supply cooperation in the CEE and SEE region Bucharest, May 27, 2016 Martin Vladimirov.
Prof. Yannis Maniatis Minister for Environment, Energy and Climate Change Pre-Launch Event for “Greece Offshore Licensing Round 2014” London, July 1st,
European Energy Southern Gas Corridor to Europe
Nord Stream 2 – A risk for the internal market and security of supply?
Dr. Stelios Bikos, Head of Commercial Division
Opening the Eurasia Gas Corridor
“Hydrocarbons Exploration Activities Offshore Cyprus”
Turkey’s Energy Outlook
Gas Supply to the EU – the Role of the Slovak Republic
Transportation of Turkmen gas to European markets - Trans-Caspian Gas Pipeline and White Stream 2017, October.
TRANSIT OF OIL AND GAS ACROSS TURKEY
Cross-border Infrastructure Projects
Liana Jervalidze Expert on Energy and Regional Issues
Nabucco, European Energy Supply Diversification, and Russia
European Commission High Level Group
DIVERSIFICATION OF TRANSPORT ROUTES AS
Presentation transcript:

Turkish Stream: A Threat or a Challenge to the Southern Gas Corridor? John Roberts Energy Security Specialist, Methinks Ltd. TUROGE 2015 Ankara 19 March, 2015

What Do We Know? Turkish Stream A plan that embraces existing contracts. SGC: A contracted set of projects.

SGC Costs Initial costings: Total: $45 bn. (BP, various). SD2: $22.5bn SCP-X $5.4bn TANAP $10 bn, $11bn, $12.8bn, $13.9 bn, $16.bn? TAP c. $4bn - 5bn. Rovnag Abdullayev: $48bn total (8 Dec 2014) Implementation under way: c. $10bn of contracts issued (early 2015).

SGC: Gas Sales Agreements Gas sales to EU buyers signed in 2013: Axpo, GDF Suez, Gas Natural, E.ON, Shell Hera, ENEL, Bulgargaz, DEPA Gas to Europe to start ~1 yr later than 1st gas Gas sales volumes (bcma) Gas sales volumes (bcma) Shah Deniz Field South Caucasus Pipeline Expansion (SCPX) Trans Anatolian Pipeline (TANAP) Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) Gas sales to BOTAS Stage 2 sales signed in 2011 (First Gas in 2018) Complementing current Stage 1 sales ACQ: Annual Contract Quantity ACQ: Annual Contract Quantity

South Stream: Route Options 2009-2011 Source: Gazprom

South Stream: The November 2012 Choice Russians want to end the 2002 JV Source: Gazprom

Turkish Stream & South Stream

South Stream – Jan 2014 - A Declaration “The European Commission has been pretending for quite a while that it has heard nothing about South Stream. Then, at some stage, receiving from the related countries copies of these agreements, the European Commission stated that all of them failed to comply with the EU Third Energy Package norms, that is, they should be denounced or revised. “In the end, these six countries collectively asked the European Commission to undertake negotiations with Russia, to which European Energy Commissioner Gunther Oettinger agreed.” Vladimir Chizhov, Russian Ambassador to the EU. 22 Jan 2014.

Russia - November 2014: Southern Costs and Eastern Challenges $22.5bn for Russia’s Southern Corridor. $22.5bn for South Stream offshore and onshore (€16-17bn I 2013). $55bn for development of the 4,000-km Power of Siberia gasline and upstream costs of the Vostok project, notably the Chayanda gasfield in Yakutia (albeit, with a $25bn upfront Chinese loan). $18.5bn for the Altai Pipeline

South Stream & Russia’s Southern Corridor The Southern Corridor: 2506 kms; 10 compressor stations Ready by 2018. Western Route: 880.6 kims, including Kubanskaya CS and the Korenovskaya CS interconnector; compressor stations’ capacity, 574 MW. Eastern Route: 1,625.6 kms; compressor stations’ capacity, 942 MW. Map source: Gazprom 2011

South Stream: July 2014 Source: Gazprom

South Stream & Turkish Stream: December 2014 Putin’s Ankara declaration (1 December 2014): “Taking account of the fact that until now we have not received permission from Bulgaria, we believe that in the current conditions Russia cannot continue with the realisation of this project.” (Source: BBC) Accord signed by Gazprom Chairman Alexei Miller and Botas Dep. Ch. Mehmet Konuk for: A new 63 bcm/y system to Turkey A 50 bcm/y distribution centre on the Turkey-Greece border. New company called Gazprom Russkaya to build line. QUESTIONS: Who knew of this plan? What destination? How many strings? EU negotiations? Turkey: The residual market?

Turkish Stream – February 2015 Source: Gazprom

South Stream/ Turkish Stream: Actual Contracts January 2014: First String physical pipe contracts €1bn Mid-March 2014: Saipem (Italy) gets contract for Saipem 7000 to lay first string (scheduled start: 4Q 2014) €2 bn Late March 2014: Second String physical pipe contracts €0.8bn  30 April: 2014: Allseas (Switzerland) gets unspecified value contract for Pieter Schelte (Pioneering Spirit) to lay 900 kms of second string and Saipem gets contract for engineering, tie-ins to landfall, storage and ancillary services (scheduled start: mid-2015). ALLSEAS CONTRACT REPORTED CANCELLED – 3 Dec 2014. Est.€1.2-1.5bn

Turkish Stream: Prospective Development 1. The Saipem 7000 and the Castoro Sei are already in the Black Sea ready for pipe laying.  2. The July 2014 South Stream route was c. 230 kms in Russian waters and EEZ; 470 kms in Turkish EEZ; and 230 kms in Bulgarian EEZ and waters. The planned landfall at Kiyikoy in Turkish Thrace adds c. 50 – 70 kms to an offshore pipeline compared to the South Stream landfall near Varna. But roughly three-quarters of planned South Stream route will be utilised. Required: A new 180-km pipeline across Turkish Thrace from Kiyikoy to the proposed distribution hub at Ipsala on the Turkey-Greece border. The border between Ipsala and Kipoi in Greece is to be the junction for the SGC’s TANAP and TAP pipelines. Question: An LNG liquefaction plant on the Saronic Gulf? TIMETABLE: Immediate or, as per Taner Yildiz (11 Dec 2014), completion in 2019?

Turkish Stream: Who Will Pay For It? September 16, 2011: OAO Gazprom, Eni S.p.A., EdF and Wintershall Holding GmbH (BASF Group) sign the shareholder agreement for South Stream Transport in Sochi, Russia. 14 November 2012, Amsterdam: “South Stream Transport is honoured to announce that a Final Investment Decision (FID) has been taken for the South Stream Offshore Pipeline in accordance with the Shareholders Agreement. The FID was made today in a Shareholders’ meeting subsequent to the meeting of the Board of Directors of South Stream Transport. The minority Shareholders maintain the right to leave the Project in case certain conditions will not be satisfied in the future.” 31 December 2014: Gazprom purchases the 50% stake in South Stream Transport held by Eni, EdF and Wintershall.

SGC & Turkish Stream: Comparative Capacities Azerbaijan-Georgia (c. 450 km); (8-9 SCP and 30-33 SCP-X) c. 40 bcm/y Georgia-Turkey (c. 240 km); (SCP-X, using compression only): 24 bcm/y TANAP Turkish Border with Georgia to Eskisehir (c. 1400 km): 33 bcm/y TANAP Eskisehir to Kipoi (c. 450 km): 20-24 bcm/y TAP Kipoi to Lecce (870 km): 20-24 bcm/y Turkish Stream: String One, 15.75 bcm/y: Essentially replaces existing Western route to Turkey & Greece String Two, 15.75 bcm/y: Additional supply to Turkey and European markets accessible via Turkey using existing infrastructure or infrastructure currently under development. String Three, 15.75 bcm/y: Additional supply to Turkey and European markets accessible via Turkey, BUT REQUIRES NEW INFRASTRUCTURE TO CARRY GAS BEYOND TURKEY String Four, 15.75 bcm/y: Additional supply to Turkey and European markets accessible via Turkey, BUT REQUIRES NEW INFRASTRUCTURE TO CARRY GAS BEYOND TURKEY. Blue Stream: Can be expanded from 16 to 19 bcm using additional compression. An additional string would be required for any subsequent expansion. Currently envisaged: a 1.0 bcm/y capacity increase.

SGC & Turkish Stream: The Legal & Political Overlap Two Key Questions: Is there anything to prevent Gazprom from booking capacity in TAP to take advantage of its second phase expansion to c. 23-24 bcm/y? What are the implications of ‘Turkish Stream’ for the longer-term development of the Southern Gas Corridor?

Southern Corridor Source Fields Field Country Estimated Reserves Output & Production Timing Shah Deniz Phases I and II Azerbaijan 1.2 tcm 25 bcm/y by 2018-2019 Shah Deniz Phase III Azerbaijan c. 500 bcm ? ACG Deep Level Azerbaija 300-500 bcm 10 bcm/y by 2023 Umid, Babek, Nakhchivan, Apsheron, Zefer-Meshel, Araz-Alov-Sharq, Asiman-Shafaq Azerbaijan 2.7 tcm Post-2023 Kurdistan Iraq ? 5-10+ bcm/y near to medium-term Akkas Iraq 59.4 bcm (GOI) 5-10 bcm/y long-term Galkynysh Turkmenistan Up to 26.2 tcm (gas in place) 10-30 bcm/y by 2016-2025 Dauletabad Turkmenistan 1 tcm 30 bcm/y with E-W pipeline Offshore Block 1 Turkmenistan 180 bcm 10 bcm/y by 2017-18 Source: Methinks Ltd

TANAP – A Line Half Full? If there is no capacity in TAP for post-SD2 gas, then does this mean TANAP will only be half-full? One sign of confidence: BP formally taking a 12% stake in TANAP on 13 March 2015. THE BIG HYPOTHETICAL: If the SGC is to grow, and Russian gas from Turkish Stream secures TAP’s expanded capacity, then what alternatives are there for post-SD2 gas to access European markets?

Nabucco West (2012) & Eastring (2015)

The SEEP Concept: 2010/11 and also 2015? In 2010, BP came up with a concept known as the South East European Pipeline (SEEP). This was predicated on the possibility of using 10 ten bcm of the gas to be produced by the second stage of Azerbaijan’s giant Shah Deniz gas project to supply markets in the Balkans, without necessarily having to make its way all the way to Italy or Austria. Although commonly portrayed as if it were a detailed project, it was essentially a concept. At the time, (see subsequent slides) there was a case for saying that regional demand might well be able to use this gas. However, subsequently, it seems reasonable to revise Balkan demand estimates downwards because the region’s two biggest consumers, Greece and Romania, may now require much less gas than previously expected. This is because Greece is suffering from recession and persistent financial crisis while a major gas discovery in the Black Sea off Romania in March 2012 has the potential to end Romania’s need to import gas. The SEEP concept envisaged a melange of existing pipelines, upgraded pipelines, new interconnectors and some wholly new mainstream pipeline coming together to constitute a coherent system for supply to prospective customers in the Balkans. It might be worth talking a look at some of the SEEP ideas to see how relevant they are in 2015.

The SEEP Concept: 2010/11 - and 2020? Source: GDF Suez, Dec 2012. TANAP (Trans Anatolian Pipeline) TAP Nabucco west (regular route to Baumgarten) Nabucco west (RWE’s route) SCP (South Caucasian Pipeline) SEEP SE Europe Pipeline 16bcm 10bcm Shah Deniz II (Absheron) East Mediterranean Pipeline Existing South Stream 63bcm 8-16bcm 6bcm for local consumption BOTAS network upgrade

South East Europe and Turkey: Additional Gas Needs 2015 2020 0.9 1.8 2 5 0.5 3.4 0.9 1.5 3.3 2 2.6 12 < 2 bcm Total: 10 bcm 2 bcm < X < 5 bcm Total: 26 bcm 5 bcm < X < 10 bcm 2025 2030 10 bcm < X < 20 bcm 20 bcm < X No need 1.2 1.2 10.5 8 8.3 5.9 2.6 2 5.3 34 4.8 24 Source: GDF Dec 2012 Total: 46 bcm Total: 62 bcm 24

South East European Gas Demand: A 2010 Overview The SEEP Rationale: Demand 1990 2008 2009 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 SE Europe 59.1 40.8 35.2 45.2 49.4 52.7 57.1 60.0 Turkey 3.2 36.9 35.1 45.0 51.1 61.6 72.1 85.1 Total w/Turkey 62.3 77.7 70.3 90.2 100.5 114.3 129.2 145.1 SE Europe total comprises: Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Macedonia, Albania. Source: IHS CERA, c. 2010

Conclusions Look for a two-string Turkish Stream; View Turkish Stream as a challenge, not a threat; There is a need to re-assess prospects for interconnectors in the Balkans.

Questions? John Roberts Energy Security Specialist Methinks Ltd New Mill House Jedburgh TD8 6TH Scotland UK Email: john.roberts@methinks.org.uk Tel: +44-1835-863725 (home) +44-7966-290354 (mobile)