Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: 2015-05-08 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission Proposed Changes to Simulation Scenario Date: 2015/01/12 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Authors: January.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1404r0 Submission November 2014 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2014/11/2 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission January 2015 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0623r1 May 2015 Guido R. Hiertz, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 TGax simulation scenario “Box 5” – calibration results Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1444r1 November 2014 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Energy Efficiency Evaluation and Simulation Model Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0374r1 Mar 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Further Considerations on Legacy Fairness with Enhanced CCA Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0320r1 Submission March 2015 Yusuke Tanaka, Sony CorporationSlide 1 GCR-BA Performance with Measurement Report in OBSS Date: 2015/03/09.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0612r0 May 2014 Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 1 Calibration Procedures towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0578r0 May 2014 Frank LaSita, InterDigitalSlide 1 Residential Scenario CCA/TPC Simulation Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1441r0 Submission Simulation Setting of Box5 Calibration Date: Authors: Slide 1Jiyong Pang (Huawei Technologies) Nov 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1172r2 Submission September 2014 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Multicast Performance in OBSS Date: 2014/9/15 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 1 Outdoor Stadium Simulation Details Discussion Date:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1392r3 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0592r0 May 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 More Power Save Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/ axr0 May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et al., MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Comparison of Calibration Methodology for MAC Simulation Date:
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1161r0 September 2014 Eric Wong et al (Apple)Slide 1 Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms Date: Authors:
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
TGax SLS MAC Calibration Test 4 Results
Simulation results for
Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Box 5 Calibration Results
Simulation Results of Box5
Reference Simulation Model for Dynamic CCA / DSC Calibration
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Simulation Results of Box5
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Box 5 Calibration Results
Box 5 Calibration Results
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Simulation results for
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Simulation results for
Simulation Results for Box5
Simulation Results of Box5
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
Box 5 Calibration Result
Simulation results for
Simulation results for
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
DSC Calibration Result
Simulation results for
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 2 Abstract This presentation describes MediaTek’s Box 5 calibration results. Applying 1 BSS UL test case.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 3 Background Performance differences are found and results are not aligned since members providing results from Sep Box 5 simulation members agreed to focus on aligning single BSS UL test case in the Mar IEEE meeting.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 4 Single BSS Calibration Case No Shadowing: Require one simulation drop. Fixed MCS 5: To avoid path-loss dependent transmission failure due to using MCS 7. 5 Combinations: STA 3, STA9. STA 3, STA 27. STA 3, STA 15. STA 3, STA 9, STA 27. STA 3, STA 9, STA 15. BSS B, UL traffic. AP B(40,20) STA3 (7.5+xb, ‑ 9.5+yb) STA9(7+xb, -7.5+yb) STA15(3+xb, -0.5+yb) STA21(-6.5+xb, -3+yb) STA27 ( ‑ 6+xb, 2.5+yb)

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 PHY Parameters Slide 5Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc. May 2015 PHY parameters BWAll BSSs at 5GHz [80 MHz, no dynamic bandwidth] Channel modelTGac D NLOS per link Shadow fadingiid log-normal shadowing (5 dB standard deviation) per link Data Preamble Type [5GHz, 11ac], always decoded correctly after successful reception, duration is considered. STA TX Power15 dBm per antenna AP TX Power20 dBm per antenna AP number of TX/RX antennas1/1 STA number of TX /RX antennas1/1 AP antenna gain0 dBi STA antenna gain-2 dBi Noise Figure7dB CCA threshold-56 dBm (measured across the entire bandwidth after large-scale fading) Rx sensitivity-76 dBm Link AdaptionFixed MCS =5 (234.0 Mbps) Channel estimationideal PHY abstractionRBIR, BCC [1, 5] Channel correlationIndependent or time-correlated channel per packet

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 MAC Parameters Slide 6Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc. May 2015 MAC parameters Access protocol [EDCA, AC_BE with default parameters] [CWmin = 15, CWmax = 1023, AIFSn=3 ] Queue lengthA single queue for each traffic link is set inside AP/STA sized of 2000 packets Traffic typeUDP CBR with rate 10^8bps (may not enough to model full buffer) MPDU size1538 Bytes (1472 Data + 28 IP header + 8 bytes LLC + 30 MAC header) Aggregation [A-MPDU / max aggregation size / BA window size, No A-MSDU, with immediate BA], Max aggregation: 64 MPDUs with 4-byte MPDU delimiter Max number of retries10 BeaconDisabled RTS/CTSOFF Traffic direction UL Only Output metric -CDF or Histogram of per non-AP STA throughput (received bits/overall simulation time) -PER of all AP/STA (1 - # of success subframes / # of transmitted subframes)

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 7 Simulation Results Test CaseThroughput [Mbps] 1 (2 STAs) STA 3: STA 9: (2 STAs) STA 3: STA 27: (2 STAs) STA 3: STA 15: (3 STAs) STA 3: STA 9: STA 27: (3 STAs) STA 3: STA 9: STA 15: 72.15

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 8 Conclusions Provide MTK’s Box 5 calibration results on single BSS test case.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 9 References 1.R. Porat et al, “Evaluation Methodology”, IEEE /571r6. 2.S. Merlin et al, “Simulation Scenarios”, IEEE /980r10. 3.P. Loc et al, “TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology”, IEEE 11-09/0451r16.