Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Graduate Project Advisor Training. Project Basics What do you already know about the Graduate Project? –List everything you think you know about the project.
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Strand C – In Depth. Competencies 8 and 9: The teacher demonstrates a willingness to examine and implement change, as appropriate. The teacher works productively.
PORTFOLIO.
World’s Largest Educational Community
What it means for New Teachers
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Consistency of Assessment
Assessing Student Learning in EPICS
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Outcomes Assessment and Program Effectiveness at Florida Atlantic University : Student Affairs Gail Wisan, Ph.D. July 13, 2010.
Principles of Assessment
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
ARTIFACT POSSIBILITIES FOR YOUR PORTFOLIO. TYPES OF ARTIFACTS Anectdotal Records Notes that you have taken in classroom observations or during your own.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Siena Heights University Graduate Teacher Education REFLECTIVE PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO OF CONTINUOUS PROGRESS for Ima Student Last updated: Fall 2009.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Leadership Certificate Program Fall 2009 Center for Leadership & Involvement.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Cathy Taylor Teaching children to count is good, but teaching what counts is better.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Laura Blake Candidate Teaching Summit Presentation “The shell must break before the bird can fly” ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson Website .
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
College of Education Graduate Programs
Cooperating Teacher Training College of Education University of Texas at Arlington.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
SCC Tenure Process November 13, Goal: Ensure Faculty Excellence  Faculty excellence supports Shoreline’s vision of being a world-class institution.
Identifying Assessments
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Mary Ann Roe e-Colorado Portal Coordinator Colorado Department of Labor and Employment Jennifer Jirous Computer Information Systems Faculty Pikes Peak.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
SCC Tenure Process November 9, 2016.
Presentation transcript:

Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs DEFENSE OF DEGREE WORKSHOP Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs

Why a Defense of Degree? Capstone collection of signature assessments and artifacts with reflections that demonstrate a candidate’s personal growth, development, and acquisition of knowledge, skills, and dispositions.

Why a Defense of Degree? Desire for meaningful and authentic assessment Candidates’ evidence of growth through the reflection/explanation of designated standards Allows candidates to present information about themselves as learners and to document growth over time

Defense Of Degree Objectives The College of Education program directors, faculty, and Educator Preparation Board members have determined three competencies in which candidates will demonstrate their knowledge, skills, and dispositions. Candidate demonstrates expertise/experience in three competencies: (1) College of Education – Diversity (2) Program Specific – (see program director) (3) Candidate Choice – (refer to Standards)

Objectives Candidates: take an active role in shaping their learning process reflect on their learning process and become evaluators of their own work and performance set goals for their progress and feel comfortable in taking risks in achieving those goals

Objectives CONTINUED Candidates have the opportunity to actively engage in an exchange of ideas and feedback with their peers and advisors as a collaborative team Candidates takes a role in setting the standards for accountability Candidates incorporate service learning into the defense that enhances student learning, fosters civic responsibility, and develops servant leaders

Competencies Contact your program director regarding competencies that need to be addressed in your defense of degree.  

Defense of Degree Development Initial Advising Session--defense of degree guidelines and components will be discussed and disseminated by program director. Workshop Sessions (offered during Fall, Spring and Summer)--includes an overview of defense of degree/development/presentation Ongoing Evaluation—candidates are responsible for making appointment(s) with their designated Program Director to discuss progress. Pre-presentation Evaluation—candidates are responsible for scheduling a meeting with their Program Director at least two weeks before the final presentation for feedback and approval Final Evaluation—candidates will present their defense of degree to the Educator Preparation Board for final approval during their last semester of program of study. ATOMIC LEARNING – available on Blackboard for assistance on how to use various presentation types for digital presentation.

Defense of Degree Process Candidates will utilize their choice of technology in presenting their defense of degree Candidates may choose to select an organized thematic portfolio that reflects what was written in personal philosophy. Candidates will write a comprehensively developed philosophy in relation to program of study. Show originality; do not create an assemblage of packaged materials. Plagiarized work automatically disqualifies your portfolio.

Philosophy of Education 3 to 5 page paper describing “Who are you as a professional educator in your program of study?” Include: What you think is important Beliefs and/or theories which guide your professional practice Goals for what you want to accomplish On-going piece of work

Service Learning Service Learning is a teaching and learning strategy that integrates academic instruction, community service, and guided reflection from a Christ-centered, faith-based perspective: Goal 1: Enhance Student Learning Goal 2: Foster Civic Responsibility Goal 3: Develop Servant Leaders

Service Learning How have you incorporated service learning in your program of study that fostered civic responsibility, enhanced your learning, and enhanced your servant leadership skills?

What is an artifact? Tangible evidence of knowledge that is gained, skills that are mastered, values that are clarified, or dispositions and attitudes that are characteristic of you.

Artifacts Anecdotal records Article summaries Assessments Awards Bulletin Board Ideas Case Studies Classroom Management Philosophy Essays/ Book Review Evaluations Floor Plans Goal Statements Individualized Plans Conferences Presentations or Attendance Journals Letters

Artifacts Management Strategies Media Experiences Workshop Agendas Observation Reports Pictures Planning Documents Professional Development Activities Staff Development Plans/ Activities Professional Organizations Projects Research Papers Rules and Procedures Schedules Self-Assessment Instruments Developed materials

What are reflections? Artifacts, that reflect the modeling of the individual’s Personal Philosophy of Education throughout their graduate program. This can be in the form of a “Reflective Journal” or “Reflections” within the portfolio.

Digital Format Utilize technology for talking points to enhance presentation Refer to defense of degree rubric Show growth and transformation Justify why degree should be awarded COLLECTION REFLECTION SELECTION PRESENTATION EVALUATION

Short reflective essay Closing Statement Short reflective essay Describes growth Self-assessment Draws conclusions Makes inferences Analyzes learning

Defense of Degree Presentation Arrive approximately 30 minutes prior to your designated presentation time. Be familiar and comfortable with the components of your defense- this is your story Dress professionally The formal defense will take place on the main campus at a date set by the College of Education and approved by the University. Present to a selected committee of members of the Educator Preparation Board Allow 30 minutes (presentation-20-25 minutes, questions-5 minutes)

Evaluative Criteria Mission Statement Personal Philosophy of Education (focus, ideas, organization) Diversity Awareness Director selected competency (program specific) Candidate selected competency (contribution to discipline) Evidence of service learning

Evaluative Criteria Artifacts with explanations and reflections Effectiveness in explaining contents Quality and design Effective use of technology Professionalism Goals for the future Closing Statement

DEFENSE OF DEGREE RUBRIC Upon completion of the candidates defense, the EPB committee will collaborate and the committee chair will submit the final score to program director. Please complete the following evaluation by circling the appropriate number: 4 = Exceeds expectations; 3 = Proficient; 2 = Below Expectations; 1 = Unsatisfactory Requirements (Refer to Defense of Degree Rubric) Personal Philosophy of Education 4 3 2 1 2. Diversity Awareness 3. Director Selected Competency 4. Candidate Selected Competency 5. Evidence of Service Learning Technology 7. Goals for the Future Professionalism Communication Closing

DEFENSE OF DEGREE RUBRIC CANDIDATE’S FINAL SCORE: __________ 40-36 = Exceeds expectations 30-35 = Proficient 00-29 = Resubmit Approval: Yes No Resubmit: ________ If a resubmission is required, candidate will have the opportunity to present within 5 calendar days to a committee of COE full time faculty for final review as scheduled by program director. EDUCATOR PREPARATION BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW: Chairperson Signature: _________________________________________________________________ Comments are encouraged. A written explanation is required if final score is 30 or below. Comments: __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DEFENSE OF DEGREE SCORING CRITERIA Based upon the candidate’s presentation, EPB committee members will utilize a defense of degree rubric stating the candidate’s status of approval and/or if a resubmission is required. In the event of a resubmission, candidate will have the opportunity to present their defense at the next scheduled EPB meeting. Educator Preparation Board meets three times a year: fall, spring, and summer.

DBU CORNERSTONE