A Local Plan for Liverpool National and Local Planning Policy David Hughes Head of Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning: Can localism work in your area? Dr Michael Harris Deputy Head of Policy & Research John Romanski Senior Neighbourhood Planning Advisor, Planning.
Advertisements

LIVERPOOL’S ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK Jane Hayward – Liverpool City Council.
World Heritage and the Planning System Steve Tyler Spatial Strategy Manager Greenwich Council.
Laura Wood Team Leader –Strategic Planning 16 th February 2015 Little Gaddesden Parish Council Meeting.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy Update Riding Mill Parish Council 28 April.
1 Bryan Lyttle Planning and Transportation Policy Manager Localism One Year On.
Last Gasp John Baker the potential of spatial planning to contribute to air quality.
Dr Chris Boomer Development Plans Manager (DoE Northern Ireland)
The National Planning Policy Framework – An Overview Ian Butter FRICS MRTPI.
Meeting the challenge of housing growth in Birmingham
Understanding ‘objectively assessed needs’ Nicky Linihan Director – NJL-Solutions.
National Planning Policy Framework. 2 Planning reform: main aims Put power in the hands of communities - with policy that is radically streamlined and.
Objecting to Development
Kent Local Nature Partnership – realising the value of nature.
SNH PERSPECTIVE ON PLANNING AND THE ENVIRONMENT Derek Manson Planning Adviser.
Aberdeenshire Local Development Plan 2016 Identification of issues.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council A Neighbourhood Plan for Broomhaugh and Riding Peter Rutherford, Northumberland.
Salford Draft Core Strategy Graham Gentry Head of Spatial Planning.
National Planning Policy Framework Member Briefing 1 st May 2012 Mark Russell Planning Advisory Service.
Strategic Planning & the Duty to Co-operate Andrew Pritchard Director of Policy & Infrastructure.
Local Transport Plan 3 Vision and Issues. The Local Transport Plan Will replace LTP2, which expires 31 March must have LTP3 approved and operative.
Planning reform: the Government’s agenda. 2 Reform agenda Absolute commitment to housing and economic growth Continue to protect and enhance the natural.
Christine James
The Local Development Framework and other Planning matters Presentation to the Bradford Property Forum 19 June 2007.
#neighbourhoodplanning Golden Rules. First Golden Rule PLAN POSITIVELY “Planning must be a creative exercise in finding ways to enhance and improve the.
Planning for the future of our district Core strategy options Presentation to C4B Associates February 2010.
PLANNING FOR HOUSING: GETTING THE EVIDENCE RIGHT Rob Jarman Head of Planning & Development Maidstone Borough Council.
National Planning Policy Framework and Localism 10th October 2011 Richard Bennett Head of Planning and Regeneration.
Assessing viability in plan making and HCA support on viability Growth Point Best Practice Network Michael Rich 11 th May, 2012.
National Planning Policy Framework Based on Consultation ended 17 th October Issues affecting Local Councils.
Professor Chris Balch Land and Planning for Community Developers: - Locating Viable Building Land 10 th July 2012 MADE, Birmingham.
Sustainable Development and Neighbourhood Plans Chris Gooding and Bill Bloxsome Data Orchard/Community First.
Muston planning for Bath & North East Somerset Council 3 June 2015 Councillor Training – Planning Mike Muston – Muston Planning.
DPD Examinations – Early Experiences Keith Holland Inspector Manager Planning Inspectorate.
Widnes and Hale Green Belt Review Alasdair Cross Principal Officer – Planning and Transport Strategy Appleton, Kingsway & Riverside Area Forum 24 th September.
Herefordshire Local Plan Members’ Seminar 9 October 2015.
Why do we need more housing? The East Midlands Regional Plan is still in force, which requires 510 houses to be built per annum between 2006 and 2026 Although.
1 Scrutiny for Policies and Place Committee 19th April Planning System Reforms Alyn Jones, Interim Director of Economic & Community Infrastructure Operations.
Rural Forum Draft National Planning Policy Framework 15 th September 2011 Rebecca Collins Senior Development Officer Kettering Borough Council.
Session 4: You have viability evidence – so what?.
Local Plans and Plan Making What is PAS ? PAS is a DCLG grant-funded programme but part of the Local Government Association Governed by.
Nigel Hannam and David Phillips Parish Conference – 11th September 2013 Balancing Development.
Strategic Planning in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Councillor Peter Moakes Chair, Joint Strategic Planning & Transport Member Group John Williamson.
CIL vs S106 The Regulation 123 list. The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just one part.
Affordable Housing Martin Aust Pathfinder Development Consultants
PAS Peer Day 10 th February 2015 Zoe Willcox Service Director Planning Place Directorate Positive Planning: Delivering Housing Unblocking stalled sites.
MHPP Forum James Shuttleworth Planning and Infrastructure Manager, MCC 9 December 2015 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework.
Planning Reform and the NPPF Development Management workshop Alice Lester May - July
Guest speaker: Lizzie Cullum (Savills). savills.com Viability Testing of CIL and Local Plans Effective Practice Lizzie Cullum BA (Hons) MRICS Surveyor,
SUSTAINABILITY TESTING. Phillip Rowson Development Manager Development Management Team.
STAMFORD CAPACITY AND LIMITS TO GROWTH STUDY SOUTH KESTEVEN DISTRICT COUNCIL FINAL REPORT PRESENTATION PRESENTERS: UNA McGAUGHRIN JESSE HONEY 14 TH DECEMBER.
Welcome to the first community meeting for The Effingham Village Plan.
Community Infrastructure Levy S106 vs CIL July 2014.
Building More Homes on Brownfield Land: Local Development Orders Brownfield Land and LDO Masterclass February 2015 Mide Beaumont DCLG.
Three Rivers District Council AGENTS FORUM 12 June 2012 BIODIVERSITY AND PLANNING APPLICATIONS - AN UPDATE Martin Hicks, Herts Biological Records Centre.
Brownfield Register Making Data Standards Work Kevin Flanagan April 2016.
NPPF and Plan Making The Planning Inspectorate The Planning Inspectorate.
Neighbourhood Planning training for Parish Councils in Harborough District Session A: Setting a Vision.
12 th April  What is it?  Why now?  Who’s doing it?  What are the benefits?  What will the plan look like?  How is it done?
New Forest National Park Local Plan Review NFALC Briefing - 21 April 2016 Steve Avery – Executive Director, Strategy & Planning.
The National Planning Policy Framework: what it means for you.
Session 4: You have viability evidence – so what?.
David Way, Senior Planning Officer, Wiltshire Council.
Planning in Principle Moving to a More Zonal Planning System Neil Wilkinson Spatial Planning & Environment Manager Gateshead Council.
AGENDA The current focus on housing Do we need older people’s housing? The role of planning? National Level Local Level Opportunities to influence Planning.
OAN and 5 year land supply – Taking the devil out of the detail
THE EFFECT OF PPS3 ON LOCAL AUTHORITY PLANNERS
Shaping the future of Laverstock and Ford Parish
Stroud District Local Plan Briefing on Stroud District Local Plan (- Conrad Moore, Planning Strategy Team) January 2016.
Planning and Design Opportunities in 2019
Presentation transcript:

A Local Plan for Liverpool National and Local Planning Policy David Hughes Head of Planning

Content National Planning Policy Framework Future of Local Plan Policy in Liverpool What do Local Plans Have to do Key Challenges for Preparing a Liverpool Local Plan

NPPF (1) The ‘Golden Thread’ The presumption in favour of sustainable development, which should be seen as a golden thread running through both plan-making and decision-taking (paragraph 14 of the NPPF). For plan-making this means that: – local planning authorities should positively seek opportunities to meet the development needs of their area; – Local Plans should meet objectively assessed needs, with sufficient flexibility to adapt to rapid change, unless: i) any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly outweigh the benefits when assessed against the policies in this Framework taken as a whole; or ii) Policies in this Framework indicate development should be restricted. For decision-taking this means: – approving applications that accord with the development plan without delay; – where the development plan is absent, silent or relevant policies are out of date, granting permission unless: i) any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in this Framework taken as a whole; or ii) specific policies in this Framework indicate development should be restricted.

NPPF (2) The Economy (NPPF paras ) ‘significant weight’ should be placed on the need to support economic growth through the planning system. investment should not be over-burdened by the combined requirements of planning policy expectations Local Plan policies should recognise and seek to address potential barriers to investment (i.e. lack of infrastructure, services and housing). Policies should avoid the long-term protection of sites allocated for employment use where there is no reasonable prospect of a site being taken up. Applications for alternative uses on such sites should be treated on their merits having regard to market signals. This could result in more allocated employment sites gaining planning permission for other uses.

NPPF (3) Housing (NPPF paras 47-55) & Brownfield Land (para 17 & 111) Housing Local Authorities must ‘boost significantly’ the supply of housing nationally. housing applications should be considered “in the context of the presumption in favour of sustainable development…Relevant policies for the supply of housing should not be considered up-to-date if the LPA cannot demonstrate a five –year supply of deliverable housing sites.” Must allow for an ‘additional buffer’ of 5% or 20%, depending on the degree to which an authority has delivered against housing requirements in recent years So having/not having a 5 year supply and deliverability drive all decisions Brownfield Land Planning policies and decisions should encourage the use of land that has been previously developed, provided that it is not of high environmental value There is no ‘brownfield first’ policy Councils may set a locally appropriate target in this regard but, Viability/Deliverability is key

NPPF (4) Natural Environment (paras ) & Historic Environment (paras ) The Natural Environment Planning should contribute to conserving and enhancing the natural environment Distinctions should be made between the hierarchy of international, national and locally designated sites, so that protection is commensurate with their status and gives appropriate weight to their importance and the contribution that they make to wider ecological networks. Local planning authorities should set out a strategic approach in their Local Plans, planning positively for the creation, protection, enhancement and management of networks of biodiversity and green infrastructure; If significant harm resulting from a development cannot be avoided (through locating on an alternative site with less harmful impacts), adequately mitigated, or, as a last resort, compensated for, then planning permission should be refused. This indicates that developers, could offer compensation to ‘overcome’ harm and gain planning permission. The Historic Environment The conservation of the historic environment is a core planning principle and an important consideration in the determination of planning applications. where a proposed development will lead to substantial harm to or total loss of significance of a designated heritage asset, local planning authorities should refuse consent unless there are exceptional circumstances.

NPPF (5) Viability, Deliverability & Sustainable Development (Para 173) Pursuing sustainable development requires careful attention to viability and costs in plan-making and decision-taking. Plans should be deliverable. Therefore, the sites and the scale of development identified in the plan should not be subject to such a scale of obligations and policy burdens that their ability to be developed viably is threatened. To ensure viability, the costs of any requirements likely to be applied to development, such as requirements for affordable housing, standards, infrastructure contributions or other requirements should, when taking account of the normal cost of development and mitigation, provide competitive returns to a willing land owner and willing developer to enable the development to be deliverable.

Future of Development Planning in Liverpool The current UDP is our local plan - but obviously not upto date and limited weight if LPA cant demonstrate a 5 year supply of housing The Core Strategy – stepping stone from UDP to a new Local Plan Draft Plan prepared for consultation over summer 2015 Final Draft to be presented to Government mid 2016 Examination in public early 2017 Adoption of new Local Plan mid 2017

What will Local Plan do? Ensure that the right development happens in the right place at the right time, Play a critical role in identifying and assessing: – How much and what development is needed and where, – what areas need to be protected or enhanced, and – whether proposed development is suitable Producing the Local Plan should be a shared endeavour – led by the local planning authority but in collaboration with – local communities, – developers, – Landowners, – and other interested parties

The Local Plan must make provision to meet needs The Local Plan must be supported by robust evidence identifying the needs the plan must meet. For housing this means: Need for new homes - Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) Supply of sites - Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) For Employment Uses: Need for employment land and the supply available - Employment Land Study (ELS) For Open Space and Recreation Facilities: Identify the amount needed and how to meet that need – New Open Space Study (OSS).

Challenges for Local Planning in Liverpool Objectively assessing our Employment and Housing growth needs DELIVERY - viability issues and browfield vs green space Duty to Co-operate - sharing growth ambitions across Merseyside Local considerations vs NPPF national policies

How Much Growth Do we expect? How much do we want?

LCR trends

Population trends and the need for homes Economic trends and the need for homes How much land for new jobs How much land for new homes, green space – community infrastructure, transport etc

Deliverability Issues Local Plan must be deliverable Housing delivery must be viable Where does the market want to build? How much demand is there for refurbishing terrace properties In the absence of 5 year supply and a local plan can the LPA protect open spaces Mayor has commissioned Green Space Review

Duty to Co-operate Housing and Employment growth needs to be distributed across Merseyside LPA's need to evidence that they have co- opertaed in allocating levels of growth If one authority can't deliver its agreed growth levels - others will have to accomodate Where and what type of employment growth will Liverpool and Mersyside need to plan for/encourage?

Local challenges vs National Policy Post Housing Market Renewal Policy - challenges for North Liverpool in a no grant world Pro-actively planning for conservation and regeneration issues in City Centre - eg tall buildings, future of private rental sector and students CIL, s 106 and planning obligations to deliver conservation/regeneration

THANK YOU ANY QUESTIONS