Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0643 Submission Autodetection with Signature Symbol May 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: 2015-05-11 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0534r1 Submission Duration in L-SIG Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: May 2010.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0815r0 Submission July 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom Q Matrix Requirement for 1MHz/2MHz detection Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0115r0 Submission January 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom 32FFT STF/LTF Sequences Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0706r2 Submission Bandwidth and Packet Type Detection Schemes for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: May 2015.
Preamble Structure in ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /0621r2 May 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Design Principles for HE Preamble Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0068r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, NEWRACOM January 2015 Support of Outdoor Environments Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r1 Date: Considerations on 11ax Auto-detection Methods January 2015 Jaeyoung Song, KAISTSlide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1228r2 Submission Nov Heejung Yu, Yeungnam Univ./NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0364 March 2015 Sigurd SchelstraeteSlide 1 11ax Preamble design: training sequence Date: Authors:
HEW PPDU Format for Supporting MIMO-OFDMA
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Preamble structure for 11ax system January 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jiayin Zhang, et al. (Huawei Technologies)
Doc.: IEEE /0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE /0823r1 July 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Preamble Design and Auto-Detection for 11ax Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0424r0 Submission March 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom Downclocking Options for TGaf PHY Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0324r2 Submission March 2012 Short Ack Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell, et. al.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0823r3 September 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Preamble Design and Auto-Detection for 11ax Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /133r0 Submission March 2003 Michael Park, Samsung Electronics co., LtdSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0853r3 September 2015 Leonardo Lanante, Kyushu Inst. of Tech.Slide 1 Extensible Preamble Format Design Date:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1091r0 September 2015 Considerations on Range Extension with SIG-A Repetition Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1289r0 Submission November 2015 Thomas Handte, SonySlide 1 Non-Uniform Constellations for 1024-QAM Date: 2015/11/08 Authors:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Diversity Mode in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0205r0 Submission Jan 2015 Shiwen He, Haiming Wang Slide 1 Time Domain Multiplexed Pilots Design for IEEE802.11aj(45 GHz) SC PHY Authors/contributors:
March 2002 Jie Liang, et al, Texas Instruments Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /0207r0 Submission Simplifying MAC FEC Implementation and Related Issues Jie.
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
4-bit CRC Revisited Date: Authors: Sept 2012 Month Year
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
Optimal CSD and Truncated SVD for Channel Estimation
WUR SYNC Preamble Design
Signaling Method for Multiple Data Rate
WUR SYNC Preamble Design
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Consideration on WUR packet Design
May 2015 Bandwidth and Packet Type Detection Schemes for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: Frank Hsu, et. al. (MediaTek)
VHTSIG Considerations
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Discussions
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
Performance Investigation on Wake-Up Receiver
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Duration in L-SIG Date: Authors: May 2010 Month Year
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Effect of Preamble Decoding on HARQ in be
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Preamble Design Harmonization
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Preamble Design Harmonization
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
Preamble design and auto-detection for 11bd
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
NGV PHY Performance Results
Evaluation of PAPR in WUR FDMA transmission
Further discussion for 11be preamble
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
Preamble Autodetection for 11be
Consideration on HARQ feedback
Preamble design and auto-detection for 11bd
Further discussion for 11be preamble
PHY Signaling for Adaptive Repetition of 11p PPDU
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0643 Submission Autodetection with Signature Symbol May 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0643 Submission Outline We propose a solution to the problem of classifying a packet as 11ax/11a/11n/11ac, which has previously been investigated in [1], [2] Classification strategy: –In 11ax packets, encode the symbol after L-SIG separately and insert a known, fixed sequence of bits into the symbol –The sequence of bits is called the signature sequence and the symbol is called the signature symbol –Decode the symbol after L-SIG. If the decoded bits match the signature sequence, declare 11ax packet. Otherwise, proceed with rotation checks as in the past We explain the attractive features of the proposal and provide simulation results May 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 2

doc.: IEEE /0643 Submission May 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 3 Signature symbol based autodetection Signature symbol: one symbol, MCS 0, separately encoded (64 FFT, 0.8 us GI) Bits going into encoder known, fixed bits: signature sequence (in general, S signature bits). 6 tail bits These bits are also effectively known The number of tail bits can be reduced to 4 with slight reduction in performance or consider tail biting code 6-8 information bits: for e.g., bandwidth, BSS Color, CP of SIG fields that follow (in general, 18-S information bits) Known bits can include a CRC to cover the LSIG bits and the 18-S bits Classification rule Run Viterbi decoder on symbol after L-SIG: no change from today Trace back from all-zero state and return most likely bits If decoded bits, at appropriate locations, match the signature sequence, declare 11ax. Else, proceed with rotation checks to classify 11a/11n/11ac L-STFL-LTF L-SIG HE-SIG Sym1 Signature symbol BPSK

doc.: IEEE /0643 Submission May 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 4 Features L-STFL-LTF L-SIG HE-SIG Sym1 Signature symbol BPSK Efficiency: Signature symbol conveys 18-S bits while doing autodetection. Early autodetection: 11ax/not decision is made 1 symbol after L-SIG. Further, the 18-S information bits are available early in the packet Minimal changes to architecture: Viterbi decoder already runs on symbol after L-SIG. Needs only one extra traceback Classification in future standards made easy: pick a different signature sequence False alarms: Go down exponentially (2 -S ) with the number of bits S in the signature sequence. With S = 10, false alarm rate ~ False alarms can be decreased further by including a CRC in HE-SIG or by taking advantage of the 6 known tail bits

doc.: IEEE /0643 Submission May 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 5 Simulation setup 11ax LTF Payload L-STFL-LTF L-SIG 3 SIG symbols Signature symbol 64 FFT, 0.8 us GI, MCS0, separately encoded 10 signature bits 8 information bits, 6 tail bits 11ax LTF & Payload Payload: 44 Bytes (3 symbols), 256 FFT, 3.2 uS GI, MCS 0 11ax LTF: 1 symbol, 256 FFT, MCS 0 SIG symbols: to ensure that payload performance curves are accurate (enough pilots + phase tracking) Channel estimation, timing, CFO estimation, phase tracking: all real. Phase noise added Signature Symbol

doc.: IEEE /0643 Submission May 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 6 11nD Overall error = Error in decoding L-SIG (or) Error in decoding signature symbol Probability of false alarm = 1e-3 (not shown) Classification is not the bottleneck in decoding packets

doc.: IEEE /0643 Submission May 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 7 UMi-NLoS Overall error = Error in decoding L-SIG (or) Error in decoding signature symbol Probability of false alarm = 1e-3 (not shown) Classification is not the bottleneck in decoding packets

doc.: IEEE /0643 Submission Conclusions Proposed an autodetection scheme using a signature sequence in the symbol after L-SIG with many attractive features Efficient: Conveys about 8 information bits while classifying the packet Early decisions: In only 1 symbol after L-SIG, 11ax/not decision is made and information bits are conveyed Minimal changes to hardware architecture Simplifies classification in future standards May 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 8

doc.: IEEE /0643 Submission References 1.[ /0360r1] Preamble Auto-Detection in ax 2.[ /0081r1] Considerations on 11ax Auto-detection Methods May 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 9