Assertive Coaching: The Essential Alternative to PD Steve Leinwand American Institutes for Research NCSM Boston 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Number Talks Presented by: Kim Mott, Instructional Coach Beechgrove
Advertisements

Leinwand Summary Thoughts What I learned about strengthening coaching in work with the Leona Group on August 20-21, 2013.
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
Ten Strategies for Moving Principles to Action to Action
Welcome! SVMI FOLLOW UP DAYS. TASKS, TOOLS, & TALK FOR INQUIRY AND RE-ENGAGEMENT.
Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success
Instruction that Maximizes Opportunity to Learn 7-12 Math
Accessible Mathematics 10 Instructional Shifts That Raise Student Achievement   Steven Leinwand This book contains 10 shifts in instruction that will.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Connecting Research to Actions Jennifer L. Curtis, Ed.D. K-12 Section Chief Mathematics Principal READY 2014.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Maths Counts Insights into Lesson Study 1. Sandra Fay, Irene Stone, Sharon Mack First year Junior Cert An Introduction to Patterns 2.
Productive Math Talk Math Alliance April 3, 2012.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION FOR IMPROVED STUDENT LEARNING:
New Teacher Preparation: Compass Teacher Evaluation
Math AP Meeting January 20, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Welcome Math Leaders Mac Scoring Training Year 17 …analyzing student thinking and improving instruction.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability.
Engaging Learners and Realizing the Development of Mathematical Practices ALM Conference July 15, 2015 Trena L. Wilkerson Professor, Mathematics Education.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
INSTRUCTION DOMAIN #3. GROUP WORK How it works: 1.Look at your assigned group and move to the corresponding table. Everyone will take their materials.
A Deep Dive into the Secondary Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day Southwind High School August 5, 2015.
Robert Kaplinsky Melissa Canham
K-1 TIPM3 Dr. Monica Hartman Cathy Melody and Gwen Mitchell November 2, 2011.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
6.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 6 29 JUNE 2015 SEQUENCING BASIC RIGID MOTIONS; THE KOU-KU THEOREM.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
A Deep Dive into the Secondary Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day Poppy Underwood – White Station High Pam Metz - Cordova High August 5, 2015.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 September 16, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Regional Interim Assessment Project (DCA) Session #1 TRICIA PROFIC, ANDREA TAMARAZIO, KIM LOUTTIT & STEVE GRASER.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
1 Overview of Class #7 Teaching Segment #3: Warm-up problem Introduction to base-ten blocks Analysis of student thinking using samples of students’ written.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
WELCOME BACK TO CAMP!. Agenda Warm-Up for statistical and probabilistic thinking Norms for our PD Teaching through problem solving Break Lesson Study:
Curriculum/Professional Learning EGUSD Secondary Mathematics Setting the Stage for CCSS 7-12 Math Pre-Service
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Shifting Our Mindsets and Our Actions from Remembering HOW to Understanding WHY Mesa County Valley School District May 26, 2015 Steve Leinwand American.
Formative Assessment October 12, Learning Target We will plan a lesson incorporating the five components of a formative assessment classroom. 2.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Breathing Classroom Life into the Teaching Practices Steve Leinwand American Institutes for Research CMC North December 11, 2015
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
Academic Language and Standards-Based Instruction Session 4 1/28/16.
Engaging Students in Learning Mathematics Fifth Grade Session 2 Pam Hutchison October 29, 2015.
Take a few minutes to complete the survey on your desk.
Coaching For Math GAINS Summary of Board Action Plans and Survey Monkey.
This module was developed by Carrie Ziegler, Nathan Auck, and Steve Jackson. They are the three principle designers of the course, Principles to Actions,
This module was developed by Margaret Smith and Victoria Bill at the University of Pittsburgh. Video courtesy of Pittsburgh Public Schools and the Institute.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Mark Roddy, Ph.D. Seattle University Effective Teaching Practices in Mathematics from the Marzano 9, to the NCTM 8, to your classroom.
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
PLC.
Supporting the work of a PLC through formative assessment
Engaging Students in Learning Mathematics Grade 3 Session 2
Presentation transcript:

Assertive Coaching: The Essential Alternative to PD Steve Leinwand American Institutes for Research NCSM Boston

Let’s be honest: We are building and flying the coaching place at the same time and Most of our passengers (colleagues) don’t have a clue why they are even on the plane!

Consider: Tutoring vs. Teaching Professional Development vs. Coaching Your choice: A 4-hour PD session with me. OR A 4-hours of co-teaching – observation, discussion, co-planning, debriefing, action-planning. It’s a no-brainer if we are to make change!

So let me start to lay a foundation for assertive coaching:

Question #1 Why would you tell a teacher whom you are coaching to differentiate, when you could be modeling differentiation in his/her classroom? (“who got the same answer in a different way?)

Question #2 Why would you tell a teacher whom you are coaching about missed opportunities (“why?”, a chance to probe, a representation), when you yourself could have done that during the lesson?

Question #3 Why would you talk about using representations in the abstract, when you could have drawn a bar model or silently gone to Desmos?

Question #4 Why would you ever observe an entire lesson, And not provide oral and written feedback, an opportunity to discuss the lesson, and begin to craft an action plan ?

Co-teaching without co-teaching Interjecting myself into the class without being a distraction “85”: The perfect moment, from the back of the room for: “Really, why is that?”, “Hold it a sec, can you convince your partner that it’s 85? [PAUSE] Go ahead and try it.” (becomes great folder for discussion about missed opportunities and reasoning and alternative approaches)

Co-teaching without co-teaching Interjecting myself into the class without being a distraction While students are explaining or teaching is talking away abstracting, slide up to the board or the computer and capture the explanation with a picture or a diagram. You rarely need to do anything else to get the discussion focused on what you’re written or drawn.

Co-teaching without co-teaching Interjecting myself into the class without being a distraction 2 and 2/3: [and from the back of the room:] “Cool. Did everyone of you do it that way? No? Can you come up and show us another way? Anyone else?

For example: What is 8 + 9? Vs. Convince me that =

8 + 9 = 17 – know it cold – add 1 to 9, subtract 1 from – decompose the 8 into 7 and 1 18 – 1 – add 10 and adjust or double – double plus 1 20 – 3 – round up and adjust Who’s right? Does it matter? 13

What do you see?

Versus Identify three things you see. Convince us. On your white boards, A triangle is: Compare to google/wikipedia

What is a triangle? a plane figure with three straight sides and three angles. "an equilateral triangle" a thing shaped like a triangle. "a small triangle of grass" a situation involving three people or things, especially an emotional relationship involving a couple and a third person with whom one of them is involved. noun: eternal triangle; plural noun: eternal triangles 17

It’s never good enough Do it. Now do it well. Now do it even better.

19 For example: Using models and representations Siti packs her clothes into a suitcase and it weighs 29 kg. Rahim packs his clothes into an identical suitcase and it weighs 11 kg. Siti’s clothes are three times as heavy as Rahims. What is the mass of Rahim’s clothes? What is the mass of the suitcase?

20 The old (only) way: Let S = the weight of Siti’s clothes Let R = the weight of Rahim’s clothes Let X = the weight of the suitcase S = 3R S + X = 29 R + X = 11 so by substitution: 3R + X = 29 and by subtraction: 2R = 18 so R = 9 and X = 2

21 Or using a model: 11 kg Rahim Siti 29 kg

Tell your partner three things you see here.

Which glass has more soda? What is your guess? Share your guess with your neighbor. and justify your guess.

What information is important here? How would you get it?

5.5 cm 7 cm 3 cm 10 cm

A Formative Assessment: Now draw two glasses with different diameters and show the heights of equal amounts of liquid. Explain your reasoning.

Your turn:

So? Order from smallest to largest and justify What is the height of Glass 3? What is the volume of each? If Glass 1 has volume V, express volume of Glasses 2 and 3 in terms of V When Glass 1 is ½ full, the height of the liquid is 3 cm. What are the heights of the liquid in Glasses 2 and 3 when they are ½ full? 29

So what I’ve learned and advocate: It’s about the kids, not egos or thin skins Of course we need to build “relationships” and trust, but “that wasn’t good enough” and “here is what is looks like” are often hard but necessary Coaching as co-teaching Written action plans with specifics are non-negotiable parts of the debrief

PAUSE: A Perspective and Some Coaching Frames or Why Coaches are Indispensable

A Progression of Insights We are charged with making math work for a much greater proportion of students. But typical instructional practice of showing, telling and practicing to get “right answers” only works for about 1/3. To complicate matters, today’s world requires reasoning, solving problems, constructing viable arguments (SMPs). Thus math classes must reflect a different set of instructional practices – productive struggle, alternative approaches and multiple representations, discourse, explanations, conjectures and justifications (MTPs). But, this is different, difficult to do, requires time and risk-taking. Which is why we must have collaborative structures and coaching to support envisioning, practicing and providing feedback as we raise quality and impact.

So there it is: Coaching and Collaborative Structures (about what?)

A Coach’s Field of Activity The heart of ensuring instructional quality and producing high levels of student achievement includes four key elements: A coherent and aligned curriculum that includes a set of grade level content expectations, appropriate print and electronic instructional materials, with a pacing guide that links the content standards, the materials and the calendar; High levels of instructional effectiveness, guided by a common vision of effective teaching of mathematics and supported by deliberate planning, reflection and attention to the details of effective practice; A set of aligned benchmark and summative assessments that allow for monitoring of student, teacher and school accomplishment at the unit/chapter and grade/course levels; and Professional growth within a professional culture of dignity, transparency, collaboration and support. (What, how, how well and with what support to do it better) 34

People won’t do what they can’t envision, People can’t do what they don’t understand, People can’t do well what isn’t practiced, But practice without feedback results in little change, and Work without collaboration is not sustaining. Ergo: Our job, as a professional, at its core, is to help people envision, understand, practice, receive feedback and collaborate. What we know (but too often fail to act on) 35

Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All Mathematics Teaching Practices Establish mathematics goals to focus learning. Implement tasks that promote reasoning and problem solving. Use and connect mathematical representations. Facilitate meaningful mathematical discourse. Pose purposeful questions. Build procedural fluency from conceptual understanding. Support productive struggle in learning mathematics. Elicit and use evidence of student thinking. 36

The You-We-I Instructional Sweet Spot Tell (Do Now) Discover Show * STIMULUS * Explore Practice * FOCUSED Q’S * You-We-You I – We – You Think/Talk/Share Record/Display Mult Reps Discuss Alt Aps Task Try Out/Check Problem * DEBRIEF * Claim (Exit Ticket) Graph Etc.Guided by: Why? How do you know? Convince Us? Explain that please? How can you picture that? OUTCOMES: Empowering Productive Struggle Engaging Problem Solving Learning Reasoning Constructing Viable Arguments

PD that models instruction Stimulus Focused Q’s Think/Talk/ Share Record/ Discuss Try out Debrief Co-taught mathematics lesson observed by entire department Overall reactions; What appeared to work and why? What adjustments or changes would you suggest? Record answers on flip chart Which comments, insights, suggestions are most important and why? Public reactions What two actions will you now take? In summary, what did you learn as a result of this activity?

So let’s focus in on coaching:

My coaching touchstones Was there opportunity for the students to learn? Why and why not? What evidence was there that the mathematics was in fact learned? What worked and was worthy of praise? What didn’t work and why? What opportunities were missed? What growth nugget can I end with or leave with the teacher? 40

My coaching frame: The four key elements of an effective lesson: 1.The Math: leaning goals, appropriateness, the big ideas, connections, common errors and misconceptions. 2.The Tasks: that is the tasks, problems, activities and their richness, alignment with the goals, their appropriateness, their sequencing. 3.The Instruction: how the tasks are orchestrated and conveyed: directions, grouping, who is doing the work, scaffolding, reviewing and debriefing. 4.The Assessment: the evidence that is gathered to determine how well the learning goals were met.

Pre-lesson planning: What’s your goal? Let’s be clear and specific. What tasks will support that goal? Who will do what, when and how? What evidence will I collect to inform me about student learning? What are the big ideas, common errors, misconceptions? What to focus on and what to skip and how to deviate How to chunk How to connect Other ____________ 42

Coaching Debriefing Discussion Questions 1.What I really liked was…. What was really impressive is when… 2.So tell me what your learning goals were for this lesson? 3.What your plan for meeting these goals? (that is what activities, problems, tasks, questions) 4.How well do you think your goals were achieved? 5.What would you do differently?

And based on this discussion: A clear action plan that is roughed out orally at the end of the discussion: – No more than three items – Based on the identified needs (the math, the tasks, the instruction and/or the assessment – For example: You talk less, expect students to talk and work more You work on on-going cumulative review to launch lessons You identify stronger tasks and I’ll help you You start employing exit slips You read…… (that I’ve attached) and we’ll talk about this next time A follow-up – Thanks for letting me observe and discuss your lesson yesterday. – As I said, I was really impressed by or pleased that you…. – So we have a record, there are 3/2/1 things we agreed constituted our action plan and what I’ll be looking to see when I next see you. – Thanks again for remembering that we do all this hard work to make a more positive impact on our students’ lives.

So let’s observe and critique Steve and Eddie Viewing lens: What did I do effectively. What would you do differently? Why?

The follow-up

Mini-dialogue #1 Coach: Have you considered trying ________? Teacher: Yes, I tried that, but it didn’t work. Coach: ________________________

Mini-dialogue #2 Coach: Have you considered trying ______? Teacher: I already do that. (conversation over) Coach: ______________________

Instructional Effectiveness My Bug-in-the-ear experience last week: pictures, graphics (parallel # lines) contexts (ramps and supports for similar triangles) estimating (more than 10 or less than 10) student engagement/talk debrief/evidence of learning vocabulary – see, show, picture, ask Big Ideas vs. answers and skills Planning (flow of problems, tasks, activities) 49

Assessment Shifting our focus from how well was it taught to how well was it learned! You try it – white boards, clickers Pause, question, answer, display Exit slips Common errors and misconceptions Warm-ups Quizzes and unit/chapter tests as basis for selective reteaching Awareness of state test strengths and weaknesses 50

Questions 1. What is your greatest challenge as a coach? 51

Questions 1. What is your greatest challenge as a coach? 2. What changes would allow you to be more effective? 52

Questions 1. What is your greatest challenge as a coach? 2. What changes would allow you to be more effective? 3. What do you do to address the need for your own professional growth and development? 53

Questions 1. What is your greatest challenge as a coach? 2. What changes would allow you to be more effective? 3. What do you do to address the need for your own professional growth and development? 4. From your unique perspectives, what actions would most help improve the teaching and learning of math in Tacoma. 54

55 Next steps: Taking Risks It all comes down to taking risks While “nothing ventured, nothing gained” is an apt aphorism for so much of life, “nothing risked, nothing failed” is a much more apt descriptor of what we do in school. Follow in the footsteps of the heroes about whom we so proudly teach, and TAKE SOME RISKS

Thank you and thank you for the indispensible work you do. 56