Leading with Wonder National Title I Conference February 2015 U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Office of State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Instruction ________________________________ Response To Intervention New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Advertisements

Response to Intervention Funding Issues. The Question Is… Can RTI be an allowable part of a federally funded program? NOT Can federal funds pay for RTI?
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
Tuesday, December 14, 2010 BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION Division of Performance and Accountability Special Education Program.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
IDEA Recovery Funds for Services to Children and Youths with Disabilities | May 20, 2009.
April 2009 Copyright © 2008 Mississippi Department of Education Instructional Programs and Services Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) April.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Comprehensive Guidance and Counselling South Shore Regional School Board May, 2010.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
ARRA Title I: The chance of a lifetime to address our most vexing challenges Reform and Restore: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational.
M AXIMIZING F LEXIBILITY IN THE A DMINISTRATION OF F EDERAL G RANTS July 17, 2013.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Sequoyah Elementary School August 7, 2014.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Disproportionality Solutions Summit: “Turning it Around” **** Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) U.S. Department of Education:
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs The Legacy of IDEA 2004: Improving Results for all Students Dr. Alexa Posny.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Schoolwide Programs – New Guidance Karen Seay, Director Federal Policy and ESEA Research Division New Directors’ Training September 17-18, 2015
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
Schoolwide Funding Flexibility – Extended Training Karen J.M. Seay, Director Federal Policy and ESEA Research Data September 21, 2015.
Utilizing Federal IDEA Special Education Funds Permissively to Serve At-Risk Students in General Education The Fiscal Mechanics of RTI and PBS.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
School-Wide Plans Presented by: Marlon Cousin, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System Cheryl Landry, Title I Coordinator Lafourche.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012 BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION Division of Performance and Accountability Special Education Program 1.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
Pennsylvania’s State Personnel Development Grant “Improving Student Results: A Focus on Highly Qualified Special Education Personnel” An Overview PDE Conference.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
New Fiscal Rules for Funding Flexibility with Title I, Part A
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
The Alabama Continuous Improvement Plan ACIP
Schoolwide Programs.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
ESSA Schoolwide 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Leading with Wonder National Title I Conference February 2015 U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Office of State Support (OSS)

Leveraging Resources to Improve Outcomes for All Students U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) and Office of State Support (OSS) February 2015 Lisa Pagano Christine Pilgrim Dan Schreier Jamila Smith

 Overview of the Office of Special Education’s final report on Leveraging Federal funds  Examples of how Federal funds can be leveraged to improve student outcomes  Share future steps the Department plans to take to further support State and LEAs Session Objectives U.S. Department of Education3

 Leverage points  Short term -  Technical assistance  Awareness of updated regulations  Information Clarification & dissemination  Long term –  Student data reporting & accountability Leveraging Federal Funds Focus Group U.S. Department of Education4

Leveraging Resources Braided Funding Financial assistance from individual funding streams to States, local governments and other pass-through entities is coordinated by all stakeholders so each individual award maintains its award-specific identity Blended Funding Financial assistance from individual funding streams to States, local governments and other pass-through entities is merged by all stakeholders into one award and each individual award loses its award-specific identity U.S. Department of Education5

6 Leveraging Resources: Schoolwide Programs

“A schoolwide program is a comprehensive reform strategy designed to upgrade the entire educational program in a Title I school; its primary goal is to ensure that all students, particularly those who are low achieving, demonstrate proficient and advanced levels of achievement on State academic achievement standards.” Designing Schoolwide Programs Non- Regulatory Guidance, pg. 2, March 2006, lead/account/swp.html U.S. Department of Education7 Schoolwide Programs

To operate a schoolwide program, a school must:  Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment to determine how students are performing academically and what factors are contributing to poor performance.  Develop a comprehensive schoolwide plan that describes the strategies the school will use to meet the needs identified through the needs assessment.  Annually evaluate the implementation of, and results achieved by, the schoolwide program and revise the plan, as necessary, to ensure continuous improvement. Comprehensive Needs Assessment U.S. Department of Education8

 Positive behavioral supports or school climate interventions (e.g., improve attendance, counteract bullying)  Advanced coursework preparation (e.g., intensive summer school courses, after-school tutoring)  Improvements to a school’s kindergarten literacy curriculum  Hiring outside partners to support the school’s leadership team Using Title I, Part A ARRA Funds for Grants to Local Educational Agencies to Strengthen Education, Drive Reform and Improve Results for Students, at guidance/titlei-reform.doc (which also applies to regular Title I funds) Uses of Title I Funds in a Schoolwide program U.S. Department of Education 9

 The following are examples of turnaround and reform- related activities for which schoolwide program schools may be able to use Title I funds to:  Prepare low-achieving students to participate in advanced coursework (e.g., Advanced Placement and/ or International Baccalaureate classes).  Hire outside data experts to build capacity to analyze student data more effectively.  Extend time for teachers to review data and identify interventions that can better meet the needs of students. U.S. Department of Education10 School Turnaround : Title I Schoolwide program

 LEAs seeking to support a professional development activity for teachers on college- and career-ready standards to improve student academic achievement in low-performing Title I schools could generally focus on Title I, Title II, and IDEA, Part B as possible funding sources.  Title II, Part A - a wide variety of PD activities  IDEA, Part B - PD aimed at ensuring regular education teachers have the knowledge and skills to support the children with disabilities in their classrooms Professional Development: Title I Schoolwide and other Federal programs U.S. Department of Education11

 As part of a comprehensive plan in a Title I schoolwide program school, Title I funds can be used to transition to schoolwide blended learning or personalized learning models.  Title II, Part A : LEAs can hire coaches or help schools tailor professional learning to the needs of individual educators.  Title III, Part A : Improve instruction for ELs by acquiring digital learning resources.  IDEA, Part B : Specific assistive technology devices and services, identified by the IEP team as needed by an individual student. U.S. Department of Education12 Digital Learning: Title I Schoolwide and other Federal programs

Blending Title I and IDEA funds in a schoolwide program has been permissible since IDEA’s reauthorization in 1997 Blending Schoolwide and IDEA funds U.S. Department of Education13 Blending is permissible as long as students with disabilities, included in such schoolwide programs:  receive services in accordance with a properly developed Individualized Education Program (IEP); and  are afforded all of the rights and services guaranteed to children with disabilities under IDEA 34 CFR § (c)

U.S. Department of Education14 Leveraging Resources: Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) 34 CFR §

Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) is a set of coordinated services for students in kindergarten through grade 12 (with a particular emphasis on students in K-3) who are not currently identified as needing special education or related services, but who need additional academic and behavioral support to succeed in a general education environment. 613(f) of IDEA; 34 CFR § (a) Leveraging Resources: CEIS U.S. Department of Education15

 CEIS funds may only be used to provide interventions to students who need academic or behavioral support to succeed in the general education environment.  CEIS funds may not be used to provide interventions to students who are currently identified as needing special education and related services. Leveraging Resources: CEIS U.S. Department of Education16

CEIS funds may be used for:  Professional development for teachers and other school staff to enable personnel to deliver scientifically based academic and behavioral interventions;  Direct interventions, such as educational and behavioral evaluations, services, and supports; and  Services aligned with activities funded under the ESEA. § 613(f) of IDEA; 34 CFR § (b) Leveraging Resources: CEIS U.S. Department of Education17

FFY 2009/ SY FFY 2010/ SY FFY 2011/ SY # of LEAs/ESAs required to reserve funds for CEIS due to significant disproportionality 405 (2.7%) 356 (2.4%) 345 (2.3%) # of LEAs/ESAs that voluntarily reserved funds for CEIS 1,597 (10.7%) 1,337 (8.9%) 1,270 (8.6%) # of children who received CEIS during reporting period 1,190,8131,258,9881,008,488 # of children who received CEIS any time in past two school years and received special education and related services in reporting period 135,718180,784149,778 1 Based on preliminary analysis of FFY 2010/SY Table 8 data 2 Based on preliminary analysis of FFY 2011/SY Table 8 data Leveraging Resources: CEIS U.S. Department of Education18

Examples  A district placed behavior specialists in middle and high schools with the highest number of suspensions to help students develop coping and anger management skills and to help teachers identify alternative strategies to address student misconduct.  Although some students showed no improvement with CEIS, the information staff collected while providing CEIS helped staff more accurately identify children who needed special education services. See GAO IDEA: Early Intervening Services (February 2013) Leveraging Resources: CEIS U.S. Department of Education 19

ROLE LEASEAUSDE Clarify CEIS requirementsXXX Develop and implement methods to ensure appropriate use of CEIS funds XXX Establish and implement mechanisms for required reporting XXX Provide technical assistance and training to support appropriate implementation XXX Review CEIS data and evaluate resultsXXX Leveraging Resources: CEIS U.S. Department of Education20

U.S. Department of Education21 Leveraging Resources: IDEA’s Other State-level Activities 34 CFR § (b)

 Voluntary: “States may reserve a portion of their allocations” § (b)(1)  Approximately 10% of each State’s IDEA allocation is available for Other State-level activities  This amount exceeds $1 billion available on a yearly basis Leveraging Resources: Other State-level activities U.S. Department of Education22

State-level activities can be braided with other Federal/State funds for:  Technical assistance  Personnel preparation and professional development and training  Positive behavioral interventions and supports  Technology in the classroom Leveraging Resources: Other State-level activities U.S. Department of Education23

State-level activities can be braided with other Federal/State funds for:  Assist in meeting personnel shortages  Capacity building activities and improving the delivery of services  Alternative programming for children who have been expelled from school Leveraging Resources: Other State-level activities U.S. Department of Education24

Notable Policy Letters/Documents that reference other State level activities:  OSEP Letter to DeTemple For example, if school building leadership team activities are being supported and 10% of the children in the school building are children with disabilities, then 10% of the cost of the building leadership activities could be funded using funds available under 34 CFR § (b)(1). “…allocating some of the funds available under 34 CFR § (b)(1) in a proportional manner would be permissible, along with other Federal and State funds, to the costs of technical assistance and capacity building activities.” Leveraging Resources: Other State-level activities U.S. Department of Education25

OSEP Letter to Batson “… [the] State’s use of Part B IDEA State set-aside funds to fully fund its PBS initiative, which provides professional development, training and technical assistance on positive behavioral interventions to general educators, administrators and support staff, as well as to staff who provide special education and related services to children with disabilities, is permissible.” Leveraging Resources: Other State-level activities U.S. Department of Education26

U.S. Department of Education27

U.S. Department of Education28 Next Steps

 OSEP Memo /osep08-09coordinatedearlyinterveningservices.dochttps://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs /osep08-09coordinatedearlyinterveningservices.doc.  Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds: Key Issues for Decision-Makers  Enter “CEIS plans” in your browser to find examples of LEA written plans for using IDEA Part B funds for CEIS and SEA guidance documents Additional Resources U.S. Department of Education29

Thank you! Key Contact Information: Lisa Pagano (OSEP): Christine Pilgrim (OSEP): Dan Schreier (OESP): Jamila Smith (OSS):