Real-Time Transmission Congestion Management & Market Effects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
Advertisements

SCED Power Balance Penalty Curve
Critique of Proposal to Designate SAPS-Shrew as CRE Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) June 4, 2009.
Discussion: Use of RAPs in system operations Kris Dixit 1.
Outage Coordination Overview D.W. Rickerson ERCOT Outage Supervisor 12/1/2008.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
ERCOT Compliance Audits Robert Potts Sr. Reliability Analyst March 23, 2005.
IMO Market Evolution Program Drew Phillips Market Evolution Program
Nodal Pricing in an LMP Energy Market
SBBH Flag Implementation QMWG October 11, SBBH Flag - Background SBBH Flag - Background: –The SBBH acronym stands for “SCED Base Point Below HDL”
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
ERCOT SOL Methodology for the Planning and Operations Horizons Stephen Solis 2014 OTS 1.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Long Term Study Task Force Update Transmission Study Practices and Methodologies April 5th,2011 LTS.
December 7, 2012 ERCOT Planning Horizon SOL Methodology Update Jeff Billo RPG.
Peak RCCo Performance Metrics Draft –November 2013.
April 16, 2010 RPG Meeting ERCOT Five-Year Transmission Plan Update Jeff Billo.
Reliability Requirements Bill Blevins Manager of Operations Support ERCOT.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 External Web Services Update Nodal Implementation Team Presentation July 7, 2009.
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2012 ERCOT Dynamic Ratings Application.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy Management System Requirement Documents December 5, 2006 Jay Dondeti EMS Project.
Constraint Management Plans (CMPs) An Ops Planning Perspective Nitika Mago Operations Planning, ERCOT.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Review and Request for Approval May 2007 John Webb.
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
1 ERCOT Nodal Protocols Telemetry Requirements. 2 Protocol References Telemetry TAC will establish TASK force and approve a telemetry criteria.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Chad Thompson, ERCOT Special ROS PGRR011 Workshop October 21 st, 2011 SCED Overview and Results.
Presentation to House Regulated Industries Committee Chairman Phil King Trip Doggett Chief Operating Officer The Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
Responding to post contingency overloads, IROL’s and SOL’s Art Gardiner – CPS Energy Steve Rainwater - LCRA 1.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Release 3 – WebEx Conference July 10, 2007.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
© Property of ERCOT /17/20041 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Adams November 17, 2004.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
2008 Annual Five Year Plan Update 2 10/12/2007 Regional Planning: Jay Teixeira, Harry Liu, Brad Schwarz, Jeff Billo, Chris Ngai.
July 10, 2008 ROS Early Delivery Systems Status – R6.3 2 Hour Test John Dumas and Jeff Gilbertson.
Appeal of PRS Action NPRR 351, Calculate and Post Projected Non-Binding LMPs for the Next 15 Minutes Floyd Trefny Texas Steel Companies.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
GTBD Forecasting Using SCED to Produce Projections of Future LMPs Floyd J. Trefny February 17, 2011.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
1. Non-Dispatchable Resources and EIS Market Carrie Simpson May 30,
Operating Guide and Planning Guide Revision Requests Blake Williams, ROS Chair September 13, 2012.
TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINTS KENNETH A. DONOHOO, P.E. Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
1 State Estimator performance. 2 State of Technology Many metrics have been proposed for measuring State Estimator performance.. PI = min Σ( Z – h i (x))^
Goal Parameters How Tools Results Increasing Revenues by Optimizing Generation Relative to PJM Forecasted Price Signals.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
MISUG TAC Update Jackie Ashbaugh ERCOT 3/7/ TAC3/7/ /22/2011 Meeting Focus on the high priority items from MISUG: Review task list prioritization.
Joint PLWG/CMWG Assignment Update to ROS September 15, 2011.
RDTF June 1, Purpose “The effect of the Shadow Price cap for the Power Balance Constraint is to limit the cost calculated by the SCED optimization.
RCWG Update to WMS March 7, Draft NPRR, Caps and Floors for Energy Storage Resources Chair of ETWG gave high level overview ERCOT had questions.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
Response to TAC Questions on PGRR031 TAC– January 28, 2014 Jeff Billo, ERCOT 1.
July 15, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting ERCOT Studies and Proposal on Reliability Energy Pricing John Dumas Director Wholesale Market.
Proposal for Consideration Regarding Holistic Solution to Congestion Irresolvable in SCED Issue:How do you identify when constraint is irresolvable Proposal:Adopt.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Approach March 2007.
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
Market Trials Update NATF March 2,
NPRR833 Workshop: Contingency Processing in CRR, DAM and SCED
Southern Cross Directives Planning Items
Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6
PJM & Midwest ISO Market-to-Market Coordination (APEx Conference 2007)
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
Presentation transcript:

Real-Time Transmission Congestion Management & Market Effects Chad Thompson, Manager, Operations Support, ERCOT Jeff Gilbertson, Sr Market Operations Analyst, ERCOT

Objectives Identify what defines a constraint in the ERCOT system. Identify which ERCOT application dispatches generation to resolve constraint overloads. Identify the types of Constraint Management Plans as detailed in the ERCOT Nodal Protocols.

Objectives Identify the time-frame in which all Congestion Management Plans are intended to resolve loading below Emergency Ratings. Identify where Congestion Management Plans are posted to the Market Identify the ERCOT application whose goal is to minimize generation costs while also respecting transmission constraints.

Objectives Identify when the transmission network is “invisible” to Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED). Identify the condition when a constraint Shadow Price is zero dollars ($0)

Congestion Management: Real-Time Chad Thompson

Congestion Basics Equipment Ratings Dynamic Line Ratings Normal/Continuous Emergency/2-Hour Loadshed/15-Minute Dynamic Line Ratings Temperature-adjusted based on ambient temperature TSPs submit a static ratings table that is tied to the ERCOT weather forecast TSPs also have the option to submit a rating via ICCP telemetry – MVA, Amps, Temperature All Autotransformers and Transmission lines have 3 ratings in the model; some may be the same

Congestion Basics

Congestion Basics ERCOT Operates to “N-1” Contingency Criteria Contingencies include the loss of Autotransformers, Transmission Lines and Generation Units N-1 congestion *generally* based on the Emergency Rating Base Case congestion based on the Normal Rating What is a constraint? An N-1 contingency and overloaded transmission element pair A base case, or real-time transmission element overload

Constraint Management How are constraints identified? ERCOT executes its State Estimator and performs a Real-Time Contingency Analysis (RTCA) every 5 minutes RTCA produces a list of constraints which is updated every time it executes How are constraints used? ERCOT executes a Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) market every 5 minutes SCED dispatches generation to resolve constraint overloads Only those constraints passed from RTCA into SCED are considered in congestion management

Constraint Management “Only those constraints passed from RTCA into SCED are considered in congestion management” Does this mean that not all constraints are activated? What are the criteria for activating constraints? Correct modeling, telemetry, & solution Not redundant Not Private Use Network Equipment 2 % or greater Generator Shift Factor* Constraint Management Plans (CMP)

Constraint Management How can I find out why a constraint was not activated? MIS Secure Area under Grid  Transmission  Real-Time Operations

Constraint Management What’s a Constraint Management Plan? A transmission switching action that is developed to ensure overall grid reliability in the event a given contingency occurs CMPs are intended to supplement SCED, while maximizing transmission capacity when possible

Constraint Management What’s a Constraint Management Plan? Currently 4 types of CMPs as detailed in Section 2.1 Definitions of the ERCOT Nodal Protocols Mitigation Plan Pre-Contingency Action Plan (PCAP) Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Temporary Outage Action Plan (TOAP) All CMPs are intended to resolve loading to below Emergency Ratings, with restoration of normal operating conditions within two hours

Constraint Management Mitigation Plan Post-contingency actions May include load shed Constraints managed to their Emergency Ratings Not Modeled in ERCOT Systems Pre-Contingency Action Plan (PCAP) Pre-contingency actions Do not include load shed

Constraint Management Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Post-contingency actions Do not include load shed Constraints managed to their 15-Minute Ratings Modeled in ERCOT Systems Temporary Outage Action Plan (TOAP) May include load shed Constraints managed to their Emergency Ratings Not Modeled in ERCOT Systems “Mitigation Plan for the duration of an outage”

Constraint Management Contingency Details Administrative Details Overloaded Elements Corrective Actions Additional Details

Constraint Management Where are CMPs Posted? MIS Secure Area under Grid  Long-Term Planning  Special Protection Systems and Remedial Action Plans

Congestion Management: Market Effects Jeff Gilbertson

Topics Covered Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) inputs and outputs Constraint Scenarios Data relationships

SCED Inputs and Outputs Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) Goal: Minimize generation cost while also respecting transmission constraints (“security constrained”) Inputs Generation to be Dispatched (GTBD) Generator offer curves Generator limits (Low/High Dispatch Limits) Generator current power output Active transmission constraints (cont’d)

SCED Inputs and Outputs Active transmission constraints Contingency and monitored element pair names Monitored element (“constraint”) post-contingency flow Constraint limit Maximum shadow price Resource shift factors This is all SCED knows about the ERCOT transmission network!

SCED Inputs and Outputs Transmission Constraint Shadow Price (SCED output) Change in cost of system dispatch for a 1 MW change in monitored element limit Maximum Shadow Price (SCED input) Prevents wide price spread when constraint is not resolvable or very difficult to resolve BASE CASE $5,000   138 kV $3,500 345 kV $4,500 69 kV $2,800

SCED Inputs and Outputs Resource Shift Factor Change of flow on monitored element due to 1MW change of output of Resource Value range: -1 to 1 Positive shift factor : flow on monitored element increases as generation increases Negative shift factor: flow on monitored element decreases as generation increases

SCED Inputs and Outputs Resource Shift Factor Magnitude of shift factor indicative of number of paths Resource output has to flow Greater magnitude shift factors: Resource located on a radial path from monitored element; and/or Resource located close to monitored element

SCED Inputs and Outputs Resource Base points (sent only to Resource) Locational Marginal Prices (LMPs) – cost to serve additional 1MW of load at a location Consistent with base points LMP higher than offer curve price, base point instructs resource to increase output LMP lower than offer curve price, base point instructs resource to decrease output Constraint solution flow

SCED Inputs and Outputs Where is SCED constraint data posted? MIS Secure Area under Markets  Real-Time Market

Constraint Scenarios No active constraints Transmission network “invisible” to SCED Dispatch is like using an “offer stack” Resources dispatched to meet GTBD Less expensive resources fully dispatched to High Dispatch Limit (HDL) More expensive resources dispatched to Low Dispatch Limit (LDL) Resources in between LDL and HDL are “marginal” and set one system-wide Locational Marginal Price (LMP) No congestion costs

Constraint Scenarios Active constraint(s) that are not binding in SCED By dispatching inexpensive resources first, the resulting post-contingency flow on constraints is less than limit No congestion costs; one system-wide LMP Again, dispatch is like using an “offer stack”

Constraint Scenarios Active constraint(s) that are binding in SCED Dispatch based on economics alone would result in post-contingency flow above transmission limit More expensive resources must be dispatched higher and less expensive resources dispatched lower in order to respect the limit Flow change on constraint is (solution resource output – initial resource output) * shift factor for each resource Power balance must be maintained, so resource level adjustments must balance each other out

Constraint Scenarios Active constraint(s) that are binding in SCED Binding constraints have a non-zero “shadow price” The shadow price is the price sensitivity of the transmission constraint If transmission limit was 1MW lower, what would that mean in terms of cost? Since we are already starting at the most economic solution at the limit, the less expensive resources would need to produce less and more expensive resources would need to produce more Results in different LMPs throughout the system

Constraint Scenarios Active constraint(s) that are violated in SCED Transmission limit is NOT respected Occurs because: there are no resources that can be dispatched to resolve the constraint the cost to resolve the constraint is very high Remember, flow is post-contingency flow. Actual monitored element flow is not allowed to go above limit.

Constraint Scenarios Conditions for transmission congestion At least one transmission constraint is active SCED dispatch results in post-contingency flow on the monitored element at or above the constraint limit

Data Relationships Relationship between constraint flow and constraint shadow price Scenario Flow Shadow Price Not binding < limit $0 Binding = limit > $0 and < Max SP Irresolvable/ violated > limit Max Shadow Price

Data Relationships Relationship between shadow price, shift factors, and LMP LMP = System Lambda - (shift factor * shadow price) - (shift factor * shadow price)… (shift factor * shadow price) subtracted for each constraint

Data Relationships Example: System Lambda is $50 Resource A has a shift factor of 0.2 to constraint A Constraint A shadow price is $100 LMP = System Lambda – (shift factor * shadow price) LMP = $50 – (0.2 * $100) = $50-$20 = $30

Questions?

Questions A constraint in the ERCOT system is defined as An N-1 contingency and overloaded transmission element pair A base case, or real-time transmission element overload All of the above

Questions Which ERCOT application dispatches generation to resolve constraint overloads? SCED RTCA VSAT VSS

Questions Which of the following Constraint Management Plans are detailed in the ERCOT Nodal Protocols: Mitigation Plan (MP) Pre-Contingency Action Plan (PCAP) Remedial Action Plan (RAP) All of the above

Questions Within what time-frame which all Congestion Management Plans are intended to resolve loading below Emergency Ratings? 2-hours 4-hours 24-hours Doesn’t matter as long as resolved

Questions Where are Congestion Management Plans posted to the Market? MIS Restricted MIS Public MIS General MIS Secure

Questions Which ERCOT application’s goal is to minimize generation costs while also respecting transmission constraints? GTBD RTCA SCED SASM

Questions Under what condition is the transmission network “invisible” to Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED)? No Active Constraints Active Constraints Binding Constraints Non-Binding Constraints

Questions Under what condition would a Shadow Price of zero dollars ($0) be calculated? Constraint flow is < limit Constraint flow is = limit Constraint flow is > limit None of the above