Relationship Between Donor Graft Cell Count and Visual Outcome in DSAEK Patients Authors Silvin Bakalian MD PhD, Johanna Choremis MD FRCSC, Michele Mabon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty in Fungal Keratitis: Prospective Study Sonika Gupta Consultant Ophthalmology Max Eye Care New Delhi, India Author.
Advertisements

Venting Incisions in DSAEK Patients: Is It an Absolute Necessity?
Use of a Novel Y- Suture Technique to Reduce Detachments in Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) Habeeb Ahmad, MD Martin Heur,
Retrospective comparison of staged versus combined cataract surgery and Descemet’s-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in patients with Fuchs’ Dystrophy.
Early Outcomes of Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic Eyes with Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses Preeya K. Gupta.
Katsuya Yamazoe, MD, Takefumi Yamaguchi, MD, Kazuki Hotta, MD, Yoshiyuki Satake, MD, Kenji Konomi, MD, Seika Den, MD, Jun Shimazaki, MD Presented by: Abdulrahman.
Roy E Lehman MD*, Samuel F Fulcher MD**
V. S. Liarakos, K. van Dijk, L. Ham, L. Baydoun and G.R.J. Melles Anterior Chamber vs Posterior Chamber IOL in DMEK for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.
Jeffrey J. Ing, MD, FACS, (Delta Eye Medical Group, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology) Thanh T. Nguyen, OD (Delta Eye.
DSAEK in Eyes With Severe Pre-operative Visual Acuity Loss. 1. Sightline Ophthalmic Associates, Pittsburgh, PA 2. Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR 3.
Corneal Densitometry and Visual Outcome Comparisons of DSAEK and DMEK Eyes Xiaolin Zhang MD Robert L. Schultze MD Robert A. Eden MD Rahul Raghu.
Bryan Y Kim 1, Shintaro Kanayama MD PhD 1, Tueng T Shen MD PhD 1, Thomas E Gillette MD 2 1 University of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, 2 Eye.
Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital Coimbatore
Somasheila I. Murthy, Prashant Garg, Pravin K. Vaddavalli
Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Irido-Corneal Adhesions and Fibrous Ingrowth into the Graft-Host Interface Causing Graft Failure in a Case of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial.
Evaluation of Interface Reflectivity and Corneal Aberrations following DSAEK Hamid Khakshoor, MD Professor of Ophthalmology Mashhad University of Medical.
Lori Lombardi MD, Mark A. Terry MD, Neda Shamie MD, Anand K. Shah MD, Daniel J. Friend MS *Dr. Terry has a financial interest in Bausch & Lomb instruments.
Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.
Outcome of therapeutic keratoplasty in fungal keratitis Sonika Gupta, MS Assistant Professor, GMCH, Chandigarh, India Author has no financial interest.
Urrets-Zavalia Syndrome Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Claire Y. Chu, MD Pawan Prasher, MD Eric Dai, MD R. Wayne Bowman, MD V. Vinod.
Quality of Vision in Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy and After Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty van der Meulen IJE, Patel SV, Lapid-Gortzak.
DSAEK Outcomes in Normal and Abnormal, High-Risk Eyes at an University Practice Hugo Y. Hsu and Sean L. Edelstein The authors have no financial interest.
Postoperative Visual Acuity in Patients With Fuchs Dystrophy Undergoing Descemet Membrane–Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: Correlation With.
Case Report of Severe Haze After DSAEK
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with Toxic anterior segment syndrome induced endothelial failure First and Presenting.
Epithelial Ingrowth Following Endothelial Keratoplasty Ritika Dalal, DNB Robert S. Feder, MD, Irving Raber, MD, Steven P. Dunn, MD, Robert Weisenthal,
Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens: A Montreal Experience Georges M. Durr, MD 1,2 Johanna Choremis, MD, FRCSC.
Clinical outcome of DALK in Keratoconus – A one year follow up
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Thickness and Asymmetry After DSAEK Dickman MM, Cheng YYY, Berendschot TTJM, van.
E-Poster Price Vision Group & Cornea Research Foundation of America Descemet - Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty :Survival Outcomes in Eyes with Pre-
Mean Keratometry Measurement Post Penetrating Keratoplasty Jacky Yeung MSc MD, Stephanie Baxter MD FRCS(C) Department of Ophthalmology, Hotel Dieu Hospital,
Long-term outcomes of keratolimbal allografts and conjunctival limbal autografts for total limbal stem cell deficiency M. Ziaei MBChB (Hons), FRCOphth.
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty with a Graft Insertion Device : Technique and Early Results Dr Wei-Boon KHOR, MRCS(Ed), Dr Jodhbir.
Successful Use of Corneal Tissue from LASIK Donors in Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Case Series Mark D. Mifflin, MD Majid Moshirfar,
Urrets-Zavalia Syndrome After Lamellar Corneal Transplant: Two Case Reports Timothy Y. Chou, MD, Sujata P. Prabhu, MD, Justin Dexter, MD Department of.
J. Brian Foster, MD No Financial Disclosures
Daniel D. Hayes, MD1; Carolyn Y. Shih, MD1; David C
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Donor Lenticule Dislocation Following DSEK Pravin K Vaddavalli MD, Suntia Chaurasia MD, Muralidhar Ramappa MD, Prashant Garg.
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) Vs Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) in patients with Keratoconus (KC). Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital.
Jodhbir S Mehta, Donald Tan The Authors have a financial Interest in the Endoglide patent/royalty.
Etiological and decision making factors for repeat DSAEK or PK in cases of failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty First and Presenting.
World Cornea Congress VII - April 15-17, 2015 Electronic Poster
DSEK for the treatment of endothelial disease in India -Initial Experience in 80 eyes- Authors have no financial interest Dr Ashish Nagpal MD, FRCS Dr.
Post-Operative Management of Vitreous Adhesion after DSAEK with YAG Laser Vitreolysis Sherif Idris 1, Ahmed Al-Ghoul 2 MD FRCSC DipABO 1 University of.
Comparison of Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) Visual Outcomes with OCT Derived Corneal Thickness Measurements Authors Abraham K. Sleem, MD Robert L. Schultze,
Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty by novice endothelial keratoplasty surgeons Jason W. Much, M.D. 1 Paul M. Phillips, M.D. 1,2 Leslie.
The authors have no conflicting interest in the subject matter of this poster. In Vivo Evaluation of DSAEK Interface with Scanning- Laser Confocal Microscopy.
First 25 Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Outcomes for an Experienced DSAEK Surgeon Authors: Victoria Epstein, MS.,DO, Josh Wallsh, MS-III,
EXPERIENCE WITH A PMMA KERATOPROSTHESIS AT THE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SAO PAULO, BRASIL Oliveira LA, M.D; Sousa LB, M.D; Hofling-Lima AL, M.D; Freitas D,
Predicting Visual Acuity after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty using Corneal Topography, Pachymetry and Posterior Curvature Asymmetry Indices.
Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) in patients with prior Trabeculectomy or Tube shunt surgery. Thadani S.M. Fynn-Thompson N. Authors.
Effect of Donor Processing and Storage Time and Preoperative Endothelial Cell Counts on DSAEK Detachment Rates Daniel Demsey BScE Stephanie Baxter MD,
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Quality of Vision in Patients With Fuchs Endothelial.
Outcomes of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with a Pre-Existing Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens S. Elderkin1A, E. Tu1A,
Outcomes and Complications of DSEK in Eyes with Tube shunts or ACIOLs
DSAEK using corneas with previous LASIK
Endothelial keratoplasty in failed grafts
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.
Hong A, Boehlke CS, Afshari NA, Kim T Duke University Medical Center
No Financial Interest in Study Material
Long term Results of Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with failed penetrating Keratoplasty Maoz D. Amiran, MD, Raneen Shehadeh-Mashor, MD, Marie Eve.
Glaucoma Progression after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Neelofar Ghaznawi MD, Melissa B Daluvoy MD, Ajoy Virdi MD, Edwin S Chen, Kristin.
Role of HSV Infection in the Histopathology of Failed DSAEK
Anand K Shah MD1 Neda Shamie MD1 Paul Phillips MD1 Mark A Terry MD1,2*
Postoperative Complications Following Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients with Prior Glaucoma Surgery Melissa B Daluvoy.
I.J.E van der Meulen1, C.P. Nieuwendaal1,
Presentation transcript:

Relationship Between Donor Graft Cell Count and Visual Outcome in DSAEK Patients Authors Silvin Bakalian MD PhD, Johanna Choremis MD FRCSC, Michele Mabon MD FRCSC The authors have no financial interests to disclose

 Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) has become the preferred surgical treatment of choice for corneal endothelial disorders including Fuch’s endothelial dystrophy (FED) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK)(1)  Studies showed that there is a gradual improvement of visual acuity over time after DSAEK surgery for patients with FED and PBK(2-3)  A study performed by Terry reported no correlation between pre- operative endothelial cell counts and postoperative complications(4) Introduction

 The aim of this study is to determine if there is any correlation between donor graft endothelial cell counts (ECCs) and postoperative visual outcome for FED and PBK patients, who underwent DSAEK surgery  In addition, to evaluate if there is any effect on graft dislocation and survival rate Purpose

 Retrospective interventional case series from a tertiary referral surgical center  A total of 68 consecutive eyes that underwent a DSAEK surgery with a follow up of one year were included in the study  Two different surgeons using the same technique participated in the study  The patients were divided into three different groups based on their donor graft ECCs Materials & Methods

 Group one was comprised from patients who received donor grafts with cell count less than 2500 cells  Group two was comprised from patients who received donor grafts with cell count that varied between cells  Group three was comprised from patients who received donor grafts with cell count more than 3000 cells Materials & Methods

 The visual acuity (VA) was evaluated in all patients preoperatively, at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively  Clinical data including, donor age, recipient age, gender, eye, clinical diagnosis, incision size were recorded  In addition, intraoperative and postoperative complications were noted  The relationship between donor graft ECCs and visual acuity was assessed between the groups of patients Materials & Methods

Number of casesGroup 1 17 cases Group 2 39 cases Group 3 12 cases Number of patients Mean age of recipient Mean age of graft donor Mean endothelial cell count of graft donor Rebubbing0%2 (5.13 %)0% Graft survival100% Results Clinicopathological data

Visual Acquity (VA) Log MAR Group 1 <2500 cells Group Group 3 >3000 cells Preoperative VA0,480,520,6 Postoperative VA at 3 months 0,290,300,32 Postoperative VA at 6 months 0,290,280,34 Postoperative VA at 1 year 0,220,270,22 Results The mean visual acuity for all groups of patients

 Our results showed that there was statistically significant improvement in visual acuity after DSAEK for all groups of patients  This was in concordance with other studies (2-3)  In addition, our results demonstrated that there was no statistically significant differences in visual acuity at different time periods between the different groups of patients with different donor ECCs  Our results also showed that grafts with acceptable ECCs did not affect the postoperative complication rates Discussion

 Our results suggest that donor graft with different acceptable endothelial cell counts did not affect the visual outcome of Descemet striping automated endothelial keratoplasty patients at different intervals up to one year postoperatively  Further studies with longer follow ups and postoperative cell counts are warranted to elucidate if there is a correlation between donor graft endothelial cell counts and visual outcome Conclusion

1.Price MO, Price FW. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18(4):290– Li JY, Terry MA, Goshe J, et al. Three-year visual acuity outcomes after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology Jun;119(6): Phillips PM, Phillips LJ, Much JW, et al. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: six-month results of the first 100 consecutive surgeries performed solo by a surgeon using 1 technique with 100% follow-up. Cornea Dec;31(12): Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: the influence of preoperative donor endothelial cell densities on dislocation, primary graft failure, and 1-year cell counts. Cornea. 2008;27:1131–1137. References