Multi-STA Block ACK Protection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0871r0 Submission Jul 2013 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion on Potential Techniques for HEW Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r1 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1437r1 November 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Efficient Wider Bandwidth Operation in IEEE ax Date:
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Regarding trigger frame in UL MU Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0354r1 March 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Bandwidth granularity on UL-OFDMA data allocation Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r0 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0376r0 Slide 1Tatsumi Uwai, Radrix co. ltd March 2015 UL-MU MAC Throughput under Non-Full Buffer Traffic Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2015 Oghenekome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 1 Throughput Comparison of Some Multi-user Schemes in ax Date:
DL OFDMA Performance and ACK Multiplexing
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r1 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0064r1 January 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Consideration on UL-MU overheads Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1211r0 Submission September 2014 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Ack Procedure for OFDMA Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Uplink Multi-User MIMO Protocol Design
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 OFDMA Non-contiguous Channel Utilization Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0567r0 May 2015 Xiaofei Wang (InterDigital)Slide 1 Multi-STA BA for SU Transmissions Date: Authors:
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on ax OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0336r1 March 2015 Xiaofei Wang (InterDigital)Slide 1 MAC Overhead Analysis of MU Transmissions Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Submission Vida Ferdowsi, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0856r0July 2015 Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1096r0 Sep 2015 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Recovery Procedures in Cascading Sequences Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1265r1 November 2015 Slide 1 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1280r1 November 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0843r1 July 2015 Submission(ZTE) UL MU Random Access Analysis Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Yonggang.
Doc.: IEEE /1122r0 Submission Identifiers in HE PPDUs for power saving Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September.
Doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Random RU selection process upon TF-R reception Date: Slide.
Reza Hedayat, Newracom doc.: IEEE /829r0 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza Hedayat Young.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0615r0 May 2012 Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Considerations for early NAV indication Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /1043r1 Submission September 2015 Yusuke Tanaka, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Overall Protocol of UL MU BA for Multicast Transmission Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0376r2 Slide 1Tatsumi Uwai, Radrix co. ltd March 2015 UL-MU MAC Throughput under Non-Full Buffer Traffic Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1098r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 ACK/BA frame for UL MU under cascading structure Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0881r1 July 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Regarding buffer status of UL-STAs in UL- OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1116r1 September 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Trigger Frame Channel Access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0102r0 January 2016 Sean Coffey, RealtekSlide 1 High Efficiency Medium Access via Rosters Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0394r0 March 2016 Sean Coffey, RealtekSlide 1 Achieving High Efficiency in Medium Access via Roster Mode Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
HE Trigger Frame Format
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
MU BAR Frame Format Date: Authors: November 2015 Month Year
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
AP access procedure for UL MU operation
MAC Calibration results
Regarding UL MU protection
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Regarding HE fragmentation
Duration/ID field in UL-MU
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Regarding HE fragmentation
Presentation transcript:

Multi-STA Block ACK Protection Date: 2015-05-11 Authors:

Introduction UL-OFDMA and UL-MU-MIMO are key enabling technologies to enhance the performance in dense environment in 11ax. Multi-STA Block ACK was adopted in SFD to handle UL-MU transmission[1][2]. Multi-TID Block ACK frame is reused as a Multi STA Block ACK[1][2]. Multi-STA Block ACK frame has variable size depending on number of users and Block ACK mode [1][2]. Block ACK mode requires Block ACK sequence and Block ACK Bitmap fields

Multi-STA BA[2] Multi-STA BA may have 11a frame format B0-B10= AID B11= ACK/BA Multi-STA BA may have 11a frame format Multi-STA BA frame has variable length due to variable number of users Multi-STA BA could have variable MCS in 11a

EIFS operation for ACK protection 11 devices need to defer EIFS duration before transmitting a frame when previously received frame contains an error or is undecodable. EIFS duration SIFS+Maximum_ACK_duration+DIFS EIFS operation needs to consider fairness among STAs[3] EIFS prevents collision on ACK from hidden STAs’ transmission

EIFS and various ACK types Legacy hidden STAs’ transmission could interfere Multi-STA BA transmission EIFS operation could not guarantee Multi-STA BA reception

EIFS duration for BA MCS 0 ACK duration EIFS duration 44us EIFS duration SIFS+Maximum ACK duration(MCS0)+DIFS 16us+44us+34us = 94us on 11a, 11n(5GHz), 11ac MCS 0 BA duration 68us SIFS+Maximum BA duration(MCS0) 16us+68us = 84us No collision but fairness problem between hidden and non-hidden STAs

EIFS duration for Multi-STA BA Multi-STA BA duration 11a preamble duration+(22+N_STA*12)bytes/rate (BA mode for all STAs) At least 196us is required to avoid collision in 8 STA, MCS 0 case EIFS is still 94us Back-off value below 12 slots may cause collision on Multi-STA BA 1 slot have 9us duration

Several approaches to protect Multi-STA BA transmission Higher MCS Multi-STA BA for Multiuser Restrict number of users based on MCS level L-SIG protection PHY level protection for Multi-STA BA Restriction on using Multi-STA BA RTS/CTS case TXOP guaranteed case only (e.g., Power Saving Multi Poll)

Higher MCS Multi-STA BA for Multiuser Restrict Multi-STA BA air time<78us 20us+(22+N_STA*12)bytes/rate Assume all STAs employ BA mode (Includes Block ACK Sequence Control field and Bitmap Field) Rate N_STA N_STA(Integer) 6 1.791667 1 9 3.604167 3 12 5.416667 5 18 9.041667 24 12.66667 36 19.91667 19 48 27.16667 27 54 30.79167 30

L-SIG protection (1) Using L-SIG protection to protect Multi-STA BA UL-MU STAs need to transmit common L-SIG Hidden STAs have disadvantage of unfair contention due to EIFS duration Non-hidden STAs differ DIFS(or AIFS) after ACK transmission, but hidden STAs differ EIFS after ACK transmission

L-SIG protection (2) For fair contention, reduced L-SIG protection to provide fairness to hidden STAs All STAs differ DIFS after ACK transmission

Restriction on using Multi-STA BA MAC level NAV setting is required for Multi-STA BA transmission Use Multi-STA BA only when TXOP is guaranteed In PSMP scenario, using Multi-STA BA for UTT RTS-CTS case RTS-CTS may set NAV to all hidden STAs

StrawPoll Do you agree 802.11ax needs to provide a mechanism for Multi-STA BA to be protected from hidden node STAs. Y N A

References [1] IEEE 802.11-15/0132r4 "Specification Framework for TGax" [2] IEEE 802.11-15/0366r2 "Multi-STA Acknowledgement" [3] IEEE 802.11-14/1211r0 "ACK procedure for OFDMA"