Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/568r0 Submission Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA May 2015 Slide 1 Date: 2015-05-11 Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /1186r2 September 2014 Pengfei Xia, Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions.
Advertisements

Submission Sep doc.: IEEE /1046r2 Zhigang Wen,et. al (BUPT)Slide 1 Discussion on Massive MIMO for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1464r0 Submission November 2011 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT), et. al.Slide 1 The better spectrum utilization for the future WLAN standardization.
Doc.: IEEE /0116r1 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1447r1 Nov 2014 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Proposed Spec Framework Document for 11ax considering potential tech features.
Doc.: IEEE /569r0 Submission Performance of 1x, 2x, and 4x HE-LTF May 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Doc.: IEEE /0543r0 Submission May 2015 TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0383r0 Impact of number of sub-channels in OFDMA Date: Slide 1Leif Wilhelmsson, Ericsson March 2015 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0358r3 Submission March 2015 Daewon Lee, NEWRACOM Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2015 Oghenekome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 1 Throughput Comparison of Some Multi-user Schemes in ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission March 2015 Slide 1 Discussion on OFDMA Scheduling for ax Date: Authors: Huawei Technologies.
Doc.: IEEE /1227r3 SubmissionSlide 1 OFDMA Performance Analysis Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek Sept 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0089r1 January 2015 Leonardo Lanante, Kyushu Inst. of Tech.Slide 1 MAC Efficiency Gain of Uplink Multi-user Transmission.
Considerations on 11ax OFDMA Frequency Granularity
Submission doc.: IEEE /0097r0 Slide 1 Performance Analysis of Frequency Selective Scheduling Date: Authors: Ningbo Zhang, BUPT January.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0567r0 May 2015 Xiaofei Wang (InterDigital)Slide 1 Multi-STA BA for SU Transmissions Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1452r0 November 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency selective scheduling in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0336r1 March 2015 Xiaofei Wang (InterDigital)Slide 1 MAC Overhead Analysis of MU Transmissions Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0623r1 May 2015 Guido R. Hiertz, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 TGax simulation scenario “Box 5” – calibration results Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0070r0 Jan 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Joint MAC/PHY Evaluation Methodology Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0486r1 Submission May 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom HEW- Metrics, Targets, Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0612r0 May 2014 Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 1 Calibration Procedures towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0868r0 July 2015 Hakan Persson, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Impact of Frequency Selective Scheduling Feedback for OFDMA Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS.
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1056r1 Submission Clarifying Link Level Simulator Assumptions Sept Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Submission Sep doc.: IEEE XXXXr1 Zhigang Wen,et. al (BUPT)Slide 1 Discussion on Massive MIMO for HEW Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0578r0 May 2014 Frank LaSita, InterDigitalSlide 1 Residential Scenario CCA/TPC Simulation Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0869r0 July 2015 Hakan Persson, Ericsson ABSlide 1 OFDMA and VoIP Capacity Date: Authors:
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0889r0 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0757r0 Submission July 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0858r1 July 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Analysis on Multiplexing Schemes exploiting frequency selectivity in WLAN Systems.
Doc.: IEEE /1321r0 Submission Reducing Explicit MIMO Compressed Beamforming Feedback Overhead for ax November 2015 Slide 1 Date:
May 2015 doc.: IEEE /0586r1 Slide 1 Frequency Diversity Options in OFDMA Date: Authors: Reza Hedayat, Newracom NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Diversity Mode in OFDMA Date: Authors:
January 2016 doc.: IEEE /0095r1 Frequency Multiple Access in 11ay Date: Slide 1LG Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1314r2 November 2015 Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 I/Q Imbalance Impact to TGax OFDMA Uplink Reception Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0066r0 Submission January 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Downlink OFDMA Protocol Design Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0818r1 Submission Further Analysis of Feedback and Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA July 2015 Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1057r0 Submission Multiple Resource Unit Allocation for TGax OFDMA Sept 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Doc.: IEEE /0889r3 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1226r0 Submission Sep 2014 Slide 1 SLS Box 1&2 Calibration Results Date: Authors: Russell Huang (MediaTek)
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0626r1 Submission Feedback Element Compression for ax May 2016 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Submission doc.: IEEE /0331r1 March 2016 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 1 Power Control for Multi-User Transmission in ax Date:
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Enhanced Resource Allocation Schemes for 11be
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date: September, 2019
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA May 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Outline May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 2 Motivation Channel Selectivity and User Allocation Channel Selectivity Simulation Results System Throughput Simulation System Throughput Results Conclusions References

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Abstract May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 3 This contribution quantifies the potential resource unit (RU) selection gains for OFDMA transmissions using different RU sizes, over a few TGax channels, in all TGax simulation scenarios. The gains achieved from CSI-based RU selection for TGax OFDMA motivate the need for efficient RU- based feedback.

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Motivation The 11ax specification framework has already defined UL/DL OFDMA as one of the key 11ax MU features [1]. –OFDMA may exploit the channel selectivity to maximize frequency selective multiplexing gain in dense network conditions [5][6][7]. We quantify the gains for ideal resource unit (RU) selection for OFDMA transmissions –over different TGax channels [2][3] –in different TGax simulation scenarios [8] –using different RU sizes Slide 4 May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Channel Selectivity and User Allocation May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 5 OFDMA could be used to exploit the channel selectivity in the channel: –In one channel instance (using Channel D model [2]), the maximum gain between best RU and worst RU is as high as 9dB. With CSI at the transmitter, it can allocate only the “best” sub-channel to a STA and avoid allocating the worst sub-channel to that user –this may require sounding or signaling between transmitter and receivers

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Simulation Methodology and Assumptions May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 6  Simulation Methodology: Characterize difference between best and worst user allocation (Instantaneous loss) Max_min delta (dB) = Channel power (best RU) – Channel power (worst RU). Characterize the difference between a best and a random user allocation (Average loss) Ave_delta (dB) = Channel Power (best RU) – Channel power(Averaged)  Simulation Assumptions: 20MHz Channel-B, Channel-D [2], and UMi channel [3] Statistics based on channel instances Numerology derived from [4]

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Exemplary Simulation Results – Channel B May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 7 –Observations: The smaller the RU size, the more RU selection gain potentially achieved saturation Note: Similar results for Channel D and UMi channel may be found in the additional material section

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Summary of Channel Gain Analysis We summarize the gain in RU energy (Ave_delta (dB)) based on channel selection vs random channel allocation Channel B –Channel D –UMi Observations: –Gain increases as the RU size decreases –Rate of increase slows as the RU size decreases May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission System Throughput Simulation Assumptions No MAC protocol overhead assumed STAs are located based on specific TGax simulation scenarios [8] Non-continuous resource allocation was allowed May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 9 Scenario Name Topology Channel Model 1 Residential A - Apartment building 10m x 10m apartments in a multi-floor building 5 STAs per BSS Indoor (B/D) 2 Enterprise B - Dense small BSSs with clusters 10m inter AP distance 64 STAs per BSS Indoor (B/D) 3 Indoor Small BSS Hotspot C - Dense small BSSs, uniform m inter AP distance 30 STAs per BSS 4 Outdoor Large BSS Hotspot D - Large BSSs, uniform 130m inter AP distance 50 STAs per BSS Outdoor (Umi) ParameterValue Scheduler 1. Proportional Fair [9] 2. Random System Throughput Metric Shannon Capacity based on system SINR RU allocation Non-contiguous RU allocation Case 1: RU1 Case 2: RU2 Case 3: RU5 Case 4: RU9 Case 5: RU18 Table derived from [8]

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 10 Exemplary Simulation Results : SS3 Number of stations: 30 PF: Proportional fair [9] Gain of PF scheduling vs Random Scheduling

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Summary of System Throughput Analysis May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 11 Large system throughput gains for scenarios with low baseline throughputs SS3: 42% and SS4: 60% Behavior correlates to channel selectivity performance observed in previous results Channel B has large initial performance increase due to multi-user diversity in RU1 but quickly saturates as the number of RUs increase Channel D and UMi channel show much less initial increase and saturation

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Observations –Scheduling for OFDMA transmission provides a gain in the system throughput of ax –The scheduling is easily done at the AP when Channel State Information (CSI) is available. –Currently, provides CSI feedback for [10]: Fast link adaptation: single MCS feedback sequence identifier for a entire transmission bandwidth DL MU-MIMO: compressed feedback of channel coefficients for multiple sub-carriers and average SNR of each Space Time Stream –The accuracy of the CSI required for DL/UL OFDMA may be more than that required for fast link adaptation and less than that required for DL MU-MIMO May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 12

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Conclusions May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 13 With CSI-based RU selection, OFDMA may maximize the system throughput gain in TGax scenarios. We quantify the potential resource unit (RU) selection gains for TGax OFDMA transmissions with different RU sizes, for different channels and in different simulation scenarios. –System throughput gains of up to 42% in indoor scenarios and 60% in outdoor scenarios may be seen by using CSI-based RU selection as opposed to a random allocation method. CSI specific to OFDMA is needed at the transmitter to realize these gains.

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission References [1] IEEE /132r4 Spec Framework, Intel [2] IEEE /940r4, TGn Channel Models, Broadcom [3] Report ITU-R M , (12/2009), Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-Advanced [4] IEEE /330r1, OFDMA Numerology and Structure, Intel [5] IEEE /858r1, Analysis on Multiplexing Schemes exploiting frequency selectivity in WLAN Systems, Samsung [6] IEEE /1227r2, OFDMA Performance Analysis, Mediatek [7] IEEE /383r0, Impact of number of sub-channels in OFDMA, Ericsson [8] IEEE /980r10, Simulation Scenarios, Qualcomm [9] Zhishui Sun; Changchuan Yin; Guangxin Yue, "Reduced-Complexity Proportional Fair Scheduling for OFDMA Systems,“ Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems (ICCCAS), vol.2, pp , 2006 [10] IEEE P802.11ac™/D7.0, Draft STANDARD Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications Amendment 4: Enhancements for Very High Throughput for Operation in Bands below 6 GHz [11] IEEE /571r8, Evaluation Methodologies, Broadcom Slide 14 May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Additional Material Slide 15 May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Simulation Results – Channel D May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 16 –Observations: Similar to Channel B but with less saturation at 13 tones

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Simulation Results – Channel UMi May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 17 –Observations: Even less saturation as number of RUs reduce

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 18 System Throughput Performance for SS1-4 SS3 SS4 SS1 SS2

doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Simulation Methodology of System Throughput Obtain per tone SINR of STAs based on path loss, shadowing of specific simulation scenario and fading channel Estimate effective SINR of sub-channels based on the specific numerology using the capacity mapping in [11] Perform proportional fair scheduling based on effective SINR of different sub-channels [9] Assign users to sub-channels Estimate PHY layer system throughput based on capacity of chosen users Average over multiple drops May 2015 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 19