Climate Sensitivity & Climate Feedback Instructor: Prof. Johnny Luo

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FEEDBACK PARAMETERS Let T s = global mean surface air temperature R= net flux of heat into the climate system ΔR f = change in R due to some change in.
Advertisements

Lecture 8 Climate Feedback Processes GEU Forcing, Response, and Sensitivity Consider a climate forcing (e.g., a change in TOA net radiation balance,
Cloud Feedback Katinka Nov 7,2011 *Photo taken by Paquita Zuidema in Maldives.
The Role of El Nino in Ocean Warming Since the 1950s Dr. Roy W. Spencer Principal Research Scientist The University of Alabama in Huntsville 8 July 2014.
MET 112 Global Climate Change
PHYSICS 231 INTRODUCTORY PHYSICS I
Week 7: IPCC Chap 2 Review of Feedback Mechanisms Climate Variations.
Chapter 3 – Energy Balance and Temperature. The Fate of Solar Radiation We owe it all to the sun… 3 things can happen to solar (and all) radiation: 1)
Water Vapor and Cloud Feedbacks Dennis L. Hartmann in collaboration with Mark Zelinka Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington PCC Summer.
GLOBAL Energy Flow Thru Atmosphere. Global Atmo Energy Balance Ahrens, Fig Solar in IR Out In a stable climate, Solar Energy IN = IR Energy OUT.
Global Warming and Climate Sensitivity Professor Dennis L. Hartmann Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Seattle, Washington.
An improved energy balance model: Atmosphere and Greenhouse gases
Climate Forcing and Physical Climate Responses Theory of Climate Climate Change (continued)
3. Climate Change 3.1 Observations 3.2 Theory of Climate Change 3.3 Climate Change Prediction 3.4 The IPCC Process.
Earth Systems Science Chapter 3 I. Global Energy Balance and the Greenhouse Effect: The Physics of the Radiation Balance of the Earth 1.Electromagnetic.
Radiative Properties of Clouds ENVI3410 : Lecture 9 Ken Carslaw Lecture 3 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
Future climate (Ch. 19) 1. Enhanced Greenhouse Effect 2. CO 2 sensitivity 3. Projected CO 2 emissions 4. Projected CO 2 atmosphere concentrations 5. What.
Lecture 3: The greenhouse effect. Other concepts from Lecture 2 Temperature Scales Forms of Heat Transfer Electromagnetic Spectrum Stefan-Boltzmann Law.
Evaluation II – The Atmosphere Feedback describes the situation when output from (or information about the result of) an event or phenomenon in the past.
EFFECTIVE TEMPERATURE OF THE EARTH SYSTEM First the Sun : 1. The spectrum of solar radiation measured outside the Earth’s atmosphere matches closely that.
Lesson 2 AOSC 621. Radiative equilibrium Where S is the solar constant. The earth reflects some of this radiation. Let the albedo be ρ, then the energy.
The Greenhouse Effect CLIM 101 // Fall 2012 George Mason University 13 Sep 2012.
Climate Change Andrew Levan – Department of Physics.
Global Warming & Climate Sensitivity: Climate Feedbacks in the Tropics Professor Dennis L. Hartmann Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
Lecture 1: Introduction to the planetary energy balance Keith P Shine, Dept of Meteorology,The University of Reading
Earth-Atmosphere Energy Balance Earth's surface absorbs the 51 units of shortwave and 96 more of longwave energy units from atmospheric gases and clouds.
Outline Further Reading: Chapter 04 of the text book - global radiative energy balance - insolation and climatic regimes - composition of the atmosphere.
Pat Arnott, ATMS 749 Atmospheric Radiation Transfer ATMS 749 Atmospheric Radiation Transfer.
Lecture 14 Climate Sensitivity, thermal inertia. Climate Sensitivity The change in equilibrium temperature per unit of radiative forcing.
Midterm #1 - Wednesday!!! Bring a scantron sheet!!!!! No OH’s this week again (last time – I promise) Midterm Review Tonight Broida Hall1610 starting 6:30!!
Climate Change UNIT 3 Chapter 7: Earth’s Climate System
CE 401 Climate Change Science and Engineering solar input, mean energy budget, orbital variations, radiative forcing January 2011.
Use of CCSM3 and CAM3 Historical Runs: Estimation of Natural and Anthropogenic Climate Variability and Sensitivity Bruce T. Anderson, Boston University.
Radiation Group 3: Manabe and Wetherald (1975) and Trenberth and Fasullo (2009) – What is the energy balance of the climate system? How is it altered by.
Metrics for quantification of influence on climate Ayite-Lo Ajovan, Paul Newman, John Pyle, A.R. Ravishankara Co-Chairs, Science Assessment Panel July.
CE 401 Climate Change Science and Engineering solar input, mean energy budget, orbital variations, radiative forcing January 2012.
2. Climate: “average” weather conditions, but the average doesn’t stay steady. I.e. Ice ages, El Niño, etc. 1. Weather: state of the atmosphere at a given.
3 May 2007 GIST May Professor John Harries, Professor John Harries, Space and Atmospheric Physics group, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College,
Climate Literacy Session: Causes Peter Coombe August 5, 2015.
Earth’s Energy Balance Complexity, climate change and human systems HCOL 185.
Future Climate Projections. Lewis Richardson ( ) In the 1920s, he proposed solving the weather prediction equations using numerical methods. Worked.
Global Scale Energy Fluxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations Aaron Donohoe -- MIT David Battisti -- UW CERES Science Team Meeting.
Projection of Global Climate Change. Review of last lecture Rapid increase of greenhouse gases (CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O) since 1750: far exceed pre-industrial.
The Atmosphere: Part 8: Climate Change: Sensitivity and Feedbacks Composition / Structure Radiative transfer Vertical and latitudinal heat transport Atmospheric.
TOPIC III THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT. SOLAR IRRADIANCE SPECTRA 1  m = 1000 nm = m Note: 1 W = 1 J s -1.
Heat Transfer in the Atmosphere Essential Question: How is heat transferred in the atmosphere?
Modelling the climate system and climate change PRECIS Workshop Tanzania Meteorological Agency, 29 th June – 3 rd July 2015.
Atmospheric Radiative Transfer PHYS 721 “The ocean sunglint in a dusty/polluted day” Picture by Yoram J. Kaufman
VII. Climate Change Blackbody model Windows and saturation Feedbacks Aerosols.
Chapter 3 Atmospheric Radiative Transfer and Climate To date, we have learned 1)The greenhouse effects, through understanding the simplest greenhouse model,
Goals for Today 1.PREDICT the consequences of varying the factors that determine the (a) effective radiating temperature and (b) mean surface temperature.
Electromagnetic Radiation Solar radiation warms the planet Conversion of solar energy at the surface Absorption and emission by the atmosphere The greenhouse.
Green House Effect and Global Warming. Do you believe that the planet is warming? 1.Yes 2.No.
1 MET 112 Global Climate Change MET 112 Global Climate Change - Lecture 3 The Earth’s Energy Balance Dr. Eugene Cordero San Jose State University Outline.
An important constraint on tropical cloud-climate feedback Dennis L. Hartmann and Kristin Larson Geophysical Res. Lett., 2002.
Lecture 1: Global Energy Balance Instructor: Prof. Johnny Luo.
Introduction to Climate and Environmental Physics HS 2014 Lecture II Christoph Raible, Markus Leuenberger, Fortunat Joos and Thomas Stocker.
Global Change: Class Exercise Global Energy Balance & Planetary Temperature Mteor/Agron/Envsci/Envst 404/504.
Shortwave and longwave contributions to global warming under increased CO 2 Aaron Donohoe, University of Washington CLIVAR CONCEPT HEAT Meeting Exeter,
Green House Effect and Global Warming. Do you believe the Earth is warming? A.Yes B.No.
Natural Environments: The Atmosphere
How the Greenhouse Effect Works/Feedback factors
Chapter 3 Atmospheric Radiative Transfer and Climate
Greenhouse Gases and Climate Modeling
Climate Forcing.
Global Change: Class Exercise
Global Warming & Climate Sensitivity: Climate Feedbacks in the Tropics
What Causes Weather? 2009.
Global Change: Class Exercise
Global Change: Class Exercise
Presentation transcript:

Climate Sensitivity & Climate Feedback Instructor: Prof. Johnny Luo

T s = 15 0 C > C Considering the Greenhouse Effect

Part I: Fundamentals of Climate Science 1.Introduction to the climate system 2.The Earth’s energy balance 3.Atmospheric radiation and climate 4.Surface energy balance 5.Atmosphere general circulation 6.Ocean general circulation Part II: Climate Change 1.Climate sensitivity & climate feedback 2.Natural & anthropogenic climate change 3.IPCC assessment of past & future climate change Energy budget (global balance & local imbalance) Fluid movement (due to local energy imbalance) What will happen if energy imbalance occurs at a global level? EAS 488/B8800 Climate & Climate Change

Outlines 1.Basic concepts: climate forcing, response, sensitivity and feedbacks 2.Climate sensitivity w/o feedback 3.Water vapor feedback 4.Ice albedo feedback 5.Cloud feedback 6.Tropical SST regulatory mechanism 7.Daisy world

Global energy balance: the starting point This chapter deals with: 1)what may break this balance? 2)what will happen when this balance is violated? First, we will look at a few fundamental concepts: 1)climate forcing, 2)climate response, 3)climate sensitivity 4)climate feedback

Climate Forcing: change in external factors that breaks the aforementioned energy balance (usually measured in changes in energy flux density in W m -2 at TOA). Climate Response: adjustment of the climate system in response to the external forcings (usually measured as change in surface temperature, T s ). Forcing & Response

Example: Forcing: When CO 2 is doubled, OLR will change from 240 W m -2 to 236 W m -2 (is this a warming or cooling for the climate system?). Response: For planet A: T s increases by 1 K; for planet B: T s increases by 10 K. Sensitivity: λ(A) = 1K/(4 W m -2 ) = 0.25 K/(W m -2 ). λ(B) = 10K/(4 W m -2 ) = 2.5 K/(W m -2 ). Climate Sensitivity: climate response (T s ) over climate forcing (Q).

Outlines 1.Basic concepts: climate forcing, response, sensitivity and feedbacks 2.Climate sensitivity w/o feedback 3.Water vapor feedback 4.Ice albedo feedback 5.Cloud feedback 6.Tropical SST regulatory mechanism 7.Daisy world

Suppose a forcing dQ is imposed on R TOA. Let’s calculate the climate sensitivity dT s /dQ. =1 equilibrium New equilibrium: R TOA = 0 Sensitivity parameter Sensitivity of the Earth’s climate

Suppose a forcing dQ is imposed on R TOA. Let’s calculate the climate sensitivity dT s /dQ. equilibrium Sensitivity of the Earth’s climate dQ: forcing; dT s : response

Suppose a forcing dQ is imposed on R TOA. Let’s calculate the climate sensitivity dT s /dQ. = 1 (b/c instantaneous changes in R TOA & dQ are the same) equilibrium New equilibrium at the TOA Sensitivity of the Earth’s climate dQ: forcing; dT s : response

Suppose a forcing dQ is imposed on R TOA. Let’s calculate the climate sensitivity dT s /dQ. = 1 (b/c instantaneous changes in R TOA & dQ are the same) equilibrium New equilibrium at the TOA Sensitivity parameter Sensitivity of the Earth’s climate dQ: forcing; dT s : response

Now we calculate: Assuming: 1) solar constant is unchanging, and 2) T e and T s change at the same rate

Now we calculate: Estimating the sensitivity parameter (T e = 255 K for current climate) What this means is: for every 1 W m -2 of energy we add to or subtract from the climate system, change of effective temperature (or surface temperature) will be 0.26 K. This is dictated by the Stefan-Boltzmann relation. Note that other factors (e.g., albedo, water vapor) are held unchanged at this point. Assuming: 1) solar constant is unchanging, and 2) T e and T s change at the same rate

Think-Pair-Share Questions: 1)For this kind of climate system, i.e., λ=0.26 K (W m -2 ) -1, what dQ is needed to warm up the Earth’s surface by 1K (i.e., dT s =1K) ? 2)How many W m -2 does the Solar Constant (S) have to increase to achieve dT s =1 K? Assume the albedo is 0.3 This is the climate sensitivity that is built-in of the σT e 4 relationship.

1 W m -2 -> 0.26 K  about 4 W m -2 is needed for 1 K. To achieve 4 W m -2 thru changing the Solar Constant (S 0 ) Think-Pair-Share Questions: 1)For this kind of climate system, i.e., λ=0.26 K (W m -2 ) -1, what dQ is needed to warm up the Earth’s surface by 1K (i.e., dT s =1K) ? 2)How many W m -2 does the Solar Constant (S) have to increase to achieve dT s =1 K? Assume the albedo is 0.3

Observations show that S 0 varies in magnitude of 1 W m - 2 (historical data dated back to 1870 can also support this estimate; however, over a longer history such as millions of years, there are larger variations). So,  S 0 (1-0.3)/4 = W m - 2. With this climate forcing, the response will be × 0.26 = K. Conclusion: the σT e 4 type of climate system is a rather stable one because of the fundamental way energy balance is achieved.

Outlines 1.Basic concepts: climate forcing, response, sensitivity and feedbacks 2.Climate sensitivity w/o feedback 3.Water vapor feedback 4.Ice albedo feedback 5.Cloud feedback 6.Tropical SST regulatory mechanism 7.Daisy world

Feedback mechanism: Sensitivity = Output/Input. With feedback, the sensitivity parameter will be different. T-P-S: How will water vapor affect the intrinsic climate sensitivity parameter? In other words, given the same forcing, how will water vapor changes the T s response?

Temperature Feedback mechanism: H2OH2O Water vapor: a strong positive feedback in global warming scenario Increasing CO 2 dQ dT s

Much of the infrared absorption (greenhouse effect) comes from the contribution of H 2 O IR absorption spectra (0 means no absorption; 100 means total absorption)

Clausius-Clapeyron relationship (C-C): saturation vapor pressure increases with temperature For current terrestrial conditions, for every 1 K increase in temperature, e s increases by ~ 6%. Calculate OLR as a function of surface temperature (holding RH constant so vapor pressure increases with T s ). This will need a radiative transfer model. For each T s, we calculate I (  OLR), so we have dT s /d(OLR)

OLR increases with increasing T s, but at a SLOWER rate than what the stefan-Boltzmann relationship gives: σ(T s - 30) 4. Conclusion: because of the water vapor feedback, climate sensitivity is HIGHER than a sigma-T- to-the-4th relationship. T * is the surface temperature (T s ). T * - 10, T * - 20, …, T * - 50 are attempts to estimate the effective temperature (T e ) from the surface temperature. For global average, T * = 288 K, T e = 255 K, so T * - 30 is a good approximation for global average curve. Red: assume clear sky Green: average cloudiness

Climate sensitivity has doubled with water vapor feedback K (Wm -2 ) -1

Sensitivity = response / forcing. Climate sensitivity w/o feedback: Double CO 2 forcing: 4 W m -2 -> 4×0.26 ≈ 1 K Climate Forcing: change in external factors that breaks the energy balance of the climate system (usually measured in changes in energy flux density in W m -2 at TOA). Climate Response: adjustment of the climate system in response to the external forcings (usually measured as change in surface temperature, T s ). Summary

Temperature goes up Feedback mechanism: H 2 O goes up Water vapor: a strong positive feedback, doubling the climate sensitivity Increasing CO 2 (or whatever causes the warming) dQdT s dQ dT s Summary