1 Asphalt Quality Assurance Program & Construction Inspection 2015 Asphalt Regional Seminars Rob Crandol, P.E. VDOT – Materials Division Assistant State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Construction of Longitudinal Joints 2014 VDOT/VAA Regional Asphalt Seminars Ken Arthur Quality Control Manager Templeton Paving.
Advertisements

2014 Washington Asphalt Conference “Specification Update & Initiatives” Joe DeVol Assistant State Materials Engineer State Materials Laboratory.
Section Cross Slope District 1 Your logo here.
2013 C&MS Section 500- Structures Changes from 2010 to 2013 Construction and Materials Specifications in Structures Items.
Asphalt Specification Changes July 2005 Contractor Asphalt Training Rich Hewitt, PE District Bituminous Engineer District Five Materials & Research.
Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.
2014 AAPA Conference March 11-12, 2014 Curtis Vincent, P.E. Construction Engineer Lyndi Davis Blackburn, P.E. Assistant Materials and Tests Engineer Specification.
Presented at: Rutgers Asphalt Paving Conference March 8, 2011 Presented by: Eileen Sheehy, P.E. Manager, Bureau of Materials NJDOT.
Caltrans Changes SECTION 39 “Hot Mix Asphalt”
1 Final Estimates and Asphalt Reports. 2 Setting Spread Rate For Asphalt Base.
Fredericksburg District 2014 Subdivision Project Resurfacing with SM Thin Lift Asphalt Gary Murphy Pavement Management Fredericksburg District.
District 8-0 Winter Schools /23/2012.
Uniform Paving Platform Regional Asphalt Seminar, Blacksburg, VA March 12, 2015 David P. Shiells, P.E. District Materials Engineer.
Regional Asphalt Seminars Pavement Wedge Guidelines and Specifications EMMETT R. HELTZEL, P.E. STATE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER.
District 8-0 QA Review Trends Summary Documentation and Certification Project certifications for materials should be reviewed as they.
Bituminous Street Recertification Initiatives. Initiative Items n Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) n Longitudinal Joint Spec and other methods for longitudinal.
Tranlation: EASL’s Average Daily Traffic Time or Traffic Pavement Condition Index Pavement Performance Pavement Condition High Performance Intersections.
MICHIGAN RIDES ON US 2015 Local Roads Workshop Gaylord March 12, 2015.
Presented by Matthew J. LaChance Pavement Solutions for State, County, and Municipal Infrastructures.
MICHIGAN RIDES ON US 2015 Local Roads Workshop Gaylord March 12, 2015.
Warm Mix for a Cold Climate Colorado DOT’s 2007 WMA Project.
 Embankment Construction – LOTs  What is the maximum length of a LOT? Mainline pavement lanes, turn lanes, ramps, parking lots, concrete box.
1 Overview CQC Asphalt Specifications.  Payment based on Contractor’s Quality Control tests.  FDOT runs verification tests at a lesser frequency. 
Asphalt Quality Assurance Program
Chapter 5 Patching and Edge Repair
Street and Local Roads Inspection and Acceptance of Alternative Pavements.
Introduction to Asphalt Pavement Construction and Compaction For ODOT District 3 presented by.
Pavement Maintenance II
Warm Mix for a Cold Climate Update on Colorado DOT’s 2007 WMA Project on I Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference and Equipment Show.
Materials Specifications & Virginia Test Methods (VTM’s) 2014 Regional Asphalt Seminars Rob Crandol, P.E. Statewide Asphalt Program Manager.
Florida Department of Transportation 1 Overview of CQC Asphalt Specifications.
Asphalt QC 2000 The Adventure Begins….. Topics Terminology Specifications Sampling and Testing Reporting/CQR Who Does What? Lube & Oil Change All in 20.
Porous Asphalt The Specs Tim Horton, Skillings Connolly Jessica Knickerbocker, City of Tacoma Mark A. Palmer, P.E., LEED AP, City Engineer, City of Puyallup.
Overview of the New Hot Mix Specifications Dale A. Rand, P.E. TxDOT Construction Division Flexible Pavements Branch TRB AFK10 Committee Meeting April 20-21,
Developing a Mixture-Based Specification for Flexible Base.
WisDOT Bureau of Technical Sevices Spring 2014 QMP Training Base Compaction SPV’s and Project Design Guidance.
Working Successfully With Property Managers: An Interactive Engagement
 Have an approved mix design before paving.  The department has eliminated the use of PG -22 Asphaltic Material and replaced it with PG -28.  Tack.
Materials Specifications & Special Provision Changes 2015 Regional Asphalt Seminars Rob Crandol, P.E. Assistant State Materials Engineer.
1 Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Arizona - Application and Verification October 3, 2008 Arizona Association of County Engineers.
REVISED May 2009STATE MATERIALS OFFICE Goals in this Session To understand:  The Sampling & Testing process  The Project Certification process  The.
Clarifying Quality Control Bill Pine, Heritage Construction & Materials 56 th Illinois Bituminous Paving Conference.
Stacy Hagenbucher.  Process Improvements  Clarification  Trends  Finals Tracking  Trends  Why Missing Dates  Additional Resource  Issues on sites.
Trenton M. Clark, P.E. Director of Engineering Virginia Asphalt Association.
Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.
Project Materials Usage and Concerns. Project Materials and Acceptance QC/QA Specifications QC/QA Specifications Quality Control Plans Quality Control.
Extending Performance with Proper Asphalt Compaction
Quantity Calculations Module 3. Quantity Calculations  Specifications  Post Bid Quantity Calculations  Production Quantity Calculations –Checking Yield.
VDOT’S PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES & EXPECTATIONS
Alabama Asphalt Pavement Association
David P. Shiells, P.E. District Materials Engineer
Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays PennDOT Research Findings
Research Implementation WHRP Flexible Group
Uniform Paving Platform A Contractor’s Perspective
ALDOT Specification Updates
QC Document Update Todd Shields, INDOT.
Alabama Asphalt Pavement Association
Panel discussion Date.
Construction Management
Longitudinal Joint Construction – Why Straightness Matters
Quality Assurance: Pay Factors and Dispute Resolution
Chip Seal Quality Assurance Guide
New Specifications for 2017
Considerations FOR more durable hma pavements
Emulsion Task Force Meeting
Document Development for Metro Project: Performance-based Procurement Asphalt Overlay for Programmed Maintenance 17/01/2019.
Quality Assurance for Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatments
Prime Factors for Successful Preservation Treatments
Materials and Tests Engineer
Fiber Reinforced Polymer Systems
Presentation transcript:

1 Asphalt Quality Assurance Program & Construction Inspection 2015 Asphalt Regional Seminars Rob Crandol, P.E. VDOT – Materials Division Assistant State Materials Engineer Trenton Clark, P.E. Virginia Asphalt Association Director of Engineering

3 QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY CONTROL (QC) and ACCEPTANCE INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE (IA) VERIFICATION SAMPLING AND TESTING (VST)

Are these Actually Different? QA or Quality Assurance is the overall program required by the owner. 1.QC or Quality Control is the processes*/procedures used by the contractor. * These processes are beyond the minimum requirements of acceptance testing - such as additional sampling Acceptance is the procedure for which a product is measured for adherence to specification such as mat density. In Virginia, this procedure is performed by the contractor for asphalt

Are these Actually Different? 2.Independent Assurance is a procedure/process used by the owner. The purpose is to ensure the people, equipment, and procedures used by the Contractor are compliant to specification 3.Verification, Sampling and Testing is a procedure / process used by the owner. The purpose is to check the acceptance decision by the Contractor such as verification cores

VDOT Uses System & Project Approach to QA System Approach at the Plant (Contractor) Certified technicians QC on mixes during production Sampling for acceptance on AC Content and Gradation; Pass/Fail on Volumetrics All mixes going to VDOT projects tested, but not specific to a project Test data entered into PLAID

VDOT Uses System & Project Approach to QA System Approach at the Plant (VDOT) Certified technicians Mix samples collected for statistical comparisons on AC Content and Gradation Mix samples collected with contractor acceptance samples for IA (matched samples) VDOT samples compared to other contractor acceptance samples for VST (unmatched samples) VDOT volumetric samples collected for Pass/Fail only and compared to contractor results

Asphalt Plant Quality Control

10

11

VDOT Uses System & Project Approach to QA Project Approach in the Field (Contractor) Asphalt Field Level 2 Technician Certified density technicians Establish roller pattern and control strip QC on density during compaction of Lots Acceptance on Lot mat density Monitoring of longitudinal joint density All data recorded on TL forms and provided to VDOT

VDOT Uses System & Project Approach to QA Project Approach in the Field (VDOT) Asphalt Field Level 2 technicians Monitor construction of roller pattern Monitor compacting, nuclear density testing, coring/plug and calculation of average control strip density Randomly tests cores from control strip (IA) Provides random numbers to contractor Monitors nuclear density testing in Lot Identifies and retrieves cores for VDOT acceptance testing (VST)

VDOT Project Staff Responsibilities IA Verifies paving equipment meets specifications Verifies materials being used are from approved sources Take temperature measurements of AC at least every hour Verifies that contractor personnel are performing QC operations correctly Verifies density testing being performed Joint Density 16

VDOT/Materials VST and IA Perform VST testing on plugs IA testing Verify method of random selection Marking of test locations Observe QC testing at control strip Observe test sections. Obtain samples of cores from control strip to reweigh in laboratory. Depth Control tests 18

19 So where does construction inspection fit into VDOT’s QA Program ? QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY CONTROL (QC) and ACCEPTANCE INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE (IA) VERIFICATION SAMPLING AND TESTING (VST)

Construction Inspection VDOT Representatives (consultant or VDOT employee) provides the construction oversight & inspection Representatives must be familiar with the VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications as well as Special Provisions that are found in the contract. 20

Document Hierarchy Section Standard Drawings Standard Specifications Supplemental Specifications Plans Special Provisions Special Provisions Copied Notes General notes and other written information not in a SP or SPCN in No Plan and Minimum Plan Concept contracts carry the same weight as plans

Key Inspection Points Prior to Density Acceptance Site preparation Milling Tacking Equipment Placement Compaction Density Acceptance General requirements Small quantity applications VTM-76 QC test sections Independent assurance Verification testing and sampling Referee procedure 22

Site Preparation Areas of particular concern/focus: Repairing failed areas Cleaning the surface Tack-achieve bonding of layers 23

Site Preparation – Failed areas Not addressing failed areas leads to premature failure of our overlays & resurfacing Approaches to correct failures can include: Milling Patching prior to the contract for resurfacing Specify patching type, material and locations in the contract Use Special Provision (SP) for Surface Preparation and Restoration Prior to Plant Mix Overlay (Volume 2) 24

Milling Why mill a road? Remove material distress Maintain surface elevation Improve cross-section What things must be inspected? Presence of scabbing Positive drainage Cleanliness Performance milling Time frames Run-on conditions 25

What Happens with No Bonding

½” Deflection, 60# Load ¼” Deflection, 160# Load Fully BondedUnbonded Bonded Demonstration

Cores Showing Debonding Bonding Failures

Days later! Courtesy of Road Science

Tacking – Proper Mainline 30

Tacking – Mainline and Joints What two categories of tack coat materials are approved by VDOT? Conventional Tack – Section 310 Non-Tracking Tack Coat –Volume 2 31

Tacking – Mainline and Joints What is the specified application rate for conventional tack on mainline? Where is it found? 0.05 – 0.10 gal/sy for undiluted Section What is the specified application rate for non- tracking tack coat on mainline? Rate recommended by the manufacturer 32

Tacking – Longitudinal Joints Proper application to result in joint density Width of application for first paving pass? 2 feet – 18 to 20 inches under first pass, 4 to 6 inches protruding beyond first pass For second pass, vertical face of first pass and approximately 1 foot into lane to be paved 33

Equipment Material Transfer Vehicle Required for interstate surface paving in 2015 Required for SMA and other specialty mixes Minimum 15 ton combined capacity between device and paver paver hopper 34

Placement Temperatures Base WMA: 40F minimum HMA: 40F for “A” mixes and less 25% RAP; 50F for “A” mixes and 25% or more RAP, “D” and “E” Mix Maximum is 350F or specified by liquid supplier New for 2015: WMA minimum is 200F 35

Placement 36 Paver Items Longitudinal joints must be offset 6” from underlying joint Surface longitudinal joint must be 6” – 12” from centerline marking; 6” offset from between lane markings Continuous line for steering the paver Grade control with ski, joint shoe

Density (Compaction) CRITICAL to pavement durability & performance ! No significant changes to procedures from 2014 SMA changes: Allow more than 3 vibratory passes, caution not to crush the stone 37

Roller pattern FEET 75 FEET MARK TEST LOCATIONS ORIENT GAUGE IN SAME DIRECTION

Thin Lift Roller Pattern Graph TL Density lbs/ft 3 Roller Passes Maximum Density = lb/ft 3 Roller Pattern = 5 passes 3 Vibratory 2 Static Roller Pattern = 5 passes 3 Vibratory 2 Static

Control Strip Construction 40  Establishes an average nuclear density reading (10 locations)  Verifies nuclear density reading using asphalt cores  Determines the Target Density Value for subsequent acceptance testing

41 When do you have to construct a Control Strip? VDOT specifications require that one control strip be constructed at the beginning of work on each roadway and shoulder course and on each lift of each course. Control Strip Construction

Locations of nuclear readings are marked by contractor.

Core locations are marked for cutting.

46 Verification of Target Density Mix TypeMin.Control Strip Density% SM-9.5A, SM-12.5A92.5 SM-9.5D SM-12.5D92.2 SM-9.5E, SM-12.5E92.2 IM-19.0A, IM-19.0D, IM-19.0E92.2 BM-25.0A, BM-25.0D92.2 Table III-3

47 Control Strip Construction An additional control strip is required when: - There is a change in type or source of materials. - There is a significant change in the composition of the material being placed from the same source. - There is a control strip failure (consecutive failures?) Construction must cease if new control strip is required

48 Test Sections Table III-4 Payment Schedule for Lot Densities % of Target Control Strip DensityPercent of Payment Greater than 102.0% to 102% to less than 98.0% to less than Less than 96.0%75

SM-4.75 is Slightly Different Mix monitored at plant through permeability testing as well as standard tests In the field: Roller pattern established (same as other dense graded mixes) Control strip constructed BUT NO CORES Average nuclear density from 10 readings is target Lot testing and payment follows Table III-4