SBFD for VCCV (draft-gp-pals-seamless-vccv, draft-gp-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator) IETF-82, Dallas, TX Vengada Prasad Govindan Carlos Pignataro Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pseudowire freeze mechanism draft-jin-pwe3-pw-freeze-00 Lizhong Jin Bhumip. Khasnabish.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 LSP-Ping and BFD for MPLS-TP draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd- procedures-00.
MPLS-TP BFD for CC-CV proactive and RDI functionalities
BFD MIB Extensions for MPLS and MPLS-TP Networks draft-vkst-bfd-mpls-mib-01 Sam Aldrin Tom Nadeau Venkatesan Mahalingam Mukund Mani Kannan KV Sampath.
OLD DOG CONSULTING Challenges and Solutions for OAM in Point-to-Multipoint MPLS Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting Ltd. Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems, Inc.
S-BFD IETF 88, Vancouver, Canada
MAC Withdraw Signaling for static PW draft-boutros-l2vpn-mac-wd-03.txt Himanshu Shah - Ciena Siva Sivabalan, Sami Boutros – Cisco Sam Aldrin - Huwei.
Softwires Hub & Spoke using L2TPv3
1 Update from Version 1 draft-dong-pwe3-mspw-oam-02.txt Yang
Directed BFD Return Path draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-directed-03 Greg Mirsky Jeff Tantsura
A Unified Control Channel for Pseudowires draft-nadeau-pwe3-vccv-2-02 Thomas D. Nadeau Luca Martini IETF 81.
MPLS Performance Measurement UDP Return Path draft-bryant-mpls-oam-udp-return-02 {stbryant, msiva,
1 LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-00 Nitin BahadurJuniper Networks Kireeti KompellaJuniper Networks IETF 69, MPLS WG,
Proactive fault detection in E-VPN (draft-vgovindan-l2vpn-evpn-bfd-00) Vengada Prasad Govindan, Samer Salam, Ali Sajassi IETF 88, November 2013 Vancouver.
IETF80, Prague1 LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in VPLS model 3 supporting Qualified learning draft-chen-l2vpn-vpls-mac-opt-qualified-01.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 IETF 84 – Vancouver August 2012 LSP Ping Support for P2MP PWs (draft-jain-pwe3-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-00.txt)
1 © 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. draft-nadeau-pwe3-vccv-00.txt IETF #56 San Francisco, CA USA Thomas D. Nadeau Monique.
PWE3 WG Document Status IETF-62 Danny McPherson Stewart Bryant
PWE3 Agenda – Monday 8 th Nov 15 min - Agenda bash, WG Agenda and Status - Andy Malis and Matthew Bocci 5 min - Dynamic Placement of Multi Segment Pseudo.
Application of PWE3 to MPLS Transport Networks
1 MPLS-TP BFD for CC- CV proactive and RDI functionalities draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv-02 MPLS WG, 77th IETF - Anaheim.
Pseudo-Wire Protection Ping Pan IETF 63.
Yaakov (J) Stein RAD Data Communications, Ltd. PW usage nits.
Gap Analysis for Operating IPv6- only MPLS Networks draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-01 Wes George (operator asking for it) Carlos Pignataro, Rajiv Asati.
Signaling Transport WG (sigtran) Wednesday, March 29, :30 AM =================================== CHAIR: Lyndon Ong -- Intro and agenda bashing.
MPLS-TP OAM Analysis draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-03.txt Nurit Sprecher / Nokia Siemens Networks Tom Nadeau / BT Huub van Helvoort / Huawei Yaacov.
Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Fibre Channel Over MPLS draft-roth-pwe3-fc-encap-00.txt PWE3 IETF-63 August 2005 Ronen Solomon
Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Fibre Channel Over MPLS draft-roth-pwe3-fc-encap-01.txt PWE3 IETF-64 November 2005 Ronen Solomon
IP Pseudowire Florin Balus August, PG 1Florin BalusIETF60 – San Diego Requirements - Existing topology FR/ATM VPNs ATM Network Frame Relay Access.
IETF 69, July 2007Slide 1 Preferential Forwarding Status bit Definition draft-muley-dutta-pwe3-redundancy-bit-01.txt Praveen Muley, Pranjal K. Dutta, Mustapha.
70 Agenda & WG Status Stewart Bryant Danny McPherson
LSP-Ping extensions for MPLS-TP draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-extensions-01 Nitin Bahadur Sami Boutros Rahul Aggarwal Eric Gray 1IETF 77 MPLS WG IETF 77,
1 PWE3 Control Word PWE3 IETF-60 August 2004 Stewart Bryant Danny McPherson.
Pseudo Wire (PW) Virtual Circuit Connection Verification (VCCV) Update Thomas D. Nadeau Cisco Systems, Inc Rahul Aggarwal (Presenter) Juniper Networks.
Pseudo-Wire Protection Ping Pan IETF 65.
Residence Time Measurement draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time-04 Greg Mirsky John Drake
S-BFD Alert Discriminator draft-akiya-bfd-seamless-alert-discrim Nobo Akiya Carlos Pignataro Dave Ward IETF 92, Dallas, USA.
25 July Pseudowire Communities draft-pkwok-pwe3-pw-communities-01 Paul Kwok Pranjal Dutta Frederic Jounay draft-pkwok-pwe3-pw-communities-01 IETF-81.
ITU-T SG17 Liaison to PWE3 on X.84 (Support of Frame Relay Services over MPLS Core Networks) Liaison online at
Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services (PALS) WG Status IETF-92 Dallas Co-Chairs: Stewart Bryant and Andy Malis
IETF 67, Nov 2006Slide 1 VCCV Extensions for Multi- Segment Pseudo-Wire draft-hart-pwe3-segmented-pw-vccv-01.txt draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-04.txt Mustapha.
MPLS-TP OAM Analysis Nurit Sprecher / Nokia Siemens Networks Tom Nadeau / BT Huub van Helvoort / Huawei Yaacov Weingarten / Nokia Siemens Networks.
Ken Grewal Gabriel Montenegro Manav Bhatia
UDP Encapsulation for IP Tunneling
MPLS-TP Fault Management Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-fault-01
Tal Mizrahi Marvell IETF Meeting 78, July 2010
Softwires Hub & Spoke using L2TPv3
IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS OAM
Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services (PALS) WG Status IETF-93 Prague
Multi-layer OAM for SFC Networks draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam-09
Greg Mirsky Jeff Tantsura Mach Chen Ilya Varlashkin
BFD for VXLAN draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan
Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP): base protocol and data model draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-yang Greg Mirsky
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping for IPv6 Pseudowire FECs
PW Control Word Stitching
IETF BIER, November 2017, Singapore
Use of p2mp BFD in PIM-SM (over shared-media segment) draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case Greg Mirsky Ji Xiaoli
Extended BFD draft-mirmin-bfd-extended
PW Control Word Stitching
Active OAM in Geneve draft-mmbb-nvo3-geneve-oam
How OAM Identified in Overlay Protocols draft-mirsky-rtgwg-oam-identify Greg Mirsky IETF-104 March 2019, Prague.
BGP VPN service for SRv6 Plus IETF 105, Montreal
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for EVPN Ethernet Segment Failover Use Case draft-zwm-bess-es-failover-00 BESS WG IETF104# Prague Sandy Zhang.
Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services (PALS) WG Status IETF 100 Singapore Co-Chairs: Stewart Bryant and Andy Malis
MPLS-TP Loopback Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-li-lb-02
Mtracev2 IANA Assigned UDP Port
PWE3/MPLS WG, IETF 80th, Prague
IESG LC: BFD for VXLAN draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan
E. Bellagamba, Ericsson P. Sköldström, Acreo D. Ward, Juniper
Presentation transcript:

SBFD for VCCV (draft-gp-pals-seamless-vccv, draft-gp-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator) IETF-82, Dallas, TX Vengada Prasad Govindan Carlos Pignataro Presented by: Stewart Bryant

Problem Statement and Scope of work Define behavior of SBFD on the VCCV of signaled and static PWs – L2TP signaled PW – Static PW – MPLS LDP signaled PW not considered in this revision (future) Reuse encapsulations and protocol procedures of RFC5885 and define what is additionally needed for SBFD. – New CV types required for SBFD Async. – SBFD echo is not in scope. – SBFD provides VCCV based fault detection only. – VCCV based Fault detection and Status signaling is out of scope

Details – 1/2 SBFD discriminator advertisement options: – Use provisioned SBFD discriminators – Use Alert disciminator (draft-akiya-bfd-seamless-alert- discrim) – Use L2TP for advertisement (draft-gp-l2tpext-sbfd- discriminator) SBFD encapsulation: – IP/UDP based encapsulation: Use IANA assigned SBFD Async UDP destination port – L2SS and PW-ACH based encapsulation: New IANA type requested for SBFD

Details – 2/2 SBFD Initiator operation: – Two new CV types requested for SBFD operation. – Option1: Use two reserved bits of the existing parameter defined by RFC 5885 – Option2: Use bits from the VCCV extended CV parameter TLV (RFC7189) SBFD Reflector operation: – Reuse reflector operation from draft-ietf-bfd-seamless- base. Capability selection: – What should be the order of preference (if any) between SBFD and BFD: Can we make them independent? i.e. no order of preference specified between SBFD and BFD.

Next Steps Requesting comments from the WG. Close off on the open items. Submit a new revision and ask for WG adoption.