Use-cases for Collaborative LMAP Lingli Deng, Rachel Huang, Shihui Duan CMCC HW MIIT draft-deng-lmap-collaboration-03

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Omniran TG 1 Cooperation for OmniRAN P802.1CF Max Riegel, NSN (Chair OmniRAN TG)
Advertisements

Gatekeepers Soh Hock Heng National University of Singapore Internet2 Commons Site Coordinator Training December 3, 2003 National Univesity of Singapore.
Dynamic Routing Scalable Infrastructure Workshop, AfNOG2008.
Page 1 of 29 Net-Scale Technologies, Inc. Network Based Personal Information and Messaging Services Urs Muller Beat Flepp
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Addressing the Network – IPv4 Network Fundamentals – Chapter 6.
Lecture 1 Internet Overview: roadmap 1.1 What is the Internet? 1.2 Network edge  end systems, access networks, links 1.3 Network core  network structure,
Lecture Chapter 1: roadmap 1.1 What is the Internet? 1.2 Network edge  end systems, access networks, links 1.3 Network core  network structure,
Lecture 1 Internet Overview: roadmap 1.1 What is the Internet? 1.2 Network edge  end systems, access networks, links 1.3 Network core  network structure,
SP Wi-Fi Services over Residential Architectures (draft-gundavelli-v6ops-community-wifi-svcs) IETF 84 - August, 2012 Authors: Sri Gundavelli(Cisco) Mark.
Networking Components Chad Benedict – LTEC
Inter-domain Routing Outline Border Gateway Protocol.
Authors list to be completed.
Lecture 1 Internet CPE 401 / 601 Computer Network Systems slides are modified from Dave Hollinger and Daniel Zappala Lecture 1 Introduction.
IETF 68 – SIMPLE WG SIMPLE Problem Statement draft-ietf-simple-interdomain-scaling-analysis-00 Avshalom Houri – IBM Tim Rang - Microsoft Edwin Aoki – AOL.
IPv6 Home Networking Architecture - update IETF homenet WG Interim meeting Philadelphia, 6 th Oct 2011 draft-chown-homenet-arch-00.
By Kyle Slinger.  A network is where you can send information to and from different PCs.
Authors list to be completed.
Large Scale Broadband Measurement Activities within the IETF, Broadband Forum and EU Leone project Trevor Burbridge, 16 th May 2013 The research leading.
11 KDDI Trial Hub & Spoke Shu Yamamoto Carl Williams Hidetoshi Yokota KDDI R&D Labs.
and LMAP liaison Document Number: IEEE R0
MPTCP – Multipath TCP WG Meeting Toronto, IETF-90, 21 st July 2014 Philip Eardley Yoshifumi Nishida 1.
Definitions What is a network? A series of interconnected computers, linked together either via cabling or wirelessly. Often linked via a central server.
Use-cases for Collaborative LMAP Lingli Deng, Rachel Huang, Shihui Duan draft-deng-lmap-collaboration-02
Ngtrans CHAIRS: Alain Durand Tony Hain Margaret Wasserman
An overview of IP addressing history and policy issues Leo Vegoda Number Resources Manager, IANA.
15-1 Networking Computer network A collection of computing devices that are connected in various ways in order to communicate and share resources.
Year 10 – Chapter 4 – Computer Networks Lesson 2: Setting up a Network Starter Task – Can you think of reasons to set up a network? Why Use Networks? 1.
Lecture 1 Internet CPE 401 / 601 Computer Network Systems slides are modified from Dave Hollinger and Daniel Zappala Lecture 2 Introduction.
1 UDP Encapsulation of 6RD IETF 78 Maastricht 2010 July 30.
1 4/23/2007 Introduction to Grid computing Sunil Avutu Graduate Student Dept.of Computer Science.
Distributed Authentication in Wireless Mesh Networks Through Kerberos Tickets draft-moustafa-krb-wg-mesh-nw-00.txt Hassnaa Moustafa
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 1: Introduction to Scaling Networks Scaling Networks.
SmartNets Results Overview SmartNets SmartNets Methods.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 1: Introduction to Scaling Networks Scaling Networks.
IPv6/IPv4 XLATE Trial Service for sharing IPv4 address Japan Internet Exchange Co., Ltd. Masataka MAWATARI.
AAA and Mobile IPv6 Franck Le AAA WG - IETF55. Why Diameter support for Mobile IPv6? Mobile IPv6 is a routing protocol and does not deal with issues related.
Content-oriented Networking Platform: A Focus on DDoS Countermeasure ( In incremental deployment perspective) Authors: Junho Suh, Hoon-gyu Choi, Wonjun.
Third-party ALTO server discovery draft-kiesel-alto-3pdisc-02 Sebastian Kiesel Marco Tomsu Nico Schwan Michael Scharf IETF 77, March 2010.
Setup and Management for the CacheRaQ. Confidential, Page 2 Cache Installation Outline – Setup & Wizard – Cache Configurations –ICP.
Campus Network Best Practices: Introduction and NREN Models Dale Smith University of Oregon/NSRC This document is a result of work by the.
Alex Leifheit NETWORKS. NETWORK A number of interconnected computers, machines, or operations. Key Components Network components, Network Architecture,
Cryptography and Network Security Chapter 16 Fifth Edition by William Stallings Lecture slides by Lawrie Brown.
1 Trusted Transitive Introduction Max Pritikin (Presentation by Cullen Jennings) Revision A.
GMPLS for Ethernet A Framework for Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Ethernet draft-papadimitriou-ccamp- gmpls-ethernet-framework-00.txt.
KMIP Compliance Redefining Server and Client requirements to claim compliance Presented by: Bob Lockhart.
Use-cases and Requirements for MPTCP Proxy in ISP Networks Lingli Deng, Dapeng Liu, Tao Sun, Mohamed Boucadair, and Gregory Cauchie draft-deng-mptcp-proxy-00.
Introduction to Computing Slides By ADEELA MUSTAFA.
Introduction to Networking
REST Style Large Measurement Platform Protocol draft-liu-lmap-rest-00.txt Dapeng Liu(Presenter) Lingli Deng China Mobile Shihui Duan CATR Cathy Li China.
Networking Components Quick Guide. Hubs Device that splits a network connection into multiple computers Data is transmitted to all devices attached Computers.
1 OVERVIEW OF TISP WORK: Analysis of Policies and Regulations Carrier Selection and Pre-selection Indicators of the Assessment of Telecommunications.
Hierarchical Management Architecture for Multi-Access Networks Dzmitry Kliazovich, Tiia Sutinen, Heli Kokkoniemi- Tarkkanen, Jukka Mäkelä & Seppo Horsmanheimo.
and LMAP liaison Document Number: IEEE R0 Date Submitted: Source: Antonio BovoVoice:
1 Welcome to Designing a Microsoft Windows 2000 Network Infrastructure.
DM Collaboration – OMA & BBF: Deployment Scenarios Group Name: WG5 - MAS Source: Tim Carey, ALU, Meeting Date:
Information Networks. Internet It is a global system of interconnected computer networks that link several billion devices worldwide. It is an international.
IETF 86 – Orlando – LMAP Large-Scale Broadband Measurement Use Cases Marc Linsner Philip Eardley Trevor Burbridge March 13, 2013.
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Sixth Edition
Discussion on DHCPv6 Routing Configuration
LMAP BoF 1. ISP use case 2. Framework
Year 11 – Chapter 4 – Computer Networks
OmniRAN Introduction and Way Forward
LMAP WG - IETF 88 draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-00
Lecture 2 Overview.
CPE 401 / 601 Computer Network Systems
IPv6 Implementation Challenges in Iran
and LMAP liaison Document Number: IEEE R0
ICT Computing Lesson 4: Computing Network.
OmniRAN Introduction and Way Forward
and LMAP liaison Document Number: IEEE R0
Presentation transcript:

Use-cases for Collaborative LMAP Lingli Deng, Rachel Huang, Shihui Duan CMCC HW MIIT draft-deng-lmap-collaboration-03

Overview of the draft Movitations from China What is Collaborative LMAP? Why is it needed? Initial discussion over how it can be done

Motivations from China China’s networks are complex – 31 provinces, 300 regions come to hierarchical networks deployments. – 3 ISP giants (CMCC, CTCC, CUCC) all manage nationwide networks. Regulator/ISP must know the network statuses of 3 ISP Giants in each region of a province, then province, and finally the whole country. Some 3rd party companies, e.g., Chinacache, Chinanetcenter are also providing nationwide network information reports. MIIT, as the official organization, has been issuing the report of broadband speed state every quarter for 2 years. It would be prohibitive for MIIT to deploy its own dedicated probes (900+).

Collaborative LMAP – narrow view: refers to the scenairo where multiple autonomous measurement systems collaborate together to perform large scale performance measurement. – broad view: LMAP practice that involves at least communication/coordination between multiple controllers/collectors Not currently chartered for LMAP WG – single controller assumption

Why is Collaborative LMAP is needed Motivated to address scalability of controller, hetegeneous MAs issue within a large ISP, or multiple sub- domains for a large ISP. Motivated to address capex issue in network monitoring for dedicated LMAP system by reusing existing systems from ISPs/3rd-party entities. Motivated to address capex issue in QoE monitoring for dedicated LMAP system by reusing LMAP systems from multiple ISPs/3rd-party entities. Motivated to do trouble-shooting in segmented access environment by reusing existing LMAP systems from multiple ISPs. Usecases for single ISP Usecases for Regulator Usecases for ICP Usecases for mutiple ISPs

Derived Requirements LMAP extensions for collaboration between domains needed Mechanisms for task coordination Mechanisms for results aggregation Extensions for authentication and authorization for collaborative measurement tasks. Minimal changes preferred.

What collaborations are needed? Controller1 MA1MA2MAn … Controller2 MA1MA2MAn … LMAP SYS#1 LMAP SYS#2 ICP-MA CPE-MA End-MA CPE-MA End-MA Collector1 Collector2

Discussion Does LMAP plan to cover these in the future? -If yes, will it be considered as a start? -If no, any idea for solving this? Other suggestions?

BACKUP

1-Usecases for the ISP scalability issue with a single controller for a fairly large scale network operator – [I-D.ooki-lmap-internet-measurement-system] – multiple controllers to share the burden of many MAs heterogeneous network devices as MAs different Controllers speaking different LMAP protocols: HTTP client for browser built-in MAs, TR.069 for CPE built-in MAs, SNMP server for network device built-in MAs multi-domain ISP network for large ISP, it might divide its global network into several autonomous domains.

2-Usecases For the Regulator Motivations for the regulator-driven LMAP – the current situation of its regional networks – the peering performance between ISPs Prohibitive to deploy a dedicated LMAP system for a large region – possible alternative: use ISP's LMAP system or a dedicated third-party systems – Through collaboration, MAs from multiple organizations can perform comprehensive measurement for the whole regional network

3-Usecases For the ICP Motivations for the ICP-driven LMAP – to understand the practical performance and impact of various network segments (e.g. access network, transit network and Internet) to the application – to guide the design, experimental and operational phases of a new feature/technology introduction Prohibitive and not economic to deploy a dedicated LMAP system for each local ISP – possible alternative: use collaborative ISP's LMAP systems

4-Usecases For the End Consumer Motivations for the End-driven LMAP – to aid trouble-shooting in segmented access environment – problems arise either from the WLAN between the end to a third-party home gateway the LAN between the home gateway to the ISP's CPE device the various segments within and beyond the local ISP's domain – potential collabration between various measurement points along the way end, home-GW, CPE, network devices, ICP