doc.: IEEE /0238r1 AgendaRich Kennedy, MediaTek IEEE /15 Regulatory SC Berlin Meeting Plan and Agenda Date: Authors: March 2015 Slide 1

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 AgendaRich Kennedy, MediaTek Abstract This presentation is the plan for the IEEE /15 Regulatory Standing Committee meeting at the Berlin a IEEE 802 Plenary the week of March 9, March 2015 Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Agenda [TAM2, ThAM1] Review and approve the agenda Administrative items Introduction Complete the work of the DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team The regulatory summaries –Challenge of LAA-LTE in 5 GHz –5 GHz expansion bands status – US, EU, ITU and CITEL –Globalstar in 2.4 GHz band update –New challenges? Actions required –Review NGMN whitepaper and any necessary interaction with that group –The New EC Radio Equipment Directive – Planning for June 2016 –Continue pressure on 3GPP for sharing in 5 GHz AOB Adjourn Rich Kennedy, MediaTek March 2015 Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Regulatory SC Ad Hoc Discuss the agenda for the week Discuss possible output documents Discuss possible motions before the WG Interaction with –Output to FCC Interactions with –Need a liaison –Simulation suggestions as it relates to real-world Wi-Fi in dense environments March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 4

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Administrative Items Required notices –Affiliation FAQ –Anti-Trust FAQ - guidelines.pdfhttp://standards.ieee.org/resources/antitrust- guidelines.pdf –Ethics –IEEE Working Group Policies and Procedures policies-and-procedures.doc policies-and-procedures.doc Chair and Secretary –Chair is Rich Kennedy (MediaTek) –Need volunteer for Recording Secretary Rich Kennedy, MediaTek March 2015 Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 6 SC Operating Rules Anybody can vote, present, and make motions Participation in SC during and WG Plenary or Interim counts towards voting rights in the respective working group All motions must pass by a 75% majority

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings  All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.  Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.  Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.  Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.  Technical considerations remain primary focus  Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.  Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.  Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. This slide set is available at Rich Kennedy, MediaTek March 2015 Slide 7

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Introduction Purpose –Improve the working relationship between the technical experts and the regulatory specialists, especially when it comes to critical technical issues Scope –The group will review new regulatory changes or impending changes affecting and standards –Each meeting will focus on the most critical issue at the time Critical Issue Focus –Direct impact on IEEE and current and future standards –Response/Input deadlines –Coordination with IEEE (RR-TAG) –Coordination with the Wi-Fi Alliance Outputs from this group must go through Rich Kennedy, MediaTek March 2015 Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Tuesday AM2 DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team –Introduction –Review the straw poll results –Discuss The Report –Rolf document 11-15/402r1 –Commissioners’ suggestion –Letter to the FCC –Motion to endorse The Report Any final thoughts? Recess until Thursday March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 9

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda DSRC Coexistence TT Wrap-up Tiger Team has been meeting since August 2013 (20 months) Two proposals heard –Detect and Avoid (Peter E.) –DSRC spectrum modification (Tevfik) FCC informed of this work in February of 2014 FCC Chairman Wheeler’s letter to Senator Rubio Straw Polls FCC blog post of Commissioners O’Rielly and Rosenworcel – Finishing the work –Tiger Team straw polls –Letter to the FCC –Final steps depend on the outcome the WG vote WG Report in 11-15/0293r0 March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 10

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda The Tiger Team The /15 Regulatory SC set up the DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team with the intent of: –Collecting the opinions of all parties in this issue, so the WG could see the full picture, not just the views of IEEE voters –Further explain the to each side what the objections to the two proposals were –Holding discussions between the two sides to see if there was some way that a compromise solution could be achieved –Creating a report to the FCC that shows every effort was made to find common ground –Failing a compromise, demonstrating that IEEE did make every effort to find a solution that worked for all March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 11

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda The Proposals Over the full course of this TT activities, only two sharing methods have been proposed 1.A DFS-like approach, whereby the APs monitor the DSRC channels, and move to another channel (or leave the DSRC band completely) for a predetermined period of time, after which it checks to see if the channel is clear and can return 2.A reconfiguration of the DSRC channels to avoid transmissions in the safety-of-life channels, which have been moved to the high end of the DSRC band, thus allowing operation with no need to detect and avoid these transmissions, and share the lower DSRC channels using existing sharing mechanisms March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 12

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Straw Poll Should take a position favoring a specific technical solution for sharing the DSRC band? Yes No Don’t care March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 13

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Next Steps Ask the WG to endorse the report –The report clearly states that no proposal was selected –We can endorse the report without agreeing with its conclusions –Endorsement or non-endorsement will be stated in the FCC letter Approval of the letter by and the 802 EC –Submit to the FCC with the report if endorsed –Submit without the report if not endorsed Independent testing will occur using both techniques –If solutions are found, and will require amendment of a standard, may be brought to the WNG later this year There was no vote on the report in the SC March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 14

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Thursday AM1 Review and approve the agenda (8:00 – 8:45) NGMN whitepaper discussion Regulatory issues –Challenge of LAA-LTE in 5 GHz –5 GHz expansion bands status – US, EU and ITU –Globalstar in 2.4 GHz band update Actions required –The New EC Radio Equipment Directive – Planning for June 2016 –Continue pressure on 3GPP for fair sharing in 5 GHz AOB –Request change in teleconference rules Adjourn Rich Kennedy, MediaTek March 2015 Slide 15

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda “The NGMN Alliance is an industry organization of world-wide Telecom Operators, Vendors and Research Institutes (see and was founded by international network operators in Its objective is to ensure that the functionality and performance of next generation mobile network infrastructure, service platforms and devices will meet the requirements of operators and, ultimately, will satisfy end user demand and expectations. “ 1 “It is the NGMN Alliance goal to drive and guide the development of all future mobile broadband technology enhancements with a focus on “5G”. The targets of these activities are supported by the partnership of worldwide leading operators, vendors, universities, and successful cooperation with other industry organizations.” Who is the NGMN Alliance?* March 2015 Slide 16Jeorge Hurtarte, Teradyne 1. Sources: and

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Intention and Required Actions of the NGMN Liaison Letter * 1. The intention of the liaison is to introduce to the IEEE on the scope and objectives of the NGMN 5G initiative. 2. The NGMN would like to invite IEEE to provide feedback on the activities and to make proposals on potential aspects to be considered in their work. 3. The NGMN wants to inform the IEEE that it is their intention to keep IEEE updated on their activities in the area of 5G at major milestones. 4. Furthermore, NGMN would like to understand and to receive information on IEEE’s current and potential future activities in the area of 5G. 5. It would be of particular interest for NGMN if there is input required from the NGMN 5G initiative and the dates and milestones by which the input from NGMN would be required. 6. The NGMN would like a representative at the NGMN Industry Conference & Exhibition in Frankfurt/Germany on March 2015, where the NGMN 5G White Paper will be publicly introduced and distributed for the first time. 7. The NGMN looks forward to deeper and further collaboration with the IEEE on 5G related activities. March 2015 Slide 17Jeorge Hurtarte, Teradyne Today * Source:

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda NGMN 5G White Paper Release Announcement* “MOBILE OPERATORS OF THE NGMN ALLIANCE PUBLISH 5G WHITE PAPER Barcelona, Spain – 3rd March, 2015 The Next Generation Mobile Networks (NGMN) Alliance is excited to announce the finalization and publication of the 5G White Paper. A global initiative has delivered key end-to-end operator requirements intended to guide the development of future technology platforms and related standards, create new business opportunities and satisfy future end-user needs. …Liaisons and co-operations with all relevant industry- organisations world-wide, SDOs and research groups have also been successfully established to work against this joint objective...” March 2015 Slide 18Jeorge Hurtarte, Teradyne * Source:

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Table of Contents 1.Executive Summary 2.Introduction 3.5G Vision Business Context Use Cases Business Models 4.Requirements 5.Technology and Architecture 6.Spectrum 7.IPR 8.Way Forward 9.Conclusions 10.Annexes Spectrum Contents Frequency Bands –Suitability of Existing Mobile Bands –Wireless Spectrum Needs Spectrum Management Options –Continuing Need for Licensed Spectrum –Supplementary Spectrum for Flexibility and Capacity –Benefits of Spectrum Flexibility Required Next Steps on Spectrum NGMN 5G White Paper Contents* March 2015 Slide 19Jeorge Hurtarte, Teradyne * Source:

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda NGMN Spectrum Highlights* “Leverage spectrum – Higher frequencies (e.g., centimetre and millimetre waves) and licence exempt spectrum should be exploited to complement …as a complement to the available mainstream licensed spectrum resource…simultaneous connections to multiple access points need to be supported.“ “A new RAT could be motivated by higher carrier frequencies (e.g., bands above 6GHz), lower latency [E2E: < 1ms], and specific use cases.” “In order to facilitate migration towards 5G, NGMN recommends that LTE/ LTE-Advanced and Wi-Fi, as well as their evolution, are to be supported by the new 5G network design. Thus, the access- agnostic network functions should accommodate any new RATs, as well as LTE/ LTEAdvanced, Wi-Fi, and their evolution.” March 2015 Slide 20Jeorge Hurtarte, Teradyne * Source:

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda NGMN Spectrum Highlights (continued)* “A fundamental requirement is that operators must be free to “re-farm” their existing mobile spectrum holdings for 5G as well as being able to gain timely access to spectrum that is already harmonised for mobile but is not yet assigned and additional spectrum that may be identified at the ITU World Radiocommunication Conference 2015 (WRC-15).” “NGMN has identified potential new requirements for MHz of spectrum located above 6 GHz to support very high data rates and shorter-range connectivity and believes that this should be studied and if appropriate addressed at the conference after WRC-15.” March 2015 Slide 21Jeorge Hurtarte, Teradyne * Source:

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda NGMN Spectrum Highlights (continued)* “Whilst in a 5G context access to additional spectrum above 6 GHz is of interest, it should be emphasized that in general low frequency spectrum (below 6GHz), especially sub- 1GHz, is absolutely essential for an economical delivery of mobile services…” “Spectrum below 1 GHz is useful for coverage (rural and indoor) and spectrum above 6 GHz is useful for very high data rates and shorter-range connectivity.” “Supplementary spectrum, made available on a shared basis, will be required to deliver extra capacity where needed… Access to licence-exempt spectrum as a useful supplement for certain applications and may be seamlessly integrated into the 5G platform.” March 2015 Slide 22Jeorge Hurtarte, Teradyne * Source:

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda NGMN Spectrum Highlights (Continued)* “Spectrum flexibility can bring benefits of spectral efficiency gains, examples include: increasing exclusive spectrum with emphasis on improving regional/global harmonisation; smart carrier aggregation to use spare frequencies; spectrum trading; and managing fair access to supplementary shared spectrum.” “In 5G, network based positioning in three-dimensional space should be supported, with accuracy from 10 m to <1 m at 80% of occasions, and better than 1 m for indoor deployments. Tracking of high speed devices will be required to provide this location accuracy in a real-time manner.” March 2015 Slide 23Jeorge Hurtarte, Teradyne * Source:

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda NGMN Spectrum Highlights (Continued)* “In 5G, network based positioning in three-dimensional space should be supported, with accuracy from 10 m to <1 m at 80% of occasions, and better than 1 m for indoor deployments. Tracking of high speed devices will be required to provide this location accuracy in a real-time manner.” Roadmap:  Commercial system ready in 2020  Standards ready end of 2018  Trials start in 2018  Initial system design in 2017  Detailed requirements ready end of 2015 March 2015 Slide 24Jeorge Hurtarte, Teradyne * Source:

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Next Steps 1. The intention of the liaison is to introduce to the IEEE on the scope and objectives of the NGMN 5G initiative. 2. The NGMN would like to invite IEEE to provide feedback on the activities and to make proposals on potential aspects to be considered in their work. 3. The NGMN wants to inform the IEEE that it is their intention to keep IEEE updated on their activities in the area of 5G at major milestones. 4. Furthermore, NGMN would like to understand and to receive information on IEEE’s current and potential future activities in the area of 5G. 5. It would be of particular interest for NGMN if there is input required from the NGMN 5G initiative and the dates and milestones by which the input from NGMN would be required. 6. The NGMN would like a representative at the NGMN Industry Conference & Exhibition in Frankfurt/Germany on March 2015, where the NGMN 5G White Paper will be publicly introduced and distributed for the first time. 7. The NGMN looks forward to deeper and further collaboration with the IEEE on 5G related activities. √ √ ? Need volunteers to review and provide comments on the NGMN 5G White Paper March 2015 Slide 25Jeorge Hurtarte, Teradyne

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Regulatory Summaries Asia European Union –ETSI TC BRAN#82 update of EN April 7-10 in Sophia-Antipolis Incorporate changes for RE-D compliance Unify LBT for Load Based Devices paragraph options –ETSI ERM TG11#xx update of EN This week (March 10-12) in Sophia-Antipolis Incorporate changes for RE-D compliance Evaluate Industrial Automation proposal for non-LBT service in 2.4 GHz March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 26

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Regulatory Summaries [2] North America –Globalstar NPRM interference testing March 2-13 at the FCC Tech Center WFA, Bluetooth SIG, NCTA, WISPA and Globalstar –FCC Commissioners O’Reilly and Rosenworcel suggest DSRC spectrum modification to support sharing with Wi-Fi –Waiting for changes to TVWS rules based on Comments filed in NPRM FCC –Waiting for NPRM(s) for sharing frequencies above 24 GHz based on Comments filed in NOI FCC March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 27

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Actions Required The New EC Radio Equipment Directive – Planning for June 2016 –Changes for 2.4 GHz band in EN –Changes for 5 GHz band in EN –Changes for WS devices in EN Continue pressure on 3GPP for equal access in 5 GHz –In ETSI BRAN –With regulators –Need simulations to show revised Harmonised Standard meets the requirements March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 28

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda Teleconferences Bi-weekly on Thursdays, 12:30 to 13:30 ET March 2015 Rich Kennedy, MediaTekSlide 29

doc.: IEEE /0238r1 Agenda References March 2015 Slide 30Rich Kennedy, MediaTek