Homogenized SSU Observations Verify the Anthropogenic Global Warming Theory Cheng-Zhi Zou 1 Haifeng Qian 2, Likun Wang 3, Lilong Zhao 4 1: NOAA/NESDIS/STAR,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems.
Advertisements

Stratospheric Measurements: Microwave Sounders I. Current Methods – MSU4/AMSU9 Diurnal Adjustment Merging II. Problems and Limitations III. Other AMSU.
Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.
Climate Change & Global Warming: State of the Science overview December 2009 Nathan Magee.
Global Warming and Climate Sensitivity Professor Dennis L. Hartmann Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Seattle, Washington.
A Fundamental Climate Data Record for the AVHRR Jonathan Mittaz Manik Bali & Andrew Harris CICS/ESSIC University of Maryland.
3. Climate Change 3.1 Observations 3.2 Theory of Climate Change 3.3 Climate Change Prediction 3.4 The IPCC Process.
Outline Further Reading: Detailed Notes Posted on Class Web Sites Natural Environments: The Atmosphere GE 101 – Spring 2007 Boston University Myneni L29:
Climate Change: An Overview of the Science Anthony J. Broccoli Director, Center for Environmental Prediction Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers.
SPARC Temperature Trends Assessment group also Shigeo Yoden, Carl Mears, John Nash Nathan Gillett Jim Miller Philippe Keckhut Dave Thompson Keith Shine.
Stratospheric Temperature Variations and Trends: Recent Radiosonde Results Dian Seidel, Melissa Free NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, MD SPARC.
Climate Change: Connections and Solutions
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Correction of Vegetation Time Series for Long Term Monitoring Marco Vargas¹.
10:23 AM Sanders 7.9 Greenhouse Effect Unit 7: Water Cycle and Climate.
Climate Change: Carbon footprints and cycles. What is climate change? What do you think climate change is? What do we actually mean when we talk about.
Data assimilation of polar orbiting satellites at ECMWF
Some analyses of updated SSU data –merging Nash data with NOAA-11 and NOAA-14 –derived trends, solar cycle –comparisons with NCEP/ERA40/HALOE data.
· Are human activities responsible for the warming? Separating out the impact of human activity from natural climate variation is extremely difficult.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Long-Term Upper Air Temperature.
1 Detection and Determination of Channel Frequency Shift in AMSU-A Observations Cheng-Zhi Zou and Wenhui Wang IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada, July 24-28,
Radiation Group 3: Manabe and Wetherald (1975) and Trenberth and Fasullo (2009) – What is the energy balance of the climate system? How is it altered by.
Anthropogenic Climate Change. Global Temperature is Increasing.
Reanalysis: When observations meet models
The Greenhouse Effect What is the greenhouse effect? Interaction between planet’s atmosphere, star’s light Results in heating of planet What causes the.
THE NOAA SSU STRATOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE CLIMATE DATA RECORD Cheng-Zhi Zou NOAA/NESDIS/Center For Satellite Applications and Research Haifeng Qian, Lilong.
AVHRR GAC/LAC Calibration Challenges for SST Jonathan Mittaz University of Reading National Physical Laboratory.
Stratospheric temperature trends from combined SSU, SABER and MLS measurements And comparisons to WACCM Bill Randel, Anne Smith and Cheng-Zhi Zou NCAR.
Evaluation of climate models, Attribution of climate change IPCC Chpts 7,8 and 12. John F B Mitchell Hadley Centre How well do models simulate present.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
Slide 1 VAISALA Award Lecture Characterising the FY-3A Microwave Temperature Sounder Using the ECMWF Model Qifeng Lu, William Bell, Peter Bauer, Niels.
The Atmosphere By : Jennifer Drinkard. Atmospheric gases Our atmosphere is made up of mainly Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Carbon Dioxide, but it also contains.
Jinlong Li 1, Jun Li 1, Christopher C. Schmidt 1, Timothy J. Schmit 2, and W. Paul Menzel 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies.
A Long Term Data Record of the Ozone Vertical Distribution IN43B-1150 by Richard McPeters 1, Stacey Frith 2, and Val Soika 3 1) NASA GSFC
The Influence of loss saturation effects on the assessment of polar ozone changes Derek M. Cunnold 1, Eun-Su Yang 1, Ross J. Salawitch 2, and Michael J.
Radiative transfer in the thermal infrared and the surface source term
The Inter-Calibration of AMSR-E with WindSat, F13 SSM/I, and F17 SSM/IS Frank J. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems 1 Presented to the AMSR-E Science Team June.
Greenhouse Gases Current Weather Anthropogenic Influences on Climate Why are Greenhouse Gases Important? Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Radiative.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
ATMOSPHERE OBJECTIVE 1 1.What are the structural components of the
Comparison of updated SSU temperatures with chemistry climate model simulations Nathan Gillett Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Victoria,
Ch. 1 Review games Quia web Name : firstlast876 Password: student I.D. #
PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF IAPP MOISTURE RETRIEVALS USING DOE ARM MEASUREMENTS Wayne Feltz, Thomas Achtor, Jun Li and Harold Woolf Cooperative Institute.
The Dynamic EarthSection 2 Objective #9 Describe the layers of the Earth’s atmosphere.
NASA, CGMS-43, May 2015 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Use of Satellite Observations in NASA Reanalyses: MERRA-2 and Future Plans.
1 SBUV/2 Calibration Lessons Over 30 Years: Liang-Kang Huang, Matthew DeLand, Steve Taylor Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) / NASA.
The greenhouse effect. How is the Earth warmed? Climate is affected by the conditions and components of the atmosphere. The Earth’s atmosphere acts like.
Current Debate on Stratospheric Temperature Trends from SSU Cheng-Zhi Zou NOAA/NESDIS/Center For Satellite Applications and Research With Help from Haifeng.
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course
NOAA Inter-Calibrated MSU/AMSU Radiance FCDR Cheng-Zhi Zou
Observing Climate Variability and Change
NOAA GSICS Processing and Research Center
ATMOSPHERE OBJECTIVE 1 1.What are the structural components of the
FIGURE 2.10 Sunlight warms the earth’s surface only during the day, whereas the surface constantly emits infrared radiation upward during the day and at.
Retrieving the Stratospheric Diurnal Cycle from AMSU measurements
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Current Debate on Stratospheric Temperature Trends from SSU
Inter-satellite Calibration of HIRS OLR Time Series
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Schematic framework of anthropogenic climate change drivers, impacts and responses to climate change, and their linkages (IPCC, 2007).
Why is carbon dioxide so important? Examining the evidence
Slides for GGR 314, Global Warming Chapter 4: Climate Models and Projected Climatic Change Course taught by Danny Harvey Department of Geography University.
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Observed Stratospheric Temperature Changes during the Satellite Era Dian Seidel, Isaac Moradi, Carl Mears, John Nash, Bill Randel, Roger Saunders,
The Vertical Structure of the Martian Ionosphere
Atmospheric reanalysis at ECMWF
Presentation transcript:

Homogenized SSU Observations Verify the Anthropogenic Global Warming Theory Cheng-Zhi Zou 1 Haifeng Qian 2, Likun Wang 3, Lilong Zhao 4 1: NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, College Park, MD, : Earth Resource Technology, Inc., Columbia, MD, : ESSIC, University of Maryland, College park, MD, Nanjing Information Science and Technology University, Nanjing, China, Introduction The Stratospheric Sounding Unit (SSU) onboard the historical NOAA TIROS-N Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellite (POES) series was a three-channel infrared radiometer designed to measure temperature profiles in the middle and upper stratospheres (Figure 1). It plays a key role in estimating temperature trends in the middle and upper stratospheres for the period of 1979–2006. However, the SSU observations suffered several instrument specific drifts that have to be corrected to derive homogenized observations for stratospheric trend investigations. STAR scientists have recently developed innovative algorithms to remove instrument biases such as those from cell pressure changes, diurnal drift, changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, and viewing angle differences. Homogenized stratospheric temperature climate data record (CDR) was developed after removal of these biases. The time series have been used to investigate and understand stratospheric temperature trends and to verify climate model simulations of the anthropogenic global warming effect on the stratosphere. This poster describes recalibration and merging schemes for generation of the NOAA/STAR SSU CDR and presents preliminary results of the SSU verification of the CMIP5 climate model simulations of the stratospheric temperature changes during References Zou, C.-Z., H. Qian, W. Wang, L. Wang, and C. Long (2014), Recalibration and merging of SSU observations for stratospheric temperature trend studies, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.,119,13, ,205, doi: /2014JD Wang, L., C.-Z. Zou, and H. Qian (2012), Construction of stratospheric temperature data records from Stratospheric Sounding Units, J. Clim.,25, 2931–2946, doi: /JCLI-D Recalibration of SSU for Generation of Consistent Radiance FCDR Figure 2 SSU scan and calibration cycle. SSU was designed with on-orbit calibration capability by viewing calibration targets, a cosmic space ‘cold’ target and an onboard blackbody ‘warm’ target, as calibration references. A two-point linear calibration equation, was used to transfer SSU raw counts data into radiances, where R is the scene radiance, C represents the raw counts of satellite observations from the Earth and target views, S = R w /(C w -C c -ε) is the slope determined by the two calibration targets. δR is a small calibration offset, and the subscripts E, w, and c refer to the Earth view, onboard blackbody warm target view, and cold space view, respectively. Figure 2 schematically illustrates the SSU scan and calibration cycle, with details in the reference. This recalibration used measurement from the space-side thermistor to represent the warm target temperature. This temperature was close to the average from all the PRT and thermistors on the blackbody and calibration uncertainty was within 0.05K. The recalibration also applied a space view correction to account for the space view anomalies associated with switching of PRT to a reference mode (equation (1), ε term). The recalibrated SSU radiances differ from those from the NOAA operational calibration archived in the NOAA/NCDC CLASS since the former applied a space view correction while the later did not. Figure 3 shows their differences for each satellite channel which was nearly constant for the entire operational period of a satellite. These differences will affect assimilation of the data in climate reanalyses. Anthropogenic global warming theory predicts that the stratosphere has a cooling response to human-induced changes in atmospheric trace gases: ozone depletion is expected to cause the stratosphere to cool, due to less absorption of the ultra-violet radiation from the sun; increases of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are expected to cause stratospheric cooling as more greenhouse gases trap more outgoing infra-red radiation close to the Earth’s surface and emit more radiation into space from the stratosphere, causing a net energy loss in the stratosphere. Such a stratospheric cooling response has been well simulated by climate models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-5 (CMIP5, Figure 6), with input of trace gas variations to the best of human knowledge at the time, although individual models had resulted in slightly different stratospheric cooling rate. The STAR homogenized SSU time series were used to verify the CMIP5 model simulations of the past climate change and trends during (Figure 6). Agreement between the homogenized SSU observations and ensemble means of multiple CMIP5 model simulations were found to be extremely well – the agreement was within the uncertainty estimates at least for SSU channels 2 and 3. This excellent agreement represents a significant milestone in verifying anthropogenic global warming theory and climate model capabilities in simulating the past climate changes. It also implies certain reliability of climate models in predicting future climate changes. In addition, it was suggested (Seidel et al. 2011) that time variation of the three SSU channels followed a remarkable relationship—average of the channel 1 and channel 3 anomalies was close to the channel 2 anomalies to within 0.1 K during the entire SSU period from 1979 to 2006 in all chemistry-climate model simulations (Figure 7). This behavior was also verified to be true by the homogenized SSU observations as shown in Figure 8. Figure 3 Differences of the global mean brightness temperature time series between the recalibrated SSU radiances and those from NOAA operational calibration archived in NCDC CLASS. Figure 4. Global mean temperature anomalies for each satellite and total trends before (left panels) and after (right panels) the adjustments and merging. (1) SSU recalibrated radiances can be used for temperature trend assessment only after adjustments are done for each satellite to remove time-varying inter-satellite biases. Drifts being adjusted included effects from instrument cell pressure changes, diurnal drifts, changes in atmospheric CO 2 concentration, and viewing angle differences. Residual inter-satellite biases may still exist after all these adjustments and they were further removed by constant inter-satellite bias corrections applied at each grid cell. After the adjustments and merging, homogenized SSU time series were obtained for all three SSU channels (Figure 4). Inter-sattelite biases were zero for each satellite pair with no bias drift over time after all adjustments (Figure 5). These provided high confidence on the adjustment and merging technologies and reliability of the dataset for stratospheric temperature trend investigation. 3. Adjustment and Merging of SSU Observations Unadjusted SSU anomaly time series from recalibrated radiances SSU anomaly time series after all adjustments and merging Figure 1 Weighting function of the three SSU channels under the standard atmospheric conditions Figure 5 Global mean inter-satellite difference time series for overlapping satellite pairs after all adjustments. 4. Verifying Climate Model Simulations of Anthropogenic Global Warming Effect in the Stratosphere El Chichón Mt. Pinatubo SSU2:-0.76K/dec Model Mean:-0.77K/dec Figure 6 Comparison of stratospheric temperature time series and trends between homogenized SSU observations and CMIP5 model simulations. Blue lines are STAR homogenized SSU observations, light grey lines are individual CMIP5 model simulations, and black lines are model means from the grey lines. SSU1, SSU2, and SSU3 are the three SSU channels representing layer mean temperatures of the mid-stratosphere, upper-stratosphere, and stratosphere- mesosphere, respectively. Trends are given for each channels at the upper right corner of each panel. Figure 8 NOAA SSU anomaly time series for (top) the average of channel 1 and channel 3 versus channel 2 and (bottom) their differences Figure 7 Global mean temperature anomalies simulated by eight Chemistry- Climate models (red lines) for 1979–2005 in the four vertical layers sampled by the three SSU channels and the Microwave Sounding Unit lower stratosphere (MSU LS). The bottom trace is the average of SSU channels 1 (25) and 3 (27) minus channel 2 (26) from the models (red lines).