1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: 12-706 and 73-359 Lecture 21 - 11/22/2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arithmetic of random variables: adding constants to random variables, multiplying random variables by constants, and adding two random variables together.
Advertisements

PERFORMING CALCULATIONS IN SCIENTIFIC NOTATION
1 Topic 2: Production Externalities Examples of types of abatement activities analyzed: –Output reduction –Cleaner production involving  VC (ex: input-switching)
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews/Joe Marriott Final Review Courses: and Lecture /1/2004.
In-Class Case Study: Clean Air Regulation Scott Matthews Lecture /
1 Extreme Events Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: /
1 Value of Life Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: / /
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapters 4 and 5 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 5 - 9/15/2003.
In-Class Case Study: Clean Air Regulation Scott Matthews Lecture 18 Nov 12, /
1 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Life Years Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: /
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /4/2002.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /6/2002.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: / / Lecture /14/2005.
Multiple Effectiveness Units Scott Matthews Lecture /
Multiple Effectiveness Units Scott Matthews /
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews /
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /5/2003.
1 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /3/2003.
1 Extreme Events Scott Matthews Courses: /
1 Cost-Utility Analysis Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: / / Lecture /9/2005.
In-Class Case Study: Clean Air Regulation Scott Matthews Lecture 18 Nov 11, /
Addition & Subtraction Add Plus More than Subtract Difference Take away Altogether Minus Less than +-
Numbering Systems Decimal (Denary) base 10. Clumsy when dealing with computers. Other systems –Binary –Octal –Hexadecimal Convenient when dealing with.
Cost-Effectiveness Problem l You have a $1.5 billion budget to spend on any combination of these programs:
Multiplication is the process of adding equal sets together = 6 We added 2 three times.
Intro to Chemistry. Scientific Notation Review your handout from before 10 = 1 x = 1 X 10 3 = 10 x 10 x 10.1 = = 1/10.01 = = 1/100.
Simplifying Fractions
Sequencing Shuffle the cards and place in a pile with the numbers facing down. Order the cards from 0 to 11. How fast can you do this?
Adding in Parts I am learning to add by splitting numbers into parts. Example : 8 can be split into or 2 and 6 or 3 and 5 or 4 and 4 1 and 7.
Words Into Equations. Attendance Markers Information Sheet.
PROPERTIES OF EXPONENTS
Adding and Subtracting Fractions With different denominators.
Chapter 2.2 The Multiplication Principle of Equality.
Adding, Subtracting, Multiplying, and Diving Integers!!!
Warm Up Perform the indicated operations. If the matrix does not exist, write impossible
I’m Thinking of a Number
Addition Multiplication Subtraction Division. 1.If the signs are the same, add the numbers and keep the same sign = = If the.
CHAPTER 4 Negative Numbers. ADDITION AND SUBTRACTION USING NEGATIVE NUMBERS A number line is very useful when you have to do additions or subtractions.
3.5 Perform Basic Matrix Operations Add Matrices Subtract Matrices Solve Matric equations for x and y.
The 4 Operations with fractions All you need to know about fractions. By Sam Tyacke.
 Scientific notation is simply a method for expressing, and working with, very large or very small numbers. It is a short hand method for writing numbers,
2-2 Translating Between Words and Math
Adding and subtracting fractions
Chapter 2 Supplemental Homework Resource
How much is one half of one half?
Exponent Rules.
Knowing your math operation terms
Adding and Subtracting Fractions
Problem-Solving Steps Solve Problem-Solving Steps Solve
Adding and Subtracting Fractions
Objectives By the end of the lesson students will:
Addition and Subtraction of Fractions
Addition & Subtraction
Engage NY Math Module 2 Lesson 21: Divide two- and three-digit dividends by two-digit divisors with single-digit quotients and make connections to a written.
Tests of Divisibility 1 - All integers can be divided by 1
Divide the number in C by 10.
Algebraic terms.
Subtract the same value on each side
Properties of Equality Algebra
Short Division.
Adding and Subtracting Fractions
Mathematical Symbols 09/04/2019 R Nicks.
Algebraic terms.
x/÷ Numbers Year 3-4 – Multiply and divide a multiple of 10
Multiply and Divide I can count equal groups of items saying how many groups and how many altogether. I can explain that multiplying is an easy way to.
Multiply and divide Expressions
How much is one half of one half?
Objective: Learn to use a table to find equivalent ratios and rates.
Adding and Subtracting Fractions
Presentation transcript:

1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /22/2004

and Intro  So far, we have considered externality problems in one of 2 ways:  1) By monetizing externality and including it explicitly as part of BCA  2) Finding cost, dividing by measured effectiveness (in non-monetary terms)  While Option 2 is preferred, it is only relevant with a single effectiveness

and MAIS Table - Used for QALY Conversions Comprehensive Fatality / Injury Values Injury Severity1994 Relative Value MAIS MAIS MAIS MAIS MAIS Fatality1.0

and Single vs. Multiple Effectiveness  Recall earlier examples:  Cost per life saved  Cost per ton of pollution  When discussing “500 Interventions” paper, talked about environmental regs  Had mortality and morbidity benefits  Very common to have multiple benefits/effectiveness  Under option 1 above, we would just multiply by $/life and $/injury values..  But recall that we prefer NOT to monetize and instead find CE/EC values to compare to others

and Multiple Effectiveness  In Option 2, its not relevant to simply divide total costs (TC) by # deaths, # injuries, e.g. CE 1 = TC/death, CE 2 = TC/injury  Why?  Misrepresents costs of each effectiveness  Instead, we need a method to allocate the costs (or to separate the benefits) so that we have CE ratios relevant to each effectiveness measure

and Options for Better Method  Use “primary target” as effectiveness  Allocate all costs to it (basically what we’ve been doing)  Add effectiveness measures together  E.g., tons of pollution  Is as ridiculous as it sounds (tons not equal, lives not equal to injuries)

and Improved Method  In absence of more information or knowing better, allocate costs evenly  E.g., if 2 pollutants each gets 1/2 the cost  Easy to make slight variations if new information or insight is available  Could use our monetization values to inform this (e.g., external cost values, $/life values, etc.)

and Recall from previous lecture

and Another Option  For each effectiveness, subtract marginal cost/benefit values of all other measures from total cost so that only remaining costs exist for CE ratios  Again could use median $ values on previous slide to do this  Examples..