Efficient Pigging of Gathering Lines

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antero Punttila Analyzing most typical energy saving measures Energy Efficiency of Steam and Condensate Systems Antero Punttila, Motiva Oy.
Advertisements

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program Optimize Separator Operating Pressures to Reduce Flash Losses SPE Paper B. Boyer -
1Last Update: October, 2011 Overview for Gathering & Processing Companies Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits U.S. Environmental.
Green Completions Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American Petroleum Institute.
Oil and Gas Industry Presentation Activities, GHG Emission Sources, and Potential Reductions January 14, 2009.
Methane Losses from Compressors Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop Northern Natural Gas Company, INGAA, CECO, Heath Consultants,
Natural Gas STAR Program. 2 The Natural Gas STAR Program The Natural Gas STAR Program is a flexible, voluntary partnership between EPA and the oil and.
Composite Wrap for Non-leaking Pipeline Defects Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas Transmission,
“Partner Experiences” Pioneer Natural Resources, USA Presented by James Meier Processors Technology Transfer Workshop September 23, 2004 Dallas, Texas.
Optimizing Nitrogen Rejection Units
Hydrocarbon Emissions Detection & Remediation Project Josh McDowell Small Business Assistance Coordinator Department of Community Outreach.
Driving Toward Energy Efficiency Emerson Process Management Novaspect. Inc. June 22 / 23, 2010 Steam.
Objectives: Understand importance of utility and maintenance system in industry/plant.
Reducing Emissions from Compressor Seals Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas Transmission Interstate.
Natural Gas STAR Partner Experiences Duke Energy Gas Transmission By: David Felcman Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop September 22, 2004 Houston,
Reducing Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-line Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas Transmission,
Acid Gas Removal Options for Minimizing Methane Emissions Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Processors Technology Transfer Workshop Gas Processors.
1Last Update: October, 2011 Overview for Production Companies Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits U.S. Environmental Protection.
1Last Updated: October, 2011 Overview for Distribution Companies Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits U.S. Environmental Protection.
Natural Gas STAR Partner Experiences Northern Natural Gas Company By: Larry “Rick” Loveless Technology Transfer Workshop June 8, 2005 Midland, Texas.
Transportation Strategy SCMN 4780 Modal Analysis: Pipeline.
LNG Technology.
STEAM HEATING.
Reduced Emission Completions (Green Completions) Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s Natural.
Pipeline Pumpdown Practices and Hot Taps
Economic Best Management Practices for Small and Medium Sized Producers Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology.
Natural Gas Dehydration Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program Casper,
Directed Inspection and Maintenance (DI&M) Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s.
Processor Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Processors Technology Transfer Workshop Gas Processors Association,
Composite Wrap Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., and Pioneer Natural Resources.
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses
Replacing High-Bleed Pneumatic Devices Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer Workshop Bill Barrett.
Directed Inspection & Maintenance At Compressor and Gate Stations
Company Reported Opportunities Technologies From Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., and Pioneer.
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API, Rice University and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June.
Partner Reported Opportunities for Small and Medium Sized Producers Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer.
World Bank Global Gas Flaring Reduction Gas STAR International and GGFR Mutual Goals Roger FERNANDEZ U.S. EPA Natural Gas STAR Team Leader.
Smart Automation Well Venting Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American Petroleum.
EPA Overreach WATERS OF THE U S METHANE REDUCTION PLAN LEGISLATIVE /REGULATORY FORUM SEPTEMBER 16, 2015.
EPA Natural Gas Star Annual Meeting © Chevron 2006 Chevron Experience: Methane Emission Mitigation Natural Gas STAR Producers & Processors Technology Transfer.
Natural Gas STAR and NiSource A Winning Partnership Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits
Page 1 Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits Part 2: Is Recovery Profitable? p Savings associated with pressure reduction p Costs.
Discovering New Opportunities for Reducing Methane Emissions Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production.
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation.
Producer Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation.
Directed Inspection and Maintenance (DI&M) at Gas Processing Plants Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Processors Technology Transfer Workshop.
Best Operating Practices for Reducing Emissions From Natural Gas STAR Partners Murphy Exploration & Production, Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs Group,
Replacing Glycol Dehydrators with Desiccant Dehydrators Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer.
Installing Plunger Lift in Gas Wells Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR from Natural Gas STAR Exploration & Production, Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs.
Convert Gas Pneumatic Controls to Instrument Air Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources.
Transmission Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas.
Reducing Emissions from Compressor Rod Packing Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation and.
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API, Rice University and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June.
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Processors Technology Transfer Workshop Pioneer Natural.
Producer Partner Reported Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American.
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API,
NiSource Natural Gas STAR Workshop Introduction to Online Tools Presented by: Heather Wright ERG June 3, 2003 Merrillville, Indiana.
Replacing High-Bleed Pneumatic Devices Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners NiSource and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June 3, 2003.
Methane Emission Reductions from Reciprocating Compressors
Best Operating Practices for Reducing Emissions F rom Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., and.
Best Operating Practices For Reducing Emissions From Natural Gas STAR Partners NiSource and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June 3, 2003.
Biomass Dispenser Design team 5 Caleb MacDonald, Kyle Newman, Michael Pettet, and Ryley LeBlanc.
Natural Gas STAR Program epa.gov/gasstar. The Natural Gas STAR Program The Natural Gas STAR Program is a flexible, voluntary partnership between EPA and.
FLASH EMISSIONS JIM COOPER, CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION.
Solar Power Applications
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
Reduce Distribution System Pressure
Understanding Updates to the EPA Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Natural Gas Systems Gina DeFrancesco Clean Energy Analyst | May 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Efficient Pigging of Gathering Lines Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Processors Technology Transfer Workshop Gas Processors Association, Devon Energy, Enogex Dynegy Midstream Services, and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program April 22, 2005

Agenda Methane Losses from Pipeline Pigging Methane Recovery Industry Experience Is Recovery Profitable? Discussion Questions

Natural Gas and Petroleum Industry Emissions Processing plants responsible for 36 Bcf of methane emissions annually, and gathering/ booster stations contribute >22 Bcf Emissions Reductions Oil Downstream 2 Bcf 1 Bcf Processing 36 Bcf 10 Bcf Production/ Gathering/ Booster 150 Bcf Distribution 73 Bcf To arrive at Gathering/Booster emissions, went into the 2002 inventory and identified gathering sources within the production sector. This was 22.2Bcf FYI: The DI&M Lessons Learned says Processing plants AND Booster stations emit a total of 36 Bcf…this is out dated. 25 Bcf Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990 - 2002 18 Bcf Transmission & Storage 98 Bcf

Pigging Gathering Lines Hydrocarbons and water condense inside wet gas gathering lines, causing pressure drop and reducing gas flow Periodic line pigging removes liquids and debris to improve gas flow Efficient pigging: Keeps pipeline running continuously Keeps pipeline near maximum throughput by removing debris Minimizes product losses during launch/capture http://www.girardind.com/

Pigging Applications Pipeline pigs come in a variety of shapes and sizes for different applications Cleaning pigs Have brushes or blades to help remove debris Sealing pigs Make tight seal for removing liquids from the pipe Inspection pigs Specialized pigs outfitted with instruments to monitor the pipeline integrity www.westernfilterco.com

Pigging and Methane Losses Gas lost when launching and receiving a pig Fugitive emissions from pig launcher/receiver valves Gas lost from storage tanks receiving condensate removed by pigging Gas vented from pipeline blowdowns

How Does Pigging Vent Methane? Gathering lines have built-in pig launchers Pig launchers have isolation valves for loading pigs, pressurizing pigs, and launching pigs with gas bypassed from the pipeline Launcher pressuring/depressuring loses methane out the vent valve Gas Flow Vent Valve Pig Launcher Gas Flow http://www.girardind.com/

Pigging Vents Methane Twice! Methane lost through vent valve on the launcher and again through vent valve on the receiver Once receiver is isolated from the line, it must be depressured to remove the pig Liquids ahead of the pig drain to a vessel or tank Isolation valve leaks cause excessive venting to depressure Depending on the company practices, a launcher will remain pressurized or they will depressurize it. Fugitives should be a lot less in the latter case. http://www.girardind.com/

Estimating Pigging Vents E = P * V / 14.7 * n * f where: E = methane emissions (cubic feet) P = Gathering line pressure (psia) V = Launcher and receiver volume (cubic feet) n = % methane f = number of piggings Pig trap isolation valve leakage increases this minimum amount of gas venting P is more of a factor than T, so omitted T as a variable as to simplify for the audience

Estimating Emissions from Pigging Estimating V Estimating P Default: 315 psia Estimating n Default: 78.8 Line Diameter (inches) V (cf) 6 0.9 12 4.6 18 11.5 26 27.7 34 65.2 48 170.7 Adapted from http://www.pigsunlimited.com

Gas Recovery from Pipeline Condensate Storage Tanks Pressurized condensate collected from pigging is sometimes stored in atmospheric tanks Gas released during atmospheric flashing can be recovered using a vapor recovery unit (VRU) rather than venting the gas Facilities with existing pigging and liquid storage capabilities can install an electric or gas powered VRU compressor to recover flashed gasses

Industry Experience One partner pigged gathering lines 30 to 40 times per year, collecting several thousand barrels of condensate per application Partner reported saving 21,400 Mcf/yr from recovering flash gases Dedicated VRU was installed with an electric compressor

Is Recovery Profitable? Partner reported installation cost of $24,000 for electric VRU compressor Annual operating cost of $40,000 mostly electricity Large gas savings and increasing gas prices will offset costs

Use Inert Gases and Pigs to Perform Pipeline Purges Pipeline maintenance requires pipe section blowdown before work can begin Gas in pipeline is usually vented to the atmosphere Inert gas can be used to drive a pig down the section of pipe to be serviced, displacing the natural gas to a product line rather than venting Inert gas is then blown down to the atmosphere, avoiding methane loss

Inert Gas Setup Existing pig launcher can be used, set up to work with inert gases Portable nitrogen supply connected to the pig launcher vent Close valve on the main pipeline, pressurize launcher with inert gas, open launcher to main pipeline Supply nitrogen until pig reaches receiver http://www.girardind.com/

Industry Experience One partner reported using inert gas to purge six pipelines for maintenance Gas savings from these applications was 538 Mcf These savings correspond to a typical application of: 2 miles of 10” diameter pipeline Nitrogen at 280 psi

Is Recovery Profitable? No capital costs with existing pigging facilities Labor costs are estimated at eight hours for two operators Nitrogen costs are roughly $8/Mcf Increased safety is the primary benefit of this opportunity Gas savings are a secondary benefit, as the labor and nitrogen costs outweigh the gas value

Discussion Questions What opportunities do you have to reduce methane emissions from your pigging operations? How can this presentation be made more useful to help you identify and evaluate opportunities? What are the barriers to your implementing the technologies and practices in this presentation?