NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Recreation and Visitor Services Planning for the “Human Habitat”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R6 Climate Change Update Marc Kramer Senior Climate Change Scientist, R6 Specialist Meeting November 2011.
Advertisements

E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A Challenges and Opportunities for Bicycling and the NPS Bob Ratcliffe Chief Conservation, Recreation and Community.
Sustainable Regional Water Resource Management By: Tucson Regional Water Coalition and Southern Arizona Leadership Council.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
RESILIENCE AND INTACTNESS A Manager’s Perspective.
Recreation and Visitor Services Bureau of Land Management … the “Purple Book” A Unified Strategy to Implement “BLM’s Priorities for Recreation and Visitor.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Special Recreation Permits. SRP OBJECTIVE Using the requests for SRPs in the Field, ORPs will be able to: Identify, locate and utilize current guidance.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
The Economics of Rivers (with an emphasis on the Verde) Doug Von Gausig, Verde River Institute, May 16, 2014.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
Harnessing the Power of Environmental Data for Decision-Making IABIN Phase II.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
The Importance of Thinking Strategically Tribal Development Seminar November 30, 2010 Steve Walker, Managing Director Heartland, LLC.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Information Technology Strategy & 5 Year Plan.
Chapter 10 Land, Public and Private. The Tragedy of the Commons In 1968, ecologist Garrett Hardin described the “tragedy of the commons” Tragedy of the.
Strategic Planning & the Duty to Co-operate Andrew Pritchard Director of Policy & Infrastructure.
Funded by the Government of Alberta Ecosystem Services and Conservation Offsets April 24 th, 2012.
Natural England State of the Natural Environment, Strategic Direction refresh, and Manifesto Dr Helen Phillips, Chief Executive, Natural England.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
1 The Lower Athabasca Regional Plan: A Case Study Biol. 595 Sept. 16, 2009.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Partnership for Urban South Hampshire Sustainable Growth.
Visual Resource Management May 2015 Lander, Wyoming.
Engaging Communities in Developing a Sustainable Wood Products and Biomass Energy Industry By Gerry Gray Vice President for Policy American Forests.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
Wisconsin’s Forests and the Comprehensive Planning Law Preserving forests in the wilderness of Smart Growth.
At the last Steering Team meeting… Goals (Rule-level) EPS (Measurable and Reportable) Natural Resources Human/Cultural Environment Administrative Avoid,
ASSESSING AND MANAGING WILDLAND RECREATIONAL DISTURBANCE Stephen J. DeMaso, Fidel Hernández, and Leonard A. Brennan Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute,
Resource Management Plan (RMP) Revision for the Las Vegas and Pahrump Field Offices Muddy Mountains.
 The SNC’s mission is to initiate, encourage and support efforts that improve the environmental, economic and social well- being of the Sierra Nevada.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Course Wrap Up UNIT 16. Overall Course Objective Having participated in the course, you should be able to: Describe the basic principles and concepts.
Please turn off or turn down cell phones. Thank You!
Sample Codes of Ethics in Adventure Tourism
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Effects Analysis and Comparison. Objectives Accurately determine which impacts need to be evaluated in the land use plan. Develop a matrix comparing the.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Cave and Karst Management Through Land Use Planning James Goodbar Sr. Cave Specialist Bureau of Land Management Cody, Wyoming May 12-16, 2014 Aaron Stockton.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Three Land Use Planning Decisions.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
Las Cienegas National Conservation Area An opportunity for cooperative conservation with the National Landscape Conservation System.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
DRAFT INNER MELBOURNE ACTION PLAN Presented by Elissa McElroy IMAP Executive Officer January 2016.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
National Association of Conservation Districts Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL February 2, 2010 The Next Generation of The Next Generation of Conservation.
INTEGRATED ACTIVE LIVING POLICY AND PLANNING WITHIN COUNCILS: FACT OR FICTION? Natalie Reiter General Manager City Strategy, City of Ballarat Caroline.
King County-Cities Climate Collaboration July 2015 Update to the GMPC
D ESIRED RSC S. D ESIRED RSC S O VERVIEW D ESIRED R ECREATION S ETTING C HARACTERISTICS L EARNING O BJECTIVES : Students will understand: 1) The link.
THE L AND U SE P LANNING P ROCESS CHAPTER III – LAND USE PLANNING PROCESS in H – PLANNING FOR RECREATION AND VISITOR SERVICES 1. Overview of LUP.
L AND U SE P LAN - LEVEL D ECISIONS Students will be able to: Identify management actions and allowable uses to support goals and objectives Identify management.
BLM Decision Making Process
Aquatic and Riparian Conservation Strategy
Kennett Township land Stewardship Initiative
John Martin Reservoir Master Plan Revision
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Recreation and Visitor Services Planning for the “Human Habitat”

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 BLM Planning in Theory

National Recreation Program Workshop – NCTC – November, 2009 BLM Planning in the real world…

National Recreation Program Workshop – NCTC – November, 2009 BLM Planning Framework Three components of BLM planning that primarily address “Human Habitat” through prescribed landscape settings: Recreation Management Visual Resources Management Visual Resources Management Comprehensive Travel & Transportation Management Comprehensive Travel & Transportation Management

National Recreation Program Workshop – NCTC – November, 2009 Related Programs that Plan for “Human Habitat” Needs Recreation addresses components needed to manage settings – to provide for sustainable recreation opportunities Recreation addresses components needed to manage settings – to provide for sustainable recreation opportunities VRM addresses landscape character – to identify and maintain the aesthetic quality of the landscape VRM addresses landscape character – to identify and maintain the aesthetic quality of the landscape CTTM addresses public access – to determine where and how people move across the landscape CTTM addresses public access – to determine where and how people move across the landscape

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 The Challenge: Planning and Managing Recreation in a World of Change Population: growth and urbanization near public land increases recreation demand and diversity of uses Economics: growing importance of recreation in the economy increases business, community and political interest and influence Technology: continued advances in recreation technology increases the pace and scope of management challenges Values: Change in public values concerning public land uses increases public expectations for non-commodity amenities

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Hotspots Critical “Human Habitat” can be mapped. Hotspots can occur where human activity and public land collide. Projections of 2020 “hotspots” were made for all counties in the lower 48 states. Social Pressure, on public land resources comes from: Population density Economic potential and activity Outdoor recreation demand USDA FS, Southern Research Station, Hotspots.

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009

Over the past decade there has been a fundamental shift and evolution in approach to both natural resources and recreation planning and management Concept of Environmental Services Concept of Benefits or outcomes- based management for recreation (BBM) Both models emphasize a shift from an activity-based approach to one which focuses on the environmental, social and economic values, services, benefits that flow from the public lands. Paradigm shift from – “balancing multiple use” to “sustaining multiple outcomes”

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Outcomes -Based Approaches share key elements:  Encourages regional & landscape level planning and use of “Conservation by Design” principles  Recognizes factors and support for sustainability and ecosystem function  Provides a framework to better involve the public and define expectations for land uses or recreation experiences  Engages communities and fosters long-term partnerships with public & private providers  Improves the long-term management of settings, facilities and public access

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Ecosystem Services and Outcomes-based Management Share Similar Approaches 1)“Begin with the end in mind” focuses on services and benefits outcomes including social, economic and environmental 2)“What do people want or need?” – Engages public prior to or during analyses and assessments for scenario development 3)“What is going on out there?” – Requires baseline data collection, environmental and social (Ecosystem) assessments 4)“What is connected and what is its value?” – Requires valuation and understanding inter-relationships 5)“What are the effects and trade-offs? - Considers long-term impacts and tradeoffs through integrated risk assessment 6)“ Management is an art not a science” – Recognizes change in ecosystem and social demands requires adaptive approaches and collaboration in management to manage risks

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Goal: Sustaining Public Lands Recreation Resources and Services to Enrich Individual and Community Life - on a landscape scale Challenge: Doing so in context of other land uses and while protecting natural and cultural resources

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 PRIMITIVEBACKCOUNTRYMIDDLE COUNTRY FRONT COUNTRY RURALURBAN We know that people seek a variety of experiences -- BLM provides settings that make those experiences possible.

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Oooh Aahhh… Oh oh… Oh NO!

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Current Recreation Planning Guidance, Tools and Strategies  Appendix C  IM Recreation Planning Checklist  IM Strategy for Implementing Recreation Priorities  NTC Course Recreation Planning: Effective Engagement in Land Use Planning(on hold)  Programmatic Strategic Plans (Purple book, OHV etc)

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Policy Updates Revised and clarified appendix C – See IM to clarify and simplify guidance (eventually new updated planning handbook) Now finalizing Recreation Planning Manual to be followed by the Handbook to provide detailed guidance or “How to” recreation planning in RMPs and RAMPS Travel and Transportation Management Manual to be contained in planning series 1610 for all resources, to be followed by OHV handbook in 8340 Developing and updating training for both Recreation Planning and Travel Management

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Managers, visitors, other land users/interests, and partners can understand and simplifies guidance FO ORP’s can consistently implement to ensure customer satisfaction and long-term setting protection. Integrates & coordinates programs such as VRM and Travel Management (social/human habitat), so they are complimentary and Addresses human issues affecting or affected by other programs’ environmental (habitat, cultural etc.)and economic (energy) resource management needs and restrictions Policy development is an adaptive process too….. Goal is to create a functional and viable recreation planning policy and process that:

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Proposed SRMA Definition *Designated administrative units established and managed for specific recreation opportunities. *Areas where a significant commitment has been made to provide and protect specific recreation settings and experience opportunities on a sustained or enhanced, long-term basis. *Has management prescriptions identified by a set of recreation setting characteristics (RSCs) and defined level of supporting development (ROS, facilities, services). *Identifies and should prescribe other management actions and allowable uses in the RMP that guide, limit, restrict or mitigate other potentially affecting programs and uses to protect essential attributes needed to achieve identified recreation opportunity outcomes *At a minimum a RMP must define Why and for Whom a SRMA is needed

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Proposed ERMA Definition  Identified areas that offer recreation opportunities that facilitate the visitors’ freedom to pursue a variety of outdoor recreation activities (attain outcomes).  Commitment is limited to stewardship or custodial level of management that may provide defined (focused) but dispersed recreation opportunities objectives or actions that address issues.  Areas may be managed for other priorities and in coordination with other land uses or resource management objectives as recreation may not be the primary or predominant land management focus.  At a minimum recreation setting issues can and should be considered in establishing other programs allowable uses and restrictive or mitigating actions (the same as habitat, cultural and other resource values).

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 BLM has two distinct strategies for managing Recreation and Visitor Services through Designation/Identification Two Types of Recreation Areas Extensive Recreation Management Areas Special Recreation Management Areas Provide recreation and resource stewardship actions to resolve identified issues and maintain critical settings Sustain and enhance settings through proactive actions and investment

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 BLM Achieves These Goals by Managing Recreation and Visitor Services Program Resources… Within Extensive Recreation Management Areas : Within Special Recreation Management Areas : …to achieve stewardship outcomes through care-taking actions or prescriptions that : 1.Address identified resource and visitor issues or conflicts 2. Consider recreation settings in concert with other land uses 3. Maintain identified critical or important recreation or VRM settings through some ilmits on other allowable uses … to sustain essential settings outcomes through proactive actions that: 1.Proactively manage to conserve resources and improve recreation opportunities 2. Consider recreation settings as a primary focus of the area’s management 3.Protect or enhance identified recreation settings by providing information, facilities and services to respond visitor needs and resource issues, and limiting other uses

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Land Use Plans and Implementation Plans Therefore Should Identify Essential Actions Needed to Provide “Critical Recreation Habitat”… Within Extensive Recreation Management Areas : Within Special Recreation Management Areas :  RMPs must identify Stewardship Objectives that Resolve Identified Care-Taking Issues –including any critical setting characteristics to be maintained and any protective restrictions on other land use activities through allowable uses etc.  Implementation Actions to Achieve the Above  Recreation management objectives that explain WHY and for Whom the SRMA should be designated. By generally defining essential character conditions, services, facilities and visitor/resident desired outcomes Implementing Specific Actions needed to maintain or enhance essential Setting Conditions or provide services Frameworks to be Engaged (allocation systems, fees, joint management partnerships, information) Protestable Appealable Land Use Plan Decisions Implementation Decisions

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Land Use Planning Level Decisions Once SRMAs and ERMAs are designated/identified, there are only two elemental types of Land Use Plan Decisions for recreation: 1)Defined Desired Outcomes (goals and objectives based on desired setting characteristics) 2)Related Allowable Uses and Management Actions. To ensure prescribed setting characteristics are maintained:  At a minimum LUPs must identify Allowable Uses and Management Actions to protect/maintain the essential physical, social and operational attributes.

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 RSC Attribute Possible Action Remoteness Identify Right-of-Way Avoidance or Exclusion Areas Identify Right-of-Way Corridors Identify Existing and Potential Development Areas for Renewable Energy Projects Identify Areas that are Available or Closed to Timber Harvest or Special Forest Product Harvest Close Designation of Off-Highway Vehicle Management Areas Revise Limited Travel Designations for Types or Modes of Travel (inc. Foot, Equestrian, Bicycle) Apply Seasonal Travel Restrictions Close Areas to Over-the-Snow Travel Require Administrative Use Agreements for Permittees Naturalness Apply No Surface Occupancy / No Surface-disturbing Activity Stipulation Apply Controlled Surface Use Stipulation Identify Areas Open and Closed to Oil and Gas Leasing Designate Visual Resource Management Classes Identify Areas Open or Closed to Mineral Material Disposal (Salable Minerals) Identify Areas Open or Closed to Non-Energy Leasable Mineral Leasing and Development Recommend Areas for Closure to Locatable Mineral Exploration/Development Propose Existing Withdrawals to be Continued, Modified or Revoked Identify Right-of-Way Avoidance or Exclusion Areas Identify Right-of-Way Corridors Identify Existing and Potential Development Areas for Renewable Energy Projects Identify Areas that are Available or Closed to Timber Harvest or Special Forest Product Harvest Identify Lands Available or Not Available for Livestock Grazing Identify Lands that are Acceptable for Coal Leasing and Development and Those that are Not Identify the Geographic Areas that are Suitable for Wildland Fire Use Identify Restrictions on Fire Management Practices Identify Decisions to Protect or Preserve Wilderness Characteristics Visitor Facilities Identify the Construction or Removal of Recreation Facilities and Trails Identify the Use of RSCCs or VRM to Guide the Type, Nature, or Form of Recreation Facilities Identify Decisions to Protect or Preserve Wilderness Characteristics Actions to Address the PHYSICAL Qualities of the Landscape

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 RSC Attribute Possible Action Contacts Employ a Permit System Identify Special Area designations for the Purpose of Individual Special Recreation Permits Place Limitations on Commercial, Competitive, or Organized Group Special Recreation Permits Revise Travel Designations Place Timing limitations on Other Resource Uses Group Size Employ Public Group Size Limitations Issue Individual SRPs Place Group Size Limitations on Commercial, Competitive, or Organized Group SRPs Evidence Of Use Identify Designated Camping Areas Identify Closures to Camping Identify Areas for Firearm Use Restrictions – Closure to Target Shooting Require the Use of Fire Pans for Campfires Require the Use of Portable Stoves – No Open Fires Human Waste Carry-out Requirement Actions to Address the SOCIAL Qualities of Use

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 RSC Attribute Possible Action Access Identify Right-of-Way Avoidance or Exclusion Areas Identify Right-of-Way Corridors Identify Existing and Potential Development Areas for Renewable Energy Projects Apply Closure to Wood Cutting and Commercial Timber Harvest Designation of Off-Highway Vehicle Management Areas Revise Limited Travel Designations for Types or Modes of Travel (inc. Foot, Equestrian, Bicycle) Close and Rehabilitate Roads and Trails Apply Seasonal Travel Restrictions Close Areas to Over-the-Snow Travel Visitor Services Increase Field Staff Develop or Stop Creating Brochures, Maps, Webpages, etc. Install or Limit Directional or Informational Signage Management Controls Add/Remove Supplementary Rules, Use Restrictions, Limitations or Closures Identify Limitations on Camping Identify Areas for Firearm Use Restrictions – Closure to Target Shooting Charge/Eliminate Use Fees Human Waste Carry-out Requirement Actions to Address the OPERATIONAL Conditions Created by Management

NATIONAL RECREATION STRATEGIC WORKSHOP – NCTC – November 2009 Moving Forward with Planning for Recreation & Visitor Services  BLM is not abandoning BBM (now OFM), but rather seeking a solution to make a fundamentally sound concept functionally operational by integrating outcome focused planning and management within our multi-use resource planning system and processes.  Theses changes should be consistent and complementary with Ecosystem Services approaches and will help us better integrate recreation or social considerations into landscape level resource planning.  Helps protect landscape elements and integrates outcomes-based principles into the management of ERMAs which form the majority of the National System of Public Lands and also offer highly valued dispersed recreation opportunities.