ß-heptapeptide CC CC CC MD: rmsd 0.14 Å NMR structure (3 1 Helix) Reversibly folds on 10 -20 ns time scale (X. Daura et al.) 7 residues, in methanol.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rates of Peptide Folding. AP A 5 (A 3 RA) 3 A Ref: Lednev I. K. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, A 21 amino acid, mainly alanine, α-helical.
Advertisements

SCCDFTB as a bridge between MM and high-level QM. Jan Hermans University of North Carolina 1.
Ab Initio and Effective Fragment Potential Dynamics Heather M. Netzloff and Mark S. Gordon Iowa State University.
Molecular Simulations of Metal-Organic Frameworks
Force Field of Biological System 中国科学院理论物理研究所 张小虎 研究生院《分子建模与模拟导论》课堂 2009 年 10 月 21 日.
Computational methods in molecular biophysics (examples of solving real biological problems) EXAMPLE I: THE PROTEIN FOLDING PROBLEM Alexey Onufriev, Virginia.
The Role of Entropy in Biomolecular Modelling Three Examples 1.Force Field Development How to parametrise non-bonded interaction terms? Include Entropy.
Photoactivation of the Photoactive Yellow Protein chemistry department Imperial Colege London London SW7 2AZ United Kingdom Gerrit Groenhof, Berk Hess,
Theoretical and computationalphysical chemistry group Theoretical characterization of  -helix and  -hairpin folding kinetics Theoretical characterization.
Graphical Models for Protein Kinetics Nina Singhal CS374 Presentation Nov. 1, 2005.
Algorithm for Fast MC Simulation of Proteins Itay Lotan Fabian Schwarzer Dan Halperin Jean-Claude Latombe.
Behaviour of velocities in protein folding events Aldo Rampioni, University of Groningen Leipzig, 17th May 2007.
N-term C-term The Folding of WW Domain FBP28 (Formin binding protein): Xavier Periole.
Simulations of the folding and aggregation of peptides, proteins and lipids. BRISBANE School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences (SMMS) Chemistry Building.
Phospholipid Monolayer Simulations using GROMACS Matthew Storey Dept. of Engineering Science, Penn State Prof. Zuo and Prof. Kobayashi Dept. of Mechanical.
Bioinf. Data Analysis & Tools Molecular Simulations & Sampling Techniques117 Jan 2006 Bioinformatics Data Analysis & Tools Molecular simulations & sampling.
Coordinates and Pathways in MM and QM/MM modeling Haiyan Liu School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China.
Algorithms and Software for Large-Scale Simulation of Reactive Systems _______________________________ Ananth Grama Coordinated Systems Lab Purdue University.
Protein Structure Refinement ─ a dynamic approach
Free energies and phase transitions. Condition for phase coexistence in a one-component system:
What are proteins? Proteins are important; e.g. for catalyzing and regulating biochemical reactions, transporting molecules, … Linear polymer chain composed.
Conformational Sampling
Monte Carlo Simulation of Liquid Water Daniel Shoemaker Reza Toghraee MSE 485/PHYS Spring 2006.
August MOBIL Summer School Lea Thøgersen.
Statistical Physics of the Transition State Ensemble in Protein Folding Alfonso Ramon Lam Ng, Jose M. Borreguero, Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Eugene.
Simulations of Peptide Aggregation Joan-Emma Shea Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry The University of California, Santa Barbara.
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Correlation of DNA structural features with internal dynamics and conformational flexibility H. Peter Spielmann University of Kentucky Dept. of Molecular.
Computer Simulation of Biomolecules and the Interpretation of NMR Measurements generates ensemble of molecular configurations all atomic quantities Problems.
Folding of Distinct Sequences into Similar Functional Topologies Hossein Mohammadiarani and Harish Vashisth (Advisor) Department of Chemical Engineering,
1 Scripting Workflows with the Application Hosting Environment Stefan Zasada University College London.
Biomolecular Modelling: Goals, Problems, Perspectives 1. Goal simulate/predict processes such as 1.polypeptide foldingthermodynamic 2.biomolecular associationequilibria.
Bioinformatics: Practical Application of Simulation and Data Mining Markov Modeling II Prof. Corey O’Hern Department of Mechanical Engineering Department.
Important coordinates Effective potential Effective Potentials for Protein Folding and Binding With Thermodynamic Constraints The AGBNP effective solvation.
A Technical Introduction to the MD-OPEP Simulation Tools
Molecular Dynamics simulations
Covalent interactions non-covalent interactions + = structural stability of (bio)polymers in the operative molecular environment 1 Energy, entropy and.
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Compressional Metalloprotein Deformation Andrew Hung 1, Jianwei Zhao 2, Jason J. Davis 2, Mark S. P. Sansom 1 1 Department.
Comparative Study of NAMD and GROMACS
Insight into peptide folding role of solvent and hydrophobicity dynamics of conformational transitions.
Protein Structure Prediction
SAN DIEGO SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER Advanced User Support Project Overview Adrian E. Roitberg University of Florida July 2nd 2009 By Ross C. Walker.
Molecular dynamics (2) Langevin dynamics NVT and NPT ensembles
MSc in High Performance Computing Computational Chemistry Module Parallel Molecular Dynamics (i) Bill Smith CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory
Dynameomics: Protein Mechanics, Folding and Unfolding through Large Scale All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations INCITE 6 David A. C. Beck Valerie Daggett.
Data-Driven Time-Parallelization in the AFM Simulation of Proteins L. Ji, H. Nymeyer, A. Srinivasan, and Y. Yu Florida State University
Dissertation Defense Thu Zar W. Lwin Departments of Chemistry and Molecular Biology and Biochemistry University of California at Irvine February 22, 2005.
Tips for Designing a Good Simulation Project. Designing Good Simulation Projects Work incrementally –Do your literature homework. –Start with small model.
Methods and Software NAMD (NAnoscale Molecular Dynamics) is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high performance simulation of large systems.
Mechanism of Curcumin Inhibiting Amyloid-  Peptides Aggregation by Molecular Dynamics Simulations Zhenyu Qian, and Guanghong Wei State Key Laboratory.
FOLDING TRANSITION AND „FOLDABILITY”
Determination of Free Energy Landscapes via Computer Simulations and its Application to the DNA i-motif Vasileios A. Tatsis, Raghvendra P. Singh.
Analysis and Evaluation of Channel Models: Simulations of Alamethicin
Young Min Rhee, Vijay S. Pande  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Modelling - Lecture 3
Anatomy of an Amyloidogenic Intermediate
An All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Study
Β-Hairpin Folding Mechanism of a Nine-Residue Peptide Revealed from Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Explicit Water  Xiongwu Wu, Bernard R. Brooks  Biophysical.
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Austin Huang, Collin M. Stultz  Biophysical Journal 
Analysis and Evaluation of Channel Models: Simulations of Alamethicin
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Statistical Prediction and Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Experimental Overview
Union of Geometric Constraint-Based Simulations with Molecular Dynamics for Protein Structure Prediction  Tyler J. Glembo, S. Banu Ozkan  Biophysical.
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Molecular Mechanism for Stabilizing a Short Helical Peptide Studied by Generalized- Ensemble Simulations with Explicit Solvent  Yuji Sugita, Yuko Okamoto 
Protein Folding and Unfolding at Atomic Resolution
Core Fragment 251ILTIITL257 of the Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 Enhances the Aggregation of Its I254R Mutant: A Prion-like Property Jiangtao Leia, Ruxi.
Hydrophobic Core Formation and Dehydration in Protein Folding Studied by Generalized-Ensemble Simulations  Takao Yoda, Yuji Sugita, Yuko Okamoto  Biophysical.
Presentation transcript:

ß-heptapeptide CC CC CC MD: rmsd 0.14 Å NMR structure (3 1 Helix) Reversibly folds on ns time scale (X. Daura et al.) 7 residues, in methanol (less atoms):  3000 at ~ ns / hour (GROMACS)

ß-heptapeptide i) i)  -amino-acids (additional backbone carbon) ii) ii)Stable 2nd structure. iii) iii)Non-degradable peptide mimetics (e.g. highly selective somatastatin analogue) D. Seebach, B. Jaun + coworkers organic chem ETH-Zurich  -Heptapeptide (M) 31-helix in MeOH at 298 K (left-handed) Daura, X., Bernhard, J., Seebach, D., van Gunsteren, W. F. and Mark, A. E. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 280,

ß-heptapeptide unfoldfold unfold  -Heptapeptide, 340 K

ß-heptapeptide Starting structure  -Heptapeptide, 360 K

Protocol for MD: ß-heptatpetide 7 residues in 986 methanol molecules (~3000 atoms) GROMOS96 force field (van Gunsteren and co-workers) GROMACS software ( twin-range cutoff (1.0/1.4nm) for vdW and Elec. Reaction Field for long-range Elec. NP 1atm T and NV 300K T ensembles. Temp= 275.3, 286.4, 297.8, 322.1, 348.6, 399.6K Berendsen Thermostat, τ T =0.1ps and τ P =1.0ps run on 8 processors for 1ns/hour. ß-heptapeptide: Conventional MD

Time (ns) Folded = rmsd from NMR Model < 0.7 Å ß-heptapeptide: Conventional MD

Folded = rmsd from NMR Model < 0.7 Å ß-heptapeptide: Conventional MD

ß-heptapeptide: Replica Exchange Replica Exchange Replica Exchange

Protocol for the REMD: 20 structures selected as initial structures for the REMD 20 structures selected as initial structures for the REMD (more than 1ns spaced and rmsd from NMR > 0.3 nm) 200 ps of equilibration of each replica at its initial temperature 200 ps of equilibration of each replica at its initial temperature T= 275.3, 280.8, 286.8, 292.0, 297.8, 303.7, 309.7, 315.8, 322.1, 328.1, 335.0, T= 275.3, 280.8, 286.8, 292.0, 297.8, 303.7, 309.7, 315.8, 322.1, 328.1, 335.0, 341.6, 348.4, 355.4, 362.3, 369.5, 376.8, 384.2, 391.8, , 348.4, 355.4, 362.3, 369.5, 376.8, 384.2, 391.8, V = Cste = V (NPT at 300K) V = Cste = V (NPT at 300K) exchange trials every 0.1, 0.5, 2.0 and 5.0 ps exchange trials every 0.1, 0.5, 2.0 and 5.0 ps 50 ns at 400 K to unfold it and generate random structures 50 ns at 400 K to unfold it and generate random structures ß-heptatpetide 7 residues in 986 methanol molecules (3000 atoms) ß-heptatpetide 7 residues in 986 methanol molecules (3000 atoms) T controled by a Berendsen bath, τ T =0.1ps. T controled by a Berendsen bath, τ T =0.1ps. ß-heptapeptide: Replica Exchange

RMSD from the NMR model (C  res. 2-6) Exchange trial every 2.0 ps ß-heptapeptide: Replica Exchange

RMSD from the NMR model (C  res. 2-6) 0.5ps2.0ps5.0ps Time of Equilibration Increasing with Time Interval Between Exchange Trial Ratio of Folded Peptide at each temperature Criterion: folded = rmsd  0.7Å ß-heptapeptide: Replica Exchange

Folded Peptide ratios as a function of the interval between exchanges ß-heptapeptide: Replica Exchange

The replicas explore temperatures at different rates. Temperature Exploration 0.5ps 2.0ps 5.0ps ß-heptapeptide: Replica Exchange

Simulations converged Folded Peptide ratios as function of the interval between exchanges ß-heptapeptide: Replica Exchange

Folded Peptide ratios: REMD vs. Standard MD ß-heptapeptide: Replica Exchange

Folding free energy: REMD vs. Brute Force MD ß-heptapeptide: Replica Exchange

NPT NVT REMD Cluster # T (K) Conformational exploration: REMD vs. Brute Force MD Cluster Analysis: use of the 4 more populated clusters (% of the total ensemble) REMD simulations reproduce conformational ensembles ß-heptapeptide: Replica Exchange

REMD simulation: 1) accurately reproduces - thermodynamics (folding free energy) - conformational (clusters) MD data for folding 2) faster than MD simulation timeREMD: 20*15ns = 300ns BFMD: 2* *800 =3200ns one TempREMD: 20*15ns = 300ns BFMD: 1*800ns = 800ns real timeREMD: 15ns / 1 CPU = 7.5 days BFMD: 800ns / 8 CPUs = 34 days Efficiency: REMD vs. Brute Force MD ß-heptapeptide: Replica Exchange