GLAST LAT Project ISOC 5/17/2004 – Seth Digel1 ISOC Lessons Learned RFA09 Issue –No writeup on lessons learned from visits to other instrument/mission.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Not So Common Commons Juli Hinz University of Utah.

Advertisements

Operations Testing in the ISOC Service Challenges are a successor and extension to the successful Data Challenge model Broader set of objectives Continue.

2014 Workshop on Spacecraft Flight Software 1 Pasadena, CA, December 16-18, 2014 ICON End-To-End Operations Philosophy Will Marchant, Manfred Bester, Carl.

GLAST LAT ProjectManager’s Face to Face - ISOC, 17 March GLAST Large Area Telescope WBS 4.1.B Instrument Science Operations Center Manager’s Face.

LAT IOC GLAST Science Support Center September 25, 2002 LAT Science Tools Review Supplemental Slides Seth Digel (Stanford University/HEPL) David Band (GLAST.

GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 71 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science.

GLAST LAT ProjectISOC Peer Review March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 LAT Operations Facility 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Section 5: LAT.

GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.

GLAST Large Area Telescope - OperationsDOE Review, 15 June GLAST Large Area Telescope Operations Review Rob Cameron Instrument Science Operations.

GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Operations Planning, 23 March GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Operations Planning 23 March 2005 Rob Cameron

Mission Operations and Data Flow Overview Koji Mukai Astro-E2 Guest Observer Facility.

GLAST LAT ProjectISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.1 Requirements 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large.

GLAST Large Area Telescope ISOC Review 15 February 2006 FSW Activities, Organization, and Resource Needs Jana Thayer Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.

GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review of the GLAST/LAT Project, Aug. 14, 2001 Scott Williams 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Operations Center Scott.

GLAST LAT ProjectEGSE Peer Design Review, August 17, S. WilliamsEGSE Schedule and Cost Electrical Ground Support Equipment Schedule and Cost Scott.

GLAST LAT Project Engineering Meeting – ISOC Peer Review 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large Area Telescope ISOC Peer Review ISOC Detail.

GLAST LAT Project July 19, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/17 Science Verification Analysis and Calibration GLAST Large Area Telescope Eduardo do Couto e Silva.

RFA 18 – Automation of Operations Software Specific Request –Specify plans and requirements for automation of operations software, and describe the software.

GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.3 Verification and Validation 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.

Section 15-1GLAST Ground System Design Review August 18&19, 2004 ISOC Organization ISOC Manager R Cameron Commanding, H&S Timeline Planning Command Generation.

GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 4.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.

GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Section Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large Area Telescope ISOC Peer Review 7.2.

GLAST LAT ProjectSLAC Pre - Baseline Review, April 16, 2002 ` 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I&T Overview WBS: Elliott D. Bloom Stanford Linear Accelerator.

GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 21 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.

GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Status Review, March 30 & 31, 2004 Integration and Test 1 Integration, Facilities, Configuration, and Test (IFCT) Flow Procedure.

GLAST Large Area Telescope - OperationsDOE Review, 15 June GLAST Large Area Telescope Operations Review Rob Cameron Instrument Science Operations.

GLAST LAT Project 1S. Ritz Purposes of the Data Challenges “End-to-end” testing of analysis software. –define the ends –define the tests (what is success?)

GLAST LAT Offline SoftwareWorkshop - SLAC, Jan , 2001 R.Dubois Lehman Review Feb Joint NASA/DoE review My understanding: –“The purpose of the.

GLAST LAT Project ISOC Subsystem1 Response to Peer Review RFA 6  Request: –Need to provide more information on the planned and actual staffing profiles.

Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.

CHIPSat Cosmic Hot Interstellar Plasma Spectrometer Spacecraft Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg S: Telematik in der Raumfahrt Prof. Dr. Schilling.

THEMIS FDMO Review Management Topics − 1 October 5, 2004 Management Topics Manfred Bester.

Servicing Mission 4 ObservatoryOperationsSupport ObservatoryOperationsSupport June ’08 MSR Chris Long.

THEMIS FDMO CDR Peer Review − FOT Activities 1June 1-2, 2004 FOT Activities Mark Lewis.

SSC SI Data Processing Pipeline Plans Tom Stephens USRA Information Systems Development Manager SSSC Meeting – Sept 29, 2009.

TRIO-CINEMA Meeting at KHU 1 October 19-23, 2009 CINEMA Operations Manfred Bester.

March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.

LAT ISOCISOC Review, 15 February GLAST Large Area Telescope Instrument Science Operations Center ISOC Staffing and Costs Rob Cameron Stanford Linear.

GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Status Review - ISOC, 3 Nov GLAST Large Area Telescope WBS 4.1.B Instrument Science Operations Center Monthly Status Review.

GLAST LAT Project 1S. Ritz Data Challenge Planning Overview Purpose Boundary conditions Plan: –scope and progression of data challenges –schedule summary.

GLAST Mission - LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review March 31, 2004 Section ISOC 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: ISOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B David Lung Stanford Linear.

GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation – Oct 2, 2001 B. Grist1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.

LAT ISOCISOC Review, 15 February GLAST Large Area Telescope Instrument Science Operations Center Commanding, Health and Safety Rob Cameron Stanford.

GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 10, 2004 Users’ Committee Meeting The Project Data Management Plan David Band – GSSC.

GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.

GLAST Large Area Telescope – ISOC Overview and StatusDOE Annual Review, 13 June GLAST Large Area Telescope Instrument Science Operations Center.

LIGO-G E PAC9 Meeting LIGO Laboratory at Caltech 1 The LIGO I Science Run Data & Computing Group Operations Plan 9 th Meeting of the.

GLAST LAT Project ISOC 1 ISOC Status Review June 3, 2004.

GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.

GLAST LAT ISOCNotes for Italian meeting, 15 december Notes about ISOC and the italian contributions Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.

D. Thompson GLAST LAT Collaboration Meeting Aug. 31, Update on Multiwavelength Needs Dave Thompson LAT Multiwavelength Coordinator.

GLAST Large Area Telescope Instrument Science Operations Center

I&T&C Organization Chart

GLAST Large Area Telescope:

Diabetes Fair Kay Nelsen, MD; Tom Balsbaugh, MD; Shelly Henderson, PhD

A preliminary definition

GLAST Large Area Telescope:

GLAST Large Area Telescope

Integration, Test, and Calibration

GLAST Large Area Telescope:

Ground Segment for WSO/UV

Proposal for LAT Year 1 Data Release Plan

GLAST Large Area Telescope

GLAST Large Area Telescope

GLAST Large Area Telescope

Launch and On-orbit Checkout

Technology for a NASA Space-based Science Operations Grid Internet2 Members Meeting Advanced Applications Track Session April, 2003 Robert N. Bradford.

Integration & Test Instrument Operations Coordination

GLAST Large Area Telescope Instrument Science Operations Center

GLAST Large Area Telescope:

Presentation transcript:

GLAST LAT Project ISOC 5/17/2004 – Seth Digel1 ISOC Lessons Learned RFA09 Issue –No writeup on lessons learned from visits to other instrument/mission operations center Resolution –Members of the ad hoc planning group for the definition of the LAT IOC (now ISOC) made visits to the operations centers for GP- B (launched April, 2004; Stanford Univ., Tom Langenstein & Brett Stroozas), RHESSI (launched 2002; Berkeley Space Sciences Lab., David Smith & Manfred Bester), and Chandra (launched in 1999; MIT & Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Dan Schwartz & Paul Plucinsky) –Each of these operations centers integrates mission operations with science (instrument) operations, and so they are not directly comparable to the ISOC in terms of complexity or staffing. (The operations center for RHESSI includes the ground station.) LAT ISOC can learn from others but there are no direct models.

GLAST LAT Project ISOC 5/17/2004 – Seth Digel2 Lessons Learned –The science operations center for GP-B is co-located with the science team at Stanford. The GP-B data also will be distributed widely to collaborating institutions, but the colocation at Stanford was deliberate to maximize the interaction with the SOC on data issues. Colocation important to maximize science. –The staffing for RHESSI operations is especially spare. The facility itself is also used to run operations for FAST and CHIPS and the routine operations, like scheduling of contacts and pipeline processing, are automated. Testbeds (simulators for the instrument computers) are maintained, and have been found vital for understanding anomalies as well as for testing flight software updates. Testbeds important for flight software updates.

GLAST LAT Project ISOC 5/17/2004 – Seth Digel3 Lessons Learned –The Chandra Operations Control Center has a room with about 4 consoles for the ACIS instrument team to monitor and command the instruments. The ACIS team has developed an impressive, flexible facility for trend analysis. The importance of a flexible system that does not require deciding in advance what needs to be monitored routinely was stressed to us. The ground-based calibration data are still actively used, >4 years into the mission. Colocation of the operations (mission and instrument) and the ACIS instrument team has been important, at least in terms of increased efficiency. Instrument team members (like the PI) at Penn State can feel out of the loop or behind the times. Colocation important to keep all science members in the loop.