The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 The National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law July 10-15, 2005 Investigating Allegations of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
Advertisements

BEST PRACTICES: IMPLEMENTATION OF PREA IN THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice April 6, 2008 Washington,
Idaho Department of Correction Prison Rape Elimination Act Brent D. Reinke, Director.
Department Regulation No. C Attorney Visits
THE PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT. OF 2003, 115
Issues Facing the Criminal Justice System
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
Prison Rape Elimination Act Sexual Abuse / Assault Prevention and Intervention.
Overview of the 2003 Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) - What it Means for the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) This summary presentation is.
1 Overview of the 2003 Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) These materials were developed by The Moss Group, Inc.under cooperative agreement #03P21G1Y4.
MCSO Department of Corrections Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Review 2008.
Iowa Department of Corrections For Contractors and Volunteers PREA.
PREA Prison Rape Elimination Act Community Confinement Audits.
Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,
Inspections 101. The OSHA Mission… To assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women, by authorizing enforcement of the standards.
How the PREA Standards for Lockups Impact Local Law Enforcement November 5, :00 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. EST Notice of Federal Funding and Federal Disclaimer.
Incidence of Sexual Violence on Campus Toll-Free Sexual Assault Hotline: (English) Toll-Free Sexual Assault Hotline: (Spanish)
1 Public Safety Advisory Committee April 24, 2013.
Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders ACTION PLANNING The American University, Washington.
The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003: Implications for Juvenile Justice Agencies Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody Kentucky Department.
Staff Sexual Misconduct With Inmates Action Planning Work Guide The American University, Washington College of Law National Institute of Corrections Washington,
Training Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youthful in Custody November 7-9, 2005 Kentucky Department of Juvenile Justice Lexington, KY.
National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law Elements of Good State Laws July 11-16, 2004.
Model Training Components for Staff and Inmates National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law March 9-14, 2003.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
Developed by Brenda V. Smith and Jaime M. Yarussi under NIC Cooperative Agreement #06S20GJJ1 Criminal Law Responses to Staff Sexual Misconduct with Individuals.
Developed by Dan Dunne under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1.
Training Objectives Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody November 7-9, 2005 Lexington, KY.
Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders National Institute of Corrections American University Washington.
Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth In Custody Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth In Custody ACTION PLANNING Addressing Staff Sexual.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders National Institute of Corrections American University Washington.
Developed by Brenda Smith under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct.
Developed Under NIC Cooperative Agreement #06S20GJJ1 Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders Investigating Allegations of Staff.
 National Awareness  International Awareness  Systemic Pressures.
Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct With Inmates Action Planning Work Guide The American University, Washington College of Law National.
Developed by Brenda V. Smith under NIC Cooperative Agreement #06S20GJJ1 Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders.
PREA Employee Training Notification of Curriculum Utilization August 2014 The Moss Group Inc. 1 The enclosed PREA Employee Training curriculum was developed.
Legal Responses to Staff Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody: Elements of Good State Laws Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders National.
Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Inmates National Institute of Corrections/American University Washington.
Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct With Inmates Action Planning The American University, Washington College of Law National Institute.
Campus Save Act The Campus Sexual Violence Elimination Act of 2013.
The Prison Rape Elimination Act Overview and Update Responding to Inmate on Inmate Sexual Violence.
State Board of Corrections An Overview of Public Law 2008 Chapter 653.
Custodial Sexual Misconduct – Statute – Sexual misconduct with offenders and juveniles. Iowa’s law is in the Sexual Abuse section of the Criminal.
Suicide Prevention Reporting for School Counselors Meridian Joint School District No. 2.
County of Marin March 2004 County Budget Overview and Potential Impact of State Funding Cuts.
Prison Rape Elimination Act PREA A Brief Overview.
[JAIL NAME] Prison Rape Elimination Act Pamphlet This brochure was produced with support from Grant No RP-BX-0001 awarded by the Bureau of Justice.
EL PASO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SERVICES Dr. Henry Sontheimer Department Director & Criminal Justice Planner.
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
CHAPTER LOCAL FACILITIES FOR DETENTION County to maintain county jail; location; agreements for detention of prisoners Duties of.
Technology Initiatives in Corrections Presented by Julius Dupree Policy Office.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 11 - Prisons and Jails.
Prison Rape Elimination Act The Prison and the Community.
31 October The African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum (APCOF) is a network of state and civil society African practitioners active in policing.
New Jersey Department of Corrections
Working with Performance-based Standards Oregon Youth Authority.
Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Basics: What RSAT Programs Need to Know RSAT Webinar.
National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law Elements of Good State Laws July 13-18, 2003.
Lets Talk About PREA NO!! Capacity Building Preventing Responding Monitoring Oregon and PREA More Oregon Statistics NPR-WORK OPR-WORK National PREA Conference.
The PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT (PREA)
Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) & Victim Advocacy
Legal Liability.
Sexual Assault Employee Training.
Purposes of the Convention
Correctional Ministry Matters
ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE Internal Occurrence Reporting and Investigation.
Older American Act Amendments of 2006
Residential Provider Oversight
Presentation transcript:

The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 The National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law July 10-15, 2005 Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders Prof. Brenda V. Smith

The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 Public Law Makes important findings about the impact of prison rape on inmates, the economy and state and federal governments

PREA Purposes Establish zero tolerance for the conduct Make prevention a top priority Develop national standards for detection, prevention, reduction and punishment Increase available data and information on incidence in order to improve management and administration Standardize definitions used for collecting date on the incidence of rape Increase accountability of prison officials who fail to detect, prevent, reduce and punish prison rape Protect 8 th amendment rights of federal, state and local prisoners Establish grant programs Reduce costs of prison rape on interstate commerce

Major Provisions Section 4: Collection of prison rape statistics, data and research (BJS)($15MM for FY ) Surveys Including prisons, jails, community corrections, boot camps, road camps, forestry programs, farms, youthful offender facilities, hospitals, drug treatment programs Federal, state and local officials are required to participate Review panel on prison rape with subpoena power Public hearings for 3 highest incidence systems and 2 lowest Report each year on 6/30

Major Provisions Continued Section 5: Prison Rape Prevention and Prosecution (NIC) ($5MM for FY ) Information and Assistance through National Clearinghouse Training and Education Report due on 9/30 annually

Major Provisions Continued Section 6: Grants to Protect Inmates and Safeguard Communities (DOJ) ($40MM) Protection of the community $ to address overcrowding Risk assessment tools Mapping of concentration of inmates in communities Policy and program development Collaboration between corrections and community on reentry Protection of Inmates Investigations Prosecution Prevention

Major Provisions Continued Section 7: National Prison Rape Reduction Commission (with subpoena authority) 9 members Conduct legal and factual study of the effects of prison rape in the US Report in 2 years of initial meeting Recommended national standards Consultation with accreditation organizations Can’t impose something that would mandate substantial increased costs to agency Hold hearings

Major Provisions Continued Section 8: Adoption and Effect of National Standards A year after National Prison Rape Reduction Commission issues report, AG publishes a final rule with standards 90 days after transmission to state departments of correction FBOP is immediately covered Possible reduction of 5% each year for failure to meet the standard Annual report on non-compliance

Major Provisions Continued Section 9: Accreditation Organizations must adopt standards or lose federal funds Section 10: Definitions Covers jails, police lockups, prisons Covers both adult and juvenile facilities, government and private Prison rape includes rape of inmate in actual or constructive custody

What does this mean? Increased scrutiny at state, federal and local level on staff sexual misconduct Broadened concern about inmate on inmate misconduct Data is your friend Get ahead of the curve You must take this seriously – it is not a backburner issue