PEER Van Nuys Testbed Simulation Laura N. Lowes - University of Washington #setAnalysisParameters.tcl #-----------------------------------------------------------

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CALCULATED vs MEASURED ENERGY DISSIPATION.
Advertisements

Seismic Simulation: Advances with OpenSees
PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting PEER 2002 Annual Meeting Ian Robertson University of Hawaii.
Seismic Performance Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Bridges
1 Dynamic/Seismic analysis of RC Element including shear effect.
Robustness assessment for multiple column loss scenarios
Overview of Direct Analysis Method of Design for Stability
An-Najah National University
1 UH-Contribution Ravi Mullapudi Parnak Charkhchi Ashraf Ayoub NEES - Jan 23, 2008.
ETABS Three Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Buildings.
CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering
PEER Relating Structural Response to Damage Eduardo Miranda Hesaam Aslani Shahram Taghavi Stanford University PEER 2002 Annual Meeting.
Rigid-Frame Structures
Beams and Frames.
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
Structural Principles and Landscapes Over Structure GSD 6242 Ecologies, Techniques, Technologies IV Spring 2015Niall Kirkwood FASLA Alistair McIntosh FASLA.
LECTURE SERIES on STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION Thanh X. Nguyen Structural Mechanics Division National University of Civil Engineering
PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting PEER 2002 Annual Meeting uPractical Application of the PEER Limit State Checking Methodolgy uAllin Cornell uwith F. Jalayer,
Shake Table Testing of a Large Scale Two Span R-C Bridge Univ. of Washington *PI: Marc Eberhard Co-PI: Pedro Arduino Co-PI: Steven Kramer RA: Tyler Ranf.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Building Systems (Seismic)
2o Ciclo de Palestras em Engenharia Civil de Novembro de 2003 Universidade Nova de Lisboa-Centro de Investigaçao em Estruturas e Construção-UNIC.
NEWBuildS Tall Wood Building Design Project – Seismic & Gravity Load Analysis and Design Zhiyong Chen University of New Brunswick
CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering
by: Jon Heintz, S.E. & Robert Pekelnicky
Instrumented Moment Frame Steel Buildings Models Erol Kalkan, PhD California Geological Survey PEER-GMSM First Work Shop, Berkeley Oct
Level (m-1 ) Level m h (1-c)h ch Rigid Beam x1x1 x k1k1 k2k2 knkn kHkH RC AND SRC SHEAR WALL MACRO-MODELING l Multiple Vertical Line.
Section 2.1 Overview Types of NL Models Inelastic Model Attributes
Assessing Effectiveness of Building Code Provisions Greg Deierlein & Abbie Liel Stanford University Curt Haselton Chico State University … other contributors.
Seismic Performance Assessment of Flat Plate Floor Systems John W. Wallace, Ph.D., P.E. Thomas Hyun-Koo Kang, Ph.D. Student Department of Civil and Environmental.
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
Modeling Progressive Collapse by Plastic Analysis
Time-dependent vulnerability assessment of RC buildings considering
Preliminary Investigations on Post-earthquake Assessment of Damaged RC Structures Based on Residual Drift Jianze Wang Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Kaoshan.
Ömer O. Erbay & Ahmet Çıtıpıtıoğlu 25 April 2008
NEESR: Near-Collapse Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Structures Presented by Justin Murray Graduate Student Department of Civil and Environmental.
Static Pushover Analysis
1.
Raft & Piled-raft analysis (Soil-structure interaction analysis)
Structural Analysis and Design of
CHINESE HOSPITAL NEW ACUTE CARE AND SKILLED NURSING FACILITY TIM ARIOSTO STRUCTURAL OPTION AE 482 – SENIOR THESIS DR. RICHARD BEHR – FACULTY ADVISOR.
University of Palestine
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
Team UCDSESM Yihai Bao, YeongAe Heo, Zhiyu Zong University of California, Davis April 4 th, 2008 Prediction for Progressive Collapse Resistance of a 2D.
Tall Building Initiative Response Evaluation Helmut Krawinkler Professor Emeritus Stanford University On behalf of the Guidelines writers: Y. Bozorgnia,
Seismic of Older Concentrically Braced Frames Charles Roeder (PI) Dawn Lehman, Jeffery Berman (co-PI) Stephen Mahin (co-PI Po-Chien Hsiao.
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
IMPACT OF FOUNDATION MODELING ON THE ACCURACY OF RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS OF A TALL BUILDING Part II - Implementation F. Naeim, S. Tileylioglu, A. Alimoradi.
Second Order Analysis In the previous classes we looked at a method that determines the load corresponding to a state of bifurcation equilibrium of a perfect.
Mahadevan (Lanka) Ilankatharan Adviser: Professor Bruce Kutter
Strength of Material-1 Introduction. Dr. Attaullah Shah.
Adaptive Nonlinear Analysis as Applied to Performance based Earthquake Engineering Dr. Erol Kalkan, P.E. United States Geological Survey TUFTS, 2008.
CABER Project Update February 22, 2008
Progress towards Structural Design for Unforeseen Catastrophic Events ASME Congress Puneet Bajpai and Ben Schafer The Johns Hopkins University.
SCHEDULE 8:30 AM 10:30 AM Session I 11:00 AM Break 12:15 PM Session II 1:30 PM Lunch 2:45 PM Session III 3:15 PM 4:30 PM Session IV.
ACI Committee 341-C State-of-the-Art Summary Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Techniques for Concrete Bridges.
Seismic Performance of New and Older CBFs Dawn Lehman and Charles Roeder (PIs) Po-Chien Hsiao (GSRs) University of Washington.
ACI Committee 341-C State-of-the-Art Summary Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Techniques for Concrete Bridges.
INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.
Bassam A. Izzuddin* and Bassam A. Burgan†
Our task is to estimate the axial displacement u at any section x
11 Energy Methods.
Modeling & Performing Static Analysis in OpenSees
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN An Over View of the Subject
NUMERICAL SEISMIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF RC BRIDGES WITH HOLLOW PIERS
PreOpenSeesPost: a Generic Interface for OpenSees
فصل اول 1- پیشگفتار 2- کلیات خوشا پیشگفتار: از دستاورد های امروزه مهندسی زلزله و سازه ، می توان طراحی سازه ها بر مبنای عملکرد را بر شمرد که اولا.
Earthquake resistant buildings
Second Order Analysis In the previous classes we looked at a method that determines the load corresponding to a state of bifurcation equilibrium of a perfect.
Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department
Presentation transcript:

PEER Van Nuys Testbed Simulation Laura N. Lowes - University of Washington #setAnalysisParameters.tcl # #PEER VanNuys Testbed Project # #script to define analysis parameters including element, section and material models # begin setAnalysisParameters source $PATH/units.tcl #MODEL # model type 2D or 3D set 2Dvs3DModel "2D"; #ELEMENTS #Element Types set ColumnElementType "fiber-hinge";# options: "elastic", "elasticEffStiff","lumped-plasticity", "fiber-hinge", "fiber", #"displacement-based" set BeamElementType "fiber-hinge"; # options: "elastic", "elasticEffStiff","lumped-plasticity", "fiber-hinge", "fiber", #"displacement-based" #IF elements are "displacement-based" - set number of elements to use along column / beam length set NumColElements 1 set NumBeamElements 1 #IF elements are "fiber" or "displacement-based"- set Number of Integration Pointsto use along length set NumColIntPts 5 set NumBeamIntPts 4 set ElementIter "yes"; #forces iteration within the element to satisfy element equilibrium set NumElementIter 20; #number of iterations within the element set tol 1e-12; #tolerance for element convergence #IF "lumped-plasticity" or "fiber-hinge" - set stiffness factors for elastic beam section between hinges #IF "elasticEffStiff" - set effective stiffness factors for beams, columns, slab set BeamStiffnessReductionFactorFlex 0.5; #setAnalysisParameters.tcl # #PEER VanNuys Testbed Project # #script to define analysis parameters including element, section and material models # begin setAnalysisParameters source $PATH/units.tcl #MODEL # model type 2D or 3D set 2Dvs3DModel "2D"; #ELEMENTS #Element Types set ColumnElementType "fiber-hinge";# options: "elastic", "elasticEffStiff","lumped- plasticity", "fiber-hinge", "fiber", #"displacement-based" set BeamElementType "fiber-hinge"; # options: "elastic", "elasticEffStiff","lumped- plasticity", "fiber-hinge", "fiber", #"displacement-based" #IF elements are "displacement-based" - set number of elements to use along column / beam length set NumColElements 1 set NumBeamElements 1 #IF elements are "fiber" or "displacement-based"- set Number of Integration Pointsto use along length set NumColIntPts 5 set NumBeamIntPts 4 set ElementIter "yes"; #forces iteration within the element to satisfy element equilibrium set NumElementIter 20; #number of iterations within the element set tol 1e-12; #tolerance for element convergence #IF "lumped-plasticity" or "fiber-hinge" - set stiffness factors for elastic beam section between hinges #IF "elasticEffStiff" - set effective stiffness factors for beams, columns, slab set BeamStiffnessReductionFactorFlex 0.5;

The Objectives Develop a model of the Van Nuys building within OpenSees that can be used to 1.Simulate building response under variable levels of earthquake loading – results support loss estimation. 2.Determine the impact of epistemic uncertainty on predicted response – results support development of the PEER methodology. 3.Support development of new element models within OpenSees. 4.Predict the post-peak response of the Van Nuys building.

Deliverables Original Schedule (11702) DeliverablesRevised Schedule (52102) 1/28/022D model – Gen. Ias needed by PEER researchers 5/31/02 2D model - Gen. II: basic model & parameterized model 5/31/02 new request 2D model – Gen. III: includes shear-failure springs, reduced lap-splice capacity, multiple representations of joint deformation 6/15/02 new request version control of models (CVS) 8/1/02 10/1/023D model – Gen. IV:8/1/02 9/1/02Soil/foundation interaction9/1/02

Gen. II Model Basic model: –Comparable to SAP model developed by Degenkolb –2D model: one exterior & one interior frame (3D with slaving) –Modeling assumptions: BeamWithHinges element model, rigid joints,  Concrete & steel material response per FEMA 356 Effective stiffnesses used to generate an initial period of 0.89 sec No gravity load representation (waiting on new element that includes distributed loading) No representation of shear failure for columns Inadequate representation of splice failure for columns - reduced strength not ductility capacity)

Gen. II & III Models Parameterized model: –For use is assessing the impact of epistemic uncertainty –2D model: one exterior & one interior frame –Modeling parameters: Element type: BeamWithHinges / NonlinearBeamcolumn / EffectiveStiffness / DisplacementBased Column failure mechanisms: Splice failure / shear failure BC Joints: Rigid / center-line dimensions / strength & stiffness degrading Material models: Variable material models / variable material data (stiffness & strain capacity) Level of discretization: Displacement-based elements / sections Effective stiffness values: BeamWithHinges / EffectiveStiffness model Damping

What is the form of the model? VanNuys.tcl model BasicBuilder -ndm 3 -ndf 6 source setAnalysisParameters.tcl - define parameters for this particular analysis source setFrameGeometry.tcl - write data structure defining frame geometry (story height, bay width, etc.) source setFrameMemberSectionProperties.tcl- write data structure defining frame member geometry (column/beam/slab prop.) source setMaterialProperties.tcl- write data structure defining material properties (each column/beam/slab has concrete & steel material properties source setElasticElementProperties.tcl- write data structure defining elements elastic section properties (all elements have elastic properties - Torsional stiff.) source setNodalMass.tcl- nodal / distributed mass for dynamic analysis source defineStructuralMaterials.tcl- execute OpenSees command to generate required materials source defineSections.tcl- execute OpenSees command to generate required sections source defineNodes.tcl- execute OpenSees command to generate required nodes source defineElements.tcl- execute OpenSees command to generate required elements source defineBoundaryConditions.tcl- execute OpenSees command to establish required boundary conditions source analyze.tcl- run analysis

setAnalysisParameters.tcl #MODEL #Model Type – options: “2D”, “3D” set 2Dvs3DModel "2D"; #ELEMENTS #Element Types - options: "elastic", "elasticEffStiff", "lumped-plasticity", "fiber-hinge", "fiber", “disp” set ColumnElementType "fiber-hinge"; set BeamElementType "fiber-hinge"; #SECTIONS #IF fiber section - Define maximum fiber dimension set MaxFiberDim [expr 0.5*$in]; #MATERIALS set ConcreteMaterialType"Concrete01";# options: “Concrete01",“Concrete02", … set SteelMaterialType"Steel02";# options: “Steel01”, “Steel02” #ANALYSIS #set AnalysisType - options: "Gravity", "Eigen", "Dynamic", "Pushover" set AnalysisType "Pushover“; #OUTPUT #options Columns 1, 4, 8 set Columns 1; #Output is disp., vel. & accel. at a single column

Basic Model: Push-Over Analysis Roof Displacement (in.) Base Shear (kips)

Basic Model – Simulated Response – NR vnuy Ground Acceleration – Northridge Eq. - Building Instrumentation Acceleration (in./sec.) Roof Acceleration (in./sec.)

Basic Model – Simulated Response – NR vnuy Ground Acceleration – Northridge Eq. - Building Instrumentation Displacement (in.) Roof Displacement (in.)

Basic Model – Response to Dynamic Loading NR.cnpk SF.vnuy NR.vnuy SF.466 * Deformation Distribution at Maximum Roof Displacement Story Displacement (in.) Hazard Level: 10% in 50 yr.

Results – Parameterized Model Base Shear (kips) nonlinearBeamColumn FEMA 356 load distribution Roof Displacement (in.)

Distribution & Documentation Web-based distribution Accessible from UW website: –Data from numerical simulation: Gen II – basic model –Documentation of modeling decisions –Tcl script defining Van Nuys building To be developed - version control for models

Current Tasks Issue of model period –predicted period ~0.9 seconds, observed is 1.5 sec. –May need to run model through San Fernando record to pre-damage the building Gravity loading – this determines point of yielding Shear / splice failure Distrubiton of results (story drift & acc.)