Induction of labor: Not as bad as you think! Bob Silver University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journal Club October 2012 Supervised by Prof.Abdulrahim Rouzi Presented by Dr.Ayman Bukhari.
Advertisements

TEMPLATE DESIGN © Comparison of outcomes of triplet pregnancy with twin pregnancy Kyu-Sang Kyeong, M.D., Jae-Yoon Shim,
Outcomes of Five Years of Planned Home Birth Attended by Regulated Midwives vs. Planned Hospital Birth in British Columbia P Janssen, PhD, 1,2,4,5, MC.
Nevada Medicaid Looks at Increased Cesarean Section Rates and Early Induction of Labor Marti Coté, RN 1.
Improving Birth Outcomes Rebekah E. Gee, MD MPH MSHPR FACOG.
© Copyright, The Joint Commission Perinatal Care (PC) Core Measure Set Celeste Milton, MPH, BSN, RN Associate Project Director Department of Quality Measurement.
UOG Journal Club: September 2012 Perinatal outcome in women treated with progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth: a meta-analysis Sotiriadis A,
PRESENTATION ON SAFETY ISSUES RELEVANT TO HOME BIRTHS AND THE PROFESSIONALS WHO PROVIDE MATERNITY CARE SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 The Maryland Chapter of the American.
Obesity and Hypertension in Pregnancy: Does it matter afterwards? Prof Leonie Callaway.
Progesterone Therapy for Preterm Labor Perinatal Conference April 14, 2006.
Algorithm & Checklist PDSA Trials
Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery Mark B. Landon, M.D., John C. Hauth, M.D., Kenneth J. Leveno,
Normal physiology of pregnancy First trimester-Increased insulin sensitivity. Late 2 nd and 3 rd trimester insulin resistance possible associated with.
Elective Cesarean Delivery, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission, and Neonatal Respiratory Distress 楊明智.
POST TERM PREGNANCY. Definitions:  postdates pregnancy - patient who has not delivered by end of 42nd week or 294 days from first day of last menstrual.
William Goodnight, MD, MSCR Assistant Professor Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine UNC Chapel Hill School of Medicine.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
Preventing Elective Deliveries Before 39 Weeks John R. Allbert Charlotte, NC.
Institute of Medicine Research Issues in the Assessment of Birth Settings: Assessment of Risk in Pregnancy Discussant M. Kathryn Menard, MD MPH Professor.
| Africa Regional Meeting on Interventions for Impact in Essential Maternal and Newborn Care, Addis Ababa, Feb 21, 2011 Timing of delivery and induction.
In the name of God.
Management of postterm pregnancy Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Number 55, September 2004 OBGY R1 Lee Eun Suk.
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: Is it Still an Option
GEORGIA HOSPITAL ENGAGEMENT NETWORK (GHEN)
Epidemiology of preterm birth Stefan Johansson Department of Neonatology, Karolinska university hospital Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
Vaginal Birth after C-section
Complications of Delivery Before 39 Weeks: OB Perspective Roger B. Newman MD Maas Endowed Chair For Reproductive Sciences Professor and Vice-Chairman Department.
Manual Vacuum Aspirator- A Safe and Cost Effective Tool for Decentralization of Post Abortion Care N Tasnim, G Mahmud, S Fatima Maternal and Child Health.
What is Labor ? (: work) Regular painful uterine contractions accompanied by progressive effacement and dilatation of the cervix.
ELECTIVE DELIVERY LESS THAN 39 WEEKS GESTATION THE HCA EXPERIENCE Steven Holt, MD, FACOG Chair Department of OB/GYN Rose Medical Center 7/31/09.
Adam Fogel, Christopher Elliot, Miso Gostimir
Induction of Labor C. T. Allred, M.D. 8/7/09. Standard Maternal Indications Preeclampsia, eclampsia Preeclampsia, eclampsia Term premature rupture of.
POST TERM PREGNANCY & IOL Dr. Salwa Neyazi Assistant professor and consultant OBGYN KSU Pediatric and adolescent gynecologist.
Dr. Yasir Katib MBBS, FRCSC, Perinatologest Dr. Yasir Katib MBBS, FRCSC, Perinatologest.
Max Brinsmead MB BS PhD May Definition and Incidence  Prolonged pregnancy is defined as that proceeding beyond 42 weeks gestation  In the absence.
Baby by Appointment? NURS 350~ Ferris State University Amanda Badgley Christine Demler Mariah Lab Tracie Strand Denise VanderWeele F erris State University,
Preterm Birth Hazem Al-Mandeel, M.D Course 481 Obstetrics and Gynecology Rotation.
Developed by D. Ann Currie RN, MSN  Version  Cervical Ripening  Induction / Augmentation  Amniotomy  Amnioinfusion  Episiotomy  Assisted Vaginal.
Post term or prolonged pregnancy Dr.shakeri. Definition  42completed weeks or more from the first day of LMP  When last menses was followed by ovulation.
TIME OF DELIVERY IN HYPERTENSIVE DISORERS OF PREGNANCY Laleh Eslamian MD. Prof. of Obstet & Gynecol Perinatologist, Shariati hospital, TUMS.
POSTTERM PREGNANCY: THE IMPACT ON MATERNAL AND FETAL OUTCOME Dr. Hussein. S. Qublan- Al-Hammad Jordanian Board in Obstet &Gynecology European Board in.
Abnormal second – stage labor.  Multiple short term & long term maternal & neonatal outcomes should be considered.
Preterm Labor & Preterm Birth Family Medicine Specialist CME Vientiane, Lao PDR December 10 – 12, 2008.
Diabetes in pregnancy Timing and Mode of Delivery
P OSTTERM PREGNANCY. D EFINITIONS infant with recognizable clinical feature indicating pathologically prolong pregnancy Post term or prolong pregnancy:
DR. MASHAEL AL-SHEBAILI OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY DEPARTMENT
Definition & Risk Factors of FGR FGR, also called IUGR is the term used to describe a fetus that has not reached its growth potential because of genetic.
Mei-Chun LU, Song-Shan HUANG, Yuan-Horng YAN, Panchalli WANG, Yueh-Han HSU, Wei CHEN Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi,
UOG Journal Club: March 2016 Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by maternal factors and biomarkers in the three trimesters of.
Breech presentation.
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
UOG Journal Club: June 2016 Single deepest vertical pocket or amniotic fluid index as evaluation test for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome (SAFE trial):
25th European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Obstetrical and perinatal complications of twin pregnancies:
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
UOG Journal Club: March 2016
UOG Journal Club: June 2016 Single deepest vertical pocket or amniotic fluid index as evaluation test for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome (SAFE trial):
Inonu University, Turgut Ozal Medical Centre
Amy Bell Peter Cherouny Sue Gullo
Pre-labor Rupture of Membranes (PROM)
Preliminary results of a randomized study on double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
Postterm Pregnancy UKSM-Wichita.
Prolonged Pregnancy.
Tabassum Firoz MD MSc FRCPC University of British Columbia
Journal Club Notes.
Implications of ARRIVE Elective Labor Induction in 2019
Induction of labor (IOL)
UOG Journal Club: September 2019
Chantal Nelson BORN Annual Conference April 25, 2017
Pregnancy at Risk: Gestational Conditions
Presentation transcript:

Induction of labor: Not as bad as you think! Bob Silver University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah

When is the best time for delivery? Delivery Expectant management ≥ 42 wks < 39 wks wks ?

Increasing maternal and perinatal risks after 39 weeks

Maternal Complications Pregnancies that continue beyond 39 weeks are associated with increased risks of: –Cesarean delivery –Operative vaginal delivery –3 rd and 4 th degree lacerations –Febrile morbidity –Hemorrhage

Statistical significance as compared to rate of cesarean delivery in the previous week gestation *p<.05 * * * * *

MFMU FOX: Cesarean % P < w 40w 41w

* * * * * * * * * * * * Statistical significance as compared to rate of outcome in the previous week gestation: *p<.05

MFMU FOX: Maternal adverse composite % P < w 40w 41w

Perinatal Complications Pregnancies that continue beyond 39 weeks are associated with increased risks of: –Stillbirth –Meconium aspiration syndrome –Mechanical ventilation –Birth trauma –Neonatal seizures/ICH/ encephalopathy –Neonatal sepsis –UA pH ≤7/BE < -12

Perinatal Death Perinatal death nadirs between weeks and increases steadily thereafter Gestational AgeLoss Rate 370.7/ / / / /1000

Prospective fetal mortality rate by single weeks of gestation: United States, MacDorman et al; NVSS 2009;57:1-20

Cord Gas Abnormalities 39 vs. 41 weeks Adjusted OR 1.65 (1.01, 2.77) Adjusted OR 1.59 (1.17, 2.16) Adjusted OR 1.6 (1.4, 1.9)

Severe Neonatal Complications 40 vs. 39 weeks: adjusted OR 1.47 (1.1, 2.0) 41 vs. 39 weeks : adjusted OR 2.04 (1.5, 2.78)

MFMU FOX: Neonatal adverse composite % P = w 40w 41w

When is the best time for delivery? Delivery Expectant management weeks

Induction and cesarean delivery: Common wisdom Retrospective cohort studies –Induction of labor prior to 41 weeks of gestation is associated with an approximately 2-fold higher risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women

Elective inductions only

When is the best time for delivery? Delivery Expectant management weeks

Standard of Care Patients undergoing induction of labor should be counseled about a 2 – fold increased risk of cesarean ACOG #107 Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:386-97

The problem Spontaneously laboring women are not the right comparison group –Cannot choose between EIOL (strategy) and spontaneous labor (event) –Choice is between EIOL and expectant management The latter may lead to spontaneous labor Also conveys downstream possibilities that may increase the CS rate

39 weeks N= 100 Spontaneous labor CS rate=20% N=20 IOL CS rate=35% N=35

39 weeks N= 100 CS rate=20% N=6 IOL CS rate=35% N=35 30% Spontaneous labor at 39 weeks CS rate=30% N=11 50% labor at 40 weeks CS rate=40% N=14 35 N=100 Medical or Post dates IOL 70 CS rate= 31%

Induction vs. Expectant Management –RCT of women at 41 weeks of gestation (N = 3407) Hannah et al, NEJM, 1992 CS %

IOL prior to 41 weeks: HYPITAT IOL vs. expectant management for mild hypertensive disease after 36 weeks (N = 756) –IOL Adverse maternal composite: RR 0.71 ( ) % P =.09 Cesarean Delivery Koopmans et al. Lancet 2009; 374:979-88

Induction vs. Expectant Management (CS%) Week of Induction IOLSpontaneous 38 weeks11.9%7.0% 39 weeks14.3%9.1% 40 weeks20.4%10.9% 41 weeks24.3%14.9% Caughey et al, AJOG 2006;195:700-5

Induction vs. Expectant Management (CS%) Week of Induction IOLSpontaneousExpectant aOR (95% CI) 38 weeks11.9%7.0%13.3%1.80 ( ) 39 weeks14.3%9.1%15.0%1.39 ( ) 40 weeks20.4%10.9%19.0%1.24 ( ) 41 weeks24.3%14.9%26.0%1.26 ( ) Caughey et al, AJOG 2006;195:700-5

EIOL vs. expectant management Retrospective Cohorts: Northwestern –588 women at 39 weeks with favorable cervix Power: 1/3 reduction in CS from 30% at EIOL –204 women at 39 weeks with unfavorable cervix Power: 1/2 reduction in CS from 40% at EIOL Osmundson et al. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:601-5 Osmundson et al. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:583-7

Cesarean Delivery % Osmundson et al. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:601-5 Osmundson et al. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:583-7

EIOL vs. expectant management at 39 weeks % Cheng et al AJOG 2012; Stock et al BMJ 2012 Cesarean delivery 10% decreased odds of cesarean in EIOL group

RCT of EIOL prior to 41 weeks Six small RCT’s None have found an increase in cesarean delivery –Poor quality –Underpowered

EIOL vs. expectant management at 39 weeks % Cheng et al AJOG 2012; Stock et al BMJ 2012 Perinatal mortality and morbidity 70% decreased odds of mec aspiration and mortality, respectively, in EIOL group

IOL & adverse neonatal outcome IOL/augmentation associated with ASD (OR 1.13) –Not supported consistently by other studies (e.g., Gale et al.) –Incorrect control group for clinical relevance –Inadequate adjustment for confounding –Use of incorrect coding for ASD

Elective Induction vs Expectant Management Elective Induction vs Expectant Management Retrospective cohort studyRetrospective cohort study California deliveries in 2006California deliveries in 2006 No prior cesareansNo prior cesareans 37 – 40 weeks gestation37 – 40 weeks gestation Elective induction compared to expectant management at each gestational ageElective induction compared to expectant management at each gestational age Vertex, non-anomalous, singleton deliveries (N = 362, 154)Vertex, non-anomalous, singleton deliveries (N = 362, 154) Darney et al. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122:761-9

Elective Induction vs Expectant Management Elective Induction vs Expectant Management Overall CS rate: 16%Overall CS rate: 16% Perinatal mortality: 0.2%Perinatal mortality: 0.2% NICU admission: 6.2%NICU admission: 6.2% OR for CS was LOWER at all gestational ages and parity for EIOL!!OR for CS was LOWER at all gestational ages and parity for EIOL!! EIOL NOT associated with severe lacerations, operative vaginal delivery, shoulder dystocia, etc.EIOL NOT associated with severe lacerations, operative vaginal delivery, shoulder dystocia, etc. Darney et al. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122:761-9

Elective Induction vs Expectant Management Elective Induction vs Expectant Management OR for CS with EIOLOR for CS with EIOL –37 weeks: 0.44 (0.34 – 0.57) –38 weeks: 0.43 (0.38 – 0.50) –39 weeks: 0.46 (0.41 – 0.52) –40 weeks: 0.57 (0.50 – 0.65) EIOL increased hyperbilirubinemia at 37 and 38 weeks gestationEIOL increased hyperbilirubinemia at 37 and 38 weeks gestation Darney et al. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122:761-9

When is the best time for delivery? Delivery Expectant management weeks ??

Trends in IOL 2005 National Vital Statistics Report Birth Data

Conclusions We know that at weeks, IOL better than EM We know that before 39 weeks, EM better than IOL Between 39 and 41 weeks: –Common wisdom that EM is better than IOL Maternal and neonatal outcomes worsen with delivery after 39 weeks The concern that IOL increases CD is founded on methodologically flawed study design –Common practice is moving away from EM –We actually don’t know whether EM or IOL is better

Conclusions An adequately powered study of elective induction of nulliparous women is needed

Induction in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks to Prevent Adverse Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management (ARRIVE)

N = 6000  target 167 per month for 3 years Nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy Randomized to one of two arms:  Elective IOL  Expectant management Design Summary

Composite perinatal morbidity Cesarean delivery Maternal and fetal outcomes Cost (including hospital) Patient satisfaction Outcomes

Inclusion Criteria 1.Nulliparous - no previous pregnancy beyond 20 weeks 2.Singleton gestation - twin gestation reduced to singleton is not eligible unless reduced before 14 weeks project gestational age 3.Project gestational age at randomization is between 38,0 and 38,6

Exclusion Criteria 1.Project gestational age at date of first ultrasound is > 20 weeks 6 days 2.Plan for induction of labor prior to 40 weeks 5 days 3.Plan for cesarean delivery or contraindication to labor  such as prior uterine surgery, active HSV infection, breech or transverse presentation 4.Signs of labor  regular painful contractions with cervical change 5.Fetal demise or known major fetal anomaly 6.Heparin or low-molecular weight heparin during the current pregnancy 7.Placenta previa, accreta, vasa previa 8.Active vaginal bleeding greater than bloody show 9.Ruptured membranes

Exclusion Criteria 10.Cerclage in current pregnancy 11.Known oligohydramnios  AFI < 5 or MVP < 2 11.Fetal growth restriction  EFW < 10 th percentile 12.Known HIV positivity because of modified delivery plan 13.Major maternal medical illness associated with increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcome  such as any diabetes mellitus, lupus, any hypertensive disorder, cardiac disease, renal insufficiency 14.Refusal of blood products 15.Participation in another interventional study that influences management of labor at delivery or perinatal morbidity or mortality 16.Delivery planned elsewhere at a non-Network site

Timing of Procedures Screen and Consent 34,0 to 38,6 Randomize 38,0 to 38,6  Elective IOL Arm Induce between 39,0 and 39,4 weeks  Expectant Management Arm Weekly follow-up visits with their providers Expectantly manage until at least 40,5 weeks, unless valid medical indication warrants delivery before 40,5 weeks Initiate antepartum fetal testing no later than 41,6 weeks according to policies at each center Induce between 40,5 and 42,2 weeks

Patients should be allowed adequate time to labor before considering the induction “failed” and proceeding to cesarean section  “failed” if at least 12 hours have elapsed since both rupture of membranes and use of a uterine stimulant and the patient remains in latent labor Otherwise, no attempt will be made to alter or mandate clinical management of the patients The Intervention – Both Arms Clinical Management of Induction

University of Utah IMC LDS McKay Dee Utah Valley Utah Sites

Induce everyone? Not Yet!!!!!!

Paradigm Shift? Stay Tuned!