HDL Efflux Capacity and Incident Cardiovascular Events in the Dallas Heart Study A Rohatgi,* A Khera, JD Berry, EG Givens, CR Ayers, KE Wedin, IJ Neeland,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Secretory Phospholipase A2: A New Risk Factor and Soon a New Target of Therapy Rabih R. Azar, MD, MSc, FACC Associate Professor of Medicine Division of.
Advertisements

THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
Lipid Disorders and Management in Diabetes
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT): Design Cannon CP.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Cholesterol quintile (mg/dL)
Only You Can Prevent CVD Matthew Johnson, MD. What can we do to prevent CVD?
HDL Particles but not LDL Particles Predict Cardiovascular Disease Events in HIV Patients: Results from Strategies for Management of ART Study (SMART)
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV/r vs DRV/rATADAR. ATV/r 300/100 mg + TDF/FTC qd N = 91 N = 89 DRV/r 800/100 mg + TDF/FTC qd  Design Randomisation 1: 1 Open-label.
Management of Dyslipidemia in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease: an update from Guidelines Oman International Vascular Conference Al-Bustan Palace.
THE LIPID PANEL What are we missing? Robert St. Amant, MD, FAAFP Diplomate, American Board of Clinical Lipidology Baton Rouge General Medical Director,
Global impact of ischemic heart disease World Heart Federation, 2011.
HYPERLIPIDAEMIA. 4S 4444 patients –Hx angina or MI –Cholesterol Simvastatin 20mg (10-40) vs. placebo FU 5 years  total cholesterol 25%;  LDL.
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
Results of Monotherapy in ALLHAT: On-treatment Analyses ALLHAT Outcomes for participants who received no step-up drugs.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) Type 2 diabetes mellitus Men and women.
Introduction Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]
Pai JK et al. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: Relative CHD risk by increasing baseline CRP plasma levels,* relative to CRP
To assess the prognostic value of variability in home-measured blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in a general population. Objective: Methods: BP.
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
STEVIA SYMPOSIUM LEUVEN July 2009 EFFECT OF STEVIOSIDE ON ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN A MOUSE MODEL OF THE METABOLIC SYNDROME Paul Holvoet Atherosclerosis and Metabolism.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
VBWG PROactive: Study design Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366: Charbonnel B et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27: Objective: Assess the effects.
A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
Ridker PM, et al. Lancet 2009;373: Baseline clinical characteristics of the study population in the placebo and rosuvastatin groups according.
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
DIABETES INSTITUTE JOURNAL CLUB CARINA SIGNORI, D.O., M.P.H. DECEMBER 15, 2011 Atherothrombosis intervention in metabolic syndrome with low HDL/High Triglycerides:
HDL Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and Incident Cardiovascular Events Journal conference Anand Rohatgi, M.D., Amit Khera, M.D., Jarett D. Berry, M.D., Edward.
○ South Asians (SAs) have high rates of CHD which are not entirely explained by traditional CVD risk factors. ○ The association of a family history of.
Over Time Additional Risk Factors Can Progress: Effect of Cholesterol and BP on CHD Risk in MRFIT Trial
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: The Year in Atherothrombosis J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(10):
Prognostic Value of B-Type Natriuretic Peptides in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease The PEACE trial Omland T, et al. JACC 2007;50:
Circulation. 2013;128: R4 이태인 / Prof. 우종신.
FOURIER Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk
From ESH 2016 | LB 3: Davide Agnoletti, MD
Background/Objective
OBESITY.
*Imperial College London
Copyright © 2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
HDL-cholesterol versus apoA-I and Atherosclerosis Regression
Prevalence Of Metabolic Syndrome And Assessment Of Nutritional And Biochemical Parameters Of Overweight And Obese Working Women 1Upasana, 2Chakravarty.
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
Cholesterol practice questions
The American Heart Association Presented by Dr. Steven E. Nissen
LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial Marc P. Bonaca, Patrice.
Comparison of baseline characteristics in participants who subsequently had an incident cardiovascular event or new-onset diabetes in the Prospective.
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk Epidemiological evidence
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Association of blood lipids with AF
HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk
Prehypertension, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in a Population-Based Sample by Ying Zhang, Elisa T. Lee, Richard B. Devereux, Jeunliang Yeh,
AIM-HIGH Niacin Plus Statin to Prevent Vascular Events
What is the likely mechanism by which HDL-C reduces coronary heart disease?
Prevalence of statin and beta-blocker use by clinical presentation
Type 2 diabetes: Overlap of clinical conditions
Section 7: Aggressive vs moderate approach to lipid lowering
Joshua A. Bell et al. JACC 2018;72:
Separate and combined associations of body-mass index and abdominal adiposity with cardiovascular disease: collaborative analysis of 58 prospective studies 
Baseline Characteristics of the Subjects*
Lars E. Laugsand et al. BTS 2016;j.jacbts
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
The cumulative incidence curve demonstrated that patients with a sub-optimal LDL-C response to statin therapy were associated with a higher risk of CVD.
Presentation transcript:

HDL Efflux Capacity and Incident Cardiovascular Events in the Dallas Heart Study A Rohatgi,* A Khera, JD Berry, EG Givens, CR Ayers, KE Wedin, IJ Neeland, IS Yuhanna, DJ Rader, JA de Lemos, PW Shaul *corresponding author Donald W. Reynolds Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center

HDL-C ≠ CHD 25% Drug Class Trial HDL-C change NIACIN AIM-HIGH 25% Placebo Drug Class Trial HDL-C change NIACIN AIM-HIGH 25% HPS2-THRIVE 15% CETPI Torcetrapib 72% Dalcetrapib 35% Niaspan 20% CETPI AIM-HIGH 15% HPS2 10% Dalcetrapib Torcetrapib 5% A H T D 0% HPS2-THRIVE. NEJM 2014;371:203-12 1 2 3 4 Schwartz GG, et al. NEJM 2012;367:2089-99 Years Boden WE, et al. NEJM 2011;365:2255-67 Barter PJ, et al. NEJM 2007;357:2109-22

HDL Function: Reverse Cholesterol Transport apoA-I Liver apoA-I ABCA1 Cholesterol efflux ABCA1 SRB1 apoA-I ABCG1 Macrophage VLDL Bile/Feces Adorni MP, et al. J Lipid Res 2007;48:2453-62 Khera AV, et al. NEJM 2011;364:127-35 Rader DJ, Hovingh GK. Lancet 2014;384:618-625

Study Objective Objective: Hypothesis: Perform a systematic evaluation of the epidemiology of cholesterol efflux capacity in a large unselected population free of cardiovascular disease . Hypothesis: Cholesterol efflux capacity varies by sex, race and adiposity and is associated with incident cardiovascular events

Methods Dallas Heart Study Baseline N = 2924 Age = 30-65 (median 42) Cholesterol Efflux Capacity Baseline Dallas Heart Study ACAT inhibitor cAMP Metabolic phenotype Cholesterol Efflux Capacity Lipoprotein composition 9.4 years N = 2924 Age = 30-65 (median 42) 57% Women 49% Black Follow up ApoB-depleted plasma ASCVD (n=132): MI/Stroke PCI/CABG CV Death % efflux Total Normalized efflux % effluxsample % effluxreference Sankaranarayanan S, et al. J Lipid Res 2011;52:2332-40

Cholesterol Efflux Capacity HDL-C and Efflux by Sex and Race   N HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) Cholesterol Efflux Capacity (Normalized) Women 1657 51 [43-61] 0.99 [0.83-1.18] Men 1267 44 [37-52] 1.01 [0.84-1.20] p-value <0.0001 0.1 Black 1443 49 [42-60] 0.98 [0.81-1.18] Non-Black 1481 45 [38-55] 1.01 [0.85-1.19] 0.002 Cholesterol efflux capacity is expressed as a ratio of percent cholesterol efflux of the sample normalized to the percent cholesterol efflux of a reference sample.

Determinants of HDL-C and Efflux HDL Cholesterol   Cholesterol Efflux Capacity Model R2 = 0.35 Model R2 = 0.03 Variable Std beta estimate Total cholesterol 0.22 0.12 Alcohol intake 0.18 HDL-C 0.09 Age 0.13 Male sex 0.05 Exercise dose 0.08 Hypertension 0.04 Black race 0.07 0.03 Smoking -0.06 -0.07 Waist to hip ratio -0.08 Body mass index -0.17 -0.23 Log Triglyceride -0.39 Model R2 reflects the total contribution of the model to the variance in the dependent variable (range 0.0-1.0).

Correlations with Lipoprotein/Metabolic Variables   HDL Cholesterol Cholesterol Efflux Capacity 0.07* HDL Particle concentration 0.52* 0.15* HDL Particle size 0.72* 0.02 Total Cholesterol 0.06* LDL Cholesterol -0.15* 0.10* Triglyceride -0.45* 0.05* Body Mass Index -0.23* -0.02 Waist to Hip Ratio -0.38* Truncal Fat (Dexa) -0.20* 0.004 Visceral Fat (MRI) -0.41* 0.03 HOMA-IR -0.29* -0.05* HDL variables Lipids Adiposity Insulin Res Values are Spearman correlation coefficients. * p<0.05, otherwise p=NS CEC=cholesterol efflux capacity; HOMA-IR: Homeostatic model assessment

Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and ASCVD Events Low efflux Hi efflux 10% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 8% ASCVD Events: MI 6% Stroke PCI/CABG CV death 4% N=132 Log rank p=0.002 2% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Years ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

HDL-C, Efflux Capacity and ASCVD Events HDL cholesterol Hazard Ratio Q4 vs Q1 (95% CI) Unadjusted 0.64 (0.40-1.03) TRF-adjusted 0.80 (0.47-1.37) TRF + HDL-P 1.08 (0.59-1.99) Cholesterol Efflux Capacity Unadjusted 0.44 (0.27-0.73) TRF-adjusted 0.30 (0.18-0.50) TRF + HDL-C 0.31 (0.18-0.52) TRF + HDL-P 0.34 (0.20-0.56) TRF + HDL-C + HDL-P 0.33 (0.19-0.55) 0.1 1.0 10 Hazard Ratio N=132/2416 for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. Traditional risk factors (TRF) = age, sex, ethnicity, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, body- mass index, total cholesterol, log triglycerides, statin use. HDL-C = HDL cholesterol. HDL-P = HDL particle concentration

Efflux Capacity and Hard ASCVD Events Primary ASCVD 132/2416 Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Q1 Referent Q2 0.71 [0.46-1.10] Q3 0.42 [0.26-0.68] Q4 0.33 [0.19-0.55] Hard ASCVD 84/2402 Q1 Referent Q2 0.69 [0.39-1.21] Q3 0.46 [0.25-0.84] Q4 0.40 [0.21-0.74] 0.1 1.0 10 Hazard Ratio Primary ASCVD: MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, and CV death Hard ASCVD: MI, stroke, death from MI or stroke. Models adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, BMI, total cholesterol, log triglycerides, statin use, HDL-C, and HDL-P.

Continuous Efflux Capacity and Cardiovascular Events Model Primary ASCVD (N=132/2416) Total CVD (N=172/2416) HR (95% CI) Unadjusted 0.75 (0.61-0.91) 0.84 (0.71-0.98) TRF-adjusted 0.65 (0.53-0.80) 0.75 (0.63-0.89) TRF + HDL-C 0.66 (0.54-0.81) 0.77 (0.64-0.91) TRF + HDL-P 0.69 (0.56-0.84) 0.79 (0.67-0.94) TRF + HDL-C + HDL-P 0.68 (0.55-0.84) Hazard ratios and 95% CIs for 1 SD increase in efflux capacity. Primary ASCVD: MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, and CV death Total CVD: ASCVD + peripheral revascularization, CHF and afib hospitalization

Efflux Capacity Improves Risk Prediction of ASCVD Events Model C-statistic Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) Net Reclassification Index (NRI) Traditional Risk Factors 0.827 0.02 0.37 Traditional Risk Factors + Efflux capacity 0.841 P value/ 95% CI p=0.02 p=0.0008 (0.18-0.56) Traditional Risk Factors: age, sex, ethnicity, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, BMI, total cholesterol, log triglyceride, statin use

Summary In contrast to HDL cholesterol, cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is minimally correlated with risk factors, lipoproteins, adiposity, or insulin resistance. CEC is inversely associated with incident atherosclerotic CV events in a population-based study free of CVD This association is not attenuated by traditional risk factors, HDL cholesterol, or HDL particle concentration CEC, as a measure of reverse cholesterol transport, may provide the ability to interrogate key mechanisms related to cardiovascular disease in humans

Other Disease Pathways Implications HDL Cholesterol HDL function Risk Prediction Coronary Disease Free Stable ACS Therapeutic Response LDL cholesterol Non-HDL cholesterol HDL cholesterol HDL Function/Flux Other Disease Pathways