Slide# 1 212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY 14260 www.civil.buffalo.edu Fax: 716 645 3733 Tel: 716 645 2114 x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Dynamics Laboratory Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology,
Advertisements

Root Locus Diagrams Professor Walter W. Olson
Chapter 4 DC to AC Conversion (INVERTER)
Use of Kalman filters in time and frequency analysis John Davis 1st May 2011.
Loop Shaping Professor Walter W. Olson
Vanderbilt University Vibro-Acoustics Laboratory 1 Decentralized Structural Acoustic Control of a Launch Vehicle Payload Fairing Kenneth D Frampton Dept.
Vibration-based Structural Health Monitoring. Vibration-based SHM Principle of Operation: Damage can be considered as a modification of physical parameters.
Record Processing Considerations for Analysis of Buildings Moh Huang California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program California Geological Survey Department.
#1 212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Instructor:
212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
Slide# Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations.
212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
#1 212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
#1 212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
Design of a Control Workstation for Controller Algorithm Testing Aaron Mahaffey Dave Tastsides Dr. Dempsey.
212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Structural Control through Base Isolation.
212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Structural Control through Base Isolation.
Advanced Communication Systems
Slide# Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations.
Slide# Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations.
Design Procedure. Design Example.
Naresh K. Chandiramani, Associate Professor
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Algorithm Taxonomy Thus far we have focused on:
Autumn 2008 EEE8013 Revision lecture 1 Ordinary Differential Equations.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Islamic University of Gaza Electrical Engineering Department.
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Technology Input Formats and Background Appendix B.
Sang-Won Cho* : Ph.D. Student, KAIST Sang-Won Cho* : Ph.D. Student, KAIST Dong-Hyawn Kim: Senior Researcher, KORDI Dong-Hyawn Kim: Senior Researcher, KORDI.
1 지진하중을 받는 구조물의 MR 댐퍼의 동특성을 고려한 반능동 신경망제어 Heon-Jae Lee 1), Hyung-Jo Jung 2), Ju-Won Oh 3), In-Won Lee 4) 1) Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental.
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Loop Shaping.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab. 1 Kang-Min Choi, Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST, Korea Jung-Hyun Hong, Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Ji-Seong Jo,
* Dong-Hyawn Kim: Graduate Student, KAIST Ju-Won Oh: Professor, Hannam University Ju-Won Oh: Professor, Hannam University In-Won Lee: Professor, KAIST.
Low Level Control. Control System Components The main components of a control system are The plant, or the process that is being controlled The controller,
ME 132 Summary –Intro and motivation of Feedback Control Following a reference (lectures, sec 1, pp1-3, sec 5) Rejecting a disturbance (lectures, sec 1,
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST 1 Structural Vibration Control Using Semiactive Tuned Mass Damper Han-Rok Ji, Graduate Student, KAIST,
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Observers/Estimators …  bnbn b n-1 b2b2.
CARE / ELAN / EUROTeV Feedback Loop on a large scale quadrupole prototype Laurent Brunetti* Jacques Lottin**
지진 하중을 받는 구조물의 능동 모달 퍼지 제어시스템
Control systems KON-C2004 Mechatronics Basics Tapio Lantela, Nov 5th, 2015.
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Sensitivity.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Islamic University of Gaza Electrical Engineering Department.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.32 (Architecture and Civil Engineering 2013), pp Development.
Introduction: The use of piezoelectric materials in smart/adaptive structures has been studied intensely for more than a decade. Engineering applications.
* 김동현 : KAIST 토목공학과, 박사후연구원 오주원 : 한남대학교 토목환경공학과, 교수 오주원 : 한남대학교 토목환경공학과, 교수 이규원 : 전북대학교 토목환경공학과, 교수 이규원 : 전북대학교 토목환경공학과, 교수 이인원 : KAIST 토목공학과, 교수 이인원 :
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab. 1 모달 퍼지 이론을 이용한 지진하중을 받는 구조물의 능동제어 최강민, 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과 조상원, 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과 오주원, 한남대학교 토목공학과 이인원, 한국과학기술원.
Dynamics Primer Lectures Dermot O’Dwyer. Objectives Need some theory to inderstand general dynamics Need more theory understand the implementation of.
DESIGN OF CONTROLLERS WITH ARBITRARY POLE PLACEMENT AND STATE OBSERVERS Dr. C. Vivekanandan Professor and Vice Principal Dept. of EEE Jan. 9, 20161SNSCE.
1 지진시 구조물의 지능제어 기법 Intelligent Control of Structures under Earthquakes 김동현 : 한국과학기술원 토목공학과, 박사과정 이규원 : 전북대학교 토목공학과, 교수 이종헌 : 경일대학교 토목공학과, 교수 이인원 : 한국과학기술원.
Kang-Min Choi, Kang-Min Choi, Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Hyung-Jo Jung Hyung-Jo Jung, Professor, Sejong National University, Korea In-Won Lee In-Won.
Sang-Won Cho* : Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST Sang-Won Cho* : Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST Byoung-Wan : Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST Byoung-Wan : Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST Hyung-Jo.
OSE801 Engineering System Identification Spring 2010
Islamic University of Gaza Electrical Engineering Department
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
VIBRATION CONTROL OF STRUCTURE USING CMAC
Modal Control for Seismically Excited Structures using MR Damper
سمینار درس کنترل پیش بین
LECTURE 1 – FUNDAMENTAL OF VIBRATION
KAIST-Kyoto Univ. Joint Seminar
(Systems And Control Engineering) (Deptartment of Electrical Engg.)
Homework 3: Transfer Function to State Space
Implementation of Modal Control for
Feedback Control Systems EELE 3360
A Survey on State Feedback AMD Control
Homework 3: Transfer Function to State Space
Chapter 7 Finite Impulse Response(FIR) Filter Design
Talk prepared by Stefan Hild AEI Hannover for the GEO-team
Presentation transcript:

Slide# Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture #7_2 Active Control - Special Algorithms Instructor: Andrei M. Reinhorn P.Eng. D.Sc. Professor of Structural Engineering

Slide# 2

Slide# 3 Issues in Active Control  Control Logic - Algorithms  Control Considerations - Stability, etc.  Control Implementations - Force Generation  Physical Implementations  Full Scale Implementations

Slide# 4 Control Considerations  Stability  Controllability  Observability

Slide# 5 Reduced Order Models

Slide# 6

Slide# 7 Stability of Control  Addition of energy to system  Control may produce “negative” damping

Slide# 8 Stability of Control

Slide# 9 Stability of Control

Slide# 10 Stability of Control

Slide# 11 Stability of Control

Slide# 12 Stability of Control

Slide# 13 Stability of Control

Slide# 14 Controllability Is it possible to modify the state (displacement and velocity) of system under the control input? For: R must have rank n n x nm

Slide# 15 Controllability

Slide# 16 Controllability

Slide# 17 Controllability above

Slide# 18 Observability Is it possible to determine the state, z, variables if the control forces, u, and the output vector, y, is known Must have rank n rn x n

Slide# 19 Observability

Slide# 20 Issues in Active Control  Control Logic - Algorithms  Control Considerations - Stability, etc.  Control Implementations - Force Generation  Physical Implementations  Full Scale Implementations

Slide# 21 Control Implementations  Force Generation  Time Delay  Robustness

Slide# 22 Time Delay Effect

Slide# 23 Time Delay Effect

Slide# 24 Time Delay Effect

Slide# 25 Time Delay Effect

Slide# 26 Time Delay Effect

Slide# 27 Time Delay Effect

Slide# 28 Time Delay Effect

Slide# 29 Time Delay in Feedback Vectors

Slide# 30 Time Delay Compensation

Slide# 31 Time Delay - Phase Lag  =   or  [sec]=  /2  f [Hz]

Slide# 32 Issues in Active Control  Control Logic - Algorithms  Control Considerations - Stability, etc.  Control Implementations - Force Generation  Physical Implementations  Full Scale Implementations

Slide# 33

Slide# 34 Three Stories Controlled Model

Slide# 35 Active Tendon System

Slide# 36 Control Equipment

Slide# 37

Slide# 38 Structural Properties

Slide# 39 Instrumentation

Slide# 40 Control System of Three Stories Structure

Slide# 41 Control Properties

Slide# 42 Transfer Functions

Slide# 43 Challenges

Slide# 44 First Floor Response

Slide# 45 Second Floor Response

Slide# 46 Third Floor Response

Slide# 47 First Floor Response

Slide# 48 Second Floor Response

Slide# 49 Third Floor Response

Slide# 50 Summary of Three Stories Model - System Uncontrolled Controlled Modal Frequencies (Hz) Modal Damping Factors (%)

Slide# 51

Slide# 52

Slide# 53

Slide# 54

Slide# 55

Slide# 56

Slide# 57

Slide# 58 Characteristics of Six Stories Model - System

Slide# 59 Six Stories Model - Control Configurations

Slide# 60 Six Stories Model - Control Configurations ExperimentalSimulations

Slide# 61

Slide# 62

Slide# 63

Slide# 64 Comparison of AMD abd ATS/ABS

Slide# 65 Estimates of Full Scale

Slide# 66 Issues in Active Control  Control Logic - Algorithms  Control Considerations - Stability, etc.  Control Implementations - Force Generation  Physical Implementations  Full Scale Implementations

Slide# 67 Full Scale Implementations

Slide# 68 Full Scale Implementations

Slide# 69 Six Story Test Structure

Slide# 70 ABS Actuator Detail

Slide# 71 Control System Components

Slide# 72 Significant Results  System operational for one year.  Verified with forced vibrations.  Subjected to three earthquakes. –Magnitudes of 4.9 to 5.6.  System performed well. –Moderate reduction of the peak response. –Excellent reduction of the RMS intensity of the response.  Not operational during fourth earthquake due to a hardware failure.

Slide# 73 Response of Controlled Structure

Slide# 74 Lessons Learned  Active bracing systems can be implemented with current technology.  System has reasonable energy requirements.  Need for improvements: –Linear controller not effective on first response peak. –Need redundancy in the control hardware.  Learned a great deal about computer and digital hardware communication.

Slide# 75 Control Algorithms  Method 1: Optimal Control  Method 2: Poles Assignment  Method 3: Instantaneous optimum  Method 4: Independent Modal Space Control  Method 5: Bounded State Control  Method 6: H 2 and H  Control Method 6: H 2 and H  Control  Method 7: Sliding Mode Control  Method 8: Fuzzy Logic Control

Slide# 76 Control Algorithms  Method 1: Optimal Control  Method 2: Poles Assignment  Method 3: Instantaneous optimum  Method 4: Independent Modal Space Control  Method 5: Bounded State Control  Method 6: H 2 and H  Control  Method 7: Sliding Mode Control Method 7: Sliding Mode Control  Method 8: Fuzzy Logic Control

Slide# 77 Control Algorithms  Method 1: Optimal Control  Method 2: Poles Assignment  Method 3: Instantaneous optimum  Method 4: Independent Modal Space Control  Method 5: Bounded State Control  Method 6: H 2 and H  Control  Method 7: Sliding Mode Control  Method 8: Fuzzy Logic Control

Slide# 78 Linear and Nonlinear Control