W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 5 May 06 Slide 1 Online DCH background analysis  Compare on-line DCH background ratio to Martin's offline analysis  Can we identify.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.

Advertisements

IP angle scan Results Martin Simard Silke Nelson Mike Kelsey.

June 28, 2004 BBBTF Steven H. Robertson McGill University, Institute of Particle Physics 1 Beam Background Simulation with B A B AR with B A B AR June.

Snowmass G. Eigen, University of Bergen G. Eigen University of Bergen Snowmass July 14, 2001.

LER thermal outgassing is back again with us Significant increase in East Diamond signal since May 12, ~3 pm due to thermal outgassing in two pumps VP3044,

W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 8 Mar 07  MD goals  Experimental procedure  HER-only x & y scans + high-current extrapolation  [LER only X & y scans +

HER LER Specific Luminosity Bucket Dependence. Luminous Region – Z axis.

CSC Online and Offline DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)

Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 1 BELLE/BABAR present background situation zThe information from BELLE:

A 1 A 2 A 3 A 4 B B B

Initial rough Background comparisons between Run5 and Run 4 Guy Wormser LAL Orsay.

W. KozaneckiMD planning meeting, 20 Jan 04 Background characterization strategy  MD goals  Background sources  Operational procedures  Open questions.

W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 19 Mar 04 Separating the luminosity background from the non-colliding beam-gas contribution  Principle  the problem  the beam-gas.

Parasitic parametrization of LER, HER and Lumi sensitivty in Trickle injection mode Very simple idea: use the very different variation with time of HER.

W. KozaneckiPEP-II MAC Review, 9-11 Oct 03 Beam-beam: Experimental Status  Introduction: PEP-II collision parameters & recent performance  Interplay.

HER vacuum study June 2006 J. Kaminski weekly MDI meeting 7/13/2006.

M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07  Operational issues  radiation aborts  background monitoring  Background extrapolations  model comparisons.

MDI meeting, Nov First look at Transient Recorder data Livio Piemontese Stan Ecklund and Mark Petree have installed – in the IR2 alcove – a 32.

W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 16 Jan 2004 BaBar-wide Background monitoring  Motivation  institutionalize...  through a weekly report to PEP-II/BBR meeting.

IR 2 Vacuum Update M. Sullivan for PEP-II team For the 2e34 meeting of Feb. 15, 2006.

W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 9 Mar 07  MD goals  Experimental procedure  HER-only x & y scans + high-current extrapolation  [LER only X & y scans] + high-current.

Deadtime Sensitivity Trigger rate varies over a wide range DCH quadrant 0 (upper east) drives high deadtime periods Do backgrounds target upper east DCH?

A Weak Interaction Probe at Forward Rapidity Daniel Jumper University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign PHENIX Collaboration 4 th Joint APS DNP and JPS Meeting.

Trickle Injection Overview Background Injection is necessary to refill beam “buckets” which have lost charge. A particular bucket is targeted for each.

W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 24 Apr 06 Slide 1 Using the gas-induced beam blowup to measure vertical IP beam sizes  Principle  heat PR02 VP8020.

W. KozaneckiMCC AP meetiing, 20 May 04 Serendipitous measurement of beam-beam tune shift in the LER  Principle  measure colliding tunes (tune tracker.

W. KozaneckiIR summary, BES-III workshop Interaction Region: a terse summary  Accelerator issues  Parameter comparison with PEP-II/KEKB  IR layout 

Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis Rajendra Desai, XIME, 2009.

M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review, Dec 04  Operational issues  radiation aborts  radiation-dose and background monitoring  Background characterization.

Beam-Beam and e-Cloud in RHIC Oct. 6, 2015 Haixin Huang, Xiaofeng Gu, Yun Luo.

50% Basal Total Daily Dose Split to mimic Euglycemic control 50% Bolus Establishing Starting Basal and Bolus Dosing Based on Pre-Meal Readings and Carb.

Luminosity Monitoring Issues  ZDC  what’s the advantage?  problems  BBC  can they do it? A. Drees QCD critical point workshop, Mar

Habitat For Humanity By: Student Name. Non-Profit Organization  Background of Organization  Benefits of Organization  How you can Contribute.

Write something about yourself. Enter Name Type comment Here Friend Name # of Friends Date and Time Type status update here.

Title Authors Introduction Text, text, text, text, text, text Background Information Text, text, text, text, text, text Observations Text, text, text,

Simulation on beam loss from radiative Bhabha process Y. Funakoshi KEK.

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann LET Beam Dynamics Workshop, Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Isabell-A.

M. WeaverB-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006 BaBar Backgrounds Matt Weaver B-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006.

William Lockman UC Santa Cruz May 6, 2005MDI meeting G4 simulation: status and validation strategy Goals Contributors Status Needed plots Future tasks.

1 Bunch length measurement with the luminous region Z distribution : evolution since 03/04 B. VIAUD, C. O’Grady B. VIAUD, C. O’Grady Origin of the discrepancies.

Beam Background Simulation at Belle/KEKB Motivation SR background Particle background Feedback to the detector design SR alarm Summary O. Tajima (Tohoku.

SuperB Meeting XVII May 28 – June 2, 2011 IR design status 1 IR Design Status and Update M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,

Results of TCL scans D. Mirarchi, M. Deile, S. Redaelli, B. Salvachua, Collimation Working Group, 22 nd February 2016.

BELLE-BABAR template Guy Wormser LAL Orsay. Completing the template Very good response to my extra requests: thanks to everydoby! Now we can make direct.

Bounds on light higgs in future electron positron colliders

Does offline media drive online response?

Beam-beam limits: MD proposal

continued on next slide

Machine Background Status & issues in BaBar/PEP-II

IS IT EFFECTIVE TO RUN ONLINE DATING BACKGROUND CHECKS YOURSELF?

Weekend Summary Squirted N2 at 3027 under various conditions

continued on next slide

continued on next slide

د. عبدالسلام محمد الدراجي ﭽايتس – سيدني / استراليا

בטיחות בתעשייה בהיבט חברות הביטוח

Your topic here Your group list and ID

أنماط الإدارة المدرسية وتفويض السلطة الدكتور أشرف الصايغ

Beam beam simulations with disruption (work in progress...)

Trickle Background Investigation

ورود اطلاعات بصورت غيربرخط

مديريت موثر جلسات Running a Meeting that Works

DIRC Background Status

Long term projections summary

Background characterization: MD plan

Luminosity performance comparison: 5-6 Jun vs. 23 Dec 03

(max 5 slides and 5 minutes) (-5 point for each extra slide or minute)

Glide slide 2 slide 4 walk walk run run run run.

continued on next slide

continued on next slide

Presentation transcript:

W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 5 May 06 Slide 1 Online DCH background analysis  Compare on-line DCH background ratio to Martin's offline analysis  Can we identify the source of the extraneous online DCH backgrounds? W. Kozanecki

MDI meeting, 5 May 06 Slide 2 HER-only running, 3 May 06 Lumi bkg or LER b-g or LER b-b or HER b-b ?

W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 5 May 06 Slide 3 HER-only running, Apr 06

W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 5 May 06 Slide 4  The online DCH background ratio, with HEB only, is about  The typical background ratio, under physics conditions, is Given that HER contributes only ~ 0.7, this implies about 0.6 units of extra background  This extra background decreases rapidly with dropping e + current. It could be  LER beam-gas  LER beam-beam or dynamic- aperture losses  HER beam-beam  What do the other subdetectors see? Conclusions