Iowa Department of Education TLC Administrator Support Program ********************* March 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
Advertisements

2013 Spring Meeting Size-Alike Session “Supporting Principals as Leaders of Learning”
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
ExCEL Academic Liaison Meeting Supporting Quality After School Programs for Our Students Tuesday, September 23, 2014.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Administrator Information AEA 267’s Mentoring and Induction Program.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
IRRE Overview of Secondary School Reform Framework New Jersey Department of Education Meetings James P. Connell, Ph. D Institute for Research and Reform.
August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Welcome to I-CAT Training! Iowa Core Outcome 4 …increase the degree of alignment of each and every student’s enacted curriculum … to the Iowa Core I A.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Technology Leadership
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Iowa’s Teacher Leadership & Compensation System October 8, 2015 Partnering for the success of students.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Module Four: Resources for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
ELI Educational Leadership Initiative Learning and Leading Together for a Brighter Future.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
Principal Information Session Tuesday, April 12, 4:00 – 5:30 PM Operations Center Teacher Information Sessions Grandview University Monday, April 18, 4:00.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
You ARE the Leader of Learning Frederick Brown Learning Principal Supervisor Summit Ft. Lauderdale, FL May 12-13,
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
You Are Invited To Apply….
THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Dolores Esposito, Executive Superintendent of Leadership Developing Social and Emotional Skills in our Schools.
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Introduction Introduction
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Introductions Introduction
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Board of Education May 2018
Maryland WIOA Alignment and Integration
Introduction Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Iowa Department of Education TLC Administrator Support Program ********************* March 2015

Introduce New York City Leadership Academy (NYCLA) Overview of program structures and content Develop understanding of school engagement plan Present school application and selection process Share critical dates Meeting Purpose and Outcomes

Framework for Learning Supports Adult Learning Collaborative Culture CommunicationContent, Pedagogy & Assessment Systems Thinking DataOrganizational Leadership Focus Areas Design and delivery of profess- sional learning. Facilitation of group processes and development of necessary structures for professional learning environments to be effective. Cultivation of skills associated with effective dialogue with colleagues. Implementati on of research and best practice in content (Iowa Core), instruction and assessment. Integration and alignment of district and statewide educational improveme nt efforts. Facilitation of data analysis and data- informed decision making. Facilitation and enactment of a vision for school improvement with teacher leadership as a point of leverage.

Principal Learning Supports Focus on O rganizational Leadership To cultivate coaching skills specific to administrators to support teacher leaders and other administrators who work with teacher leaders. To develop the Professional Capital of an organization.Professional Capital

Principal Learning Supports Focus on O rganizational Leadership To cultivate a mindset that supports empowerment of teacher leaders. To allocate resources and implement organizational structures and schedules that facilitate the implementation of a system of teacher leadership.

Overall Purpose: To equip and support principals to form a cohesive building leadership team that is aligned to a singular mission as embraced by the district, and is able to lead a collaborative process to strengthen instructional practice that leverages teacher leaders for school-wide improvement of student learning. TLC Administrative Support Program

TLC Administrator Support Program Description: The TLC Administrator Support Program will be a comprehensive, year-long professional development program focusing on building the capacity of the principal to develop and facilitate distributed leadership in their school, namely by supporting and leveraging teacher leaders as part of the leadership team. TLC Administrative Support Program

Emphasize the authentic work of school leaders and utilize job- embedded experiences Align to clear and rigorous school leadership standards Reflect leadership needs of districts and schools where leaders will serve Cultivate teamwork to promote sustainable school improvement STUDENTS NYC LA Approach to Leadership Development

NYC LA’s process is designed to: - Ensure program is reflective of and responsive to local needs -Ensure development of local capacity to sustain and evolve program over time Stakeholder Engagement Standards Alignment Program Design Curriculum Development Training Evaluation & Other Technical Assistance

The program includes: a three-day summer intensive training for the principal and members of district leadership three half-day workshops during the school year for principals and TLC building teams one-on-one school-based coaching TLC Administrative Support Program

TLC Impact on School Leadership: Need for more clarity of the principal’s role now that teacher leaders are members of the school leadership team -Specifically, the principal’s role as an instructional leader and evaluator Create emphasis on the need for distributive leadership Highlight a need for principals to build capacity of instructional coaches/teacher leaders to work with adults Focus Group Highlights

Skills principals need to be successful: Ability to communicate a clear vision Ability to understand change management and the ability to lead through change Ability to delegate responsibilities and foster collaboration among teams Focus Group Highlights

Building Capacity for TLC Administrators and Teams Principal & Team Leadership Needs State, District & School Goals Summer Institute Leadership Coaching Ongoing Workshops Building principal and team capacity to improve student achievement Statewide Program Capacity Building and Sustainability

Two Tiered District / School Engagement ModelEligible ParticipantsRequired District ResourcesCost to District/School Model 1: AEA-Based Support Up to 12 buildings per AEA Lottery All completed applications by Superintendent support/sign-off Superintendent or designee participation in summer institute Principal participation in all three components Travel expenses Salary expenses Model 2: District- Based Support Any district, or group of districts, who can identify and support required program staff Up to 21 coaches who will be trained by the DE & NYC LA. Lottery if more than 21 All completed applications by Superintendent support/sign-off Superintendent or designee participation in summer institute Principal participation in all three components District provided program staff (# of staff determined by # of schools served and full-time/part-time status of program staff) o Must meet state eligibility requirements o Must attend coach training provided by the state program All costs associated with providing a program facilitator and coach. Some districts may have central office capacity already, in which case, a percentage of current staff time can be allocated to this new initiative. Districts also have the option to hire staff. Facilitators will be negotiated with AEA.

Staffing Structure StaffModel 1: AEA-Based Model 2: District-Based Coaches Nine coaches total  Hired by NYC LA  Each serves 12 schools  One coach per AEA Up to 21 coaches across the state  District provides at least one coach per district/group of districts  Max 12 schools each if full time FacilitatorsNine facilitators total  Each based in the AEA, existing staff who are identified and released from other work (17 days min)  State-based AEA facilitators support the district based cohorts as well  Each district/group of districts will need to purchase 4.5 days of facilitator time

Implementation/Training Calendar Scope of WorkCalendarDetailParticipants Staff Selection Week of March 30 Two days in Iowa DE Core Team, plus any additional identified stakeholders Curriculum Design March-April NYC LA team will primarily design. DE team will join for two three-hour remote sessions NYC LA Team and DE Core Team Program Recruitment and Enrollment March 16-Apr 15 Program description materials available, and active conversations with districts to identify which program model fits their needs the best. Full TLC State Support Team and AEAs Coach Training April days in Des Moines All state-supported and district- based coaches (up to 30) Facilitator Training May days in Des MoinesAll facilitators (up to 12) Summer Institute Prep June days in Des MoinesAll facilitators and coaches

Model 1: AEA-Based Support Registration March 16 – April 1 Forms Available on DE Website - TLC page Lottery/NotificationApril 5, 2015 Participation12 Buildings per AEA Contact Lora Rasey: Registration Requirements  Superintendent nomination of school  Principal signed program agreements  Participation in all three training components

Model 2: District-Based Support Registration March 16 – April 1 Forms Available on DE Website - TLC page Lottery/NotificationApril 5, 2015 Program Staff Identified Coaches identified and facilitator agreement in place April 17, 2015 DE Contact Lora Rasey: Registration RequirementsSuperintendent nomination of school(s) Principal program agreements by building Provide leadership coach(es) Participation in all three components

Registration and Participation Assurances Agreement Model 1: AEA-Based Support Forms will be available on the TLC page March 16, compensation-system

Registration and Participation Assurances Agreement Model 2: District-Based Support Forms will be available on the TLC page March 16, compensation-system

Questions Please submit your questions through the CHAT function. Your questions will be answered in the order received. Thank you!