INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 Heckscher-Ohlin To demonstrate the Heckscher-Ohlin (HO) result.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tariff, general equilibrium
Advertisements

4 Trade and Resources: The Heckscher-Ohlin Model 1 Heckscher-Ohlin
CHAPTER 5; FACTOR PRICES
Classic Trade Theory Ricardian Model - Technological Comparative Advantage: Basic 2 Good Ricardian model (Feenstra, Chapter 1) Continuum of Goods [Dornbush,
International Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy, Ch. 7;  Charles van Marrewijk, Figure 7.1 Bertil Ohlin ( )
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Appendix 4.1 Alternate Proofs of Selected HO Theorems.
Introduction Classical economics and comparative advantage Analysis of comparative advantage Production possibility frontier and autarky Terms of trade.
The Basis for Trade: Factor Endowments and the Heckscher-Ohlin Model
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 2 countries; A and B Comparative advantage (technology differences)
Other Assumptions: two countries, two factors, two products; perfect competition in all markets; Free trade; Factors of production are available in fixed.
Chapter 4 Resources, Comparative Advantage and Income Distribution
International Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy, Ch. 8;  Charles van Marrewijk, Figure 8.1 James Meade ( )
International Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy, Ch. 4;  Charles van Marrewijk, Figure 4.1 Paul Samuelson (1915–)
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Theorem
International Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy, Ch. 3;  Charles van Marrewijk, Figure 3.1 David Ricardo (1772–1823)
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 X = 10 X = 14 Constant returns to scale 7 21 Suppose 5 labor.
The Heckscher-Ohlin Model
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 We will use the Edgeworth-Bowley box and results from factor.
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 An entrepeneur who wants to maximize profits can solve this.
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Theorem
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 FPE and Stolper-Samuelson; tool: Lerner diagram Let’s look at.
Chapter 4 -- HO Model INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, ECO 486
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 A’s offer curve We have seen how to derive an ‘offer curve’,
International Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy, Ch. 5;  Charles van Marrewijk, Figure 5.1 Harry Johnson (1923–1977)
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 Derivation of the offer curve X Y 0 p x /p y 2 Take an economy.
HECKSCHER-OHLIN THEORY  What determines comparative advantage?  What are the effects of international trade on the earnings of factors of production?
International Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy, Ch. 6;  Charles van Marrewijk, Figure 6.1 Francis Edgeworth ( )
Factor Endowments and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory
Resources and Trade: The Heckscher-Ohlin Model
Theories of World Economy. Agenda The Heckscher–Ohlin theory Leontief’s paradox Theorem Ribchinsky.
The Heckscher-Ohlin Model Udayan Roy October 2009.
1 HO Model – Factor Proportions INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, ECO 486 Bertil Ohlin Eli F. Heckscher,
Introduction Neo-classical economics General structure of the neo-classical model Production functions Cost minimization Impact of wage rate and rental.
An Introduction to International Economics
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model Factor Proportions Theory.
Prof. Dr. Volker Clausen Universität Duisburg-Essen Campus Essen 1 Ricardo, David (1817): On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London.
EC 355 International Economics and Finance
Heckscher-Ohlin; 1 To demonstrate the Heckscher-Ohlin (HO) result we will use some of the earlier results, in particular Factor Price Equalization First,
New Classical Theories of International Trade
NEOCLASSICAL TRADE THEORY
Unit 1: Trade Theory Heckscher-Ohlin Model 2/3/2012.
Chapter III: HO Model Lectured by: Mr. SOK Chanrithy.
Supplementary notes Chapter 4.
International Economic Relations Econ 548 Summer 2007 William J. Polley Department of Economics College of Business and Technology Western Illinois University.
Note sparse e grafici sul modello di Heckscher e Ohlin Luca De Benedictis.
University of Papua New Guinea International Economics Lecture 9: Trade Theorems and Extensions.
Introduction Heckscher - Ohlin Demand The production possibility frontier Structure of the equilibrium Autarky equilibrium International trade equilibrium.
University of Papua New Guinea International Economics Lecture 6: Trade Models III – The Heckscher-Ohlin Model.
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Resources, Comparative Advantage, and Income Distribution.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 The Heckscher- Ohlin Model.
International Economics Tenth Edition
We will use the Edgeworth-Bowley box and results from factor price equalization (FPE) to derive Rybczynski’s theorem It applies to the effect of an increase.
Trade and Resources The Heckscher-Ohlin model Dr. Petre Badulescu.
University of Papua New Guinea International Economics Lecture 12 - Revision Lecture: Trade Models.
CHAPTER 1; THE WORLD ECONOMY
Factor endowments and the Heckscher-Ohlin theory
Study Unit 4.
Factor Endowments Theory and Heckscher-Ohlin Model
FPE and Stolper-Samuelson; tool: Lerner diagram, 1
The Stolper-Samuelson Theorem:
The Production Possibility Frontier (Fixed Proportions)
Chapter 6: Factor abundance and trade
Chapter 2 Inter-Industry Trade Inter-industry trade Inter-firm trade.
Rybczynski We will use the Edgeworth-Bowley box and results from factor price equalization (FPE) to derive Rybczynski’s theorem It applies to the effect.
The Heckscher-Ohlin Model
Derivation of the offer curve, 1
Tariff, general equilibrium; 1
Comparative advantage (technology differences); 1
Presentation transcript:

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 Heckscher-Ohlin To demonstrate the Heckscher-Ohlin (HO) result we will use some of the earlier results, in particular Factor Price Equalization First, note that if 2 countries start to trade this equalizes the prices of the 2 final goods in the 2 countries. According to FPE under identical technologies and CRS this equalizes the rewards for the 2 inputs, the wage w for labor and the rental r for capital, in the 2 countries. That, in turn, implies that the capital-intensity with which the 2 goods X and Y are produced are identical in the 2 countries (FPE) and the Rybczynski (Ryb) theorem. It is the of the four basic results that requires only identical homothetic preferences According to Ryb. the country with (rel.) more capital produces (rel.) more of the (rel.) capital-intensive good; say country A has more capital, less labor and good X is (rel.) more capital-intensive

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 2 Here is the green ppf of country B, it produces at point B p 0 X (cap int) Y (lab int) B BpBp Country A has more capital and less labor, so we can trace first the Capital and then the Labor Ryb-line to arrive at country A’s production point A p more capital less labor more capital ApAp Or we could take the other route and first trace the Labor and then the Capital Ryb-line The end result is obviously the same. Heckscher-Ohlin

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 3 This is where the assumption of identical homothetic preferences comes in Through country A’s production point A p we can also draw a ppf. B BpBp At the int. eq. trade prices for goods X and Y the income line is tangent for country A at A p and for country B at B p A Both countries consume somewhere along their own income line, however the ratio with which goods X and Y are consumed is the same Heckscher-Ohlin ApAp 0 Y (lab int) X (cap int)

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 4 Naturally, to be an international equilibrium the trade triangles have to match (reciprocally) If we know country B’s consumption point B c along its income line, extending a line from the origin through B c determines country A’s consumption point A c along its income line. This can only occur if the consumption ratio is in between A p and B p (as drawn) BpBp 0 ApAp BcBc AcAc Heckscher-Ohlin Y (lab int) X (cap int)

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 5 Since the consumption ratio is in between A p and B p country B, which has relatively more labor than country A, exports good Y, which uses labor relatively intensively. BpBp 0 X ApAp BcBc AcAc The reverse holds for country A (it has rel. more capital and exports good X which uses capital rel. intensively). According to the HO result a country exports the good which makes intensive use of its abundant factor of production Heckscher-Ohlin Y (lab int) X (cap int)