Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement June 6 - 9, 2010 Fredericton, New Brunswick.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Allegation An allegation may be submitted by : Any Person. An allegation may be filed with the PLSB through: The Department of Education A Public.
Advertisements

Sexual Harassment Seminar Mechanisms in Lingnan University to deal with sexual harassment Presented by Li Kam-kee, Director of Administration.
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT SECTION 59 GRIEVANCE PROCESSES Terry Lisson Director Promotion Appeals & Grievance Reviews 22 April 2010.
OVERVIEW OF THE FLORIDA BAR DISCIPLINE SYSTEM November 30, 2006.
2007 Annual Conference Professional Discipline Ruby E. Brice, J.D. S.C. Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation.
F L O R I D A D E P A R T M E N T O F B U S I N E S S A N D P R O F E S S I O N A L R E G U L A T I O N Division of Regulation Complaint Process Division.
Superintendent Hearings David V. Cirillo, Esq. Assistant Director Personnel & Labor Relations July 30, 2009.
The Legal Series: Employment Law I. Objectives Upon the completion of training, you will be able to: Understand the implications of Title VI Know what.
Independent Police Review Act, 2007— Legislative Process and Implementation CACOLE Conference 2009 Ottawa, Ontario June 8 – 10, 2009.
ORILLIA POLICE SERVICES BOARD Role and Responsibilities.
Public Complaints Ottawa Police Services Board September 24, 2012.
1 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS. 2 Texas Education Agency provides Notice of Procedural Safeguards Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities Download this.
The Corruption and Crime Commission: Threat to organised crime, or to our concept of justice? Malcolm McCusker AO QC The John Curtin Institute of Public.
Chapter Nine Discipline at the Workplace
Strategic Plan 2012/17 and Annual Performance Plan 2012/13 INDEPENDENT POLICE INVESTIGATIVE DIRECTORATE (IPID) 19 NOVEMBER 2014 BRIEFING TO THE PORTFOLIO.
Ottawa Police Service Chief’s Complaint Investigations Insp. T. Youngson-Larochelle and S/Sgt. M. Marin.
HUMAN RIGHTS Administering Human Rights Legislation.
1 Mr. Tony McCourt Ombudsman for the Defence Forces Presentation to Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions 5 th November, 2014.
Example - Human Rights Case. Case Citation Formats Criminal Law:R v. Jones prosecution v. defense Civil Law:Smith v. Jones plaintiff v. defendant Human.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
April 2, 2007 Ontario Human Rights Commission Introduction to the Enhanced Complaints Process (ECP) – Pilot.
MICHIGAN AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION J100 STAR 07.ppt.
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES EXPEDITED CASE PROCESSING PURSUANT TO PUBLIC ACT
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Outreach and Education Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement.
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
FILING AND DECIDING A HUMAN RIGHTS CASE PART A: DEFINITIONS PART A: DEFINITIONS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL PROCESS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL.
STATE OF ARIZONA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS Mission Statement The mission of the Board of Chiropractic Examiners is to protect the health, welfare,
IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS AMENDMENT PROPOSALS Present by Rick LaRose, Chair Dispute Resolution Committee Annual IFTA Business Meeting July 18-19,
Making Regulatory Processes More Accessible and Transparent.
Role of the Public Access Ombudsman A.R.S. § Investigate complaints relating to public access law. Train public officials and educate the public.
1 GAEP Study Tour An Overview of the Ombudsman for Workplace Safety May 16, 2007.
MEDIATION OF MINOR NATURE CITIZEN COMPLAINTS West Point Leadership Academy Final Project Detective Troy Officer.
Uniform Complaint Procedure Memorandum # MEM-560 October 10, 2003 By: Jaime Morales.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
+ Human Rights Complaints. + Filing a Complaint A lawyer is not needed to file a complaint. Complaints can be withdrawn at any point. Complainant – person.
 Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 20 (Part XX) was proclaimed dealing with Violence Prevention in the Work Place.  Work Place Violence.
Sexual Misconduct Information Presented by Office of Equity & Inclusion Sue Groff, Ed. D. September 8, 2015.
Office of the Disability Appeals Officer Oifig an Oifigigh Achomhairc um Míchumas National Information Sharing Day February2009.
The Law Society and You. The Role of the L.S.U.C. Regulates, governs and licenses Ontario’s lawyers and licensed paralegals pursuant to the Law Society.
ODAO Information Sharing Day Presentation February/March Office of the Disability Appeals Officer Oifig an Oifigigh Achomhairc um Míchumas National.
Welcome Managing concerns and complaints How should schools handle complaints? This session links to guidance from the DfE and local authorities, and looks.
BREAKING THE SCHOOL TO PRISON PIPELINE J. Corpening.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
What Is Police Misconduct? Any action performed by a law enforcement officer that is criminal, unconstitutional, or against established rules, regulations,
Washington State Collection Agency Board: Regulatory Process Grace Hamilton, Investigator Department of Licensing – Collection Agency Board Complaint Process.
Investigations Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.) authorizes the Inspector General to conduct.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaints Process CLN4U.
Sexual Harassment Seminar
SCSEP Grievance Policies & Procedures
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS AND CITIZEN COMPLAINTS
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
University of Brighton
AAPG 2019 – Medicine Hat The role of the Public Complaint Director and complaint oversight Presented by Heather Spicer Calgary Police Commission Executive.
University of Brighton
Public Protector South Africa Deputy Public Protector of South Africa
Presentation transcript:

Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement June 6 - 9, 2010 Fredericton, New Brunswick

2 The Office of the Independent Police Review Director  Director is appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council on recommendation of the Attorney General  Director cannot be a police officer or former police officer  Employees of the OIPRD are appointed under the Public Service Act and cannot be serving police officers  Creates a mandatory police liaison officer position  The Chief of Police retains the responsibility for disciplinary hearings and imposition of discipline

3 Intake of Complaints  The OIPRD reviews all complaints received to determine whether it is policy, service or conduct complaint  Minor complaints can be resolved locally and then reported to the OIPRD  The OIPRD will not be involved in any internally lodged “Chief’s complaint”  Complaints must be filed within six months of the incident  The Director has the discretion to deal with complaints beyond the current deadline of six months but must consider: Is the complainant a minor or under a disability? Was the complainant charged criminally in relation to the complaint? AND Is it in the public interest to deal with the complaint?

4 Local Resolution

5  Local Resolution (Local Complaints) matters may relate to: The conduct of a police officer The policies or services of a police department  Before accepting a complaint for local resolution, the police service must: Advise the complainant that they may make their complaint to the OIPRD They may be required to take their complaint to the OIPRD if it cannot be resolved locally Provide the complainant with the information concerning the OIPRD  Local complaints must be made in person

6 ContactLocal ComplaintLocal Inquiry Local Resolution In Person By Phone In Person Not Required to Report Reported to OIPRD Fill Out and Sign: Local Resolution Agreement Form Refusal to Sign Form Part V Public Complaints

7 Complaints Filed with the OIPRD

8 Filing a Complaint  Complaints must be submitted on the OIPRD complaint form  A person can file a complaint directly with the OIPRD  A person can also file a complaint at any municipal, regional or provincial police service in Ontario  The police must then forward the complaint form to the OIPRD within three business days

9 Who can Complain  A complaint may be dismissed if the complainant is not one of the following:  The person directly affected  A witness  Someone in a personal relationship with the person directly affected AND suffered loss, damage, distress, danger or inconvenience  A person who has knowledge of the conduct, or has possession of something that the Director feels is compelling evidence establishing misconduct or unsatisfactory work performance  As a result, more than one person could file a complaint about the same incident  In such a case, the OIPRD may consider whether it would make sense to consolidate the complaints

10 Consolidation of Complaints  Complaints may be consolidated where they pertain to the conduct of the same police officers that affects the same persons Only one investigation would need to occur All of the complainants will be so advised of the consolidation One complainant will be deemed to be the “primary complainant” - This is usually the most directly affected party - Only the primary complainant will be able to make decisions with respect to the complaint All complainants will be advised of the final outcome of that complaint

11 Screening the Complaint  Complaint is classified and screened pursuant to sections of the Police Services Act (PSA)  If the complaint is screened out the OIPRD: Will document the reasons and send a decision letter indicating why the complaint was not accepted to the complainant, respondent officer and the Chief, who also receives a copy of the complaint  If the complaint is screened in the OIPRD: Will determine who will investigate – the OIPRD, the police service in question, or another service Send a decision letter to the complainant, respondent officer and the Chief - The package for the Chief will also include a copy of the complaint and a redacted copy for the respondent officer.

12 Policy and Service Complaints about Municipal Police Services  The OIPRD must refer policy and service complaints to the Chief of the concerned police service  The Chief must: Review the complaint Determine what action to take, if any, and take that action Notify the complainant, the OIPRD and the board in writing of what was done, with reasons Inform the complainant that they may request a review by the relevant police services board  If a complaint is made about a local policy of an OPP detachment that is providing policing services to a municipality, or provincial policies or services of the OPP, the OIPRD will screen the complaint then send it to the OPP headquarters  After determining his or her response, the OPP detachment commander must submit a written report, with reasons, to the board, the OIPRD and the complainant

13 Investigations

14 Investigations  The OIPRD has standardized investigative reports throughout the province  As part of oversight, the OIPRD will ensure: Investigative reports have all information required and reporting is consistent throughout Ontario All steps have been taken to make sure a thorough investigation has occurred  Director has authority to pull back investigations  Complainants and respondent officers will receive a copy of the completed investigative report

15 Results of an Investigation by Police Service CONCLUSION  Whether a police Chief or the OIPRD has investigated, they will decide, based on Reasonable Grounds, if a complaint is: substantiated/unsubstantiated serious/less serious  Where a Chief finds that the conduct was of a serious nature he/she must hold a hearing  Where a Chief deems the complaint unsubstantiated or not serious the complainant may request a review of the Chief’s decision (30 days)  Where the OIPRD has investigated, it will report the findings to the Chief, then: Where the conduct was serious in nature the Chief must hold a hearing If the conduct was less serious the matter may be resolved informally or disposition without a hearing

16 OIPRD Powers OIPRD has the authority to: Search police premises and vehicles with or without a warrant Search other places with a warrant Summons persons or things under the Public Inquiries Act

17 Other OIPRD Powers  Can direct the Chief or board to deal with complaint as specified  Direct the Chief or board to take other actions as he/she deems necessary or take the action independently  Order a hearing into a complaint  Assign the conduct of a hearing about a Chief or Deputy Chief to Ontario Civilian Police Commission  Conduct investigations into systemic issues related to complaints from the public  Conduct audits on how services are dealing with complaints

18 Reviews

19 Request for Reviews Policy Complaints  A complainant may request a review in writing to the board within 30 days of receiving the report from the police Chief or the detachment Commander  Police service boards will: Review the complaint; take any action, or no action, in response to the complaint, as considered appropriate Notify the complainant, Chief or Commander and the OIPRD in writing of the response to the complaint, with reasons Conduct Complaints  The complainant may ask the OIPRD for a review within 30 days of a Chief’s decision that the conduct complaint is unsubstantiated or not of a serious nature  If the OIPRD agrees with the Chief, it will confirm the decision  If the OIPRD does not agree, the Director may give the Chief directions Assign or take over the investigation Direct a hearing into the matter  The OIPRD will notify all parties of the decision  The OIPRD decisions are final  There is no review of a classification or investigation by the OIPRD

20 Disciplinary Hearings

21 Disciplinary Hearings and Appeals Decisions  The Chief retains the responsibility for disciplinary hearings and imposition of discipline  Under the Police Services Act, police Chiefs and police services boards are required to provide copies of disciplinary hearing decisions to the OIPRD  The OIPRD will post the decisions on its website

22 OIPRD – First Nine Months  OIPRD opened to the public on October 19, 2009  Local Resolution has been utilized well as an alternate to formal complaints. We are seeing resolution after meetings between complainants and respondent officers indicating satisfaction with having open discussion  OIPRD and police services have been working well together to resolve complaints and conduct effective investigations  Meetings and participation from Respondent/Witness officers have been forthcoming and cooperative – so far no negative feedback  Established timelines are being met by all involved  Respondent/Witness officers appear to receive early and sufficient notice of complaints  OIPRD continues to engage police services and the public especially in training programs  The investigative process has been made uniform with the same report format being used throughout Ontario

23 Contact details Office of the Independent Police Review Director 655 Bay Street, 10th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 2T4 Tel: Fax: