SOSOSY Quality of Implementation Tool Year 3 Implementation Rating Rubric Overview, Scoring, and Reporting May 2, 2015 META Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Individual Professional Development Planning for Teachers
Advertisements

Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information. Primary Evaluators All teachers will be assigned one Administrator to be the Primary Evaluator. The primary evaluator.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Voices From the Field Rick Pardo & Donna Norley Board: Thames Valley DSB Learning Team Facilitator (Professional Learning Cycle)
Iowa’s Application of Rubrics to Evaluate Screening and Progress Tools John L. Hosp, PhD University of Iowa.
Intel ® Education Assessing Projects: Teaching the Net Generation: Curriculum, Pedagogy and the Challenge of 21 st Century Learning 10 to 11 September.
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
EBS Survey Vermont PBS “Bringing out the BEST in all of us.”
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
National Center on Response to Intervention Developed by the National Center on Response to Intervention and RMC Research RTI Integrity Framework: A Tool.
WELCOME! Elementary Math Building Leads / Coaches Please complete the ORANGE information sheet. Wednesday, September 26, 2012 Kathleen Wilson - Math Program.
Individual Professional Development Planning for Teachers
Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.
DATA RETREAT PRINCIPAL’S MID-YEAR REPORT Vandercook Lake Schools Townsend Elementary Principal: Diane McQuillan Subject Area: Reading &Writing.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
© 2008 by PACT PACT Scorer Training Pilot.
RECENT CCSS ASSESSMENT RESOURCES CCRESA C & I COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 17, 2013.
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION AFTERNOON SESSION: 2/18/13.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Presentation Topics School Improvement Plans Combing Title I Schoolwide with SIPs Submitting Plans & Required Documents Districtwide Initiatives Training.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
Module 4 Evaluating Services to Binational Migrant Students Designing an Implementation and Outcome Evaluation of State and Local Binational Services 1.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Documenting Ongoing ELD Progress Using the Secondary ELD Assessment REF Amaris Rivas Coordinator’s Meeting April 10, 2008.
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Certified Evaluation Plan Training Module Products of Practice, Student Voice Surveys December 2014.
Important to Remember! Name of tool used to collect data. Date the tool was administered.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus.
Teaching Literacy: From 0 – 360° in 180 days! Who could be “highly qualified”? An evolution of thought…
What is Expected in Updating Your SIP? Metro-Nashville Public School System School Improvement Plan Process September 2008.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
State Steering Team Meeting November 19, 2014 Clearwater, Florida 1:00pm – 5:00pm
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
MontCAS CRT-Alternate (CRT-Alt) Spring 2011 Test Administrator Training Grades 3-8 and 10 in Reading and Math Grades 4, 8, and 10 in Science Presentation.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Simulation 1 – Elementary School Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits.
Fidelity of Strategy Implementation (FSI) Tool Overview, Scoring, and Reporting 1 Washington Migrant Education Program.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Benchmarks of Quality (BOQ) Training
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Tier One Report 2013 Welcome to the Tier One Report webinar. During this webinar, we will discuss a report that was built to help manage staff members’
State Steering Team Meeting
Georgia Department of Education
Evaluation Information
HSSD Teacher Evaluation Process
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Fidelity of Strategy Implementation (FSI) Tool
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Presentation transcript:

SOSOSY Quality of Implementation Tool Year 3 Implementation Rating Rubric Overview, Scoring, and Reporting May 2, 2015 META Associates

The QI Tool Addresses the Year 3 Plan activities/strategies 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.2.5, 1.2.6, (See the SOSOSY Year 3 Plan and the FII) Focuses on continuous improvement in the implementation of SOSOSY services Allows flexibility in who will administer it and at which sites Consists of a rubric with 8 key elements Page 2 contains information, directions, and space for additional comments

Directions for Administering the QI Place an X through the rating that best reflects your site’s condition for each of the 8 elements. If you are completing the QI electronically, shade the rating in yellow. If a particular element is not applicable, draw a line through the column.

Directions for Administering (Cont.) Administer at 3 sites prior to August 28, (Small states at 1 or 2 sites, as feasible) Return the QI tools to the State MEP director or SOSOSY coordinator by 9/1/15. Director/coordinator sends them to META by ASAP after 9/1/15 Fill in the identifying info (QI page bottom) 5-point rubric (1=beginning implementation; 5=highly effective implementation)

QI Key Elements 1)Individual Needs assessment (NA) 2)websites 3)TA and PD 4)ID&R 5)Program NA 6)Use of pre/post assessments 7) Use of data for differentiation of instruction/services 8)Use of data for pro- gram improvement

QI Evidence Potential evidence suggestions are provided for key elements; however, states may have other types of evidence (i.e., assessments, artifacts) Documentation of evidence and comments to support the ratings can be included in the last column (Comment) on the front of the QI or on the Additional Comments section on page 2 of the QI.

Quiz! How many key elements are on the QI? How many QI’s must be administered? By what date must the QI be administered at local MEP sites? By when do local sites turn in their QI’s? To score Highly Effective on the QI for Element #3 (TA & PD), what evidence should be in place?

QI Practice You have 5 minutes. You have an envelope containing information describing a site. Complete the identifying information at the QI bottom. Then mark the QI rubric based on the information in the envelope. At the end of 5 minutes we will debrief.

Example A (sample site) for training* Site A is in its first year of SOSOSY implementation and operates during the summer. OSY needs are assessed during interviews using the OSY Profile. The 3 staff have had little time to explore resources and websites, and have been involved in 1 training on OSY curriculum, assessments, and resources. They are using several of the SOSOSY materials and administer pre/post assessments, do progress monitoring, and are just beginning to use the results for making improvements to the program. *NOTE: Expand or change this example to fit your state situation. Cut the example out and place it in an envelope for training.

Example B (sample site) for training* Site B is a mature SOSOSY site that has operated for the past six years during the summer and regular school year. Student needs are assessed by recruiters and then project staff on the COE, OSY Screener, and a local needs assessment. The results are used for directing instruction through the use of a local Student Success Plan. Site B staff have trained other local sites on SOSOSY lessons, assessments, resources, and ID&R and always turn it their evaluation forms with high ratings. They have systems in place for ongoing progress monitoring of OSY and meet weekly as a staff to analyze and use the results to focus instruction. *NOTE: Expand or change this example to fit your state situation. Cut the example out and place it in an envelope for training.