Results-Oriented Monitoring (ROM)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

1st Meeting of the Working Party on International Trade in Goods and Trade in Services Statistics - September 2008 Australia's experience (so far) in.
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Assessment of administrative and institutional capacity
Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.
Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI Rural Development Networking and Cooperation
EuropeAid PARTICIPATORY SESSION 1: 3 topics Each table chooses its topic: o Managing reality (Blue) o Assessing performance (Yellow) o Monitoring & reporting.
Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
Information and Publicity Requirements Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 24th March 2015, Svolvær, Norway.
EuropeAid’s today’s quality framework and the Results agenda
Co-funded by the PROGRESS Programme of the European Union EQUINET – European Network of Equality Bodies 2014 Equinet Annual General Meeting 4 December.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
European Union | European Regional Development Fund From INTERREG IVC to Interreg Europe Info day in Tullamore Akos Szabo| Project Officer Interreg Europe.
Part-financed by the European Union WS 3: Communication Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant seminar, Hamburg, 2-4 April 2008.
Joanna Fiedler Enlargement and Neighbouring Countries Unit DG Environment European Commission REReP → RENA Vision of the European Commission PEIP Regional.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
Eurostat’s Technical Co-operation in the SPECA Region Mariana Kotzeva, Eurostat Adviser Hors Classe 7 th SPECA Project Working Group on Statistics, Issyk-Kul,
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
Project Communication Kirsti Mijnhijmer & Christopher Parker 23 February 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development Fund.
PACIFIC AID EFFECTIVENESS PRINCIPLES. Purpose of Presentation Provide an overview of Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness Provide an overview of Pacific.
Regional Training/Consultations on Capacity Development for Sustainable Growth and Human Development in Europe and CIS Application of Capacity Development.
DANIDA’s Experience of Results Managing for Development Results Peter Ellehøj – Quality Assurance Department November 2011.
South African – Flemish (SAF) Development Programme DGOS-attachés 2003 VVOB.
ACP S&T Programme - Stakeholder conference October Implemented by the ACP Secretariat Funded by the European Union EDULINK - ACP Science and.
Capacity Enhancement and Mobilisation Action (CEMA) for the Africa EU Energy Partnership (AEEP) Lawrence Agbemabiese UNEP-DTIE, France.
The industrial relations in the Commerce sector EU Social dialogue: education, training and skill needs Ilaria Savoini Riga, 9 May 2012.
1 UNEP/IETC EST Initiative Proposed Cooperation Framework 4 December 2003 Otsu, Japan.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM IN POLAND Action Plan and the Two-year NRN Operational Plans.
1 Project Coordinators’ meeting March 2010 TEMPUS MONITORING POLICY.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
Evaluation of NRNs Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
1 European Union - European Commission Delegation to China and Mongolia EU-China Biodiversity Programme (ECBP) Cooperation & Development Section.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Твининг пројекат Европске Уније Успостављање механизма за спровођење ММR *** Twinning project Establishment of a mechanism for implementation of MMR Пројекат.
> 1 ACP S&T Grant Contract N° FED/2009/ Introducing WP6 Monitoring & Quality control Objectives, actions, procedures Dr Sarah Bracking.
Evaluation Experts Meeting, DG AGRI L4, Brüssel, The Monitoring- and Evaluation System of the Austrian RDP Karl M. Ortner (AWI) Otto.
External Action: Thematic Programme For Environment and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources including Energy Structure: I- INTRODUCTION II - CONTEXT.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Overview of the Development Account Project Regional workshop on outcomes and lessons learnt from technical assistance projects in support of improving.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
The Project Outputs and Activities.
Florian Sauter-Servaes
Project financed by the European Union
Making Technical Cooperation work for capacity building
Tempus Monitoring Policy
INFORMATION & PUBLICITY REQUIREMENTS
Tracking development results at the EIB
Common Monitoring and Evaluation System for Rural Development
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Introduction on the outline and objectives of the workshop
Strategy for statistical cooperation with the enlargement countries 2014 – 2020 MGSC March 2014 Point 3.1 of the Agenda Ferenc Gálik.
The Learning Networks under the ESF
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Study on the Experience and Actions of the Main European Actors Active in the Field of Development Education and Awareness Raising (DEAR) Karina Chircu.
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
EVALUATIONS in the EU External Aid
FrAmework for Multi-agency Environments
Making Technical Cooperation work for capacity building
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
Presentation transcript:

Results-Oriented Monitoring (ROM) This project is funded by the European Union A project implemented by an ICCS-NTUA Consortium Service Contract for a “Review of implementation of centrally managed projects and programmes financed by the EU under the thematic programmes (CMTPs) EVA/2014/353-590 A European Union’s Project Results-Oriented Monitoring (ROM) EU DEAR Programme - Inception Seminar Brussels, 29 April 2015

CONTENTS 1. ROM System and ROM CMTP Project 2. DST – ROM CMTP / Areas for Collaboration

1. ROM System and ROM CMTP Project

1.1 ROM Definition (what) ROM is a system designed to assist the EC services in monitoring of and reporting on EU funded development and cooperation projects and programmes by mobilising external consultants

1.2 ROM general objectives (why) - To increase transparency and accountability in the use of public funds. - To shift to a results based assessment of aid rather than one based mostly on commitments and disbursements. - To improve the quality of cooperation with projects and programmes through the provision of timely, relevant, and well-focussed conclusions and recommendations.

1.3 ROM Stakeholders (who) EU Institutions EU Council (Consilium): 28 Heads of the EU Member States + EU Council President + President of the EC who define the EU's overall political direction and priorities. European Parliament: 751 members directly elected by the EU voters who exercise the legislative function of the EU and have control over the EU budget and the EC European Court of Auditors (ECA): The EU’s independent external auditor who checks that EU funds are correctly accounted for, are raised and spent in accordance with the rules and have achieved value for money EU inter-institutional bodies European External Action Service (EEAS): The EU's diplomatic service. It helps the EU's foreign affairs chief to carry out the Union's Common Foreign and Security Policy. European Investment Bank Group: The EU's bank which finances and provides expertise for sustainable investment projects as part of the EU policy objectives. Other EU entities EC Departments and Services: The Departments are the Directorate-Generals (DGs) which deal with a specific policy. The Services deal with more general administrative issues. EU Agencies: 40 Legal entities set up to perform specific tasks under EU law.

1.4 ROM implementation (how, where, when) 1) Plan, organise, implement, report on, and follow up on a yearly basis: - ROM Reviews (worldwide) by assessing relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability of ongoing projects - Results Reporting Support (at Brussels HQ) by recording values of achieved indicators of closed projects 2) Produce Annual Consolidated Reports based on the analysis of ROM Reviews and Results Reporting Support

1.4.1 ROM Reviews Objectives - To provide an external opinion on project implementation in order to support project management by the EC HQ services - To provide support to implementing organisations in project management through advice during the field visits and recommendations Number of CMTPs 135/year (with circa 39 ongoing DEAR projects for the 1st year)

1.4.2 Results Reporting Objectives - To assist the Units in the reporting on results data, available in project reports and documents - To facilitate quality control of data included in the reports Number of CMTPs 95/year (with 16 closed DEAR projects in the 1st year)

1.4.3 Annual Consolidated Reports ROM review Analysis Per country and geographic region Per sector with specific focus on gender and climate change Per thematic programme and for each component Results Reporting Support Analysis Quality of Results Indicators, completeness of project reporting by the implementing partners, quality of the Logframe.

2. DST – ROM CMTP Areas for collaboration

2.1 DST potential focus ROM CMTP recommendation of May/2013 “…It is advisable that future CfP are accompanied by a service contract which could be launched early in the implementation of the grants in order to establish the necessary activity-based monitoring tools (guidelines, reporting templates, web-based repository document system etc…” “…At the <service contract> kick-off meeting, a workshop could be organised, bringing together the EC services and relevant stakeholders in order to decide on the requirements, strategy and expectations…”

2.2 Complementarity ROM - DST Preconditions - Exchange of information (planned visits, templates) - Complementarity in the assessment of the effectiveness of grants - Appropriateness of the selected reporting indicators

2.2.1 Complementarity Example No 1 ROM Review criterion No 3: Effectiveness - Has the expected progress in terms of outputs been properly achieved? - Is the quality of outputs (including those of CD support) satisfactory? - Are the outputs (including CD) still likely to lead to the expected outcomes? - Is there evidence that the action supports the implementation or the development (or change) of the targeted country‘s policy/actions?

2.2.2 Complementarity Example No 2 DST - Establish reporting framework - Annual collection of data, including values of results indicators of ongoing grants ROM - Assess framework in practice through field visits to the grants - Consolidation of results indicators of ended grants in the context of the EU RF which can initiate a discussion on the appropriateness of the selected reporting indicators

Thank you Brussels e-mail: Brussels@ROMCMTP.eu Team Costas MISSIRLIS Team Leader Michel LECOMTE Deputy Team Leader Justyna BIELAT Cooperation Coordinator Elea NOVA Junior Expert Dimosthenis TSIORIS Financial/Administrative Assistant