1 Multilateral Environmental Agreements Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Tokyo, June 2007 RTAs and The Environment: Internalizing the Externalities at Regional Level by LAKSMI DHEWANTHI Ministry of Environment, Indonesia.
Advertisements

Intergovernmental Consultation on Strengthening the Scientific Base of the United Nations Environment Programme
International Environmental Governance Report of the Executive Director UNEP.
PARNERSHIPS: Institutions working together to achieve the goal Session C1.
AN OVERVIEW OF MEAs AT GLOBAL AND REGIONAL LEVELS
ISSUES/CHALLENGES AND FUTURE. MEA OBLIGATIONS EnforcementLegislation Policies.
A Presentation by UNEP At the UNFCCC Workshop on the Adaptation Fund Fairmont Hotel Macdonald Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 3—5 May 2006.
3 rd Global Networking Conference on RECP September 4, 2013 Evelyn Swain GEF-6 Update.
1 Cleaner Production & MEAs: The Linkage CPC Workshop.
Facilitating MEA Implementation with Cleaner Production: Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
Understanding Multilateral Environmental Agreements.
Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs)
1 Roles of UNEP, GEF & CBD in the Environment 2 nd Training Workshop for BCH Regional Advisors May 2006 Bangkok, Thailand.
PROJECT BACKGROUND & PROGRESS NIGERIA POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCB S ) MANAGEMENT PROJECT (P )
Home William Ehlers Team Leader, External Affairs GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC November 1 st, 2013 What is the GEF?
1 Taking the Next Steps: Facilitating MEA Implementation with Cleaner Production Status and Potential for Future Activities.
Financing POPs waste disposal Identifying resources for actions under the Stockholm Convention David Piper Task Manager (POPs enabling activities) UNEP.
Summary of submissions on the Adaptation Fund Workshop on the Adaptation Fund Edmonton May 3-5, 2006.
Highlights and Visions May 24,  Since joining the GEF as an Executing Agency in 2004, the Bank has developed a portfolio that amounts to nearly.
1 Inter-linkages: BCH, Parties, Capacity Building, Compliance and RA Concept Sustainability Biosafety Programme - Secretariat of the Convention on Biological.
Project Overview, Objectives, Components and Targeted Outcomes
GEF and the Conventions GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 1 to 3 November 2011 Cape Town, South Africa.
OPPORTUNITIES AND NEW DIRECTIONS THE GLOBAL MECHANISM’S COMPLEMENTARY ROLE WITH GEF: OPPORTUNITIES AND NEW DIRECTIONS Presentation to the GEF Expanded.
ECENA Exchange Programme First Plenary Meeting January, 2006 Zagreb, Croatia Update on strengthening the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental.
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
International Environmental Law and International Commercial Treaties John Pendergrass Environmental Law Institute Senior Attorney, Co-Director International.
Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency National Capacity Self Assessment (GEF/UNDP) The Third GEF Assembly Side Event – 30 th August,2006 Cape town Integrating.
What is the NEPAD? It is a vision and strategic framework for Africa’s renewal. It has eight sectoral priorities, namely:  Infrastructure (ICTs, Energy,
Country Presentation- GEF Operational Focal Point, Sri Lanka GEF Sub-Regional Workshop 2-3 December 2007, Bali, Indonesia Anura Jayatilake Director, Environmental.
ENHANCING SYNERGIES AMONG THE BASEL, ROTTERDAM AND STOCKHOLM CONVENTIONS Tirana, Albania, June 2010 Basel ConventionRotterdam ConventionStockholm.
BRIEFING SEQUENCE a) MEA FOCAL POINT AGENCIES b) COMMITTEES CREATED FOR THE THREE UN CONVENTIONS c)COMPOSITION OF MEA FOCAL POINT AGENCY COMMITTEE AND.
Session 4: The Convention on Biological Diversity Making Access Decisions.
Ministerul Mediului si Gospodaririi Apelor Session 6 - Enhancing National GEF Coordination, Communication and Outreach Developing the National Capacity.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 2 Slide 1 The EIA process The EIA process comprises:  screening - to decide if and at what level EIA should be applied.
1 Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal Brief background The Convention Implementation actors.
The Multilateral Fund and its Management Structure UNFCCC Workshop on the Adaptation Fund 3-5 May 2006 Alberta, Canada Maria Nolan Chief Officer - Multilateral.
International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005.
Institutional Structure of the GEF William Ehlers, Head, External Affairs Team American University Seminar April 9, 2012 Washington, DC.
Paul Desanker Financial and Technical Support UNFCCC secretariat Framework for Capacity- building in Developing Countries Expert Workshop.
Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Nairobi, Kenya May 2007.
1 Civil Society and Public Participation in the GEF Bonizella Biagini NGO Coordinator Global Environment Facility.
Institutional Structure of the GEF GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop September 2011 Honiara, Solomon Islands.
1 Integrating (Mainstreaming) Sound Management of Chemicals into National Development Planning United Nations Development Programme Energy and Environment.
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Institutional Structure of the GEF GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop February 15-17, 2011 Hotel Memling, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo William.
Rationalizing the Global Environmental Governance System: Synergies between Multilateral Environmental Agreements Pamela S. Chasek, Ph.D. Executive Editor,
INTRODUCTION TITLE Location, Date 1 Ignacio Sanchez Diaz Consultant to the SPHS and UNDP Regional HHD Team for Greening Health Systems with focus on Sustainable.
Martin Adriaanse UNEP’s Global Programme of Action and the Water Convention Miedzyzdroje, 21 April 2002.
BRIEFING SEQUENCE a) MEA FOCAL POINT AGENCIES b) COMMITTEES CREATED FOR THE THREE UN CONVENTIONS c)COMPOSITION OF MEA FOCAL POINT AGENCY COMMITTEE AND.
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Key Commitments, Targets and Timetables from the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation.
William Ehlers Team Leader, External Affairs GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 Institutional Structure of the GEF.
International Organizations Continue…. UN Environment Program (UNEP) Established in 1972 by General Assembly Resolution 2997 following the Stockholm Conference.
1 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Clearing-house Mechanism for Information on POPs. Role of Regional Centres.
1 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Clearing-house Mechanism for Information on POPs, its web site and tools Geneva, 7 December 2007.
International Context for PRTRs Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals.
Financing Arrangements in the International Climate Change and Biodiversity Regimes Jolene Lin Assistant Professor Faculty of Law The University of Hong.
A Sustainable Tourism Framework for the Caribbean Mercedes Silva Sustainable Tourism Specialist Caribbean Tourism Organization “Ma Pampo” World Ecotourism.
THE BASEL, ROTTERDAM AND STOCKHOLM CONVENTIONS Barbados, March 2009.
6/12/ ORIGINS, BENEFITS AND THE PATH FORWARD BRS Secretariat December 2015 SYNERGIES UNDER THE BASEL, ROTTERDAM AND STOCKHOLM.
Capacity Development for the CDM (CD4CDM) First National Workshop - SURINAM Host Country Institutional Issues Miriam Hinostroza UNEP.
1 Joint Clearing-house Mechanism for Information Exchange and its draft strategy By Osmany Pereira Gonzalez, BRS Secretariat Geneva, 7 October 2015.
External Action: Thematic Programme For Environment and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources including Energy Structure: I- INTRODUCTION II - CONTEXT.
This course was developed in cooperation with the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law SYNERGIES AND LINKAGES IN COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT.
International Affairs Division
Global Environmental Governance
Institutional Structure of the GEF
International Organizations
GEF and the Conventions
GEF and the Conventions
Institutional Structure of the GEF
Presentation transcript:

1 Multilateral Environmental Agreements Overview

2 What are MEAs? International legal instruments that: n have a goal of environmental protection n are concluded between a large number of states or international organizations as parties n concluded in written form n governed by international law n can be embodied in a single instrument or in two or more related instruments (framework agreements)

3 Milestones in the evolution of MEAs n Stockholm Conference on the Human Development (1972): – first attempt to address inter-relationships of environment and development at global level – adopted first global action plan for environment – established the United National Environmental Program (UNEP) – accelerated development of modern MEAs: more than 60% of existing MEAs are adopted after Rio n The 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED): – national and international policies redirected towards integration of environmental, economic and development objectives – Agenda 21 and Rio Declaration adopted – development of new international regimes stimulated

4 Core MEAs n MEAs of global significance n negotiation, development or activities are associated with UNEP work n Main clusters: – Biodiversity – atmosphere – land – chemicals and hazardous wastes – regional seas and related

5 MEA Commonalties n Shared Goal: – Sustainable Development n Cross-cutting issue: – pollution/waste management

6 MEA Clusters: Biodiversity n Consists of MEAs related to protection and conservation of biodiversity. n Main MEA - The Biodiversity Convention Protection of biodiversity is directly relevant to pollution management and efficient use of resources, and, therefore, to Cleaner Production

7 MEA Clusters: Atmosphere MEAs aimed at protection of athmosphere from pollutants. For example: n Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete Ozone Layer n The Kyoto Protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Implementation of the atmosphere cluster MEAs requires effective pollution management and therefore the cluster is directly relevant to Cleaner Production

8 MEA Clusters: Marine Environment n Conventions relevant to marine environment: – 17 Regional Seas Conventions and A number of Protocols on land-based sources of pollution of marine environment – Global Program of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based Activities (GPA) Most MEAs in the marine cluster are multi-sectoral agreements based on precautionary and preventive approaches, therefore,Cleaner Production is relevant to these MEAs

9 MEA clusters: Chemicals & Hazardous waste n Deal with hazardous impacts of wastes and chemical pollution n Main treaties of the cluster: – Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal – Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade – Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). Cleaner Production is relevant to all Conventions of the cluster and helps to enchance synergies among them

10 Key concepts n Legally-binding agreements – set commitments in form of legally-binding targets and time-tables n Non-binding instruments – set out important issues and priorities, foster discussion and attention, and stimulate new thinking and development of legally-binding instruments

11 MEA Implementation n Implementation of an MEA – a process of converting international commitments and requirements into national law and policy in order to induce behavioral change of target groups, i.e. those actors causing the problem in question. n Compliance – refers to whether the countries adhere to the agreement provisions and undertake implementation measures, including procedural measures (e.g. national reporting) n Effectiveness – whether a MEAs resolved a problem that caused its creation.

12 Institutional elements of core MEAs (1) n Conference of Parties (COP) – Ultimate decision-making body on implementation and development of their respective MEAs n Secretariat – Supports COP and performs a number of varied functions depending on the mandate of the MEA n Executive and subsidiary bodies – Generally advisory in nature, report to COPs on scientific, technical, or financial matters or on implementation progress; internal or external, standing bodies or ad hoc with a limited mandate

13 Institutional elements of core MEAs (2) n Clearinghouses – Facilitate exchange of information (websites, databases operated usually by the Secretariats) n Implementation actors on national level – Represented by the national authorities and/or institutions, training and information centres n Financial mechanisms

14 Financial mechanisms n Regime Budgets – MEAs can establish one of more of mandatory or voluntary trust funds, most often administered by the international organizations that provide the Secretariats. Budgets are proposed by Parties and approved by the COPs n Development Assistance – Funds can be provided via foundations (e.g. UN Foundation), bilateral arrangements, private sector donors and NGOs n Other multilateral financing mechanisms – Global Environment Facility, The Kyoto Protocol climate-related mechanisms, the World Bank

15 Global Environment Facility n A co-financing mechanism – resources of developed countries, banks, NGOs, bilateral and multilateral agencies to address global environmental problems within the framework of country priorities n GEF focal areas – Biodiversity, climate change, international waters, ozone depletion, POPs, land degradation. n Project Eligibility – Country-driven and endorsed by host Governments – Produce identifiable global benefits – Participation of all affected groups and transparency – Consistency with the Conventions – Posses strong scientific and technical merit – Financially sustainable and cost-effective – Include process for monitoring, evaluation and incorporation of lessons learned – Play catalytic role that leverages other financing

16 Strengths and weaknesses of modern MEAs n Weaknesses: – Lack of synergies among MEAs – Inadequate implementation and coordination of MEAs at the national level – Inadequate compliance and enforcement – Lack of environmental and performance indicators to measure the effectiveness of MEAs – Inadequate funding for selected MEAs n Strengths: – Growing commitment to explore synergies – Increased attention to principles of precaution and prevention

17 n Shared Goal: – Sustainable Development n For MEAs, Cleaner Production can contribute to: – wider use of prevention as the best strategy of environmental protection – issue linkage and providing positive incentives for compliance and implementation – strengthening synergies among MEAs – adding flexibility to the agreements What can Cleaner Production do? (1)

18 What can Cleaner Production do? (2) n Cross-cutting capacity building activities of CP initiatives and MEAs : – Policy advice – Technical and financial assistance – Assessment and management of pollution – Education and awareness – Information exchange – Strengthened participation of all stakeholders in the decision-making – International partnership

19 Implementing MEAs via CP versus traditional end-of-pipe approaches:

20 Implementing MEAs via CP versus traditional end-of-pipe approaches (contd.)