LER MAR13 Analysis Is MIA data less accurate than that taken in last year? Is phase measurement still Ok? Is coupling measurement still Ok? Or simply that.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Martensite Creation: Box with Fixed Cylinder July 1, 2012.
Advertisements

Factor out a common binomial EXAMPLE 1 2x(x + 4) – 3(x + 4) a. SOLUTION 3y 2 (y – 2) + 5(2 – y) b. 2x(x + 4) – 3(x + 4) = (x + 4)(2x – 3) a. The binomials.
Review of dynamic aperture studies Yiton Yan SLAC.
Optics modeling and correction Yiton T. Yan Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Thanks to: Y. Cai, W. Colocho, F-J. Decker, M. Donald, Y. Nosochkov, J.
MIA optics knobs and IP knobs for PEP-II optics (+ dispersion) improvement and IP matching, and its fast iteration during MD for accommodating orbit drift.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
Unit 4 Review Solutions a 5 – 32a 2 4a 2 (3a 3 – 8) 2. a 2 b 2 + ab ab(ab + 1) 3. x(x – 2) + y(2 – x) x(x – 2) – y(x – 2) (x – 2)(x – y)
Reflexive -- First sentence of proof is: (1) Let x  Z (2) Let (x,x)  R. (3) Let (x,x)  I (4) Let x  R.
EXAMPLE 4 Solve proportions SOLUTION a x 16 = Multiply. Divide each side by 10. a x 16 = = 10 x5 16 = 10 x80 = x8 Write original proportion.
7.1 Area of a Region Between Two Curves.
Algebra 1: Solving Equations with variables on BOTH sides.
Status of the LHC optics T. Persson on behalf of the OMC-team.
Correlation Scatter Plots Correlation Coefficients Significance Test.
DECIMAL ARITHMETIC. Equivalent Additions You may be asked to do the following sum without a calculator How ? As we shall see throughout this.
Optics measurement, modeling, and correction - PEP-II experience Yiton Yan SLAC.
Warm-Up Exercises Evaluate the expression for, 0, and 2. 1 = x – 1. 2x2x3 + x – 2. 3.In 2005, Carey’s Pet Shop had a profit of $55,000. In 2006,
Edexcel GCSE Maths Spec B – Modular: Booster C © Pearson Education This document may have been altered from the original. Objectives To understand.
2.4 Graphing Linear Equation Sept 12, Y-intercept a point where a graph intersects the y-axis Vocabulary equation written in the form Ax + By =
2.9 Warm Up 1. Solve 2x2 + 11x = , –7 ANSWER 2
Greatest Common Factor The Greatest Common Factor is the largest number that will divide into a group of numbers Examples: 1.6, , 55 GCF = 3 GCF.
May 2004 Prof. Himayatullah 1 Basic Econometrics Chapter 6 EXTENSIONS OF THE TWO-VARIABLE LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL.
Инвестиционный паспорт Муниципального образования «Целинский район»
5x 4 – 405 = 5(x 4 – 81) = 5(x 2 + 9)(x 2 – 9) = 5(x 2 + 9)(x + 3)(x – 3) by D. Fisher.
Multiplying Binomials Objectives: To Multiply Two Binomials FOIL To multiply the sum and difference of two expressions To square a binomial.
Warm-Up Exercises Factor out a common binomial EXAMPLE 1 2x(x + 4) – 3(x + 4) a. 3y 2 (y – 2) + 5(2 – y) b. Factor – 1 from ( 2 – y ). Distributive property.
(x – 8) (x + 8) = 0 x – 8 = 0 x + 8 = x = 8 x = (x + 5) (x + 2) = 0 x + 5 = 0 x + 2 = x = - 5 x = - 2.
Observations and Analysis of the Planets AS 103 Lab Part I.
 Polynomials Lesson 3 Multiplying and Factoring Polynomials using the Distributive Method.
© Imperial College London Numerical Solution of Differential Equations 3 rd year JMC group project ● Summer Term 2004 Supervisor: Prof. Jeff Cash Saeed.
FINDING THE SLOPE FROM 2 POINTS Day 91. Learning Target: Students can find the slope of a line from 2 given points.
5.4 Factoring ax 2 + bx +c 12/10/2012. In the previous section we learned to factor x 2 + bx + c where a = 1. In this section, we’re going to factor ax.
Sec. 9-2: Multiplying & Factoring. To multiply a MONOMIAL with a polynomial, simply distribute the monomial through to EACH term of the polynomial. i.e.
What does y=mx mean? Where does it come from?. In this lesson you will learn to derive the equation y=mx by using similar triangles.
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. 12G Vectors in Space.
SECONDARY ONE 6.1a Using Substitution to Solve a System.
Linear Imperfections equations of motion with imperfections: smooth approximation orbit correction for the un-coupled case transfer matrices with coupling:
0.3 Linear Inequalities Aug 29, Graphing x = # Ex. Graph x = -3 The x coordinate is -3 no matter what the value of y is. xy Choose any.
Factor out a common binomial
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
Recent MIA Results Yiton T. Yan Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Acknowledgement: Y. Cai, F-J. Decker, S. Ecklund, J. Irwin, J. Seeman, M. Sullivan,
3 ( x + 2 ) = 3 x ( 3 x - 5 ) = 6x - 10 x x x - 5 M May.
11/18/2004 FNAL Advanced Optics Measurements at Tevatron Vadim Sajaev ANL V. Lebedev, V. Nagaslaev, A. Valishev FNAL.
Intro U4D9 Warmup Evaluate each equation for x = –1, 0, and y = 3x 2. y = x – 7 3. y = 2x y = 6x – 2 –3, 0, 3 –8, –7, –6 3, 5, 7 –8, –2, 4.
How do you solve a system of quadratic and linear equations? x 2 +4x-8 =y 3x+5=y.
照片档案整理 一、照片档案的含义 二、照片档案的归档范围 三、 卷内照片的分类、组卷、排序与编号 四、填写照片档案说明 五、照片档案编目及封面、备考填写 六、数码照片整理方法 七、照片档案的保管与保护.
공무원연금관리공단 광주지부 공무원대부등 공적연금 연계제도 공무원연금관리공단 광주지부. 공적연금 연계제도 국민연금과 직역연금 ( 공무원 / 사학 / 군인 / 별정우체국 ) 간의 연계가 이루어지지 않고 있 어 공적연금의 사각지대가 발생해 노후생활안정 달성 미흡 연계제도 시행전.
Жюль Верн ( ). Я мальчиком мечтал, читая Жюля Верна, Что тени вымысла плоть обретут для нас; Что поплывет судно громадней «Грейт Истерна»; Что.
Pre-Algebra 11-2 Slope of a Line Warm-up Purple workbook – pg. 85 # 1 Need to be finished within the next 5 minutes Pictures or progress report.
Chapter 3 Lesson 2 Solving Systems of Equations Algebraically.
Rewrite a linear equation
Ben Cerio Office of Science, SULI Program 2006
Copyright 2011 Davitily.
From: Variational Integrators for Structure-Preserving Filtering
Factoring GCF and Trinomials.
Status and Plan for the PEP-II Lattices
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
5.5: Factoring the Sum and Difference of Two Cubes
the ability of a substance to dissolve into another substance
Objective Factor polynomials by using the greatest common factor.
SuperB Dynamic Aperture A. Bogomyagkov, E. Levichev, P
Edge Detection Using ICA
with Model Independent
Objective Factor polynomials by using the greatest common factor.
LNF site 1.2 Km LER lattice: preliminary dynamic acceptance studies
M. Sullivan, G. Yocky PEP-II meeting Feb. 26, 2007
Warm-Up 5 minutes Multiply. 1) (x – 3)(x – 2) 2) (6x + 5)(2x + 1)
1) Expand Brackets 2) Factorise
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Indicator 16 System of Equations.
Presentation transcript:

LER MAR13 Analysis Is MIA data less accurate than that taken in last year? Is phase measurement still Ok? Is coupling measurement still Ok? Or simply that the MIA solution over-kill? Or MIA solution caused unwanted nonlinear effect? Yiton T. Yan SLAC Let us quickly survey some results and then we will discuss this at the end.

Virtual LER MAR13, 2007 (left) and wanted model (right) ey ~ 2.0Ey ~ 1.5

MIA wanted LER (left) and after-dialing LER (right)

Virtual LER MAR13, 2007 (left) vs. after dialing in MIA solution (right)

XX raw data ---- Mar13, 2007 (left) vs. April 25, 2006

YY raw data ---- Mar13, 2007 (left) vs. April 25, 2006

XY raw data ---- Mar13, 2007 (left) vs. April 25, 2006

YX raw data ---- Mar13, 2007 (left) vs. April 25, 2006

Symplecticity for XX vs. YY MIA data shows that the MIA data for XX and YY seems to have similar quality

Singular values ---- Mar13, 2007 (left) vs. August 15, 2006

Singular Vectors ---- Mar13, 2007 (left) vs. August 15, 2006

Comparison of R12 residuals: Apr 25, 2006 (top) vs. Mar 13, 2007 (bottom)

Comparison of R34 residuals: Apr 25, 2006 (top) vs. Mar 13, 2007 (bottom)

Comparison of R32 (y to x) residuals: Apr 25, 2006 (top) vs. Mar 13, 2007 (bottom)

Comparison of R14 (x to y) residuals: Apr 25, 2006 (top) vs. Mar 13, 2007 (bottom)

The Knob: magnet strength changes QFP9R QDP8R QFP7R QDP6R QFP5R QDP4R QFP3R QDPR QFPR QFP9R QDP8R QFP7R QDP6R QFP5R QDP4R QFP3R QDPR QFPR SKG SKG SK6L SK5L SK4L0.565 SK3L0.561 SK2L SK SK SK SK SK SKG SKG

Discussion – Why MIA LER solution did not work on Mar 13, 2007, what should we do next for LER? Simply LER MIA data was not good enough to warrant a good enough virtual LER? The solution over-kill: strong changes of global skew, etc. causing significant orbit change which was not restored to the original orbit after dialing in MIA solution? Others? What should we do next for LER?