Mathematics and Science Teaching Programs Grant Proposal Workshop Panel Discussion: Writing Successful STEM Education Proposals - Principal Investigator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strengthening Institutional Commitment to STEM Teacher Preparation and STEM Education: Lessons Learned from The Leadership Collaborative (TLC). Miami,
Advertisements


Survey Responses Challenges and Opportunities Matt Richey St. Olaf College.
Department of Medicine Three Year Review Workshop Job Descriptions November 21, 2012 Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three Year Review Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three.
Department of Medicine Three Year Review Job Descriptions Job description should be defined when started in the Department of Medicine – last minute changes.
Office of Grants and Sponsored Programs Faculty Orientation.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 9 Competitive.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Facilitators: Janet Lange and Bob Munn
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’06 Institute Partnerships  Focus on:  Development of school-based intellectual leaders and.
1 Partnering Successfully with Universities John L. Bear Dean, College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics University of Houston College of Natural Sciences.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
1 Exploring NSF Funding Opportunities in DUE Tim Fossum Division of Undergraduate Education Vermont EPSCoR NSF Research Day May 6, 2008.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
Noyce Program Evaluation Conference Thursday, December 6, 2007 Frances Lawrenz Michelle Fleming Pey-Yan Liou Christina Madsen Karen Hofstad-Parkhill 1.
Welcome to the Sustainability Grant Writing Workshop Webinar participants please:  Dial in: (888) / Participant code  Bottom left screen,
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Cluster Analysis on Perceived Effects of Scholarships on STEM Majors’ Commitment to Becoming Teachers versus Teaching in High Needs Schools Pey-Yan Liou.
The Influence of Scholarships on the Recruitment of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Majors to Teach in High Needs Settings Pey-Yan.
Two Year College Bert E. Holmes Carson Distinguished Chair of Science at UNC-Asheville and formerly Program Officer in Division of Undergraduate Education.
CSU Summit on the Preparation of Teachers Irvine, California February 14, 2011 Connecting Teacher and Administrator Preparation with After-School Learning.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
NSF Programs That Support Research in the Two-Year College Classroom  V. Celeste Carter, National Science Foundation Jeffrey Ryan, University of South.
META Alternate Licensure Program for Special Education Teachers Terry Dozier, Director VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Wednesday, May 24, 2006 National.
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
1 Higher Education Engagement with K-12: Partnerships, Possibilities, and Pitfalls Nancy S. Shapiro Office of Academic Affairs University System of Maryland.
ELISA STONE, GEORGE JOHNSON & RYAN SHIBA CAL TEACH BERKELEY UTEACH CONFERENCE MAY 2014 Surviving and Thriving Post-Replication.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Grant Programs to Support Community Engagement and Service Learning Judy Botelho Interim Director, Center for Community Engagement.
Proposal Writing Workshop Part II: Features of Effective Proposals.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
CSU Math and Science Teacher Initiative California Mathematics Council-South November 7, 2009 Joan Bissell, Director Mathematics and Science Teacher Initiative.
Updates on Office of International Programs Presentation to the Faculty Senate November 8 th, 2012 Prema Arasu Professor & Vice Provost International Programs.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What? Half million dollar MSP grant with additional financial support from industry partners.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
WRITING THE SUCCESSFUL PROPOSAL C. June Strickland, Ph.D., RN Associate Professor University of Washington School of Nursing.
Institutional Change and Sustainability: Lessons Learned from MSPs Nancy Shapiro & Jennifer Frank CASHÉ KMD Project University System of Maryland January.
Archived Information Dissemination Strategies for a Hub and Spokes Model Mentoring Institution with Adaptors Based on presentation notes by Laurie Schreiner,
Frances Lawrenz and The Noyce evaluation team University of Minnesota 1 Acknowledgement: This project was funded by National Science Foundation (Grant#REC )
Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Differential Effects of Participatory Evaluation in a National Multi-site Program Evaluation Frances Lawrenz University of Minnesota.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
Math and Science Scholars at Texas A&M University Timothy P. Scott Dean, College of Science Texas A&M University Kit Price Blount TxCETP Project Director.
NASA LIFT OFF Overview Inquiry LIFT OFF Team ALAMEDA County Office of Education LOS ANGELES County Office of Education SANTA CLARA County Office.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
1 Direction scientifique Networks of Excellence objectives  Reinforce or strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a given research topic.
California State University CSU Math and Science Teacher Initiative: The Fundamental Role of Collaboration and Partnerships Beverly Young, Ph.D. Assistant.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources National Science Foundation.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
NSF Peer Review: Panelist Perspective QEM Biology Workshop; 10/21/05 Dr. Mildred Huff Ofosu Asst. Vice President; Sponsored Programs & Research; Morgan.
Presented by the College of Arts & Sciences with the Office of Contracts and Grants University of San Francisco April 2012.
Updates to Program Approval Process and Graduate Faculty Nominations Dr. George Hodge Assistant Dean for Program Development.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
ELI Educational Leadership Initiative Learning and Leading Together for a Brighter Future.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Presentation transcript:

Mathematics and Science Teaching Programs Grant Proposal Workshop Panel Discussion: Writing Successful STEM Education Proposals - Principal Investigator Tips and Formulas for Success David Andrews, CSU Fresno (Moderator) David Stronck, CSU East Bay John Keller and Elsa Medina, Cal Poly SLO Nilgun Ozer, SFSU Deborah Summers, CSU Chico February 6, 2009

How to Write a Successful Proposal Establish need for and viability of program –existing partnerships – particularly K-12– in narrative and letters of support –campus(es) has or have a large, diverse team to carry out the program activities – in terms of faculty, staff, and students –long term change will be achieved at your institution(s) through the particular grant Establish strong program elements –Prepare your $budget$ before identifying program elements –Identify roles and responsibilities for all members of the proposal “team” who will implement program on campus Clearly specify those of program coordinator – the individual who will carry out the “nuts and bolts” of running the program –Any letters of support from school district partners and Deans, etc. should be substantive (no boiler plate) Establish strong evaluation component –Check with your institutional IRB before submittal Establish PI and institutional credentials –PI (principal investigator) should have experience managing large programs –Institution should have track record in partnerships with K-12 Establish evidence of institutional priority, infrastructure and program sustainability –Institution should commit to continuation of some program elements/outcomes –Disseminate program outcomes

How to Operate a Successful Program: Recruitment is Job 1 First step is to put together an excellent team to manage and implement your proposal Must recruit project leadership intersegmentally: e.g. It is important to link to your partner community colleges and K-12 districts Must cast net far and wide when recruiting for project participants: e.g. It is important to advertise broadly --- whether for future teachers as part of Noyce Scholars, or community college partners for the ATE program

K-12 Partnerships – Visit Sites Often – Build Relationships Working closely with districts during project years and after funded project completed essential Maintain close contact with principals, master teachers, and classroom teachers working with you; provide incentives for all Develop methods to track program participants, particularly after program has completed – often will want to do longitudinal evaluation

Sustainability Seek private support for grant activities continuation in the first year of your funded program Explore synergies between the federally funded programs and state and CSU funded programs.

Institutional Infrastructure is Key You can only be funded (and successfully implement!) under the most programs if you have a solid infrastructure in place Solid infrastructure means: –A programs coordinator who can work with you as PI to implement the day-to-day management of the program –Good support from Chair, Dean, Provost –Good financial management support from your grants and contracts office

Panel Remarks: David Stronck Be an opportunist: (1) Recognize that each foundation has carefully formulated a goal and is seeking proposals to implement the foundation¹s goal. (2) Focus on meeting the goal of the Foundation. Provide detailed plans for meeting the goal, not merely generalizations. (3) If you are not qualified or interested in a Foundation¹s goal, then begin the process of trying to identify another foundation that has an appropriate goal related to your qualifications and interests. (4) Do not waste your time and energy by submitting a proposal about your great but irrelevant idea and hoping that a foundation will change its goal.