4. CONCLUSIONS Regarding the annual scale generation, it is clear that the value computed from historical record is well within the range of the synthetic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrology Rainfall Analysis (1)
Advertisements

2013/12/10.  The Kendall’s tau correlation is another non- parametric correlation coefficient  Let x 1, …, x n be a sample for random variable x and.
4 th International Symposium on Flood Defence Generation of Severe Flood Scenarios by Stochastic Rainfall in Combination with a Rainfall Runoff Model U.
Materials for Lecture 11 Chapters 3 and 6 Chapter 16 Section 4.0 and 5.0 Lecture 11 Pseudo Random LHC.xls Lecture 11 Validation Tests.xls Next 4 slides.
Use of regression analysis Regression analysis: –relation between dependent variable Y and one or more independent variables Xi Use of regression model.
Scaling Laws, Scale Invariance, and Climate Prediction
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for Clustering Gene Expression Data K. Y. Yeung and W. L. Ruzzo.
Ch11 Curve Fitting Dr. Deshi Ye
Introduction Data and simula- tion methodology VaR models and estimation results Estimation perfor- mance analysis Conclusions Appendix Doctoral School.
CVEN 5838 Aug 28, 2008 Lecture 2 Reservoir Capacity Yield Analysis (how to size a reservoir and measure its performance)
GEV Flood Quantile Estimators with Bayesian Shape-Parameter GLS Regression Dirceu Silveira Reis Jr., Jery R. Stedinger and Eduardo Savio Martins Fundação.
5. CONCLUSIONS Initially constructed and applied for the New York State’s rainfall stations (Wilks, 1998), DUM was able to reproduce its good performance.
4. SMMAR(1) IMPLEMENTATION It was developed a Pascal routine for generating synthetic total monthly precipitation series. The model was calibrated with.
By:Tahereh Ensafi Moghadam Aridity zoning of dry-land (Climatic Index of desertification) based on precipitation and temperature in central basin of.
Duan Wang Center for Polymer Studies, Boston University Advisor: H. Eugene Stanley.
Tables, Figures, and Equations
Autocorrelation Lecture 18 Lecture 18.
Lecture II-2: Probability Review
12 Autocorrelation Serial Correlation exists when errors are correlated across periods -One source of serial correlation is misspecification of the model.
Review of Probability.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for Clustering Gene Expression Data K. Y. Yeung and W. L. Ruzzo.
Lecture (16) Introduction to Stochastic Hydrology.
EE513 Audio Signals and Systems Statistical Pattern Classification Kevin D. Donohue Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Kentucky.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION Project Report Unscented kalman Filter Information.
Time-Series Analysis and Forecasting – Part V To read at home.
Downscaling in time. Aim is to make a probabilistic description of weather for next season –How often is it likely to rain, when is the rainy season likely.
Economic Cooperation Organization Training Course on “Drought and Desertification” Alanya Facilities, Antalya, TURKEY presented by Ertan TURGU from Turkish.
1 CSI5388: Functional Elements of Statistics for Machine Learning Part I.
Statistical inference. Distribution of the sample mean Take a random sample of n independent observations from a population. Calculate the mean of these.
LECTURE 2. GENERALIZED LINEAR ECONOMETRIC MODEL AND METHODS OF ITS CONSTRUCTION.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 10 Inferences Involving Two Populations.
Tests for Random Numbers Dr. Akram Ibrahim Aly Lecture (9)
New Mexico Rio Grande Water Operations Modeling: Creating a synthetic flow sequence representative of regional paleo-hydrology for alternatives analysis.
Chapter 17 Time Series Analysis and Forecasting ©.
Progress Toward a New Weather Generator Eric Schmidt, Colorado State University - Pueblo Dr. James O’Brien, Florida State University Anthony Arguez, Florida.
A Process Control Screen for Multiple Stream Processes An Operator Friendly Approach Richard E. Clark Process & Product Analysis.
Elements of Financial Risk Management Second Edition © 2012 by Peter Christoffersen 1 Simulating the Term Structure of Risk Elements of Financial Risk.
1 11 Simple Linear Regression and Correlation 11-1 Empirical Models 11-2 Simple Linear Regression 11-3 Properties of the Least Squares Estimators 11-4.
INTRODUCTORY STUDY : WATER INDICATORS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE HYDROLOGICAL DATA EAST OF GUADIANA RIVER by Nikolas Kotsovinos,P. Angelidis, V. Hrissanthou,
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION Probability and statistics review ASEN 5070 LECTURE.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
STOCHASTIC HYDROLOGY Stochastic Simulation of Bivariate Distributions Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National.
Business Statistics, 4e, by Ken Black. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. 3-1 Business Statistics, 4e by Ken Black Chapter 3 Descriptive Statistics.
Introducing Error Co-variances in the ARM Variational Analysis Minghua Zhang (Stony Brook University/SUNY) and Shaocheng Xie (Lawrence Livermore National.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Eleventh Edition and the Triola Statistics Series by.
September 28, 2000 Improved Simultaneous Data Reconciliation, Bias Detection and Identification Using Mixed Integer Optimization Methods Presented by:
Random Processes Gaussian and Gauss-Markov processes Power spectrum of random processes and white processes.
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Forecasting Construction Cost Index Values Using Auto Regression Modeling Charles Nickel, P.E. Cost.
Stochastic Hydrology Random Field Simulation Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.
Stochastic Processes and Transition Probabilities D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M6L5 Stochastic Optimization.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
Principal Component Analysis
Data Analysis. Qualitative vs. Quantitative Data collection methods can be roughly divided into two groups. It is essential to understand the difference.
Tests of hypothesis Contents: Tests of significance for small samples
Becoming Acquainted With Statistical Concepts
STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION Kalman (sequential) filter
Why Stochastic Hydrology ?
RAINGUAGE NETWORK DESIGN
Basic simulation methodology
Chapter 6: Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) Models
Materials for Lecture 18 Chapters 3 and 6
Descriptive Statistics
EE513 Audio Signals and Systems
Descriptive and Inferential
Facultad de Ingeniería, Centro de Cálculo
Stochastic Simulation and Frequency Analysis of the Concurrent Occurrences of Multi-site Extreme Rainfalls Prof. Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental.
Professor Ke-sheng Cheng
Testing Causal Hypotheses
Relative impacts of mitigation, temperature, and precipitation on 21st-century megadrought risk in the American Southwest by Toby R. Ault, Justin S. Mankin,
Presentation transcript:

4. CONCLUSIONS Regarding the annual scale generation, it is clear that the value computed from historical record is well within the range of the synthetic series values and, in most cases, close to the average from 1000 series computed. This shows that the synthetic series reasonably preserve most of the historical record’s statistics in terms of annual precipitation. Next task for the MDM conclusion is a debug procedure, in order to find what is wrong with the monthly step generation. 1. MONTHLY DISAGGREGATION MODEL - DUM This model is based on a monthly time step, which avoids reproducing zero rainfall sequences what is a rather complicated procedure. By selecting a disaggregation model one take advantage of the fact that in humid regions annual precipitation has an essentially normal distribution. This has the Central Limit Theorem support and also has been successfully verified by many statistical tests. 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE MODEL SYNTHETIC RAINFALL SERIES GENERATION - MDM Heinz D. Fill, André F. Santana, Miriam Rita Moro Mine Contacts: REFERENCES: HOMBERGER, G. M., RAFFENSBERGER, J. P., WILBERG, P. L. Elements of physical hydrology, John Opkins, University Press, Baltimore, KELMAN. J. Modelos estocásticos no gerenciamento de recursos hídricos. In:______. Modelos para Gerenciamento de Recursos Hídricos I. São Paulo: Nobel/ABRH p ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/ ) under Grant Agreement N° Third author also would like to thank “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq” for the financial support. Annual time step precipitation generation Disaggregation in a monthly time step 2.1. Annual Precipitation It has been assumed that total annual precipitation is not serially correlated, but cross correlation among rainfall stations was considered. Also annual precipitation has been assumed to be normally distributed what is supported both by empirical evidence (Homberger et al., 1998) and also by the Central Limit Theorem. So, generation of multisite annual precipitation series is reduced to a multivariate normal distributed random numbers generation. In serially uncorrelated hydrologic variables case, they may be modeled by the equation (Kelman, 1987): Where x(t) is a vector of k (number of sites) cross-correlated random variables, z(t) is a size k independent random variables vector and B is a coefficients matrix, obtained from the sites correlation matrix. Variables are attached to a time index t Monthly Precipitation The chosen method uses disaggregation coefficients computed from historical records. It is called Hydrologic Scenarios Method. For each historical record year, a matrix D j (j=1, 2, …, m) (m = length of historical record) with size k x 12 (k = number of sites) is constructed. Its elements are: 3. MDM’S VALIDATION For MDM validation some synthetic series statistics have been compared to those computed from the historical records on the selected sites within the La Plata Basin. Figure 2 shows their geographical location within the study area. All the algorithms were developed in Matlab (R13, The Mathworks Inc, 2000, under license) software Annual Validation It have been generated 1000 series of 62 year long each one (the same length as the historical record) and the following statistics have been computed: Figure 2: Selected Sites for Validation # ConventionSite Name 1 Monte Carmelo 2Monte Alegre 3Usina Couro do Cervo 4Franca 5Fazenda Barreirinho 6Tomazina 7União da Vitória 8Lagoa Vermelha 9Caiuá Table 1: Sites number convention Where P im (j) represents the month m, site i and year j precipitation, while P i (j) is the site i and year j annual precipitation. Given an annual precipitations series, disaggregation proceeds randomly combining each matrix D j with the annual amounts. The model is structured in 2 Modules and performs sequentially the following steps (Figure 1): Compute mean and variance at each site Standardize mean annual precipitation Compute the correlation matrix Compute the coefficient matrix (B) Compute the disaggregation matrices (D j ) Generate k independent standard normal random number Transform standard normal vector into cross correlated random vector, using: Obtain the length m cross correlated annual precipitation series Apply the Hydrologic Scenarios Method to disaggregate annual in monthly precipitation Module 1 Module 2 Figure 1: P rocedures Sequence in MDM Mean, Standard Deviation and Skew Coefficient; Number of consecutive years below/above mean; Each synthetic series correlation matrix; Maximum cumulative deficit for 80% of mean. The last item has an important effect on flow regulation studies because influences significantly hydropower generation in well regulated systems, such as the Brazilian interconnected system. Some of the results are shown in Figures 3, 4 and 5; sites convention numbers are expressed in Table 1. Figure 3: Validation - Mean Figure 4: Validation – Standard DeviationFigure 5: Validation – Cumulative Deficit 3.2. Monthly Validation In the monthly step mean, standard deviation and autocorrelation seasonal values were computed, for both historical and synthetic values. Besides, analogous procedure of annual validation was followed for synthetic values, with maximum, minimum and average values calculated. The first results, however, showed a discrepancy between the original and generated series for some of the sites. This fact was attributed to some programming bug, which will be revised and fixed soon.